Red Bend Software, Inc. et al v. Google
JOINT STATEMENT of counsel Regarding Claim Construction and PreHearing. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Tempesta, Jennifer)
Red Bend Software, Inc. et al v. Google
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION RED BEND LTD., and RED BEND SOFTWARE INC., Civil Action No. 09-cv-11813-DPW Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.
GOOGLE INC., Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. RED BEND LTD. and RED BEND SOFTWARE INC., Counterclaim-Defendants.
JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT Pursuant to Local Rule 16.6(B)(4) and the stipulated schedule (Docket No. 92), the parties hereby jointly submit this Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement:
Claim Construction Hearing 1. Timing and Witnesses
The parties anticipate that the claim construction hearing, which is scheduled for August 18, 2010 at 9:30 am, will take no more than half a court day. Each party will take no more than two (2) hours for tutorial and arguments combined. Google reserves the right, during the technology tutorial portion of Google's presentation, to have its expert Dr. Walker present the technology tutorial. Red Bend objects to Dr. Walker testifying at the claim construction hearing because, inter alia, the use of expert testimony is unnecessary particularly in view of this Court's familiarity with the technology and issues in this case. Red Bend does not intend to present using any witnesses but reserves the right to call Mr. Peleg, the named inventor of the patent-in-suit, during the claim construction hearing in the event that Google presents using Dr. Walker. Google reserves the right to object to the testimony of any party witness including Mr. Peleg. 2. Tutorials
The parties anticipate that each side will present technology tutorials in the form of slide presentations as an introduction to their respective claim construction arguments. The time for the tutorials shall be deducted from the time allotted to each side, and shall take no longer than forty-five (45) minutes. 3. Arguments
The parties intend to present their arguments at the claim construction hearing. Arguments for each party will last no longer than the time remaining after presentation of that party's tutorial. B. Joint Claim Construction Chart The parties' Joint Claim Construction Chart is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Dated: August 3, 2010 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Jennifer C. Tempesta Daniel Cloherty (BBO# 565772) Dwyer & Collora, LLP 600 Atlantic Avenue - 12th Floor Boston, MA 02210-2211 Telephone: (617) 371-1000 Facsimile: (617) 371-1037 Robert C. Scheinfeld (RS-2632) (pro hac vice) Eliot D. Williams (EW-6560) (pro hac vice) Jennifer C. Tempesta (JT-4841) (pro hac vice) Baker Botts L.L.P. 30 Rockefeller Plaza, 44th Floor New York, New York 10012-4498 Telephone: (212) 408-2500 Facsimile: (212) 408-2501 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Red Bend Ltd. and Red Bend Software Inc.
By: /s/ Elizabeth Austern Jonathan M. Albano, Bar No. 013850 firstname.lastname@example.org, David M. Magee, Bar No. 652399 email@example.com BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP One Federal Street Boston, MA 02110-1726 Telephone: 617.951.8000 Susan Baker Manning (pro hac vice) firstname.lastname@example.org, Robert C. Bertin (pro hac vice) email@example.com Elizabeth Austern (pro hac vice) firstname.lastname@example.org BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 2020 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006-1806
Telephone: 202.373.6000 William F. Abrams (pro hac vice) email@example.com, BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 Telephone: 650.849.4400 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on August 3, 2010.
/s/ Jennifer C. Tempesta Jennifer C. Tempesta
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?