Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 578

DECLARATION of Harvey F. Lodish, Ph.D. in Support of Opposition to Roche's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Double Patenting Over Claim 10 of the '016 Patent by Amgen Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2 of Declaration of Lodish# 2 Errata Ex. A# 3 Exhibit Ex. B# 4 Exhibit C# 5 Exhibit Ex. D# 6 Exhibit Ex. E-I# 7 Exhibit Ex. E-II# 8 Exhibit Ex. F# 9 Exhibit Ex. G# 10 Exhibit Ex. H# 11 Exhibit Ex. I# 12 Exhibit Ex. J# 13 Exhibit Ex. K# 14 Errata Ex. L# 15 Errata Ex. M# 16 Exhibit Ex. N# 17 Exhibit Ex. O# 18 Exhibit Ex. P# 19 Exhibit Ex. Q# 20 Exhibit Ex. R# 21 Exhibit Ex. S-1# 22 Exhibit Ex. S-2# 23 Exhibit Ex. S-3# 24 Exhibit Ex. T# 25 Exhibit Ex. U-1# 26 Exhibit Ex. U-2# 27 Exhibit Ex. V# 28 Errata Ex. W# 29 Exhibit Ex. X# 30 Exhibit Ex. Y-1# 31 Exhibit Ex. Y-2# 32 Exhibit Ex. Z)(Rich, Patricia)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 578 Att. 24 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT T Lodish Decl. in Support of Opposition to Roche's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Double Patenting Over Claim 10 of the `016 Patent Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 3 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 4 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 5 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 6 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 7 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 8 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 9 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 10 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 11 of 12 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 578-25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 12 of 12

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?