Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1019

MOTION for Leave to File a Reply in Further Support of Roche's Motion In Limine to Preclude Amgen From Introducing Into Evidence or Referencing to the Jury: 1) the September 30, 1985 Amgen/Ortho Product License Agreement, and 2) Evidence Concerning Licensing of the Patents-In-Suit by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Seluga, Kimberly)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 1019 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1019 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, vs. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, AND HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No.: 05-CV-12237WGY ROCHE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ROCHE'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE AMGEN FROM INTRODUCING INTO EVIDENCE OR REFERENCING TO THE JURY: 1) THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1985 AMGEN/ORTHO PRODUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT, AND 2) EVIDENCE CONCERNING LICENSING OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT Defendants F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffman-La Roche Inc. ("Roche") respectfully request leave to file a reply to Amgen Inc.'s Opposition to Roche's Motion in Limine to Preclude Amgen Inc. from introducing into evidence or referencing to the jury: 1) the September 30, 1985 Amgen/Ortho Product License Agreement (PLA), and 2) Evidence Concerning Licensing of the Patents-In-Suit (D.I. 975). Roche's proposed reply brief is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In support of this motion, Roche states that its proposed reply brief is primarily limited to the issues raised in Amgen's Opposition, is concise, and will be of assistance to the Court. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1019 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the parties have conferred in an attempt to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and that no agreement was reached. Dated: September 7, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Respectfully submitted, F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By their Attorneys /s/ Kimberly J. Seluga Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Robert L. Kann (BBO# 258025) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) Kimberly J. Seluga (BBO# 667655) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 kseluga@bromsun.com Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Mark S. Popofsky (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Peter Fratangelo (BBO# 639775) Vladimir Drozdoff (pro hac vice) David L. Cousineau (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1019 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Kimberly J. Seluga Kimberly J. Seluga 03099/00501 735972.1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?