Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 1090

DECLARATION re #1089 Opposition to Motion, Declaration of Alfred H. Heckel in Support of Roche's Opposition to Amgen's Emergency Motion to Allow Amgen to Examine Dr. Don Catlin on Monday, September 24, or in the Alternative to Take Depositon De Bene Esse by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Exhibit B)(Fleming, Thomas)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 1090 Att. 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 1090-3 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 1 "DuBord Brown, Renee" <rbrown@daycasebeer.com> 09/14/2007 08:34 AM To <TFleming@kayescholer.com>; <HHeckel@kayescholer.com> cc <dlopez@kayescholer.com>; <bborel@kayescholer.com>; <dbaker@kayescholer.com>; <hsuh@kayescholer.com>; <jhuston@bromsun.com>; "mgottfried" bcc Subject Roche's case-in-chief Tom, In the remote possibility that Roche rests its case today, Amgen may call one or more of Drs. Friedman, Lin, Orkin or Ms. Spaeth. Amgen does not expect to use any documents in their examination today. We reserve the right to amend or modify this list at anytime. Regards, Renee ***************************************************************** *** Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete all copies of the message. ***************************************************************** *** Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?