Jones v. Warden Lafayette Parish Correction Center

Filing 17

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Cou rt because: 1) Petitioner has not established that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution and Laws of the United States; and 2) Because petitioner's claims are barred by the one-year limitation period codified at 28 USC Section 2244(d); and, since petitioner failed to exhaust available state court remedies his claims, although now technically exhausted, it must be dismissed as procedurally defaulted. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 12/14/09. (crt,Guidry, C)

Download PDF
RECEIVED DEC 1 4 2009 TONY A. MOORE CLERK WESTERN DIS1IRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE LOUISIANA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-0086 SECTION P JUDGE DOHERTY MAGISTRATE JUDGE METHVIN JUDGMENT DOUGLAS C. JONES LA. DOC #126403 VS. LYNN COOPER, WARDEN For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts because: 1. Petitioner has not established that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution and Laws of the United States; and, 2. Because petitioner's claims are barred by the one-year limitation period codified at 28 U.S.C. §2244(d); and, since petitioner failed to exhaust available state court remedies his claims, although now technically exhausted, it must be THUS DONE AND SIGNED, of bp~e ~e~09. v 20 F. DOHERTY STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?