Marcantel v. Social Security Administration
Filing
22
JUDGMENT ADOPTING findings and conclusions of Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 4/27/09. (crt,Brazell, G)
RECEIVED
USDC, WESTE RN DISTRICT OF LA DATEJ~ ~4OORErCLE & 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE-OPELOUSAS DIVISION
RO~AL1EMARCANTEL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIIAL SECURITY
*
*
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1964 JUDGE DOHERTY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILL
*
AMENDED JUDGMENT' This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge C. Michael HiU for Rep: rt and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the ibsence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Report and Reccmmendation of the Magistrate Judge is conc usions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DE(I REED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the (I ommissioner for further administrative action pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U S.C.
correct
and adopts the findings and
§ 405(g).
This includes, but does not limit, sending the case to the hearing
level, with instructions to the Administrative Law Judge to obtain a consultative
`The original judgment issued by this Court on April 2 1, 2009 erroneously stated, "the Commissioner's decisi~n is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE." [Doe. 20, ¶ 2~ his Amended : T J udgn ill `~issued to correct that error.
psyciiatric and/or psychological evaluation on claimant's mental impairment of bord~rlinentellectual functioning and its effect on the onset date.2 i Lafayette, Louisiana, this
J7 day of April, 2009.
RERECCAJF. DOHE
Y UNITED TATE S DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Anyjudgment entered herewith will be a "final judgment" for purposes of the Equal Access to
JUStice
Act
(EAJA). See, Richard v. Sullivan, 955 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1992) and S/ia/ala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?