Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 379

DECLARATION re 377 MOTION to Preclude Further Interference with Third-Party Discovery and Compel Production of Documents And Deposition Testimony, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Defendants? Defense Under 35 U.S.C. Section 271(e)(1), 378 Memorandum in Support of Motion, OF MARIO MOORE by Amgen Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Confidential Exhibit Coversheet# 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8# 9 Exhibit 9, Part 1 of 2# 10 Exhibit 9, Part 2 of 2# 11 Exhibit 10# 12 Exhibit 11# 13 Exhibit 12# 14 Exhibit 15# 15 Exhibit 16# 16 Exhibit 17# 17 Exhibit 18# 18 Exhibit 19# 19 Exhibit 20# 20 Exhibit 21# 21 Exhibit 22# 22 Exhibit 25# 23 Exhibit 26# 24 Exhibit 27# 25 Exhibit 28# 26 Exhibit 29# 27 Exhibit 30)(Gottfried, Michael) Additional attachment(s) added on 4/16/2007 (Paine, Matthew). Additional attachment(s) added on 4/16/2007 (Paine, Matthew).

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 379 Att. 18 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 379-19 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 19 Dockets.Justia.com From: Mathie, BeLinda I. [mailto:belinda.mathie@kattenlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:19 PM To: Fishman, Deborah Cc: DCousineau@kayescholer.com; Kemnitz, Christian T. Subject: Roche protocol numbers Deborah, I am writing to follow up on your conversation with Chris Kemnitz and me earlier today regarding the list of Clinical Trial Services Agreements/Clinical Trial Agreements between DaVita and Roche, produced to you as DVA-AMGEN0000001. After consulting with counsel for Roche, who is copied on this email, DaVita hereby provides you with the protocol numbers for the two studies omitted from DVAAMGEN0000001. The protocol numbers are ML20336 and ML20338. At this time, DaVita will not be providing any information about these studies beyond the protocol numbers, per our instructions from Roche. Should you believe this disclosure is inadequate, we request that you notify DaVita and Roche at your earliest convenience. To the extent you believe additional discovery is appropriate, please contact counsel for Roche and attempt to resolve the issue. BeLinda I. Mathie Litigation Associate Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 525 West Monroe Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) 902-5283 (direct) (312) 577-4482 (fax) CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 379-19 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 3 of 3 CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?