Stout v. Reuschling et al
Filing
43
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 27 Motion for Sanctions, 41 Second MOTION for Sanctions filed by Eric T Reuschling, Steven B Koch. Signed by: Magistrate Judge William Connelly on 6/21/2016. Objections due July 8, 2016. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter, # 2 Exhibit FRCP 72)(nk, Chambers)(copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maryland
William Connelly
United States Magistrate Judge
6500 Cherrywood Lane
Greenbelt, Maryland 20770
Office: (301) 344-0627
Fax: (301) 344-8434
June 21, 2016
Keith V. Stout
3667 Rusty Leaf Court
Waldorf, Maryland 20602
Phillip M. Pickus
Assistant Attorney General
1201 Reisterstown Road
Pikesville, Maryland 21208
Re: Stout v. Reuschling, et al.
TDC-14-cv-1555
Dear Mr. Stout and Counsel for Defendants,
A copy of a Report and Recommendation rendered in the above-captioned case is
enclosed. Any objections you wish to make thereto must be filed with the court within 14 days
(July 8, 2016) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, a copy of which also is enclosed.
After the time for filing written objections has expired, the United States District Judge
will review the Report and Recommendation whether or not you have filed written objections to
it. If you should fail to file written objections within the time set forth above (or within the time
of any extension specifically granted by the court) and the United States District Judge
subsequently adopts the Report and Recommendation, you will have lost your right to appeal the
finding of the Report and Recommendation to the United States Court of Appeals.
Sincerely yours,
/s/
William Connelly
United States Magistrate Judge
Enclosures
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?