Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al

Filing 546

MOTION in Limine by Students for Fair Admissions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Hughes, John)

Download PDF
Exhibit 5 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION 2 3 -------------------------------x 4 5 STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., 6 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-14176 7 vs. 8 PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (HARVARD CORPORATION); and THE HONORABLE AND REVEREND THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, 9 10 Defendants. 11 -------------------------------x 12 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 13 14 DEPOSITION OF RAKESH KHURANA, a 15 witness called by the Plaintiff, taken 16 pursuant to the applicable provisions of 17 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 18 before James A. Scally, RMR, CRR, a 19 Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth 20 of Massachusetts, at the offices of 21 WilmerHale, 60 State Street, Boston, 22 Massachusetts, on Thursday, April 27, 23 2017, commencing at 9:06 a.m. 24 250 1 interests, how they want to contribute to each 2 other's learnings, and their desire to contribute to 3 society's well-being in consideration of their 4 applications to Harvard. 5 Q. Would you favor increasing the weight given 6 to legacy admissions if it resulted in decreasing the 7 racial diversity of the student body on campus? 8 9 MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Objection. I would prefer having as diverse a group of 10 students who come from a variety of different 11 backgrounds and interests and want to study a variety 12 of different subjects, learn from each other, hear 13 each other, understand each other, and who share a 14 desire to contribute to the well-being of society. 15 16 Q. So would you favor increasing the weight of legacy if it would decrease racial diversity? 17 18 MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Objection. I would need to know much more about the 19 variety of different characteristics of those 20 students that you're talking about. 21 Q. 22 diversity? 23 24 Which students, the legacies or the racial MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Both of them. Objection. 251 1 Q. You can't answer that question? 2 A. I can't answer that question. 3 Q. Have you ever heard anyone at Harvard raise 4 concern that its admissions process disadvantages 5 Asian-Americans? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. Who has raised that concern with you? 8 MS. ELLSWORTH: 9 Remind the witness not to disclose the contents of 10 communications with counsel or advice 11 of counsel. 12 question without doing so, you may. If you can answer the 13 A. I've heard it discussed as a general topic. 14 Q. By who? 15 A. I can't recall specific people. 16 Q. Have you ever reviewed any analysis by the 17 university's Office of Institutional Research as to 18 the extent to which Asian-Americans are disadvantaged 19 by the admissions process? 20 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 21 A. I may have. 22 Q. And what are you thinking of when you say you 23 24 may have? A. I see a variety and saw a variety of 252 1 different reports when I became dean. 2 MS. ELLSWORTH: If you're going to 3 move into a document, can we take a 4 break? 5 over an hour. 6 We've been going for a little MR. STRAWBRIDGE: 7 Yeah, we can take a break. 8 (Recess: 4:34 p.m. to 4:41 p.m.) 9 (Exhibit 10, February 2013 10 PowerPoint presentation Bates stamped 11 HARV00031773 through 31858, marked.) 12 13 BY MR. STRAWBRIDGE: Q. I've handed you a document that's been marked 14 as Exhibit 10. 15 you recognize that document? 16 a particular part of the pool -- or the document. 17 I'm sorry. 18 suffix of 804 through 810. 19 Can you look through that and see if And I can direct you to It's starting on the page with the Bates (Pause.) Have you had a chance to look at that? 20 Specifically to 804 to 810, did you have a chance to 21 look at that? 22 A. I did. 23 Q. Okay. 24 Before we broke, I asked you whether you had reviewed any reports from the Office of 253 1 Institutional Research about whether Harvard's 2 admissions process affects or disadvantages Asians. 3 Do you recall ever seeing this document? 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A. I may have seen some of these tables, but I can't say for certain that I saw this document. Q. What do you recall about seeing some of these tables? A. That there was an examination of looking at the admittance of students. Q. And which tables in particular do you think you've seen before? 12 A. I can't tell you specifically. 13 Q. Okay. 14 examination? 15 16 17 And what do you remember about this MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Objection. Just that I didn't think that this was -- analysis was done appropriately. 18 Q. And why didn't you think that? 19 A. There's limitations, a lot of limitations to 20 21 doing what are called fitted models like this. Q. Okay. Let's back up a little bit. When do 22 you specifically remember seeing some of these 23 tables? 24 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 254 1 A. I believe that as I familiarized myself with 2 the office of the dean of Harvard College, that I 3 read a variety of different analyses and perused 4 several reports. 5 Q. And so is it your testimony that you think 6 you saw these documents, you know, they were made 7 available to you in the office of the dean? 8 9 10 A. I can't say about these specific documents, but tables like this. Q. Do you -- do you specifically remember seeing 11 documents that analyzed what the effect of various 12 admissions variables were on Asian-Americans in the 13 admissions pool? 14 A. I think so. 15 Q. And specifically with respect to what appears 16 on page 810, or the page with the Bates suffix of 17 810, there's a question 3 that says, "Is there bias 18 against Asians in college admissions?" 19 Do you see that? 20 A. Yes. 21 Q. Okay. And do you remember reviewing some 22 presentation containing these tables or other similar 23 information that was addressing whether there was 24 bias against Asians in college admissions? 255 1 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 2 A. I don't remember. 3 Q. You don't remember that? 4 A. I don't remember that. 5 Q. Do you remember in what -- were these on a 6 share drive, or were they emailed to you? 7 remember how you were reviewing the tables that you 8 think look like the tables that are in this 9 presentation? 10 11 MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Do you Objection. I think there were a variety of reports in my 12 office, and I just remember reading them and going 13 through them. 14 Q. Like in a hard copy binder? 15 A. In a hard copy. 16 17 I can't say how -- whether they were in a binder. Q. Okay. Do you remember discussing those 18 tables or that analysis with anybody else in the 19 office? 20 21 22 23 24 A. I don't recall discussing them with anyone else in the office. Q. Do you know whether you discussed them with the interim dean who preceded you? A. I don't believe I discussed them. 256 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Q. Do you recall whether you ever discussed them with Dean Hammonds? A. I don't believe I discussed this with Dean Hammonds. Q. And you can't remember discussing it with anybody? A. I don't remember discussing these with anybody. Q. When you say there are a lot of problems with 10 a fit model such as these, what specific problems, if 11 any, do you recall thinking about when you looked at 12 tables like the ones in this report? 13 14 15 16 A. That models like this violate statistical and hypothesis testing. Q. Did you discuss any of that with people at the Office of Institutional Research? 17 A. No. 18 Q. Do you think that the people at the Office of 19 Institutional Research understand statistical 20 modelling? 21 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 22 A. I don't know. 23 Q. Do you assume that the people who do the 24 institutional research for the college and for the 257 1 university have some background in statistical 2 modelling? 3 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 4 A. I do. 5 Q. Do you assume them to be competent at their 6 jobs? 7 A. I do. 8 Q. So you read these things, and it occurred to 9 you that you don't think this was a reliable 10 analysis, or you read something like this, you're not 11 sure if it was this report or something like this, 12 and you didn't talk to or otherwise engage with 13 anybody on it? 14 A. No. 15 Q. And the only time you remember seeing 16 something like this was just sitting in your office 17 catching yourself up on the things that the dean has 18 access to? 19 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 20 A. I can't remember if that was the setting. 21 Q. Okay. 22 Do you have any idea why these were prepared? 23 A. I don't. 24 Q. Did you take any steps to find out why they 258 1 were prepared? 2 A. I did not. 3 Q. Did you take any steps to determine what a 4 proper analysis would yield with respect to this 5 information? 6 A. No. 7 Q. Did you -- have you since seen any analysis 8 from the Office of Institutional Research at the 9 university or the college addressing the question as 10 to whether there's bias in the college admissions 11 process against Asians? 12 MS. ELLSWORTH: I'll just remind 13 the witness to answer the question only 14 to the extend you can do so without 15 disclosing communications of counsel or 16 advice of counsel. 17 A. I'll be following the advice of counsel. 18 Q. Okay. So other than in communications with 19 counsel, you haven't seen any other Office of 20 Institutional Research products like this except for 21 this time you were in your office getting up to 22 speed? 23 24 MS. ELLSWORTH: A. I don't think I have. Objection. 259 1 Q. And when you say -- I just want to make sure 2 I understand. 3 there were problems with this type of analysis when 4 you picked this thing up and looked at it; correct? 5 A. Do you remember -- you remember that I remember thinking I wouldn't use this kind 6 of -- I would have not approached this question this 7 way. 8 9 10 Q. Okay. trying to determine whether an admissions process is biased against Asian-Americans? 11 12 How would you approach the question of MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Objection. I didn't -- what I was -- that's not the 13 question I would have been asking. 14 question I thought was being asked. 15 16 17 Q. That's not the But why -- what question did you think was being asked? A. How do you -- how does -- you build up a 18 model to understand whether the process we used 19 produces the class that we think we need and would 20 want and would most benefit from a Harvard College 21 education. 22 Q. Do you think Harvard should take steps to 23 ensure that its admissions process is not 24 disadvantaging Asian-Americans as a group? 260 1 2 MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Objection. I think Harvard College should take an 3 admissions process that considers each student's 4 background, experiences, academic aspirations, 5 extracurriculars, contributions to their community, 6 the benefits they would derive from a four-year 7 residential experience, and their desire to 8 contribute to the well-being of society in evaluating 9 each application. 10 11 Q. Do you think that the Harvard admissions process disadvantages Asian-Americans? 12 A. I don't know. 13 Q. You don't know? 14 A. I don't know. 15 Q. If it did, would it be something that would 16 concern you? 17 18 MS. ELLSWORTH: A. Objection. I would be concerned if Harvard's admissions 19 process disadvantaged students along a variety of 20 different characteristics. 21 Q. Including race or ethnicity? 22 A. Including and not limited to race and 23 ethnicity. 24 Q. Other than the general conversations you 261 1 mentioned earlier, do you recall anyone else ever 2 raising with you concerns that Asian-Americans were 3 disadvantaged by the Harvard admissions process? 4 A. I can't recall. 5 Q. Do you know whether any student groups at 6 Harvard have ever raised concerns about whether 7 Harvard's admissions process disadvantages Asian- 8 Americans? 9 A. I don't know. 10 Q. You don't know if they have or not? 11 A. I don't know what you mean by "student 12 13 groups." Q. 14 Does Harvard have student affinity groups? MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 15 A. Harvard -- yes. 16 Q. Are some of those student affinity groups 17 18 associated with nationalities or ethnicities? A. Some of those student groups have missions 19 that advance the cultural interest of a variety of 20 different identities. 21 Q. And do you recall any of those student groups 22 raising concerns about whether the admissions process 23 at Harvard disadvantages Asian-Americans? 24 MS. ELLSWORTH: Objection. 267 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I, JAMES A. SCALLY, RMR, CRR, a Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public duly commissioned and qualified in and for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, do hereby certify that there came before me on the 27th day of April, 2017, at 9:06 a.m., the person hereinbefore named, RAKESH KHURANA, who provided satisfactory evidence of identification as prescribed by Executive Order 455 (03-13) issued by the Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, was by me duly sworn to testify to the truth and nothing but the truth of his knowledge concerning the matters in controversy in this cause; that he was thereupon examined upon his oath, and his examination reduced to typewriting under my direction; and that this is a true record of the testimony given by the witness to the best of my ability. I further certify that I am neither attorney or counsel for, nor related to or employed by, any of the parties to the action in which this deposition is taken, and further, that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties hereto or financially interested in the action. 15 16 My Commission Expires: April 8, 2022 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 _________________________ James A. Scally, RMR, CRR CSR/Notary Public

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?