EEOC v. Freeman

Filing 35

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 27 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Freeman Responses due by 11/1/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mirengoff, Paul)

EEOC v. Freeman

Doc. 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (SOUTHERN DIVISION) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. FREEMAN, Defendant. Case No. 8:09-CV-02573-RWT

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR FOUR DAY EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 6(b) and Rule 105(9) of the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Defendant Freeman hereby moves for a four-day extension of the time in which to file its Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Reply Brief is currently due on Monday, October 18, 2010. Freeman seeks leave to file Reply Brief on Friday, October 22, 2010. Freeman requests this extension of time due to conflicting professional obligations of counsel. Plaintiff EEOC has agreed to the extension proposed by this Motion. A proposed Order is attached to this Motion.

Dated: October 13, 2010 Respectfully submitted, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP /s/ Paul E. Mirengoff__________ Donald R. Livingston (Bar No. 15787) Paul E. Mirengoff (admitted pro hac vice)

Dockets.Justia.com

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Freeman