O'Connell v. Associates in OB/GYN Care, LLC et al
ORDER granting 84 MOTION to Vacate Default Judgment and Request for Hearing. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 6/16/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Tentative Scheduling Order) (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
101 WEST LOMBARD STREET
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201
(410) 962-2698 FAX
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MEMO TO COUNSEL RE: Christy T. O'Connell v. Steven Brigham, M,D., et al.
Civil Nos. JFM-14-1339 and JFM-15-2418
I have reviewed the memoranda submitted in connection with the motion to vacate
default judgment filed by American Medical Associates, P..C., Steven C. Brigham, M.D., and
Vikram H. Kaji, M.D.
The motion (document 84) is granted. In light of the ambiguities involved in the question
of whether the defendants received actual notice of the law suit and in light of the wellestablished policy that cases should be resolved on their merits, I am satisfied that the default
should be set aside. Defendant should file an answer within fourteen days of the date of this
A conference call will be held on July 13.2017 at 4:30 p.m. to discuss the
appropriate schedule in this case. I ask counsel for plaintiff to initiate the call.
Enclosed is a tentative scheduling order with approximate dates for your information.
Please consult with one another before the call and be prepared to discuss whether you would
like to participate in a settlement conference either before or after the completion of discovery,
any changes to the dates in the form scheduling order, and whether there is unanimous consent to
proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all proceedings.
Also enclosed is a letter regarding a call-in hour program for the resolution of discovery
Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be nagged as an opinion and docketed
as an order.
Very truly yours,
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?