Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 704

DECLARATION re #703 Response, #633 Opposition to Motion, by Amgen Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit 2#3 Exhibit 3#4 Exhibit 4#5 Exhibit 5 1 of 2#6 Exhibit 5 2 of 2#7 Exhibit 6)(Gottfried, Michael)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 704 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 704 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) F. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE ) LTD., a Swiss Company, ROCHE ) DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, a German ) Company and HOFFMANN LAROCHE ) INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) AMGEN INC., Civil Action No.: 05-12237 WGY DECLARATION OF CRAIG H. CASEBEER IN SUPPORT OF AMGEN INC.'S REPLY TO ROCHE'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 704 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 2 of 4 I, Craig H. Casebeer, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, counsel for plaintiff Amgen Inc. I am admitted to practice law before this Court (pro hac vice) and all of the Courts of the State of California. 2. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge. If called to testify as to the truth of the matters stated herein, I could and would testify competently. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Young v. Lumenis, 2007 WL 1827845 (Fed. Cir. June 27, 2007). 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of select pages from Item 5 in the Notice of Claimed Investigational Exemption for Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (rHuEPO), bearing bates AM-ITC 00988329, AM-ITC 00988840-841. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of select pages of Joan Egrie's Deposition taken on April 15, 1991, in Record or Party Lin (Fritsch v. Lin Interference No. 102,097), bearing bates AM-ITC 00356638, AM-ITC 00356812-81 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of select pages from Joan Egrie's Lab Notebook No. 633, bearing bates AM-ITC 00336897 ­ 907. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the Hoeschst Marion Roussel v. Kirin-Amgen Inc., [2002] EWHC 471 (Patents), bearing bates AM-ITC 01066841 925. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the index to Amgen's r- HuEPO Product License Application, submitted in Fritsch v. Lin, Interference Nos. 102,096, 102,097 and 102,334, bearing bates AM-ITC 00950070 ­ 080. 1 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 704 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 3 of 4 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this 12th day of July, 2007. By: /s/ Craig H. Casebeer Craig H. Casebeer 2 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 704 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document, filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as on-registered participants. /s/ Michael R. Gottfried Michael R. Gottfried 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?