McNulty et al v. Casero et al

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING 37 Motion for Protective Order and SCHEDULING conference call. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 8/15/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Tentative Scheduling Order, # 2 Discovery Letter)(hmls, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHAMBERS OF 101 WEST LOMBARD STREET BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201 (410) 962-0782 (410) 962-2698 FAX J. FREDERICK MOTZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE August 15, 2017 MEMO TO COUNSEL RE: John and Carolyn McNulty v. Robert Casero, Jr. and Catherine Mary Hattenburg Civil No. JFM-16-2426 Dear Counsel: I have reviewed the memoranda submitted in connection with plaintiffs’ motion for protective order. The motion (document 37) is granted. A conference call will be held on August 29, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the appropriate schedule in this case. I ask counsel for plaintiff to initiate the call. Enclosed is a tentative scheduling order with approximate dates for your information. Please consult with one another before the call and be prepared to discuss whether you would like to participate in a settlement conference either before or after the completion of discovery, any changes to the dates in the form scheduling order, and whether there is unanimous consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all proceedings. Also enclosed is a letter regarding a call-in hour program for the resolution of discovery disagreements. Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be flagged as an opinion and docketed as an order. Very truly yours, /s/ J. Frederick Motz United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?