McNulty et al v. Casero et al
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING 37 Motion for Protective Order and SCHEDULING conference call. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 8/15/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Tentative Scheduling Order, # 2 Discovery Letter)(hmls, Deputy Clerk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
CHAMBERS OF
101 WEST LOMBARD STREET
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201
(410) 962-0782
(410) 962-2698 FAX
J. FREDERICK MOTZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
August 15, 2017
MEMO TO COUNSEL RE: John and Carolyn McNulty v. Robert Casero, Jr. and
Catherine Mary Hattenburg
Civil No. JFM-16-2426
Dear Counsel:
I have reviewed the memoranda submitted in connection with plaintiffs’ motion for
protective order. The motion (document 37) is granted.
A conference call will be held on August 29, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the
appropriate schedule in this case. I ask counsel for plaintiff to initiate the call.
Enclosed is a tentative scheduling order with approximate dates for your information.
Please consult with one another before the call and be prepared to discuss whether you would
like to participate in a settlement conference either before or after the completion of discovery,
any changes to the dates in the form scheduling order, and whether there is unanimous consent to
proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all proceedings.
Also enclosed is a letter regarding a call-in hour program for the resolution of discovery
disagreements.
Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be flagged as an opinion and docketed
as an order.
Very truly yours,
/s/
J. Frederick Motz
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?