Daobin et al v. CISCO Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 18

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by CISCO Systems, Inc. Responses due by 8/8/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bisbee, Lincoln)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Du Daobin, et al.

Plaintiff,
v.
CISCO Systems, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 8:11-cv-01538 PJM

ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Parties’ Joint Motion For Extension Of Time To
Respond To The Complaint, it is by the Court this ___ day of ___, 2011, ORDERED:
1. If this Court denies Defendants’ request for a stay (Docket No. 17), then the Defendants
shall respond to the Complaint within 30 days of such Order;
2. If this Court grants Defendants’ request for a stay in any respect, then the Defendants
shall respond to the Complaint within 30 days of the expiration of such a stay;
3. Plaintiffs’ brief in opposition to any motion to dismiss shall be due 30 days following the
service of such motion by Defendants; and
4. Defendants’ reply brief in further support of any motion to dismiss shall be due 21 days
following the service of such Opposition Brief by Plaintiffs.

SO ORDERED.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DB2/ 22566105.1