Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al
MOTION for Leave to File to Participate as Amici Curiae by M. B., K. C., Sarah Cole, Y. D., G. E., A. G., I. G., R. H., J. L., Fadhal Moore, Arjini Kumari Nawal, R. S., Itzel Vasquez-Rodriguez, Keyanna Wigglesworth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Culleen, Lawrence)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS,
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF
HARVARD COLLEGE (HARVARD
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-14176-DJC
MOTION TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICI CURIAE
Movants and Proposed Student Amici Curiae (“Proposed Amici”), J.F. and M.A., hereby
move for leave of court to participate in this matter as amici curiae alongside the current amici
curiae (“Current Amici”), who are a group of current and prospective students of Harvard to
whom the Court has granted leave to participate in this action as amici.1 Order at 23, June 15,
2015, ECF No. 52. Movants seek to have the same amici curiae status as the Current Amici
under the Court’s Order and to work in unison with the Current Amici to advance the special
interests of current and prospective students of Harvard. Id.
In support of this motion, and as grounds thereof, the Proposed Amici would respectfully
show the Court the following:
Proposed Amici include:
The Court specifically granted Current Amici leave to participate as follows: (1) amici curiae may,
through their counsel, submit a brief or memorandum of law not to exceed 30 pages, exclusive of
exhibits, on any dispositive motion in this case; (2) amici curiae may, through their counsel, participate in
oral argument on any dispositive motion in this case; and (3) amici curiae may submit personal
declarations or affidavits in support of their memorandum of law, which may be accorded evidentiary
weight if otherwise proper. Order at 23.
a. J.F., who is an Asian American high school student who has applied for
admission to Harvard College for the 2017-18 school year. See Ex. 1. J.F.
would be the only Asian American prospective student of the amici curiae and
can speak directly to Plaintiff Student for Fair Admissions (“SFFA”) claim
that Asian American applicants are harmed by Harvard’s race-conscious
holistic admissions policy.
b. M.A., who is half Pacific Islander, one-quarter black, and one-quarter white,
is a sophomore in high school, and intends to apply for admission to Harvard
College for the 2019-20 school year. See Ex. 2. J.D. would be the only
Pacific Islander prospective student of the amici curiae and thus would
contribute to and enhance the unique position of the amici curiae.
Movants seek to join the Current Amici to advance the special interests that the
Current Amici have in this action, as recognized by the Court in granting them amici status.
Movants will contribute to and enhance the unique position of the Current Amici to inform the
court of interests other than those represented by the parties; to expound that one of the many
justifications for considering race and ethnicity in college admissions is to remedy the adverse
impact that certain admissions practices have on the diversity profile of the admitted class,
including “legacy” applicants, Early Action, and reliance on the SAT; and to focus the Court’s
attention on the broader implications of various possible rulings. In addition, as Asian
Americans and Pacific Islanders, Movants are uniquely positioned to address SFFA’s claims that
Asian Americans are harmed by Harvard’s race-conscious holistic admissions policy.
Movants will be represented by Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Los
Angeles. Counsel for the Proposed Amici and Current Amici will coordinate and advance a
unified, comprehensive presentation of the student amici curiae’s special interests to the Court.
The role of an amicus curiae, meaning “friend of the court,” is to “assist the court
‘in cases of general public interest by making suggestions to the court, by providing
supplementary assistance to existing counsel, and by insuring a complete and plenary
presentation of difficult issues so that the court may reach a proper decision.’” Sierra Club v.
Wagner, 581 F.Supp.2d 246, 250 n.1 (D.N.H. 2008) (quoting Newark Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v.
Town of Harrison, N.J., 940 F.2d 792, 808 (3d Cir. 1991)).
While no rule of court governs the participation of amici curiae in a trial court
action, case law establishes that such participation lies within the sound discretion of the District
Court. Strasser v. Dorley, 432 F.2d 567, 569 (1st Cir. 1970). While courts in this circuit have
had no occasion to enumerate the factors that a District Court should consider in weighing the
proffered assistance of a friend of the court, it is well-established that such participation should
be permitted where prospective amici “provide helpful analysis of the law, they have a special
interest in the subject matter of the suit, or existing counsel is in need of assistance.” Tafas v.
Dudas, 511 F.Supp.2d 652, 659 (E.D. Va. 2007) (quoting Bryant v. Better Business Bureau, 923
F.Supp. 720, 727 (D.Md. 1996)). Given the Movants’ unique perspective on Asian American
and Pacific Islander admissions to Harvard, which is a central issue in this case, Movants
respectfully request that this Court exercise its discretion to allow them to join the Current Amici
as friends of the court.
The Proposed Amici will provide information that is both useful and critical to the
Court in resolution of this case. Courts have deemed amicus participation useful when, for
example, a party has a special interest in or is particularly familiar with the issues in a case, a
party has expertise in a particular area of law, and a party offers a different approach to resolving
a particular issue.
This Motion is timely and will not prejudice the parties. The parties are currently
in discovery, and the Court did not grant amici curiae leave to propound discovery, participate in
depositions, obtain copies of documents requested in discovery, or otherwise participate in
discovery in this case. Order at 23. Proposed Amici’s participation in this action will not delay
the Court’s schedule but will provide the Court with greater insight into current and prospective
students’ special interests in the subject matter of the suit.
WHEREFORE, the Proposed Amici respectfully request that the Court grant them leave
to participate as amici curiae in this matter under the same amici status as the Current Amici
DATED: December 12, 2016
/s/ Nicole K. Ochi
Nicole K. Ochi, Cal. Bar # 268678
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE –
1145 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90017
ATTORNEY FOR PROPOSED AMICI CURIAE
Certificate of Conference
In accordance with Local Rule 7.1(a), I hereby certify that I conferred with counsel for
Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant.
/s/ Matthew Cregor
Certificate of Service
In accordance with Local Rule 5.2(b), I hereby certify that this document filed through
the ECF system on December 12, 2016 will be sent electronically to the registered participants as
identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Lawrence E. Cullen
Lawrence E. Cullen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?