Sias v. Talecris

Filing 7

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 8/28/09. (crt,Brazell, G)

JSDC, WESTERN DISTRICT OF LA TONY RJ,IOORE, CLERK DATE.

RECEIVED

>1/ ~Y/~'9..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PAUL D. SIAS VS. TALECRIS CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1089 JUDGE HAIK MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Having given notice to plaintiff of this court's intention to dismiss this action without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to submit a completed and signed application to proceed informapauperis or this court's filing fee, and having received no response to this court's August 17, 2009 Order allowing the plaintiff time to comply, this court finds that plaintiff's action is subject to dismissal under F.R.C.P. 4 1(b) and 16(f). Such dismissals may also be done sua sponte in accordance with the court's inherent power to control its own docket. See Link v. Wabash Railroad Company, 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962); Woodson v. Surgitek, Inc., 57 F.3d 1406, 1417 (5th Cir. 1995); Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Energy Gathering, Inc., 2 F.3d 1397, 1407 (5th Cir. 1993); and Rogers v. Kroger Company, 669 F.2d 317, 320-321 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be and it hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers at La August, 2009. ~V RIC~~{ART. HAIK D UNI'~TEDSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE ette, Louisiana, this 28th day of