Facebook, Inc. v. Phoenix Media/Communications Group, Inc. et al

Filing 69

DECLARATION re 67 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion by Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Chen, Reuben)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS FACEBOOK, INC, Plaintiff, C.A. No. 1:10-cv-11917-DPW PHOENIX MEDIA/COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., PEOPLE2PEOPLE GROUP, INC., TELE-PUBLISHING, INC., AND FNX BROADCASTING LLC, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. Defendants. DECLARATION OF REUBEN H. CHEN IN SUPPORT OF FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PHOENIX MEDIA/ COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. AND PEOPLE2PEOPLE GROUP, INC.’S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS I, Reuben H. Chen, declare as follows: I am an attorney at the law firm of Cooley LLP. I represent the Plaintiff Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) in the above captioned matter and have been admitted pro hac vice to this Court. I make this declaration in support of Facebook’s Response to Phoenix Media/Communications Group, Inc. and People2People Group, Inc.’s Statement of Material Facts in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. 1. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an Applied Materials Interoffice Correspondence bearing Bates numbers FBPMC00000484-486. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 1 the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 2nd day of September, 2011 at Palo Alto, California. /s/ Reuben H. Chen Reuben H. Chen -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Reuben H. Chen, hereby certify that pursuant to Local Rule 5.4(C), this document has been filed through the ECF system and will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). For those parties indicated as non-registered participants, if any, a paper copy will be sent by facsimile and/or U.S. First Class Mail on September 2, 2011. /s/ Reuben H. Chen Reuben H. Chen 968514 /HN -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?