Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 295

DECLARATION re #293 MOTION to Enforce the Court's January 23, 2007 Order Compelling Roche to Produce its Cell Line and to Extend the Time for Amgen to Submit its Infringement Expert Report Regarding the Testing of Roche's DN2-3(a)3 Cell Line BY KRISTA M. CARTER by Amgen Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit 2#3 Exhibit 3#4 Exhibit 4#5 Exhibit 5#6 Exhibit 6#7 Exhibit 7#8 Exhibit 8#9 Exhibit 9#10 Exhibit 10#11 Exhibit 11#12 Exhibit 12#13 Exhibit 13)(Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 295 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 295 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE ) LTD., a Swiss Company, ROCHE ) DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, a German ) Company and HOFFMANN LAROCHE ) INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) AMGEN INC., Civil Action No.: 05-12237 WGY DECLARATION OF KRISTA M. CARTER IN SUPPORT OF AMGEN INC.'S MOTION TO ENFORCE THE COURT'S JANUARY 23, 2007 ORDER COMPELLING ROCHE TO PRODUCE ITS CELL LINE AND TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR AMGEN TO SUBMIT ITS INFRINGEMENT EXPERT REPORT REGARDING THE TESTING OF ROCHE'S DN2-3(A)3 CELL LINE 597088_1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 295 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 2 of 3 I, Krista M. Carter, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law before all of the Courts of the State of California and before this Court (pro hac vice). I am an associate with the law firm of Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, counsel for plaintiff Amgen Inc. in this matter. 2. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge. If called to testify with respect to the truth of the matters stated herein, I could and would do so competently. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated January 29, 2007 from Patricia Carson to Deborah E. Fishman. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 1, 2007 from Deborah E. Fishman to Patricia Carson. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 16, 2007 from Patricia Carson to Deborah E. Fishman. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 15, 2007 from Krista M. Carter to Patricia Carson. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Amgen's Proposed Stipulation in regards to Production of Roche's Cell Line, dated February 22, 2007. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of Roche's Proposed Stipulation in regards to Production of Roche's Cell Line, dated February 9, 2007. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated January 26, 2007 from Deborah E. Fishman to Patricia Carson. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 5, 2007 from Deborah E. Fishman to Patricia Carson. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 22, 2007 from Patricia Carson to Krista M. Carter. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of the Court's January 23, 2007 Electronic Order. 597088_1 1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 295 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 3 of 3 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 22, 2007 from Krista Carter to Patricia Carson. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated February 23, 2007 from Patricia Carson to Deborah Fishman. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of an email dated February 23, 2007 from Deborah Fishman to Pat Carson. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: February 23, 2007 /s/ Krista M. Carter Krista M. Carter

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?