Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 675

DECLARATION re #672 Reply to Response to Motion, (Declaration of Keith E. Toms in Support of Defendants' Reply Memorandum In Further Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment That the Asserted Claims of the '933 Patent Are Invalid for Indefiniteness and Lack of Written Description) by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit 2)(Seluga, Kimberly)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD; ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH; and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No.: 05-CV-12237WGY ORAL ARGUMENT SET FOR JULY 17, 2007 DECLARATION OF KEITH E. TOMS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE `933 PATENT ARE INVALID FOR INDEFINITENESS AND LACK OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Mark S. Popofsky (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Jagoe (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 Dated: Boston, Massachusetts July 9, 2007 Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Timothy M. Murphy (BBO# 551926) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) Kimberly J. Seluga (BBO# 667655) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 Counsel for Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Dockets.Justia.com I, Keith E. Toms, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that: 1. I am an attorney admitted to the Bars of the State of Massachusetts and the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and am an associate at Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, counsel for Defendants in the above-captioned case. 2. I make this Declaration in Support of Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment That the Asserted Claims of the `933 Patent are Invalid for Indefiniteness and Lack of Written Description, dated July 9, 2007. 3. Exhibit 1, attached hereto, is a true and correct copy of Serial No. 487,774, Paper 50, 12/20/95 Second Preliminary Amendment and Remarks. 4. Exhibit 2, attached hereto, is a true and correct copy of Serial No 202,874, Paper 43, 05/15/95 Office Action. Executed this 9th day of July 2007 at Boston, Massachusetts. /s/ Keith E. Toms Keith E. Toms BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Kimberly J. Seluga Kimberly J. Seluga 03099/00501 700474.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?