Aguiar v. Webb et al

Filing 71

MOTION to Dismiss by Ashida Kim. (Attachments: # 1 Memo in Support, # 2 Declaration in Support, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Brosius, Amy)

Download PDF
Aguiar v. Webb et al Doc. 71 Att. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS William V. Aguiar, III, Plaintiff, v. Floyd Webb, Barron Sheppard, Wendy Sheppard, Ashida Kim a.k.a. Christopher Hunter a.k.a. Bradford Davis a.k.a. Radford Davis, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-l 1673 MLW DECLARATION OF RADFORD DAVIS IN SUPPORT OF RADFORD DAVIS' MOTION TO DISMISS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. I am a resident of Florida. I have never been in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I have not offered or contracted to offer services of any kind in Massachusetts. I do not own or lease property in Massachusetts. I do not have bank accounts in Massachusetts. I do not file tax returns in Massachusetts. I am a martial arts expert. I am interested in the martial arts and collect information about martial arts and martial arts history. I own two websites, dojopress.com and ashidakim.com on which I display information about martial arts, martial arts history, and offer martial arts-related merchandise for sale. The information I post on my websites is all produced and displayed utilizing resources outside of Massachusetts. 8. Since January 2006,1 have sold approximately 7 books and DVDs from my websites to 1 Dockets.Justia.com persons with Massachusetts addresses. These sales totaled $267.25, and account for less than one percent (1%) approximately of the sales I made from my websites during this period. None of these sales involved items that would appear to be the focus of this action. 9. I do not disseminate advertising in Massachusetts. My only advertising appears on my websites. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29th day of January 2008, at Winter Haven, Florida. Radfbrd Davis 21839645.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?