Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 100

MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal the Recent Decision of the ITC Regarding Defendants' Section 271(e) Safe Harbor Defense by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Huston, Julia)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 100 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 100 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, vs. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, AND HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., Defendants CIVIL ACTION No.: 05-CV-12237WGY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE RECENT DECISION OF THE ITC REGARDING DEFENDANTS' SECTION 271(e) SAFE HARBOR DEFENSE Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively "Roche") respectfully request leave to file the ITC's Initial Determination dated July 7, 2006, under seal because it contains highly confidential information that is subject to a Protective Order entered by the ITC. As set forth in Roche's supplemental memorandum dated July 10, 2006, the ITC issued an Initial Determination dismissing Amgen's ITC case against Roche because it held that Roche's CERA activities fell within the § 271(e)(1) safe harbor. Because this decision deals with the very same issue currently pending before this Court in connection with Roche's pending motion to dismiss (Docket Nos. 44 & 45), Roche believes it would be beneficial for the Court to have the ITC's opinion as part of the record in this case. The Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") in the ITC case designated the Initial Determination as confidential in accordance with the Protective Order entered in that proceeding, Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 100 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 2 of 3 and did not disclose its rulings in the public record. See Protective Order, Exh. A. Indeed, the ITC's docket reflects only that a confidential Order was entered; the ITC's ruling and opinion are not publicly accessible. The ALJ appropriately treated the Initial Determination as confidential because it contains detailed information regarding Roche's clinical trials of CERA and other sensitive information not intended for public disclosure. Under the Protective Order, Roche may disclose the ITC decision to this Court provided that the information is not made of public record. See Protective Order, Exh. A at ¶ 5 ("Confidential business information obtained in the Commission proceeding may be used with the consent of the supplier in a parallel district court proceeding under a protective order issued by the district court without losing its confidential status under the protective order in this proceeding as long as the information is not made public in the district court proceeding . . . .") (emphasis added). Thus, Roche respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for leave to file the ITC's Initial Determination under seal. CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the parties have conferred in an attempt to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion. No agreement was reached. 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 100 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 3 of 3 DATED: Boston, Massachusetts July 11, 2006 F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By its attorneys, /s/ Julia Huston Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 jhuston@bromsun.com Principal Counsel: Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard Suh (pro hac vice) Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 836-8000 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Julia Huston Julia Huston 03099/00501 516767.1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?