Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al
Filing
377
DECLARATION re #376 Opposition to Motion, Originally filed as Dkt 367 by Facebook, Inc., Christopher Hughes, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, Eduardo Saverin, Thefacebook LLC, Mark Zuckerberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Chatterjee, I.)
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11
Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT 10
Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 6
Filed 07/02/2008 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
The Facebook, Inc., et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
NO. C 07-01389 JW
Plaintiffs,
JUDGMENT ENFORCING SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
v.
12
ConnectU, Inc., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
/
Pursuant to the Court’s June 25, 2008 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Confidential Motion to
16
Enforce the Settlement Agreement (docket item no. 461), the parties appeared before the Court on
17
July 2, 2008 to show cause why a judgment should not be entered. Based on the papers submitted
18
and oral arguments of counsel,
19
20
21
22
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ENFORCING “THE TERM SHEET & SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT” AS FOLLOWS:
(1)
The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg:
(a)
Pursuant to Paragraphs 4 and 7 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by
23
the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, The Facebook, Inc. shall deposit with
24
the Master, the amount of cash and the certificates representing the amount of
25
The Facebook, Inc. common shares stated in Paragraph 7 of the Agreement,
26
endorsed for transfer. The following legend shall appear on certificates of
27
The Facebook, Inc. common stock issued pursuant to this Judgment:
28
Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 3 of 6
Filed 07/02/2008 Page 2 of 5
1
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
2
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR
3
SALE, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN
4
EFFECT WITH RESPECT TO THE SECURITIES UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL
5
REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE ISSUER THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED,
6
OR UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144 OF SUCH ACT.
7
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO AN AGREEMENT
8
WITH REGARD TO THE VOTING OF SUCH SHARES, AS PROVIDED IN THE CERTAIN TERM SHEET
9
& SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO WHICH SUCH SHARES WERE ORIGINALLY
ISSUED. THE HOLDERS OF SUCH SHARES ARE ENTITLED TO THE SAME ANTI-DILUTION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
RIGHTS AFFORDED THE ISSUER’S SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK, AS PROVIDED IN SUCH TERM
12
SHEET & SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. A COPY OF SUCH TERM SHEET & SETTLEMENT
13
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ISSUER.
14
(b)
Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, on or before 12 noon on
15
July 9, 2008, The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg shall submit to the
16
Court for approval a proposed form of release. Upon approval by the Court,
17
the release shall be signed by The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg, and
18
shall have attached to it corporate authority given to the corporate signatory
19
and shall be notarized as to each signatory and shall be immediately deposited
20
with the Master;
21
(c)
Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by
22
the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, a legally sufficient dismissal with
23
prejudice of all cases by and between the parties pending as of the date of the
24
Agreement.1 The dismissal shall recite that each party to the respective
25
litigation shall bear their own attorney fees and costs.
26
27
28
1
The other two cases are ConnectU, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:04-cv-11923DPW, currently on appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals; and ConnectU, Inc., et al. v.
Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:07-cv-10593-DPW, currently pending in the District of
Massachusetts.
2
Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 4 of 6
Filed 07/02/2008 Page 3 of 5
1
(2)
2
ConnectU Inc., Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Vinklevoss, and Divya Narendra:
(a)
Pursuant to Paragraphs 4 and 7 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by
3
the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, ConnectU Inc. shall deposit with the
4
Master all shares of ConnectU Inc., endorsed for transfer. To the extent the
5
parties to the Agreement do not own any shares of ConnectU Inc., to fulfill
6
the obligation of the transfer of “all ConnectU stock,” the parties to the
7
Agreement shall take such actions in their respective corporate and individual
8
capacities as are necessary to effect the deposit with the Master of all shares
9
of ConnectU stock;
(b)
Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, on or before 12 noon on
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
July 9, 2008, ConnectU, Inc., Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Vinklevoss and
12
Divya Narendra shall submit to the Court for approval a proposed form of
13
release. Upon approval by the Court, the release shall be signed by these
14
parties and shall have attached to it corporate authority given to the corporate
15
signatory and shall be notarized as to each signatory and shall be immediately
16
deposited with the Master;
17
(c)
Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by
18
the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, a legally sufficient dismissal with
19
prejudice of all cases by and between the parties pending as of the date of the
20
Agreement. The dismissal shall recite that each party to the respective
21
litigation shall bear their own attorney fees and costs.
22
(3)
Upon further order of the Court, the parties shall deposit with the Master such other
23
and further things which will facilitate the orderly exchange of the consideration and
24
shall do the things ordered by the Court to ensure the operational integrity of the
25
business entities that are parties to the Agreement.
26
27
28
3
Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 5 of 6
Filed 07/02/2008 Page 4 of 5
1
(4)
The deposits being made with the Master by the parties pursuant to this Judgement
2
shall be transferred out of the deposit by the Master only upon further Order of the
3
Court in enforcement of the Agreement.
4
The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Judgment.
5
6
Dated: July 2, 2008
JAMES WARE
United States District Judge
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 6 of 6
Filed 07/02/2008 Page 5 of 5
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2
Chester Wren-Ming Day cday@orrick.com
D. Michael Underhill MUnderhill@BSFLLP.com
David A. Barrett dbarrett@bsfllp.com
Evan A. Parke eparke@bsfllp.com
George Hopkins Guy hopguy@orrick.com
I. Neel Chatterjee nchatterjee@orrick.com
Jonathan M. Shaw jshaw@bsfllp.com
Kalama M. Lui-Kwan klui-kwan@fenwick.com
Monte M.F. Cooper mcooper@orrick.com
Scott Richard Mosko scott.mosko@finnegan.com
Sean Alan Lincoln slincoln@Orrick.com
Steven Christopher Holtzman sholtzman@bsfllp.com
Theresa Ann Sutton tsutton@orrick.com
Tyler Alexander Baker Tbaker@fenwick.com
Valerie Margo Wagner valerie.wagner@dechert.com
Yvonne Penas Greer ygreer@orrick.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Dated: July 2, 2008
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By:
/s/ JW Chambers
Elizabeth Garcia
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?