Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 283

DECLARATION re 281 MOTION to Enforce the Court's December 29, 2006 Order and To Compel the Further Production of Documents OF DEBORAH E. FISHMAN by Amgen Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2 (cover page for confidential exhibit 2)# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8# 9 Exhibit 9# 10 Exhibit 10# 11 Exhibit 11# 12 Exhibit 12)(Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 283 Att. 1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 Exhibit 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 8 From: ECFnotice@mad.uscourts.gov [mailto:ECFnotice@mad.uscourts.gov] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 8:56 AM To: CourtCopy@mad.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al "Order on Motion to Compel" ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was received from Paine, Matthew entered on 12/29/2006 at 11:56 AM EST and filed on 12/29/2006 Case Name: Case Number: Filer: Document Number: Docket Text: Judge William G. Young : ORDER entered re [165] Motion to Compel Production of Documents. " The Court Adopts Roche?s Compromise Position Save That Where Request are Allowed Herein Roche Must Produce All Documents Responsive to Such Request. Where Request Are Denied, Roche Nevertheless Must Produce the Documents Falling Within its Compromise Portion. Motion Allowed as to Requests 1 (to the extent not already produced), 5, 14, 16, 21-22, 24, 41, 137-138, 158-160. Motion Denied as to Requests 45-109, 111, 113-126, 148-150, 154-155, 162-167, and 176 as Amgen Does Not Seek Damages. Should Amgen Need These Documents for its Injunction Presentation, However, to the Extent These Request Are Not Overbroad (many are) it May Renew Its Requests After First Producing All the Counterpart Sales and Production Documents From Its Own Files. A Spirit of Cooperation Will Assist the Parties Here. Requests 15, 17, 18, 19-20, 23, 37-40, 42, 139, 146, 200-205, 218-220 are Denied As Overbroad Without Prejudice to Their Renewal Upon the Drafting of More Narrow and Focused Requests. The Discovery Ordered Herein Shall Be Furnished Within 30 Days of the Date of This Order. As This Court Has Made This Without the Need for Reference to the Supposed ?Trade Secret? Documents, Roche?s Motion for Reconsideration Will Be Denied As Moot and The Documents Returned To It. Preliminary Review of the Documents Reveals, However, That Some of Them Are Deserving of Putative Trade Secret Protection Although Many Are Not." (Paine, Matthew) The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al 1:05-cv-12237 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 8 1:05-cv-12237 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Leora Ben-Ami lbenami@kayescholer.com Michael F. Borun MBorun@marshallip.com Lee C. Bromberg lbromberg@bromsun.com, jcreedon@bromsun.com Patricia A. Carson pcarson@kayescholer.com Lloyd R. Day , Jr daylr@daycasebeer.com David L. Ferrera dferrera@nutter.com, jberry@nutter.com Thomas F. Fleming tfleming@kayescholer.com, maodma@kayescholer.com Kevin M Flowers KFlowers@marshallip.com, mgreene@marshallip.com; dgerou@marshallip.com William G. Gaede , III wgaede@mwe.com Michael R. Gottfried mrgottfried@duanemorris.com, vlweeks@duanemorris.com; lmbyrnes@duanemorris.com Julia Huston jhuston@bromsun.com, chiggins@bromsun.com Mark Izraelewicz mizraelewicz@marshallip.com Michelle E. Moreland mmoreland@mwe.com, pdeneen@mwe.com; gdrozario@mwe.com; sguess@mwe.com; mscordino@mwe.com Matthew C. Nielsen MNielsen@marshallip.com, mkipley@marshallip.com Sandip H. Patel SPatel@marshallip.com Heather B. Repicky hrepicky@nutter.com Patricia R. Rich prich@duanemorris.com, vlweeks@duanemorris.com; lmbyrnes@duanemorris.com Nicole A. Rizzo nrizzo@bromsun.com, lburns@bromsun.com Thomas I. Ross tross@marshallip.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 4 of 8 Linda Sasaki-Baxley lbaxley@daycasebeer.com Howard Suh hsuh@kayescholer.com, maodma@kayescholer.com Keith E. Toms ktoms@bromsun.com, kreed@bromsun.com Steven A. Zalesin sazalesin@pbwt.com, mcolitigation@pbwt.com 1:05-cv-12237 Notice will not be electronically mailed to: Firasat Ali McDermott Will & Emery 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, 94304 D. Dennis Allegretti Duane Morris LLP 470 Atlantic Avenue Suite 500 Boston, MA 02110-2600 Adam Arthur Bier Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Michael F. Borun Marshall, O'Toole, Gerstein, Murray & Borun 6300 Sears Tower 233 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6402 Michael F. Borun Marshall, O'Toole, Gerstein, Murray & Borun 6300 Sears Tower 233 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6402 Mary Boyle McDermott Will & Emery 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Renee DuBord Brown Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 5 of 8 Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Krista M. Carter Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLC 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Andy H. Chan Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Steven Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Monique L. Corday Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 Darrell G. Dotson Amgen Inc One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 Deborah E. Fishman Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Jennifer E. Flory Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Robert M. Galvin Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Eugene M. Gelernter Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 6 of 8 Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Geoffrey M. Godfrey Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Mary Susan Howard Amgen Inc One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 Richard O. Jackson Patternson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, LLP 133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Susan M. Krumplitsch Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 , CA 95014 Andrew Kumamoto McDermott Will & Emery 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Jonathan D. Loeb Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 David M. Madrid Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Mario Moore Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder Suite 400 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 7 of 8 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 Kimberlin L. Morely Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Dirve Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 Darcy A. Paul Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Cullen N. Pendleton Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Mark S. Popofsky Kaye Scholer LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Jeremy D. Protas Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606 Katie J.L. Scott Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Rebecca J. Wais Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Stuart L. Watt Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 283-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 8 of 8 Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 Wendy A. Whiteford Amgen Inc One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?