Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al

Filing 900

MOTION for Leave to File a Reply in Further Support of Roche's Motion In Limine to Preclude Amgen Inc. from Asserting that the Generation of Tryptic Fragments and Determination of the Amino Acid Sequence of Epo Was Novel and Non-Obvious by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Hoffmann LaRoche Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Proposed Reply))(Toms, Keith)

Download PDF
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et al Doc. 900 Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 900 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, Ltd, a Swiss Company, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GmbH, a German Company and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants. ROCHE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE AMGEN INC. FROM ASSERTING THAT THE GENERATION OF TRYPTIC FRAGMENTS AND DETERMINATION OF THE AMINO ACID SEQUENCE OF EPO WAS NOVEL AND NON-OBVIOUS Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and HoffmannLa Roche Inc. ("Roche") respectfully request leave to file a reply to Amgen Inc.'s Opposition to Roche's Motion in Limine to Preclude Amgen Inc. from Asserting that the Generation of Tryptic Fragments and Determination of the Amino Acid Sequence of EPO was Novel and Non-Obvious (D.I. 880). Roche's proposed reply is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Roche seeks to file this reply to address certain factual and legal assertions raised in Amgen's Opposition. Roche's brief proposed reply is primarily limited to the issues raised in Amgen's Opposition, and Roche believes that it will aid the Court in deciding the issues at hand. Civil Action No. 05-12237 WGY Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-12237-WGY Document 900 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1 I certify that counsel for the parties have conferred in an attempt to resolve or narrow the issues presented by this motion and no agreement has been reached. Dated: August 30, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Respectfully submitted, F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. By their Attorneys /s/ Keith E. Toms Lee Carl Bromberg (BBO# 058480) Robert L. Kann (BBO #258025) Julia Huston (BBO# 562160) Keith E. Toms (BBO# 663369) Nicole A. Rizzo (BBO# 663853) Kregg T. Brooks (BBO# 667348) BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel. (617) 443-9292 ktoms@bromsun.com Leora Ben-Ami (pro hac vice) Mark S. Popofsky (pro hac vice) Patricia A. Carson (pro hac vice) Thomas F. Fleming (pro hac vice) Howard S. Suh (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Jagoe (pro hac vice) KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 836-8000 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on the above date. /s/ Keith E. Toms 3099/501 731861.1 Keith E. Toms 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?