Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 377

DECLARATION re #376 Opposition to Motion, Originally filed as Dkt 367 by Facebook, Inc., Christopher Hughes, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, Eduardo Saverin, Thefacebook LLC, Mark Zuckerberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Chatterjee, I.)

Download PDF
Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 10 Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476 Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 6 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION The Facebook, Inc., et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 NO. C 07-01389 JW Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT ENFORCING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT v. 12 ConnectU, Inc., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 / Pursuant to the Court’s June 25, 2008 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Confidential Motion to 16 Enforce the Settlement Agreement (docket item no. 461), the parties appeared before the Court on 17 July 2, 2008 to show cause why a judgment should not be entered. Based on the papers submitted 18 and oral arguments of counsel, 19 20 21 22 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ENFORCING “THE TERM SHEET & SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT” AS FOLLOWS: (1) The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg: (a) Pursuant to Paragraphs 4 and 7 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by 23 the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, The Facebook, Inc. shall deposit with 24 the Master, the amount of cash and the certificates representing the amount of 25 The Facebook, Inc. common shares stated in Paragraph 7 of the Agreement, 26 endorsed for transfer. The following legend shall appear on certificates of 27 The Facebook, Inc. common stock issued pursuant to this Judgment: 28 Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476 Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 3 of 6 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 2 of 5 1 THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED 2 UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR 3 SALE, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN 4 EFFECT WITH RESPECT TO THE SECURITIES UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL 5 REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE ISSUER THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED, 6 OR UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144 OF SUCH ACT. 7 THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO AN AGREEMENT 8 WITH REGARD TO THE VOTING OF SUCH SHARES, AS PROVIDED IN THE CERTAIN TERM SHEET 9 & SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO WHICH SUCH SHARES WERE ORIGINALLY ISSUED. THE HOLDERS OF SUCH SHARES ARE ENTITLED TO THE SAME ANTI-DILUTION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 RIGHTS AFFORDED THE ISSUER’S SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK, AS PROVIDED IN SUCH TERM 12 SHEET & SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. A COPY OF SUCH TERM SHEET & SETTLEMENT 13 AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ISSUER. 14 (b) Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, on or before 12 noon on 15 July 9, 2008, The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg shall submit to the 16 Court for approval a proposed form of release. Upon approval by the Court, 17 the release shall be signed by The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg, and 18 shall have attached to it corporate authority given to the corporate signatory 19 and shall be notarized as to each signatory and shall be immediately deposited 20 with the Master; 21 (c) Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by 22 the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, a legally sufficient dismissal with 23 prejudice of all cases by and between the parties pending as of the date of the 24 Agreement.1 The dismissal shall recite that each party to the respective 25 litigation shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. 26 27 28 1 The other two cases are ConnectU, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:04-cv-11923DPW, currently on appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals; and ConnectU, Inc., et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:07-cv-10593-DPW, currently pending in the District of Massachusetts. 2 Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476 Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 4 of 6 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 3 of 5 1 (2) 2 ConnectU Inc., Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Vinklevoss, and Divya Narendra: (a) Pursuant to Paragraphs 4 and 7 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by 3 the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, ConnectU Inc. shall deposit with the 4 Master all shares of ConnectU Inc., endorsed for transfer. To the extent the 5 parties to the Agreement do not own any shares of ConnectU Inc., to fulfill 6 the obligation of the transfer of “all ConnectU stock,” the parties to the 7 Agreement shall take such actions in their respective corporate and individual 8 capacities as are necessary to effect the deposit with the Master of all shares 9 of ConnectU stock; (b) Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, on or before 12 noon on 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 July 9, 2008, ConnectU, Inc., Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Vinklevoss and 12 Divya Narendra shall submit to the Court for approval a proposed form of 13 release. Upon approval by the Court, the release shall be signed by these 14 parties and shall have attached to it corporate authority given to the corporate 15 signatory and shall be notarized as to each signatory and shall be immediately 16 deposited with the Master; 17 (c) Pursuant to Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by 18 the Court, on or before August 4, 2008, a legally sufficient dismissal with 19 prejudice of all cases by and between the parties pending as of the date of the 20 Agreement. The dismissal shall recite that each party to the respective 21 litigation shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. 22 (3) Upon further order of the Court, the parties shall deposit with the Master such other 23 and further things which will facilitate the orderly exchange of the consideration and 24 shall do the things ordered by the Court to ensure the operational integrity of the 25 business entities that are parties to the Agreement. 26 27 28 3 Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476 Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 5 of 6 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 4 of 5 1 (4) The deposits being made with the Master by the parties pursuant to this Judgement 2 shall be transferred out of the deposit by the Master only upon further Order of the 3 Court in enforcement of the Agreement. 4 The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Judgment. 5 6 Dated: July 2, 2008 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case 5:07-cv-01389-JW Document 476 Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 367-11 Filed 09/02/11 Page 6 of 6 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 5 of 5 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Chester Wren-Ming Day cday@orrick.com D. Michael Underhill MUnderhill@BSFLLP.com David A. Barrett dbarrett@bsfllp.com Evan A. Parke eparke@bsfllp.com George Hopkins Guy hopguy@orrick.com I. Neel Chatterjee nchatterjee@orrick.com Jonathan M. Shaw jshaw@bsfllp.com Kalama M. Lui-Kwan klui-kwan@fenwick.com Monte M.F. Cooper mcooper@orrick.com Scott Richard Mosko scott.mosko@finnegan.com Sean Alan Lincoln slincoln@Orrick.com Steven Christopher Holtzman sholtzman@bsfllp.com Theresa Ann Sutton tsutton@orrick.com Tyler Alexander Baker Tbaker@fenwick.com Valerie Margo Wagner valerie.wagner@dechert.com Yvonne Penas Greer ygreer@orrick.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Dated: July 2, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?