Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. GOOGLE, INC.
Filing
56
AFFIDAVIT of Samuel K. Lu re 53 Opposition to Motion by Skyhook Wireless, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Lu, Samuel)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SKYHOOK WIRELESS, INC.,
Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant and
Counterclaimant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL K. LU IN
SUPPORT OF SKYHOOK WIRELESS,
INC.'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE
INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OF INDEFINITENESS AND
SKYHOOK WIRELESS, INC.'S REPLY
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
I, Samuel K. Lu, declare as follows:
1.
I am an attorney at the law firm of Irell & Manella LLP ("Irell & Manella"),
counsel to plaintiff Skyhook Wireless, Inc. ("Skyhook"). I am a member in good standing of the
State Bar of California, and have been admitted to the Bar of this Court for the purpose of this
litigation. I submit this declaration in connection with Skyhook's opposition to Google Inc.'s
motion for summary judgment and Skyhook's reply claim construction brief. I have personal
knowledge of the matters set forth in this declaration and, if called as a witness, could testify to
its contents.
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the
transcript of the deposition of Anthony S. Acampora, Ph.D., which was held on September 22,
2011.
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excerpts from Anthony
S. Acampora, An Introduction to Broadband Networks (1994).
2501621
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
4,425,639.
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent Application
No. 20080039130.
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
7,869,667 B1.
7.
Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
7,627,548.
8.
Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
7,751,592.
9.
Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Skyhook's Opening
Claim Construction Brief, Dkt. #49.
10.
Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 1 to the
deposition of Anthony S. Acampora, Ph.D., which was held on September 22, 2011.
11.
Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of excerpts from The
American Heritage College Dictionary (3rd ed. 1997) produced by Skyhook in this litigation,
bates marked SKYFED013732–33, and SKYFED013736.
12.
Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of excerpts from Wiley
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dictionary (2004) produced by Skyhook in this
litigation, bates marked SKYFED013811–12, and SKYFED013814.
13.
Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of excerpts from McGraw-
Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms (4th ed. 1989) produced by Skyhook in this
litigation, bates marked SKYFED013711–12, and SKYFED013714.
2501621
-2-
14.
Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of excerpts from
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (10th ed. 2001) produced by Skyhook in this
litigation, bates marked SKYFED013717–18, and SKYFED013723.
Executed on September 28, 2011, in Los Angeles, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
forgoing is true and correct.
/s/ Samuel K. Lu
Samuel K. Lu
2501621
-3-
Certificate of Service
I, Samuel K. Lu, hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent
electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
on September 28, 2011.
/s/ Samuel K. Lu
Samuel K. Lu
2501621
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?