Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 219

Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of George W. Johnston, Patricia Rocha-Tramaloni, Nancy DiLella by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C)(Toms, Keith)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 219 Att. 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 219-3 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) AMGEN INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 05-CV-12237WGY v. ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ) ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, and ) HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DECLARATION OF PATRICIA ROCHA-TRAMALONI IN SUPPORT OF PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION FOR DEFENDANT I, Patricia Rocha-Tramaloni, declare that the following is true and correct, under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746: 1. I am in-house counsel for Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and member in good standing of the Bars of the States of New York and New Jersey. I am in good standing in every jurisdiction in which I have been admitted to practice. 2. jurisdiction. 3. I am familiar with the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the There are no disciplinary proceedings pending against me in any court or District of Massachusetts. Dated: December 11, 2006 /s/ Patricia Rocha-Tramaloni Patricia Rocha-Tramaloni Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 219-3 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on January 9, 2007. /s/ Keith E. Toms 03099/00501 583803.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?