Daobin et al v. CISCO Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by CISCO Systems, Inc. Responses due by 7/25/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bisbee, Lincoln)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Du Daobin, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
CISCO Systems, Inc., et al.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 8:11-cv-01538 PJM
CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Defendant CISCO Systems, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel and pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Local Rule 105(9), hereby moves this court for an extension of time to
file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. The extension of time
sought would require Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint no later than July 25, 2011.
Defendant’s counsel has sought and obtained the consent of Plaintiffs’ counsel to the abovereferenced extension of time. This is the first extension of time sought by Defendant’s counsel
in this matter.
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order extending
the date by which Defendant must respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to July 25, 2011.
Dated: July 6, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Lincoln O. Bisbee
Lincoln O. Bisbee (Bar No. 28953)
lbisbee@morganlewis.com
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS
1111 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
02099.62191/4235564.1
Washington, D.C. 20004
202.739.3000
202.739.3001 (fax)
Counsel for Defendant
02099.62191/4235564.1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the attached Consent Motion for
Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading and Proposed Order were
served electronically via ECF to the following:
Daniel S. Ward
WARD & WARD, P.L.L.C.
2020 N Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 331-8160
(202) 503-1455
Counsel for Plaintiffs
/s/ Lincoln O. Bisbee
Lincoln O. Bisbee
Counsel for Defendant
02099.62191/4235564.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?