Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al

Filing 576

EXHIBIT 1 by Lawrence Crawford. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 4, # 4 Exhibit 5, # 5 Exhibit 6) *Note that the envelop of this filing states that it is being made as 2 of 2 but Clerk's Office never received envelop 1 of 2 so there is no motion to link this to on the docket*(McDonagh, Christina)

~-

*

l
~..~
.. <,-··:;i
·• l ~:

··-~

(')
,-

rn

::!
::ti=--""-~•
;n (·
~

(l) ff"]

oo
~t,
"Yl

~·

.·/

.

.J ,l

I

COURT OF APPEALS
AL .,
FOR THE 4TH . CIR CU IT ET .

----~--------------LINA
PE TIT I~N FROM SOUTH CARO
ETo AL .,)
(CASES 2:1 ~-c v-1 127 -JM C-M GB

~~~-----------------

R E C E IV E D
JAN 17 2013
S.C. SUPREME CO UR T

;
17 -69 60 ; 17 -71 39 ; 17 -71 37
NO .(S ) 17 -66 93 ; 17 -69 25 ;
DOCKET
99 ;
; 16 -21 41 ; 17 -14 15 ; '16 -22
17- 713 4; 17 -70 68 ; 16 -19 53
; 17- 753 2 ET . AL c,
17- 718 6; 17- 741 0; 17 -74 28

--------------~-----

LAWRENCE
; JASON MORRIS GOURDINE;
CHRISTOPHER DARNELL WILSON
JAHJAH
EL JAHJAH Te TIS HB ITE AKA
La CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRI
AL MAHDI ETm AL .,
PE TIT ION ER (S)

Vso

ER IN CASE
JUDGES WHO SIGNED THE ORD
JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD; THE
.,
; WARDEN McFADDEN ET . AL
16 -19 53 ; THE UNITED STATES
DEFENDANT(S)

------------~------i

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

E
HEREBY CE RT IFY , THAT WE HAV
TOPHER WILSON ET . AL ., DO
WE, CHRIS
TS GIVING
Y OF AN AF FID AV IT OF FAC
MAILED AND OR SERVED A COP
ON
OR; MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTI
NOTICE; FIL ING WRIT OF ERR
JUD ICI AL
N TO CHALLENGE
MOTION FOR RECUSAL; MOTIO
AND OR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
17 -71 86 ;
UNDER CA SE( S) 17- '75 32 AND
THE COURT'S JUR ISD ICT ION
ENTS
WAIVE THE (6) MONTH STATEM
TION FOR A STAY; MOTION TO
MO
1-o f-3 4

/

'
IN CASE(S) 17-7410 AND 17-7428; MOTION 10 EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT;

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND MOTION TO MOTION THEREFOR, ON THE 4TH.
CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL INVOLVED PARTIES BY U.S. MAIL
POSTAGE PREPAID BY DEPOSITING IT IN THE INSTITUTIO N MAILBOX
ON DECEMBER 22 1 2017.

RESPECTFULLY 6
JAHJAH AL MAHDI

'===-==~-l.~_.: ;. ~
JA~~RDINE

)

CHRISTOPHER DARNELL WILSON

DECEMBER 22, °101~

2-of-34

..

J

..

L.,_

COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE 4TH. CIRC UIT ET
...

-

. . •..

. ....

0

AL.,

-·-- -- - - - - - - - --

PETIT ION FROM SOUTH CAROLINA
(CASES 2:17- cv-11 27-JM C-MG B ET. AL., )

,

-------------------DOCKET NO.( S) 17-66 93; 17-69 25; 17-69 60; 17-71
39; 17-7 137;
\
17-7 134; 17-70 68; 16-19 53; 16-21 41; 17-14 15; 16-22
99;
17-7 186; 17-74 10; 17-74 28; 17-75 32 ETc AL.,

------------~------CHRISTOPHER DARNELL WILSON; JASON MORRIS GOURDINE;
LAWRENCE
LB CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T~ TISHB ITE AKA
JAHJAH
AL MAHDI ET. AL~,

PETIT IONE R(S)

Vs ..

JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD; THE JUDGES WHO SIGNED THE
ORDER IN CASE
16-19 53; THE UNITED STAT ES; WARDEN McFADDEN ETc
AL.,
DEFENDANT(S)

-------------------AFFID AVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDIC IAL NOTICE; FILIN
G
WRIT OF ERROR; MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION AND OR
PROTECTIVE
ORDER; MOTION FOR RECUSAL; MOTION TO CHALLENGE
THE
COUR T'S JURIS DICT ION UNDER CASE (S) 17-75 32 AND
17-71 86;
MOTION FOR A STAY; MOTION TO WAIVE THE (6) MONTH
STATEMENTS IN CASE (S) 17-74 10 AND 17-74 28; MOTIO
N TO
EXCEED THE PAGE LIMI T; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND
MOTION
TO MOTION THEREFOR

-------------~-----3-of- 34

'- j

.....

IN RE: TO GIVING ALL CASES CAPTIONED NOTICE OF EVENTS RELATED

TO BOTH CASE(S) 17-7532 AND 17-7186.

TO: THE 4TH .. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ET. AL.,
THE PETITIONERS IN THESE PARALLEL CASES GIVE THE
COURT AND PARTIES JUDICIAL NOTICE. HERE THE COURT IN BOTH CASE(S)
17-7532 AND 17-7186 WILL FIND:

(1) A COPY OF EXHIBIT,

11

17-6960 11 ., THIS IS THE

(65) PAGE AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE; FILING
WRIT OF ERROR;***, DATED OCTOBER 15, 2017. A TYPED VERSION OF
THE PLEADING IS ALREADY FILED IN ALL PARALLEL CASES.
(2) PLRA.APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT
OR FEES FOR GOURDINE, WILSON AND CRAWFORD, THE KING-KHALIFAH
AKA JAHJAH AL MAHDI ..
(3) A COPY OF EXHIBIT, "GOURDINE". THE [14] PAGE
AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE, FILING WRIT OF ERROR;
NOTICE OF SEEKING LEAVE TO APPEAL;***, DATED JULY 2, 2017.
(4) EXHIBIT, "MAHDI" .. A COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT
OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE CAUSES
OF ACTION AGAINST JUDGE HARWELL****, [23] PAGES DATED JULY 8,
2017.,
(5) A COPY OF EXHIBIT,

11

TRUSTEE 11 • THIS IS THE

DOCUMENT THAT MAKES UP CASE 16-2299.
ALL CLAIMS, ISSUES, DEFENSES, PETITIONS, MOTIONS ARGUED
WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOW BEING ARGUED WITHIN BOTH CASES
17-7532 AND 17-7186. ENOUGH GAMES HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE 4TH.
CIRCUIT. YOU ARE TO GRANT THE INJUNCTION AND OR PROTECTIVE ORDER
SOUGHT WITHIN THESE PARALLEL CASES. WE MOTION FOR THIS AND THAT
MOTION IS TO BE NOW GRANTED BY YOU BY DECREE AND JUDGMENT OF
THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND COURT WHOSE
4-of-34
,,,
~

~·r

!;ft:~'

.

\

RAND LEGISLATIVE POWER AND AU'l'liO
SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY, JUD ICIA L
DUE TO THE CLAIMS OF DEFAULT
ITY ARE BINDING UPON THI S COURT
NG FROM CASE 201 3-C P-4 00- 008 4
AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL EMERG1
CH THE UNITED STATES IS PARTY
IN RICHLAND COUNTY S.C . TO WHI
PROTECTED UNDER BOTH ARTICLE 1
TO THAT DEFAULT WHICH IS ALSO
OF THE U.S .. CONSTITUTION. THE
SECTION 10 AND ARTICLE IV § 2
T NOW BE DEEMED FORFEITED DUE
GRANTING OF THE INJUNCTION MUS
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND FRAUD
TO THE OBSTRUCTION, MACHINATION,
AND ALL COURTS INVOLVED ALSO
ENGAGED IN BY THESE DEFENDANTS
T RIS ES TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL
PRODUCING STATE INTERFERENCE THA
THESE CLERKS AND CASE MANAGERS
LEVEL BY THE JUDGES ALSO USING
F0S upp .2d e, 200 0 WL 331 287 26
AS PROXY, MQQGKlW~-~.-~E~~~£QN 7
958 FoS upp . 761 (19 97) ; ~A~ KlW £
(S. D.I nd. 200 0); gv~ ~-~ o-£ CG ~~T
am2 014 ); 2A~ Q~~ £-~ 9-~ ALE ~r 58
v~- W~ ~ZE ~r 201 4 WL 491 881 3(D .C.P
C-& -~A ~LG Ry- ~~C ~-Y .-W MI~ ~-~ L~~ ~y
FeS upp .3d r 514 (DS C.2 014 ); LGR
r 720
(Md .20 15) ; U~£~-~~-£GU~W-~A~QL~MA
~w~~r 780 F3d . 211 CA4
14)
.-WA~~T 741 F3d . 492 CA4 (Va .20
F3d . 518 CA4 (S. C.2 013 ); WA~b-~

• IT IS SO ORDERED.
AND PARTIES JUD ICIA L NOTICE
THE PET ITIO NER S GIVE THE COURT
ENTATION OF THE FAC TS. WE ARE
TO ENSURE THERE IS NO MISREPRES
NG
THI S IS A MISNOMER .. WE ARE·ARGUI
NOT ARGUING "THEOCRATIC LAW" ..
CH
HAVE THEOCRATIC COMPONENTS WHI
11
FOREIGN LAW", WHICH HAPPEN TO
o RULES OF CIV IL PROCEDURE AND
WAS ARGUED UNDER RULE 44 OF SeC
ACT THAT WAS DEFAULTED ON BY
THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
THE (19 3) MEMBER STATES OF THE
THE S.C . ATTORNEY GENERAL AND
VATICAN AND THE UNITED STA TES ,
UNITED NATIONS WHICH INCLUDE THE
ARY
AH, IS FOREIGN SOVEREIGN FIDUCI
WHERE CRAWFORD, THE KING-KH.ll_I.-IF
IWITH SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY, JUD
HEI R TO THE (4} GLOBAL THRONES
AUTHORITY THAT IS BINDING UPON
CIA L AND LEG ISL ATI VE POWER AND
TUS AS SUCH BEFORE THI S NATION
THI S COURT, BY HIS ORIGINAL STA
FEDERAL PRo'BATE LAW, BY LEGAL
WAS FORMED VIA INTERNATIONAL AND
MADE OR UNMADE BY THE COURTS
BIN DIN G CONTRACT THAT CANNOT BE
OVED
ED IN CASE 201 3-C P-4 00- 008 4 REM
WHICH WAS ARGUED AND ESTABLISH
I TELL YOU THAT THE RULES ARE
TO THE FEDERAL COURT. SO WHEN
DED
PARALLEL CASES, THEY ARE SUSPEN
SUSPENDED WITHIN ALL OF THESE
S.C . ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OR THE
UNLESS YOU CAN SHOW THAT THE
THE AFF IDA VIT (S) OF DEFAULT AND
UNITED STATES MOVED TO DEFEAT
5-o f-3 4

,
'.•

'VOIDING OF JURISDICTION IN A TIMELY MANNER OR PRODUCE AN ORDER
THAT IS NOT TAINTED BY FRAUD OR REMOVAL. I, JAHJAH AL MAHDI,,
GIVE THE COURT AND PARTIES JUDICIAL NOTICE THAT I AM OFFICIALLY
EXERCISING THAT POWER AND AUTHORITY GIVEN BY THE DEFAULT AND
11

11

CONTRACT 11 ,

COVENANT 11 ,

ESTABLISHED BY THE SOLE CORPORATION

W~ICH IS PROTECTED UNDER BOTH ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 AND ARTICLE
IV§ 2 OF THE U.So CONSTITUTION . WHERE THERE IS CONTRACT AND
FIDUCIARY DUTY, ••• THERE IS OBLIGATION. THE OBLIGATION OF THE
CONTRACT IS THE LAW THAT BINDS JAHJAH AL MAHDI, TO ACT RENDERING
VOID CASE 17-7532 AND STAYING THAT CASE DUE TO ADDITIONAL ACTS
OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT, AND RENDER VOID ANY ACT DONE BY ASHLEY
BROWNLEE IN CASE 17-7186~ THE 4TH. CIRCUIT CANNOT MAKE (OR ALTER)
THE CONTRACT ESTABLISHED BY THE SOLE CORPORATION (MAKE ANOTHER
INTERPRETATIO N OTHER THAN THAT WHICH IS ESTABLISHED BY THE SOLE
CORPORATION, RENDERING ITS OBLIGATION OR POWER VOID BY JUDICIAL
DETERMINATION OR USE OF EX POST FACTO LAW)o I, JAHJAH AL MAHDI,
AM SOVEREIGN BY WAY OF MY ORIGINAL STATUS AS SOVEREIGN WITH
ALL SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY, JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ATTRIBUTES,

(10) THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE THIS NATION WAS FORMED WHERE THE
COURTS CANNOT MAKE A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION BASED UPON OR STANDING UPON SUCH EX POST FACTO LAW TO BURDEN THE OBLIGATION OF
THE CONTRACT AND OBSTRUCT JAHJAH AL MAHDI IN HIS FIDUCIARY OUTIES
TO MY GOD AND MY ,HOLY COMMONWEALTH WHO ARE BENEFICIARIE S OF
JU([ElU;CAW-WU~ ... -I.llllii!R~X-If;i!~ ... -<;O.,.-lil.,.-IU.~WQQC.12I.A~~.cs
CORP. 7 81 F.Supp. 157(DSC.1948 ); G~ARAW-~.-~WE-N~W-¥GRK-GI~~
Q~R~.-G~-EQU C.r F.Supp.3d., 2015 WL 4240733(N.Y. D.C.2015); ~w~~R~
NA~IGWAL-AIRGRAR~-LQCGE-l6S2-~v-l~~~RWA~IQWAL-AIRCRA~~-SERU~C~

THE

11

TRUST 11 ,

J;WC,.-+Ci:IARI.li:S~Otll.).,r- ...:02 F2d. 808,.

49 L.R.R.M.

(BNA) 2976 ( 4'i'H.Cir.

_1962); E~~E-R.-GO.-~ ,-~MQM~K~~£ r 304 U.Sm 64(1938); QGCEN-~v
~AN~ERSr 25 u.s. 213(1827); ~RY£~EE£-GR-CAR~liMOY~~-CQLL~~E-v,
WQQQWARCr 17 u.s. 518, 1819 WL 2201; ~~y~~-~.-U.5~ r 133 s.ct.
2072, 186 L.Ed.2d. 84, 81 u.s.L.W. 4372(2013); u.s.-~.-WEI.I. Sr
-

L

234 CA4 (Va.2014); £~IRES-Vv-SC~ OQLS 7 --F.Supp.3d.
--, 20t7,WL 4174774(DSC. 2017); ~lR~W-~WlRO-S ANCGR~-~.-CU C~N~
~OEE~ERr 132 s.ct. 2459, 189 L.Ed.2d. 457, 82 u.s.L.w. 4578(u.s.
578 Fed. Appx'

2014); ~W-RE~-~REEW 7 980 F2du 590(9th.Cir.1 992); AW~ERSO~-lil,
~iaER~~-LQSS Y-lWC.r 477 u.s. 242, 106 s.ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d.
'202(U.S.198 6); WlLLER-v.-~A RRi£~r F.Supp.2d., 2013 WL 1868028
6-of-34
'-

'(Ya .. 2013); WIL£Q~-~~-GMAC-MOR~G9r-LLCr F.Supp e3do, 2015 WL

5244967 (DSCo2 015)~-A ~SQ-~E E-EX~I ~I~r-~~ RU£~iE ~v
THE "TERM" OR "CONCEPT" OF A "JUDGE " OR "ATTORNEY" DO
NOT COME FROM YOU OR YOUR LAWS .. THEY DO NOT COME FROM YOUR NATION, NOR DO THEY COME FROM ENGLAND OR ENGLISH LAW. THEY COME
FROM US, THE SOLE CORPORATION 8 AND IS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
GIVEN TO YOUR NATIONS AS A "GRANT" WITH RESTRI CTIONS , AS IS
I

THE RIGHT TO LEGALLY MARRY, SET IN PLACE THROUGH ADAM AND ABRAHAM
EXHIBI T,
u MEMBERS OF THE SOLE CORPORATION AS IS ARGUED WITHIN
"TRUST EE" .. THEIR OWNERSHIP IS WITH ME, JAHJAH , AS THE FIDUCIARY
HEIR KING, KHALIFAH OF THE SOLE CORPORATION BEING THE ORIGIN AL
6

FOUNTAIN OF ALL LAW AND SOVEREIGN POWERe YOU CANNOT LEGALLY
ATTACH, ARREST OR EXECUTE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF A FOREIGN
SOVEREIGN SOLE CORPORATION WITHOUT CONSENT, WHICH IS WITHDRAWN,
ABSENT OF ITS RIGHTS AND PREROGATIVESQ DUE TO THE DEFAULT EMER11
11
GING FROM CASE 2013-C P-400-0 084, AND BY THE COVENANT , "CON1
TRACT" , AS FIDUCIARY HEIR PROTECTED UNDER BOTH ARTICLE 1 SECTION
10 AND THE PRIVILE GE AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF ARTICLE IV§ 2
OF THE U~S. CONSTITUTION, THE COURT CANNOT BY MY ORIGINAL STATUS
/
RIGHTS OR PREROGATIVES,
UNDER CONTRACT TAKE AWAY THE KING'S
OR BURDEN THE OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACTo THE EXPROPRIATION

EXCEPTION UNDER THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT IS ALSO INVOKED WHERE THE TAKING, ATTACHING ETC. RELATED TO THIS INTELL ECTUAL PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL PROBATE
LAW, ALSO INVOLVING THE OTHER (192) MEMBER'STATES OF THE UNITED
NATIONS IN EFFORTS TO DISMANTLE MY VOTING AND DISCRETIONARY
POWERS ON THESE MA'l''i'ERS r DESTROYING THE RESTRIC TIONS PLACED
UPON THIS INTELLECTUAL. PROPERTY WHERE THERE IS NO "JUSTIC E OR
FAIRNE SS" IN VIOLATION OF THE CONTRACTu THUS DESTROYING MY CONTROL AS THE SOLE CORPORATIONe THE F.SmI~A g APPLIE S WHERE BY
YOUR ACTS THERE IS DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON NATIONALITY, RELIGION, SUCH AS MY ISRAEL I DESCENT AND THE FACT THAT I AM MUSLIM,
CHRIST IAN AND JEW COMBINED, A NOVELTYg AND I ~ OF AFRICAN BLOODe
THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, THESE LEGAL TERMS OR CONC,EPTS, ARE
IMMOVABLE, WHICH INCLUDE THE RIGHT TO LEGALLY MARRY BEING IMMOVABLE PROPERTY HERE IN THE UNITED STATES FALLING UNDER THE F.S.I.A .
THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY, CONVENTION ON JURISDI CTIONA L IMMUNITY
7-of-34

.',;

STATES AND THEIR PROPERTY, RES., 59/3
I
8, ART S. 5, 10-1 2 (DE C.
2, 2004 )(AD OPT ING A RES TRIC TIVE THEO
RY OF IMMUNITY AND WITHDRAWING IMMUNITY FOR LOSS OF PROPERTY WHE
RE, AMONG OTHER REQ UIR ~MENTS, "THE ACT OR·O MIS SION OCCURRED
IN WHOLE OR 'IN PART IN
THE TERRITORY OF THE OTHER STA TE" );
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
ON JUR ISDI CTIO NAL IMMUNITY·
OF STATES AND THEIR PROPERTY SUP P.
A/5 9/22 NOo 1, PP. 7-11 (MAR
I
1-5 , 200 4). ALSO SEE EXH IBIT , "TRU
STEE"., ALSO SEE THE CONTR)\CT
UNDER LUKE ·11: 52; ISAI AH 11:1 -5; ZECH
ARIAH 6:12 -13 ; ISAI AH 16:5 ;
isAI AH 32: 1-4 ; ISAI AH 42:1 8-22 ; JERE
MIAH 23:5 -6; JEREMIAH 33:1 521 (CRUCIAL ONE ); EZE KIEL 34:2 2-30
; EZE KIEL 37:2 2; DANIEL 11: 13; ALSO SEE alMO W-~ .-RR ~U~ ~I~- OR- WUW
GAR ~y-- FoSu pp .. 3d. --, 201 7
WL 440 229 3(D .. D.C .. 201 7); ~QL I~~A -RE~
Q~~ l~-G R-~E w~z g~~A -~.-~ E~M ii:~Gfl ".".& -~A'! i-;WE -.lW~ ERW r-I;n; ~,lI., I,;U,
I~-C ~ 137 s.,c t .. 131 2, 197 L.E d.2d
.,
663 , 85 U.,S.,L.,W" 4221 !(U .. S .. 201 7}.

·"CJ~'

STATE AND OR FEDERAL REGULATION IN
THIS CASE, OF DESCENT
AND DIST RIBU TION OF DECEDENT'S ESTA
TE MUST GIVE WAY IF SUCH
REGULATION IMP AIRS THE FIDUCIARY DUTY
AND SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY,
JUD ICIA L, LEG ISLA TIVE AND EXECUTIVE
POWER OF THE CROWN, IMP AIRI NG
EFFE CTIV E EXE RCIS E OF U.,S., FOREIGN
POLICY RELATED TO OUR FOREIGN
LEGAL SYSTEM TO INCLUDE THE SUPERSED
ING AUTHORITY AND POWER
OF THE KIN G-K HAL IFAH 'S DECREES, i£~M
ER~l~-R~-MI~LERz 389 U.S .
429 , 88 s.c t .. 664 , 19 L.E d.2d .. 683(
U .. S.,1 968 ); QQij;,..!,r.,._S:E.Q~RAI.
CEM QCR A~IC -R~~ g~~I C-0~ -~~W IQ~I Ar 189
F.Su pp.3 d., 6 (D., D.C .,20 16);
ARM igIL ~O-D IS~R I2U~ lG~- EW~ ER~ RI£E £~IW
Co-R 0-~A .l¼g w_M US~ CA~ -lW£ ~RU ~
MEN~S-MAWU~AC~URE-CO.-~~Q~r F.S upp
e3d ., 2014 WL 281 594 3(D .C.F la.
201 4); ~AS Sl~R -~~- X~!S iEW ~aQ RNE MliZ
A-C QL~ E~~ lQ~- ~QU NQA ~~Q ~r
73- F3d . 613 (9th QCi re20 13);
✓
A~-~ M~M AR~ -Y~- ~oA ~Co ~v-lW ~ER Wr- ~N~ .r
679 F3d . 205 (4th .Cir .20 12) .
IN THE GLOBAL NATIONS CONSPIRING TO
ATTACH, EXECUTE OR
ARREST THE KIN G-K HAL IFAH 'S INTELLEC
TUAL PROPERTY IN GIVING SODOMITES AND GOMORRAHRITES THE RIGHT
TO LEGALLY MARRY BY JUD ICIA L
DETERMINATION. SUCH ACTION PRODUCES
VIOLATIONS OF THE HOBBS
ACT WHICH SET FORTH PRO HIBI TION AGA
INST CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE
WITH COMMERCE BY ROBBING, ATTACHING,
EXECUTING OR ARRESTING
THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS VALID
UNDER COMMERCE CLAUSE ON
8-o f-34

HAVE ESSENTIALLY
ITS FACE AND IS APPLIED TO THESE DEFENDANTS WHO
LECTUAL PROPERTY,
ROBB~D AND HIGH-JACKED THE KING-KHALIFAH'S INTEL
"GRANT" UNDER
REMOVING THE RESTRICTIONS PLACED UPON IT BY THE
HOTEL AND HONEY"CONTRACT", WHERE CATERING AND WEDDING SERV ICES,
CREDIT CARD
MOON ACCOMMODATIONS, FINANCIAL VENTURES SUCH.AS
PRODUCE COMMERCE
AND OTHER BANKING USAGES NATIONALLY AND GLOBALLY
INTERNATIONAL
ACTI VITIE S AND ARE DONE AND MADE ACROSS STATE AND
RAL, EVEN
BORDERS. THE APPLICATION OF YOUR STATE AND OR FEDE
NEXUS TO INTE RINTERNATIONAL LAWS COULD BE BASED ON DE MIN.IMUS
ACTI VITY
STATE COMMERCE, SO LONG AS STATUTE OR LAW REGULATED
TANTIAL EFFE CT
WHICH, THROUGH REPE TITIO N, IN AGGREGATE HAD SUBS
ING SERVICES
ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE, WHERE MANY OF THESE WEDD
ING GIFTS SUCH
ARE EVEN DONE ON THE INTERNET, WHICH INCLUDE WEDD
U.S. SUPREME
AS THOSE MATTERS THAT ARE PRESENTLY BEFORE THE
RIGHTS COMCOURT IN THE MASTERPIECE CAKESH0P v~ COLORADO CIVIL
TS AND PUBL IC
MISSION •.•• ADDRESSING FREE SPEECH, RELIGIOUS RIGH
e YOU ARE IN
ACCOMMODATION PRODUCING INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAIM
u.s0 1011 , 118
VIOIL ATIO N OF THE HOBBS ACT, GU5~ 0-Y~- U~£~ x 523
sQct. 1201 (MEM) 140 LDEd a2d. 329(U .Se19 98); u~~.- ~~-W lLES r
1v § 8 Cle
122 F3d~ 235( 5thD Cir.1 997) ; U.S.C sA. CONST. ARTe
r F.Su pp.3 d.,
3; 18 UeS.C .Ae § 1951 ; UWI~iC-S~A~E£-~w-ME~C~RSON
UEr FoSu ppQ3 d.,
2016 WL 6084 637(S ~D.T ex.20 16); YW~~EC-£~A~Ea-~~-R
~QER r F.Su pp.2 d.
2015 WL 5007 930( S.D.T ex.20 15); SI~~E X-~o- ~ER~ E~RQ
, 2006 WL 3354 137(D .C.M d.200 6).
, THE
DUE TO THE AIDS THAT 'S PRODUCED BY SUCH ACTI VITY
ASSOCIATED WITH
DEBAUCHERY AND VIO~ATIONS OF RELIGIOUS BELIE FS
TO THE TERMS
SUCH PRAC TICES , THAT STAND IN BLATANT DEFIANCE
11
NO'r LAY WITH
OF THE 18 CONTRACT WHICH CLEARL~ STATE, "THOU SHALT
SHALL NOT WEAR
A MAN AS THOU LAYETH WITH A WOMAN", "THE WOMAN
NOT WEAR THAT
THAT WHICH PERTAINETH TO A MAN AND A MAN SHALL
ARE AN ABOMINATION
WHICH PERTAINETH TO A WOMAN FOR ALL THAT DO SO
E OF THE BELIEVERS
UNTO THE LORD THY GOD", "THERE SHALL BE NO WHOR
Y 22:5 AND 23:1 7.
NOR A SODOMITE OF THE BELIE VERS ". SEE DEUTERONOM
11
YOUR NATIONS
THIS IS CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE GRANT" GIVEN TO
FOREIGN SOVEREIGN
WITH REST RICTI ONS AS THUS STATED IN PART. THE
RTY EXIST ING
POWER WHOSE AUTHORITY OVER THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPE
TO PROTECT
VIA THE SOLE CORPORATION HAS THE PARAMOUNT RIGHT
9-of- 34

-·

'THE LIVES 9 HEALTHu MORALS, COMFORT AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE
PEOPLE WHICH INCLUDE HIS HOLY COMMONWEALTH WHO RESIDE WITHIN
ALL GLOBAL AND OR NATIONAL BORDERSr MQW~-~~Q~.-&-LQA~-AS~!W
v.-~AISQE~~r 290 UoS. 398, 54 ScCt. 231, 88 AaL.Rc 1481, 78
L.Ed. 413(U.S.1934 ); ~LLXQ~~-Y~-2Q ARQ-OE-£C~QQ ~-~~u~~E~a-OE
MACISGN-COW SG~~QA~EQ-SC MCQL£r--F3do- -, 2017 WL 5988226(7the Cir.
2017); ~OR~~-~ARQL I~A-A££!~-O~- EQYCA~QR£r- I~C9-Yv-S~A~E r 368
NoCo 777, 786 S.Ee2dc 25S(NoCo2016 )o SINCE THE KING-KHALIFAH
WAS NOT PARTY TO ANY OF THESE ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN QUESTION
DEALING WITH THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND YOUR COURTS HAD
NO CONSENT, THE RULINGS ARE VOID FOR FRAUD AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATION, GQRQGW-Y.-~v ~eCw-RE~AIL-~ RQURy-~WC.z FcSupp.3d., 2016
WL 4247738(DSC .2016); RE~Q-¥v-S~G-W A~ER-RE~QR~r -b~Cvr F.Supp 3d.,
0

2016 WL 2935891(DSC~ 2016); QAW-RXAW-~O b~OER£r-~~C~- ~.-CR~~A~
RIQGE-QE~~LQREMEW~r-IWC. 7 783 F3do g76, 91 Fed~ R~ SERV.3do
625(4th.Cir.2 015); WEAVER-Vv-MA££A~~U£~~~£r 137 S.Ct. 1899,
198 L.Eda2d. 420, 85 UoSoLeWo 4433(UoSe201 7); ~~R~~A-V,-~Q R~~
--Fed. Appx'--, 2017 WL 4176224(3rdo Cir.2017).
THE S5Co ATTORNEY GENERAL MUST RESPOND, NOT THE 4THB
CIRCUIT JUDGES OR YOUR CLERKS OR CASE MANAGERS ACTING AS PROXY
FOR THE JUDGES CONSPIRING UNDER COLOR OF LAW OR AUTHORITY IN
ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT TO ABSTAIN FROM ADDRESSING SUBSTANTIAL FEDERAL QUESTIONS TO CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS IN VIOLATION
OF 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 AND 1001 RENDERING ILLEGAL THESE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS. THE S.Co ATTORNEY GENERAL OR THE FEDERAL ATTORNEYS
MUST RESPOND AND DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY TIMELY SOUGHT TO DEFEAT
. ~HE DEFAULT AND VOIDING OF JURISDICTION DGNE BY AFFIDAVIT{S)
IN CASE 2013-CP~400- 0084 OR ALL RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, TITLES AND
IMMUNITIES STANDa IN SUCH, THE 4TH. CIRCUIT, NOR YOUR CLERKS
OR CASE MANAGERS ACTING AS PROXY FOR THE JUDGES CONSPIRING TO
CREATE AN INCOMPLETE RECORD AND CIRCUMVENT RULING, ABSTAINING
FROM ANSWERING FEDERAL QUESTION, NOR THE.STATE MAY EXCLUDE A
PERSON, NAMELY, THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN FIDUCIARY KING-KHALIFAH
WITH SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY, JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE POWER AND
AUTHORITY BY HIS ORIGINAL STATUS AS SUCH BEFORE THIS NATION
WAS FORMED, TO PRACTICE LAW (LAWGIVER OF GOD, ATTORNEY, JUDGE,
LEGISLATOR), OR ANY OTHER OCCUPATION GIVEN TO HIM BY "COVENANT",
l0-of-34

·J

"CONTRACT" (FIDUCIMY -KING-KHA LIFAH), IN A MANNER OR FOR REASONS
THAT CONTRAVENE THE DUE PROCESS POWER AND AUTHORITY GIVEN TO
HIM OR IN A MANNER THAT VIOLATES THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE
LAWS CLAUSE OR ARTICLE l SECTION 80 OR ARTICLE IV§ 2 OF THE
U.S. CONSTITUTION, ~!;:liWARE-1 .'~-~QARQ-Q i: ... li:XAWS-Qi:- ~W:i-S~A~li: -QE

u.s.

232, -r:, s.ct. 752, 64 A.L.R.2d. 288, 1 L.Edo2d.
796(U.S.1 957); ~Ar;;:•R~-v. -SUL~.~AW r 2017 WL 3710066(D .C.Nev.201 7);
U~R~~WlA- 2QARC-0~-M li:C•Gl~E-~. -~ACKRk£Q Wr 6~ Va. Appe 461, 796
~oW•r 353

S.E.2d. 866(2017) ; ~Q~-~~-ROG ER~~ 139 F.Supp.3do 120(D.C.C .2015);
SQ~~S-~~~Y •RG~~AA-2 ~v-G~-~AR- EXAMI~ER Sr 811 F.Supp~2d . 1260
(E.D.Va.2 011); ~~Ri:Z-v.-~ ~!ME5 ... Q.£~RIC~-G ~-CQ~UM2 XAr-l~C.r
F.Supp.3d ., 2016 WL 6124679(D .C.Mdo201 6); I~-Rli:~ ... QRli:E~r 980
F2d. 590(9th.C ir.1992). WE MOTION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT.
IT IS GRANTED.,
I, JAHJAH AL MAHDI, FULFILLED MY DUTY BY YOUR NATION'S
DUE PROCESS LAWS AND PEACEFULLY, AS A NON-COMBATANT, FILED LEGAL
ACTION TO ESTABLISH ALL RIGHTS, TITLES, PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES
e
I GAVE PROPER NOTICE AND PROPERLY SERVED ALL PARTIES INCLUDING
THE UNITED STATES AND BROUGHT THE MATTERS TO THEM UNDER CASE
2013-CP-4 00-0084 WHERE WE WERE SUBJECTED TO OUTRAGEOUS ACTS
OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND OBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE, WHERE THEY DEFAULTED AND JURISDICTI ON WAS MADE VOID
FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATION AND OTHE~ UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION,
THEREU~ON THAT CASE WAS REMOVED TO THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
WITHIN THESE PARALLEL CASES SUB-JUDIC E. THE PRIVILEGE AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE PROTECTS RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, TO INCLUDE OUT OF STATE
AND OR EVEN FOREIGN STATE CITIZENS IN THIS INSTANCE VIA THE
F.S.I.A. CONNECTIONS, TO PLY THEIR TRADE, PRACTICE THEIR OCCUPATION AND PURSUE A COMMON CALLING& IN THIS INSTANCE THE COMMON
CALLING OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE SOLE CORPORATION IS THAT OF PROPHET
, KING, KHALIFAH, IMAM, LAWGIVER AND HIGH PRIEST WITH SUPERSEDING
ATTORNEY, JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE POWER AND AUTHORITY AND THE
COURTS CANNOT IMPAIR THE KING-KHALIFAH ON ACCOUNT OF HIS OUT
OF STATE CITIZENSH IP ACTING FOR PROTECTORATE PURPOSES, W~2UR~E¥

~.-~QUW~r 569 u.s. 221, l33 s.ct. 1709, 185 L.Ed.2d. 758(u.s.
2013); WEWR¥-v.-U~RWQNXr 20fl7 WL 2167t23(2 017); SCHQ~~~~~~Q ·
v.-SCWWli::t,Cli:JiU4AWr 821 F3d. 27 3 (2nd. Cir. 201 6).,
)

11 -of-34

·-

NOW LETS WITH THIS FRAUD UPON
PRODUCED IN THE FORM OF CASE 17-753 2
6960 RENDERING THIS CASE VOID AND IN
DUE PROCESS VIOLA TION, WHICH INCLUDE

THE COURT THE 4THm CIRCU IT
AS THEY DID IN CASE 17FORFEITURE FOR FRAUD AND

ALL ORDERS PRODUCED THEREIN
MAKING THIS CASE ILLEGAL AND A CRIMINAL ACT TO PROCEED WITH
17IT AS FILED . THIS INCLUDE WHAT ASHLEY BROWNLEE DID IN CASE
7186. THIS IS CHALLENGE TO THE 4TH., ·CIRCU IT'S JURISD ICTION .
CIRJURISD ICTION LIES WITH TRUSTEE JUDGE AUSTIN WHERE THE 4TH.
R
CUIT'S JURISD ICTION IS LIMITED AND RESTRICTED., SUBJECT MATTE
JURISD ICTION IS RAISED IN BOTH CASES 17-753 2 AND 17-7i8 6 AS
IT WAS IN CASE 17-696 0 AND THIS CASE AND ALL PARALLEL CASES
...
SHALL NOT FAIL TO TAKE NOTICE. SEE EXHIB IT, "17-69 60"~
WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER A PERSON HAS STANDING TO SUE,
THE COURT MUST FOCUS ON THE STATUS OF THE PARTY WHO HAS FILED
E
THE COMPLAINTm BY THE PLEADINGS WITHIN THESE CASES TO INCLUD
MAHDI,
THOSE UNDER CASE 16-229 9, EXHIB IT, "TRUSTEE"., I, JAHJAH AL
ACT"
AM FOREIGN SOVEREIGN FIDUCIARY HEIR, KING, KHALIFAH BY "CONTR
.

WITH SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY, JUDICI AL AND LEGISLATIVE POWER AND
TED
AUTHORITY WHICH CANNOT BE MADE OR UNMADE BY THE COURTS PROTEC
ITIES
UNDER BOTH ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 AND THE PRIVIL EGE AND IMMUN
CLAUSE UNDER ARTICLE IV§ 2 OF THE U~S~ CONSTITUTION, WHERE
PLAIN ALL ACTS WHERE DONE SPECIF ICALLY TO THE KING AND THE OTHER
TIFFS WHO ARE BENEF ICIARI ES OF THE ,uTRUST", WHO SOUGHT TO AID
THE KING-KHALIFAH EXERCISE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS
WITH
IN VIOLATION OF 42 u.s.c. A. § 12203 (a)(b) OF THE AMERICANS
DISAB ILITIE S ACT. WHAT AND WHO I, JAHJAH AL MAHDI AM, AS WELL
PARALLEL
!.S MY HOLY COMMONWEALTH IS, THE PETI'lI ONERS IN THESE
11
APPEA LS, WAS ESTABLISHED BY "COVENANTvv, nCONTRACT BY MY, OUR,
BE
ORIGIN AL STATUS BEFORE THIS NATION WAS FORMED WHICH CANNOT
AND
UNMADE BY THE COURTS WITH EX POST FACTO LAW. THE FIDUCIARY
'

llQQI.S r
JUDIC IAL DUTY COMMAND'S IT, 29 U., S .c.A. § U 04; Sli?J;RS :S-ll.-SC
R~
--F.SU PP.3d .~-, 2017 WL 41747 74(DS C.20t7 ); ~J;~~~- ~~~R~- 2AMCQ
~.-gu~~ ~MO~~ ~ERx 132 S.Ct. 2459, 189 L~Ed. 2d. 457, 82 U.S.Le We

4578( U.S.20 14); BER~Z -~.-~H IW~S-Q I£~RIC ~-O~-~ OLQM 2~A-~~ C.r
QL~WA
F.Sup p.3d., 2016 WL 61246 79(D.C .Md.20 16); SCQ~~-~~~sou~H-~AR
8
2017 WL 87585 8(DSC .2017) ; w~~LE ~-~.-£~ AXURO r 2016 WL 395166
U.S.
(DSC. 2016); GRY~O -QA~A ~~UX-Y .-A~LA £-G~Q2 A~-GR QU~-L .~. 7 541
12-of- 34

UMX~~-~.
dc2 de 86 6(U .S. 20 04 ); LQ
124 S.C te 19 20 , 158 L.E
56 7,
(20 14 ); ~.£ .-Y .-~ ISD A~ Er
~~ -S~ A~ Esi · 65 F.S up p~ 3d . 19
uw ~~
); S~ ~~~ ~U ~-~ ~-A Y~ gR ~-R
200 7 WL 21 56 66 6(D SC .20 07
F.S up pe 2d
81
81 7, 184 L~ Ed .2d . 62 7,
~QiCA~-CiN~~Rr 133 Se Ct .
GIOWA~-W
~Q-~.-~~QQ&~r F.S up p.2 d., 2013
.L .W . 40 53 (U .S8 20 13 ); ~.zwA
u.s
0

,

WL 70 70 18 (D SC .20 13 }c
ER
CASE. 17 -69 60 , POSSESS SEV
E CASE 17 -75 32 , AS DID
TH
TO THE H
S THAT ARE NOT SUBJECT
AL STRUCTURAL DE FIC IEN CIE
FAT
VOID
SE 17 -75 32 AND 17 -71 86
OR DOCTRINE RENDERING CA
LESS ERR
TION ES TA BL IS
T AND DUE PROCESS VIOLA
FOR FRAUD UPON THE COUR
GRANTED BY DECREE OF THE
E BY SANCTIONS SOUGHT AND
FO RF EIT UR
ST , WE MOT
BAL THEOCRATIC COURTo FIR
CH IEF JU ST ICE OF THE GLO
TON, G ·',...GORY
Z, THACKER, DA VIS , HAMIL
THE RECUSAL OF JUDGES DIA
FOR
l86 . AS LO ~
H CASES 17 -75 32 AND 17 -7f
, DUNCAN AND SHEDD IN BOT
ALLE
N THESE AND THE OTHER PAR
OF THESE JUDGES SIT UPO
AS ANY
.
T VOIDS YOUR JU RIS DI ION
VE A STRUCTURAL ERROR THA
APPEALS YOU HA
RECORD:
RULED ON, ON THE COURT
THE ISS UE OF RECUSAL IS
UNTIL
OR § 22 54 , W
§ 19 83 , NOT A MANDAMUS
UNDER THE PR OV ISI ON S OF
CA S.
RT FIL ED THE APPEAL OF
TS OF FRAUD UPON THE coµ
YOU IN AC
THE FRAUD
INGS ARE ILLEGAL DUE TO
-75 32 UNDER. THE PROCEED
17
A
NG TH IS STRUCTURAL ERROR
USE CASE 17 -75 32 PO SSE SSI
AND BECA
UGS.
GES SIT . THE LANGUAGE THE
CASE 17 -71 86 IF THESE JUD
DO
,
~£¥LYAWlAt 136 s.c t. 18 99
USED IN WlLLlAM£-H.-~EW
PRE~E COURT
AR AND UNEQUIW. 43 59 (U eS e20 16 ) IS CLE
L.E d.2 de 13 2, 84 U.S .Ls
195
'
LY ADJUDICATED CASES ON
CLAR.ITY TO ALL PREVIOUS
VOCAL GIV ING
USAL IS MANDAPRONGS. IF ONE EX IST REC
.'
SU BJE CT o THERE ARE (3)
THE ,
URT,.
UNITED STATES SUPREME CO
THE LANGUAGE USED BY .fiiE
TO RY . WATCH
A CASE
N CASE NOR CAN A MAN TRY
N SHALL SIT UPON HIS OW
NO MA
SHALL HE SIT
EST IN THE OUTCOME NOR
TO WHICH HE HAS AN INTER
IONAL LE VE L.
RIS ES TO AN UNCONSTITUT
THE PO TE NT IAL FOR BIA S
IF
THE
E OUT OF MANY" EXAMPLES
ICI AL BIAS.WAS ONLY "ON
EX TR A-J UD
ADDRESSING.
RT WA§ REFERRING TO AND
UNITED STATES SUPREME COU
PHASIS
L BIA S noF ANY KIND" (EM
E OB JEC TIV E RIS K OF ACTUA
WHEN TH
L, UNDER THE DUE PROCESS
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVE
ADDED) RIS ES TO
OR BECOM"[N ]OT cr' A HARMLESS ERR
THE FAILURE TO RECUSE IS
CLAUSE,
ISD ICT ION
ICH VOIDS THE CO UR T'S JUR
STRUCTURAL IN NATURE WH
ING
E
9:1 7-c v-1 80 3-T MC SU BJU DIC
CESS VIO ILA TIO N. IN CASE
FOR DUE PRO
13 -of -34
1

. ,
E
S IS A COPY OF THE (44 ) PAG
AS IN THE PARALLEL APPEAL
AS WELL
THE 4T H.
, THE JUDGES SOUGHT WITHIN
MPLAINT. BY TH IS DOCUMENT
CO
REQUIRED
ELVES~ THE 4THo CIR CU IT IS
CIR CU IT MUST RECUSE THEMS
LL
0, ALL PARALLEL CASES, AS WE
DUE PROCESS LAW IN CASE 17- 696
BY
L
ON THE MOTION FOR RECUSA
17- 753 2 AND 17- 718 6 TO RULE
AS IN CASES
D§ 225 4
SOME FRAUDULENTLY PRODUCE
DER MANDAMUS, NOT UNDER
NOT UN
THESE PR OTO WHICH THEY ARE -PARTY ·To
AP PEA L, BUT UN DE R§ 198 3
WHICH MUST BE ADJUDICATED
EVEN VIA THE WRIT OF ERROR
CEEDINGS
IS IS DONE
SUBSEQUENT ACTION UNTIL TH
UN DE R§ 198 3., THUS, ANY
ION
VOIDS THE COURT'S JUR ISD ICT
A DUE PROCESS CLAIM THAT
CREATES
ER COLOR
N THE COURT CONSPIRING UND
BY THESE ACTS OF FRAUD UPO
TO
OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUS TIC E
AND OR AUTHORITY IN ACTS
OF LAW
TIALLY ORDERING
S FOR WRIT OF CE RT .,, POTEN
DENY US APPEALABLE ISS UE
G
CEEDING WITHOUT FIR ST RULIN
BE PARTY TO AN ILLEGAL PRO
US TO
4TH~ CIR CU IT
FOR RECUSALG FURTHER 6 THE
ON THE SUBMITTED MOTION
M AN N THE COURT TO ABSTAIN FRO
DITIONAL ACTS OF FRAUD UPO
IN AD
UE A RULE
, GETS JEN NIF ER RIC E TO ISS
SWERING FEDERAL QUESTION
PROCEEDINGS
3 AND 16- 214 1 WHEN THOSE
(d) NOTICE IN CASES 16- 195
40
ACH BY LAW. THE CO NS PIR ING
AND NO SUCH NOTICE CAN ATT
ARE ILLEGAL
A JUD GE /
6 USING ASHLEY BROWNLEE AS
GES THEN UNDER CASE 17- 718
JUD
IN ACTS OF
SWERING FEDERAL QUESTIONS
PROXY, _.TO ABSTAIN FROM AN
UMENT
FIL ING OF THE (70 ) PAGE DOC
UPON THE COURT, BLOCKS THE
FRAUD
INFORMAL BR IEF
ICH IS SUBSTITUTED AS THE
DATED OCTOBER 5, 201 7 WH
NG
S AND OBSTRUCT JUS TIC E USI
DENY US APPEALABLE ISS UE
TO AGAIN
ICI AL REVIEW
PREVENT FULL AND PROPER JUD
THESE CLERKS AS PROXY TO
PRO IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL
ISS UE S WITHIN THESE CASES
OF THE
NUAL FRAUD
o WE OBJECT TO TH IS CONTI
TECTION OF THE LAWS CLAUSE
S OF MACHINATION REQUIRING
4THG CIR CU IT JUDGES P~1D ACT
BY THESE
DUE TO SANCRE OF THE ISS UE S SOUGHT
TH EIR RECUSAL AND FORFEITU
THEO~
D BY DECREE OF THE GLOBAL
ICH ARE SOUGHT AND GRANTE
TIONS WH
EMBER 5,
MAHDI. SEE LETTER DATED DEC
CRATIC JUD GE , JAHJAH AL
-71 86 . IT IS SO ORDERED.
201 7 FIL ED IN CASE 17
ERAL
ABSTAIN FROM DECIDING FED
THE 4TH . CIR CU IT CANNOT
CONSPIRING
753 2 OR 17- 718 6 PROCEED
QUESTIONS BEFORE CASE 17APPEAL
RITY TO DENY US ISS UE S ON
COLOR OF LAW AND OR AUTHO
UNDER
TION AND FOR
ION FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLA
WHICH VOID YOUR JUR ISD ICT
P USING
N OF THE LAWS CLAUSEG STO
N OF THE EQUAL PROTECTIO
VIOLATIO
14 -of -34

TO SK IR T
AS PROXY, AS JUDGES
AND CASE MANAGERS
~I CI AL
TH ES E CLERKS
ON AND ARBITRARY JU
ABUSES OF DI SC RE TI
UR
RU LI NG , TO HI DE YO
RULING ON
S OF OF FI CE . STOP
AT IO N OF YOUR OATH
US
AC TI ON IN VI OL
FOR APPEAL. A MANDAM
BSTITUTING MANDAMUS
ISSUES OF APPEAL SU
SE MANAGERS
D THE CLERKS OR CA
TE FOR AN APPEAL AN
TE
CANNOT SU BS TI TU
MACHINATION TO CREA
A JUDGE IN ACTS OF
FOR
CANNOT SU BS TI TU TE
ST AI NI NG
PEALABLE IS SU ES , AB
CORD AND DENY US AP
E
AN INCOMPLETE RE
IN VIOLATION OF DU
FEDERAL QUESTIONS
UCIAL
FROM RULING ON CR
RC UI T JU DG ES
NS AND THE 4T H. CI
MOTION FOR SANCTIO
PROCESS LAW .. WE
CLEARLY ES TA BL ISH ED
ARE IN VIOLATION OF
L& YOU
IN QUESTION RECUSA
OF OF FI CE
WELL AS YOUR OATHS
II I SE CT IO N 1, AS
ST AT UT ES , AR TI CL E
CLEARLY ES TA BL ISH ED
INAL IN DEFIANCE TO
. CRIM
CLERKS
MAKING YOUR ACTIONS
FI CE HAVING THESE
AND THAT OATH OF OF
LE GI SL AT IV E IN TE NT
LL REVIEW IN
NDER AND IMPEDE FU
JUDGES TO BLOCK, HI
ACTING AS
86 -A a
(2 ), 19 85 (3 ) AND 19
U~ S.C e § 19 83 , .19 85
S~ S
.
VI OL AT IO N OF 42
-R QN -~ A~ R- ~~ ~~ R~ R4
2 AND 10 01 , Y. 5.- ~.
ᤤ 24
WELL AS 18 U. S. Ce
S. 19 89 );
10 3 L. Ed .2 d. 29 0( 0.
5, 11 9 s. ct . 10 27 ,
1~ ~. T 48 9 u. s. 23
44 04 26 9( 20 17 ); ~A ~E
~z --B oR .-- , 20 17 WL
-~ L~
(0 .S .
~~ -R E~ -A RG O- ~R ~C IX 7
49 8, 92 S. Ct . 17 49
'
&~W•~~~A~r 40 6 U9 S.
CARR•~R-ASS!W-~v-W
Su pp .3 d. 58 2, 20 14

-

20 -u .~ .-~ ~R RE ~C Xr

9 F.

19 72 ); u. s.- v. -$ 4~ yJ
~- 0~ -S EN A~L ~A ~~ -S R~ E~ ~- 2R IE
WL 10 29 1 u.s q- +A ~~
~I ~~ T
WL 12 66 24 0; 19 97
~.r i EQ RR ES ~~ R- ~.- W
OM -~U YR M QN ~-~ ~0 -A
y-S ~R
~Q RS -G R• ~-~ .-W A~ CM
IA M -~ .-A ~~ E~ r 46 6
s. ct . 53 8( U. S. 19 88 ); ~g ~~
48 4 u. s. 21 9, 10 8
L. Ed .,2 d. 56 5
s. ct . 19 70 , 1.9 71 -1 98 2, 80
u. s. 52_2, 53 6- 54 3, 10 4
Ed . 67 6
33 9, 34 8- j4 9, 25 L.
~R Q~ W ~A z 10 0 U. S.
(1 98 4) ; ~~ -~A R~ ~-~
~ 63 s. ct .
~-ASS~~T 39 1 u. s. 21
E-~.-~YARQRA~~Q-WlI..
px '
(1 88 0) ; ROCU
I..:&.IAM.Sr 381 Fe d. Ap
(U .S .l9 43 ); l:~-RE.;.-W~
~~ E~ g
93 8, 87 L. Ed . fl1 85

8( 4t h~ Ci rQ 20 10
28 4, 20 10 WL 22 31 ~5
1, E. D. Va ••
15 WL 11 10 94 97 , *

O); W ~L L~ AW S- Y9 -u~ i~~

£~

20

DETERMINED BY
TION OF RECUSAL AS
MUCH, ON THE QUES
INAS
R A JUDGE
11
ASKS '[N ]O T' WHETHE
COURT. THE COURT
AL
THE U. S. SUPREME
JU DI CI AL OR PERSON
(FOR EXAMPLE EXTRA
BI AS
RTED
HARBORS AN ACTUAL
PIR IN G JUDGES ASSE
SC RE TI ON THE CO NS
E OF DI
ETHER
BI AS AS IN AN ABUS
(EMPHASIS ADDED) WH
AU D) , BUT 'IN ST EA D'
FR
IN TH EI R ACTS OF
FOR BI AS OF
IS A '[P ]O TE NT IA L'
CT IV E MATTER THERE
ON AL ~
'I
, AS AN OB JE
TO AN UN CO NS TI TU TI
ADDED) THAT RI SE S
"ANY KIND" (E MP HA SIS
NAL LEVEL
CH AN UNCONSTITUTIO
CONSPICUOUS TH~T SU
LE VE L" , WHICH IS
15 -o f- 34

S AS IS
EL AND RELATED CASE
IS T IN THESE PARALL
OF' ·B IA S Db ES EX
CONCERN,
ING THESE JUDGES OF
WHAT OCCURRED INVOLV
EVIDENCED BY
17 -7 53 2
LENTLY FIL ED UNDER
TH IS CASE IS FRAUDU
WHICH INCLUDE HOW
6, ATTEMPTING
NLEE IN CASE 17 -7 18
ES USING ASHLEY BROW
A
AND THE JUDG
LSON TO FI LE IN FORM
ULATE CHRISTOPHER WI
NIP
TO FRAUDULENTLY MA
THEM
THE PLRA LANGUAGE ON
NTS THAT DO NOT HAVE
T
PA UP ER IS DOCUME
G AS LEGISLATORS, NO
CTURAL ERROR, ACTIN
STRU
TO CIRCUMVENT THE
LI NG
Y DETERMINED THAT FI
E LEGISLATORS CLEARL
N
JU DG ES , WHERE TH
THE PLRA, TO AB ST AI
BE DONE PURSUANT TO
MUST
BEFORE TH IS COURT
Y OF
THE CONSTITUTIONALIT
E SP EC IF IC ISS UE OF
FROM RULING ON TH
THESE CASES
D THE AEDPA 6 BEFORE
IS IO NS , THE PLRA AN
THESE PR OV
S ARE
ESS LAW OR THE CASE
REQUIRED BY DUE PROC
PROCEED. TH IS IS
E IN CLEAR
AND CASE MANAGERS AR
THE JU DG ES , CLERKS
ILL EG AL AND
D
D UPON THE COURT AN
OATH OF OF FIC Ec FRAU
VI OL AT IO N OF TH EI R
TO ADDRESS
ERROR IS NOW FIL ED
ERROR EX IS T. WRIT OF
STRUCTURAL
Y SU BDE R§ 19 83 BEFORE AN
TION FOR RECUSAL UN
IT . RULE ON THE MO
EGAL AND VO ID
PROCEEDINGS ARE ILL
TTER OCCURS OR ALL
SEQUENT MA
AP PE AL S,
R PENDING PARALLEL
17 -7 53 2 AND ALL OTHE
UNDER 17 -7 18 6,
S. Ct "
55_6 U., S. 86 8 u 12 9
X- CQ A. t,-C Q, ,.,. ..,I ~~ .,.
AS SE
CA 1¢E A~ Q~ -ll .. -A .~. -M
SQNr 20 16
; ~QMW£QW-Y.-S~EY~N
s2 d. 12 08 (U .S .2 00 9)
22 52 , 17 3 L. Ed
QMI~lUM£-lNCo-~•-W~AbE~
~EWWOG~-GARQRWS-~QNC
WL 11 56 64 9( DS C. 20 16 );
-~~
11+ (M d.2 01 6) ; ~ACRE£
20 16 WL 67 88 85 2u *
~R Q~ E~ Xi ES -~~ C• r
15 ); ~
Ap px ' 79 (3 rd .C ira 20
ERAL-U~£•r 61 5 Fe do
t6 );
A~~ORWEX-GE~
WL 71 77 61 5( D. M d. 20
~-~ OR ~Q ~A ~I QN r 20 16
RE .-S X~ ~A X. ~~ .~~ lA
52 4( Do OH I0 .20 16 ).
-~U ~O Xr 20 16 WL 61 08
i

1~ -R E~

,
11
11
THESE RAT, ST IN KI NG
ING THE STAKE IN
LETS FI NI SH DRIV
THE
CORRUPT JUDGES
WHAT'S GOING ON HERE
VAMPIRES HE AR TS .
AND STUNT
UP ID CRIMINAL MESS
TH IS IS THE SAME ST
4T H. CI RC UI T?
R
THE EN TIR E CASE UNDE
UNDER CASE 17 -6 96 00
YOU JUDGES PULLED
ERE IS THE
NDERING IT VO ID . WH
RRUPTED BY FRAUD RE
17 -7 53 2. IS CO
IN FORMA
ERE ARE THE FI LI NG
R CASE 17 -7 53 2? WH
FI LI NG FE E PA ID FO
T REQUIRE
17 -6 96 0, YOU DID NO
CUMENTS? AS IN CASE
PA UP ER IS DO
EN , THE
WHICH WE HAVE NOT SE
-7 53 2. IF YOU DIDu
S
SUCH FOR CASE 17
2 AS IT DOES IN CASE
EX IST IN CASE 17 -7 53
ROR
SAME STRUCTURAL ER
PENDING
R PARALLEL APPEALS
17 -6 92 5 AND THE OTHE
17 -6 96 0, 17 -6 69 3,
FRAUD THAT
PERSPICUOUS IN YOUR
E 4T H. CI RC UI T. IT S
BEFORE TH
IS
PLRA IN FORMA PAUPER
SO WE ATTACHED THE
YOU MADE A MI ST AK E.

or

16 -o f-3 4

WE DON'T
DOCUMENTS FOR THIS CASE TO HELP YOU OUT A LITTL E BIT.
STEP,
WANT YOU TO FALL AND BUMP YOUR HEAD., WATCH THAT FIRST
THE FRAUD
ITS A "DOOS EY". NOW RULE ON THE DOGGON' ISSUE S!!! STOP
17-75 32
AND FOOL ISHNE SS. IT IS SO ORDERED. THE COURT UNDER CASE
THE
AS IN CASE 17-69 60 DID NOT ISSUE ANY ORDER STATING THAT
EST INFILIN G FEES WERE WAIVED. THIS IS CLEAR ERROR AND MANIF
PLAIN ERROR
JUSTI CE. THIS CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION AND
THAT SUCH
BY YOUR FRAUD AND MACHINATION. UNLESS THE COURT RULES
COURT
A FILIN G FEE OR FORMS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, WHICH THE
VIOLATION
DID NOT DO. THE COURT CANNOT ACT AS A LEGISLATOR IN
LEGIS LATIV E
OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE AND UNDO A CLEAR
JUDGES
ENACTMENT REQUIRED FOR FILIN G WITHIN THIS COURT. THE
DUE PROCESS
ARE NOT LEGISLATORS WHICH VOID YOUR JURIS DICTI ON FOR
s.ct. ,310,
VIOLA TION. WE OBJEC T, ~A~K-MA~KAZ~-Y~-R~~ERSQ~~ 136
5~Q~r
194 L.Ed .2d. 463, 84 U.S.L .W. 4222( UoS~ 2016) ; U~~9- ~v-aA
818 F3d. 651(1 1th.C ir.20 16).
1
IT IS NOT THE 4TH. CIRCU IT S OR ANY COURT'S PLACE TO
WHERE ·CHANGE THE MEANING OF A CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS STATUTE;
YS A CLEAR
STATUTE' S LANGUAGE IS PLAIN AND UNAMBIGUOUS, AND CONVE
ARE
AND DEFIN ITE MEANING, RULES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
ER MEANING.
NOT NEEDED AND THE COURT HAS NO RIGHT TO IMPOSE ANOTH
IS CONSIDERED
WHAT THE LEGISLATORS SAY IN THE TEXT OF THE STATUTE
S~A~E
THE BEST EVIDENCE OF THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT AND WILL,
R-~.-~ ~~Lr
Vv-M~LE~ 7 --S.E .2d.- -, 2017 WL 36116 94(S. C.201 7)~ £IGNG
419 s.c.
s.E.2 d, 2017 WL 11771 1(SGC .2017) ;~£M~ ~w-~. -~~RR A~Xr
C~-~. -~AR£ l~~
548, 799 SeE.2 d. 479(S .C.20 17); 5~AR -A~~E ~E~IC Ar-~~
ss ~.s.L .W.
:JQ~J;W C-u:, 137 s.ct. 1002, 197 LQEd. ,2d. ·354·,

.e_:RAI

136 s.ct.
4139( U.S.2 017); ~~~.W Q-WQ ~OR-C A~Sr-L L~~-~ 9-~A~ ARRQ r
2117, 195 L.Ed .2d. 382, 84 U.S.L aW. 4424.
BY THAT WHICH WAS SET IN PLACE BY THE LEGISLATURE THE
00 BE
4THo CIRCU IT RULES AND DUE REQUIRE THAT A FEE OF $505.
TO FILE
PAID OR 28 U.S.C . § 1915( a)(1) REQUIRES AN AFFIDAVIT
CAN PROCEED.
IN FORMA PAUPERIS TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE ANY MATTER
BY SENDING
THIS IS JURIS DICTI ONAL , SO WE DECIDED TO HELP YOU OUT
THE COURT
THE ONES ATTACHED. JUST LIKE THE COURT UNDER 17-69 60;
ABOUT
UNDER CASE 17-75 32 IS PROHIBITED FROM SAYING ANYTHING
17-of -34

.

'::-•

THIS CASE. THE RULES ARE SUSPENDED FOR CASE 17-7532 AS IT IS
ALSO FOR CASE 17- 71 8 6. IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION UNDER CASE 17-753 2
UNLESS YOU HAVE ENTERED AND SERVED UPON US AN ORDER WAIVING
THE FILING FEES EXPLAINING WHY (EMPHASIS ADDED) SUCH FEES WERE
WAIVED. WE GIVE YOU JUDICIA L NOTICE . SINCE THE DOCUMENTS FOR
FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS ARE NOW ATTACHED FOR BOTH CASES 177532 AND 17-718 6, THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PLRA AND THE
AEDPA MUST BE ADDRESSED ON THE COURT RECORD BEFORE THESE CASES
CAN PROCEED OR THE PROCEEDINGS BECOME ILLEG.AL. BY THIS FAILUR E
THE COURT ACTED AS A LEGISLATOR, NOT A JUDGE, OVERRULING CONGRESS
WITHOUT A PROPER JUDICIA L DETERMINATION EXPLAINING "WHY", WHICH
VOIDS YOUR JURISD ICTION FOR FRAUD AND DUE .PROCESS VIOLAT ION.
THIS IS A JURISDI CTIONA L DEFECT, u.a.-U~- RQW-~ A~~-~N ~ER~2I SES
S.1989 );
J;NC ... r 489 u.s. 235, 119 s .. ct. 10~1,-1 03 L.Ed.2 d. 290(U.
~N-R~~ -ARGO -CR~CL ~r-LL~. r--B.R .. --v 2017 WL 440426 9(2017 ); U~l~~C
S~A~~S -Y~-S~E -2R~-~W X~R~RI S~S-~~~ ~r 2017 WL 422687 3(D.C.O HIO.
2017); ~WGW~SOW-R.-~INWr 2016 WL· 572436 9(2016 ); ~A~~R- ~.-0W~W Sr
2014 WL 115962 9; IW-RE~-QYRQ£ERr 2015 WL 406824 3(N.D.2 015);
£~GWE-~ ... -2AW~-G~-W~W~~QRK-M~~~QW-W.A~r 2014 WL 61480; ~GRi~~
~.-GOM MJ;SSlQ N-0~-SQ ~J;A~-S ~C~r 32 FcSupp .3d. 157; E~~A~WA~lQ~
R.-2Rll l~Xr 2015 WL 7078682 (N .. D.N .. Y.2015 ); WE£~-Y .-U~I~~ Q-S~A~ E5r
2016 WL 537578 2(2016 ); MQG~~- ~v-~~Q~ G~A-~A ~•E•C-C QR~QRA ~~GWt
F.Supp .3d., 2015 WL 930?30 7(2015 ); IW-RE~-~~~ACEr 535 B.R. 329
(2015) ; ~LA~E~ ~-Y.-WA RQr 738 F3d. 607(4t h.Cir.2 013). WE MOTION
FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT BRIEF AND THE COURT RULE
ON THESE ISSUES UNDER CASE 17-7532 BEFORE ANY I~JFORMAL BRIEF
BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. THE 4TH. CIRCUIT CANNOT ABSTAIN
FROM ANSWERING FEDERAL QUESTIONS OR ORDER US TO BE PARTY IN
AN ILLEGAL PROCEEDING, ~AK~-~A RR~ER- A£5!W-~ ~-Ma~M •~~XAW r 406
u.s. 498, 92 s.ct. 1749(U .S.i972 ); Q..,S9-~... -$~~r~2 0-U.S.- ~URR~ ~C~r
9 F.Supp .3d. 582, 2014 WL 126624 0; 2RQWW -Y.-g.s. r 2014 WL 2871398
(DSC.2 014); 1997 WL 10291 u.£.~A~ ~~~~A~ ~-2R•~~ +-2R~~ ~-Oli:-U .s.
s~~A~QR S-QRJ;w _c;._._l,l A~Cllr-S ~RQW... ~lU.IRMQ NG-E'l!.., ... AI..:r; li:QRRli:S ~~R-ll.,.
WW~~~T 484 U.S. 219, 108 S.Ct. 538(Uo S.1988 ); ~U~~•AW-Vw-A~~~Wr

466 U.S. 522, 536-54 3, 104 S.Cta 1970u 1977-1 982, 80 L.Ed~2 d.
565(19 84); SA~CUS ... u .... WARCUA~~T 2014 WL 133098 4(DSC. 2014);
18-of-3 4

~

80 ).
34 9, 25 La Ed ~ 67 6( 18
~A r 10 0 U. S. 33 9, 34 8~A R~ ~-~ XR ~lW
PEAL UNDER
YOU TO LOOK AT THE AP
GO FURTHER. I WANT
LE TS
FFERENCE IN
-7 53 2. WHAT'S THE DI
-7 18 6, 17 -6 96 0 AND 17
CASES 17
OF
RC UI T JUDGES IN ACTS
S BE SID ES THE 4TH~ CI
TH ES E (3 ) APPEAL
(7 0) PAGE
PROXY TO BLOCK THE
G ASHLEY BROWNLEE. AS
FRAUD US IN
E
NS PIR IN G TO MANIPULAT
TOBER 5 1 20 17 AND CO
DOCUMENT DATED OC
FORMA PA UP ER IS DOCU
DI FF ER EN T FIL IN G IN
OUT
WILSON IN TO FIL LI NG
E PL RA
NSTITUTIONALITY OF TH
ENT RULING ON THE CO
MENTS TO CIRCUMV
CTURE OF TH E
IS NOTHINGo THE STRU
DPA? THE ANSWER, •• •
AND THE AE
E
SAME. SO THEN WHAT TH
ARE ESSENTIALLY THE
CASES SU B- JU DI CE
AND ti7 -7 53 2
UNDER CASES 17 -6 96 0
ESE CORRUPT JUDGES
HECK DO TH
17 BEAS CORPUS AND CASE
ESE CASES FIL ED AS HA
DOING HAVING TH
IF CASE 17 A § 19 83 AC TIO N? AND
SE NT IA LL Y FIL ED AS
71 86 IS ES
RE McFADDEN IS LIS TE D AS
CORPUS WHICH IS WHY
75 32 IS A HABEAS
DER CASE
WITHIN THE RECORD UN
Y IS IT NOT LIS TE D
SP ON DE NT . WH
ANCE
L IS MAKING AN APPEAR
S. C. ATTORNEY GENERA
17 -7 53 2 THAT THE
IN CASE 17 E REQUIRED TO APPEAR
17 -6 96 0? IF THEY AR
AS IN CASE
E
UNDER CASE a7 -7 53 2 DU
E REQUIRED TO APPEAR
69 60 , _THEN THEY AR
JU ST IC E
DECREE OF THE CH IEF
IT IS SO ORDERED, BY
TO YOUR FRAUD.
ATIC COURT.
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCR
2 IS THE SAME
SWER FOR CASE 17 -7 53
NO NE TH EL ES S, THE AN
TH EIR
SIN CE THEY FA ILE D IN
0~ THE 4THo CI RC UI T,
FOR CASE 17 -6 96
IS TO USE CA SE
17 -6 96 0 TH EIR PLAN
MACHINATION IN CASE
ACTS OF
R CASE 17 ASHLEY BROW,NLEE UNDE
THE ACTIONS DONE BY
17 -7 53 2 AND
K
INCORRECTLY AND BLOC
FIL IN G THE CA SE (S}
BY
71 86 TO DEFRAUD US
20 17 FROM
NT DATED OCTOBER 5 1
THE (7 0) PAGE DOCUME
THE FIL IN G OF
OF
E CO NS TIT UT IO NA LIT Y
CUMVENT RULING ON TH
BE IN G FIL ED AND CIR
LI NG OUT
ATING WILSON INTO FIL
FRAUDULENTLY MANIPUL
THE PLRA BY
M
MENTS TO ABSTAIN FRO
FORMA PA UP ER IS DOCU
DI FF ER EN T FIL IN G IN
THE 4T H.
EXPECTED US TO ENTER
E IS SU E. THEY NEVER
RULING ON TH
ICH
SES THAT FOLLOWED WH
GE OF SUBSEQUENT CA
LU
CI RC UI T WITH THE DE
D AND
11
HT AND PROVE THE FRAU
11
A MARKER TO HI GH LIG
CAN NOW ACT AS
ERKS,
CI RC UI T PA RT IE S, CL
PIRED IN BY THE 4T H.
CR IM IN AL IN TE NT CONS
RTS TO
CUSED IN TH EIR EFFO
AND, JUDGES SOUGHT RE
CASE MANAGERS
THEY KNEW
E CASES AVOID SU IT~
E DEFENDANTS IN THES
PR OT EC T TH
22 54 ,
NOT WARRANTED UN DE R§
OF JU DG ES . SUCH IS
WE SOUGHT RECUSAL
0

19 -o f-3 4

ER§ 1983 AND THEY WANTED
BUT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED UND
WERE SITT ING UPON THE IR
TO CONCEAL THE MATERIAL FACT THAT THEY
§§ 242 AND 1001 MAKING CASE
OWN CASES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S .C.
REMENTIONEDe WE ARE SEEKING
17-7 532 ILLEGAL LIKE THE OTHERS AFO
AS RULER OF THE UNITED
REPARATIONS FOR SLAVERY AND JIM CROW
AL THRONES; WE ARE SEEKING
ETH IOPI AN EMP IRE, ONE OF THE (4) GLOB
SECTION 10 AND ARTICLE IV
REL IEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 1
OF THE HOBBS ACT, 28
§ 2 OF THE U.S . CONSTITUTION; VIOLATIONS
, THE RICO ACT
u.s .c. § 267 9, THE F.So ieA o, THE CaAcTo TREATY
ISSUES WHICH COULD NOT HAVE
AND OATH OF OFF ICE AND OTH ER§ 1983
OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT
BEEN GRANTED UND ER§ 2254 e SO IN ACTS
UNDER CASE 17-6 960 , THEY
AND MACHINATION, JUST LIKE YOU DID
532 TO DEFRAUD US AND
ESTABLISHED THE APPEAL UNDER CASE 17-7
OF THE ESSENTIAL ISSU ES
PREVENT FAIR v PROPER AND FULL REVIEW
AL, NOT JUST UNDER CASE 17BEFORE THE COURT BY FILI NG THE APPE
A§ 2254 ACTION AS OPPOSED
696 9, BUT ALSO UNDER CASE 17-7 532 AS
CASE 17-7 186 CONSPIRED
TO A§ 198 3 WHILE ASHLEY BROWNLEE IN
DOCUMENT DATED OCTOBER
TO BLOCK THE FILI NG OF THE (70) PAGE
5, 201 7. WE OBJ ECT .
ANYTHINGe STAY
WE OBJECT TO CASE 17-7 532 'S USAGE FOR
ORDERED. THE ENTIRE CASE
THESE CASES AS WE SOUGHT. IT IS SO
, DUE TO ASHLEY BROWNLEE'S
UNDER BOTH CASE 17-7 532 AND 17-7 186
CIRC UIT JUDGES ARE CORRUPTED
RECENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THE 4THm
S STAND IN EGREGIOUS VIO LABY FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND THE CASE
PRODUCED TO CONCEAL THE MATERTION OF 18 u.s. cG §§ 242 AND 1001
JASON M. GOURDINE DID NOT
IAL FACT THAT THE KING-KHALIFAH AND
2254 AND BROWNLEE, AC'rING
:2NTER THE U.S . DIST RIC T COURT UNDER§
G THE FILI NG OF THE (70)
AS PROXY FOR THESE JUDGES IS BLOCKIN
AND TRYING TO MANIPULATE
PAGE DOCUMENT DATED OCTOBER 5, 2017
IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS
WILSON INTO FILL ING OUT DIFFERENT
FEDERAL QUESTION. THE CASE
TO CIRCUMVENT OR ABSTAIN RULING ON
IN THE DIST RICT COURT PURSUB -JUD ICE UNDER 17-7 532 WAS ENTERED
MANDATES OF THE ALL WRITS
SUANT TO WRIT OF ERROR WHICH BY THE
D UND ER§ 1983 NOT § 225 4,
ACT OF 28 U.Sa C• § 1651 MUST BE HEAR
OR AUTHORITY TO DENY US THE
CON SPIR ING UNDER COLOR OF LAW AND
ECTORATE PURPOSES AND BEHIND
EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.FOR PROT
QAM £-Y. -CA L~~ QR~ iA-~ ~s~i ~u~~ Q~
REL IGIO US AND RACIAL HATRED, ~Ag L-A
20-o f-34

,.

~U~~~~r~-OR-MQMELAWO-SE
~o~i-~~-QE~AR~MEW
4; CQNA
F3 dc 93 (4 th .
, 20 16 WL 64 64 44
g. £~ -~ o~ ~A RE x 82 0
20 16 WL 17 55 87 1;
6 1 S JU R IS -- F .S up p. 3d .- -,
-7 53 2 AND 17 -7 18
(S ) 17
VOIDS BOTH CA SE
ION PL A C ir .2 01 6) TH IS
E PROCESS VIOLAT
THE COURT AND DU
,
D UPON
RED,
'
DI CT IO N FOR FRAU
. IT IS SO ORDE
L RE LI EF SOUGHT
EITURE FOR AL
C~Ar
CING YOU IN FORF
; U.S9-R.~A~EOEK
~3 28 0( D SC o2 01 4)
20 14 WL 15
., 20 07
W ~I ~~ -R .-W A ~I Sr
-Y ~£ •r Fa Su pp Q 2d
d. 20 10 ); M U~ X- R~
D aC .M
20 10 WL 40 54 26 7(
.2 00 7) .
WL 51 31 71 6( D SC
NG
ES, EVEN CONSPIRI
RI CT COURT JUDG
ST
ONCE THE UQ S. DI
IN ACTS OF FRAUD
RC UI T, ENGAGED
HIN THE 4TH. CI
STRUCTION
WITH PA RT IE S WIT
NSPIRACY AND OB
ON, CRIMINAL CO
MACHINATI
IONS OF
UPON THE COURT,
OF OF FI CE , VIOLAT
NS OF THEIR OATH
ATIO
IONS
OF JU ST IC E, VIOL
. CO NS T. , VIOLAT
AND 2 OF THE U .S
IONS 1
ARTICLE II I SECT
IGN SOVEREIGN IM
TREATY, THE FORE
THE C .A .T e
D, BY
OF THE RICO ACT,
IONS OF LAW CI TE
AND OTHER PROVIS
A .D .A .
MUNITY ACT, THE
T ORIGINALLY FI LE
ER THAT WE DID NO
SES IN A MANN
SES
ESTABLISHING CA
SI TT IN G UPON CA
ED PROCEEDINGS,
·ouR INTEND
AS
THEM, ALTERING
POTENTIAL FOR BI
OR TO WHICH THE
E DEFENDANTS
PREME
TO WHICH THEY AR
ATION OF U .S . SU
AL LEVEL IN VIOL
CE
NSTITUTION
OPERTY AND EVIDEN
RI SE S TO AN UNCO
RITS OF ERROR, PR
SPOLIATING W
v- 29 39 ,
COURT PRECEDENT,
ATE CASE 4: 16 -c
TO TIMELY REINST
OUR RIGHT
WITH
ALSO TO PREVENT
ORDER, CONSPIRING
HIN (1 0) DAYS OF
WIT
S
31 01 -3 10 7- M BS -T ER
PT. OF CORRECTION
AND THE S. Cc DE
EY GENERAL
THONY COOK
THE S. C o ATTORN
-KHALIFAH AND AN
ANSPORT THE KING
AND TR
THE
TO NOT PI CK UP
-C P- 40 0- 00 84 FOR
UNDER CASE 20 13
OCEEDINGS
THEY CAN
TO THE STATE PR
ECTIVE ORDERS SO
FRAUDULENT PROT
INING
ING
PURPOSE OF OBTA
EEDINGS, INSTRUCT
ESE FEDERAL PROC
WITHIN TH
DOCUMENT
'MAKE USE OF THEM
OF THE {7 0) PAGE
OBSTRUCT FI LI N G
TO
ANIPUASHLEY BROWNLEE
ATTEMPTING TO M
CASE 17 -7 18 6 AND
20 17 IN
PAUPERIS
DATED OCTOBER 5,
FI LI N G IN FORMA
G OUT DIFFERENT
LL IN
T AROUND
LATE HIM INTO FI
L IS SU ES AND GE
LING ON ESSENTIA
UMVENT RU
IF ER RI CE
DOCUMENTS TO CIRC
USE OF PLRA, JE NN
R THAT EX IS T BY
ERRO
EEDINGS
THE STRUCTURAL
TO ILLEGAL PROC
LE 40 (d ) NOTICE
ICAL
TACH A RU
S. C .D .C o IN PHYS
CONSPIRING TO AT
14 1, INSTRUCTING
95 3 AND 16 -2
THE COURTS
UNDER CASES 16 -1
EDED TO ACCESS
YING PROPERTY NE
, DESTRO
ATTACKS UPON US
IDENCE AND LEGAL
KE COPIES OF EV
.D .C . NOT TO MA
DOCUAND TELLING S. C
IS EVIDENCE AND
S TO PREVENT TH
NY INJUNCTION
DOCUMENTS OR DE
8

~

21 -o f- 34

FRAUDULENT
ERAL COURTS COULD PRODUCE
MENTS SUB MIS SIO N SO THE FED
IN VIO LAT ION
DATIONS OR DETERMINATIONS,
REPORTS, ORDERS, RECOMMEN
OF THE
1 AS WELL AS IN VIOLATION
OF 18 U., S.C . §§ 242 AND 100
EGULAR
IN TH EIR TOTALITY BECAME IRR
HOBBS AC T. THE PROCEEDINGS
DIS AB ILI TY
WRIT OF ERROR. WHERE CIV IL
AND INV AL ID WARRANTING THE
ENTAL
THE ILLEGAL DEPRIVING OF PAR
IN TH IS CASE EX IST SUCH AS
COURTS
IGN KING-KHALIFAH, WHERE ALL
RIGHTS OF A FOREIGN SOVERE
LIFAH
JAH AL MAHDI, THE KING-KHA
REPEATEDLY TOLD THAT I, JAH
WERE
NS HIP
NS HIP AND ADOPT THE CIT IZE
DENOUNCE HIS AMERICAN CIT IZE
ID OF THE SOLE CORPORATION
ISR AE LI FOREFATHER KING DAV
OF HIS
ER
THRONE OF ISRAEL AND THE OTH
AS THE FID UC IAR Y HE IR TO THE
LA OF SOVEREIGN RIGHTS IN VIO
BAL THRONES, THE DEPRIVING
(3) GLO
NDENCE
ED BY DECLARATION OF INDEPE
TION OF THE F.S .I Ag DECLAR
G
TO INCLUDE THE EST AB LIS HIN
IN CASE 201 3-C P-4 00- 008 4,
FIL ED
AIRED
CIARY RIGHTS WHERE THEY IMP
BEFORE THE COURT THE BENEFI
11
IN VIO LA T", 11 COVENANT , "COMPACT"
OBLIGATION OF THE "CONTRAC
THE
LATING RIGHTS
\0 OF THE UoS • CO NST ., VIO
TION OF AR TIC LE 1 SECTION
ARTICLE
E AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF
ABLISHED UNDER THE PRI VIL EG
EST
ING AND
EGAL ARRESTING AND OR ATTACH
IV § 2, AS WELL AS THE ILL
PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF THE
CUTING OF OUR INTELLECTUAL
OR EXE
IN THE FORM
BY THE iuGRANT", "CONTRACT"
RES TRI CTI ON S ESTABLISHED
ITES
R NATIONS GAVE THESE SODOM
RIG HT TO LEGALLY MARRY YOU
OF THE
ING INT ER UED IN CASE 16- 229 9 EFF ECT
AND GOMORRAHRITES AS IS ARG
LISHED
OF THE HOBBS ACT; ALL ESTAB
STATE COMMERCE IN VIOLATION
FROM CASE
COLLATERAL ~ST OPP EL EMERGING
BY CONTRACT, DEFAULT AND
1
WAS
KING-KHALIFAH S CONVICTION
P-4 00- 008 4; AND WHERE THE
201 3-C
THE SUP PRE SUCTURAL ERROR, TO INCLUDE
OBTAINED BY FUNDAMENTAL STR
NG STATE
INNOCENCE AND THE CONSPIRI
SIO N OF EVIDENCE OF ACTUAL
IN THE
THE BENEFICIARY PLA INT IFF S
AND FEDERAL ACTORS ATTACKED
ALIATION
DUE PROCESS MATTERS IN RET
PARALLEL AND RELATED CASES
TUTIONALLY
HIM SEEK REDRESS FOR CONSTI
BECAUSE THEY SOUGHT TO AID
0,
PLU IPA AND 42 U.S .C. §§ 200
TED RIG HTS IN VIOLATION OF
PROTEC
OR WAS THE
5(3 ) AND 198 6. WRIT OF ERR
12 20 3(a )(b ), 19 85 (2) , 198
v-3 55 5NOT JUS T UNDER CASE 8:1 4-c
RO PRI ATE VEHICLE TO FIL E
APP
RELATED
7-c v-0 180 3-T MC OR ANY OTHER
RB H-J DA , BUT ALSO UNDER 9:1
RD
COULD NOT POSSIBLY BEEN HEA
WHERE THESE ISS UE S COULD
CASE
t.
MADE IN RQ£~,_y,.,.:il:.AXEr 136 s.c
UN DE R§ 225 4. THE HOLDINGS
S.C .
TO THE STATE COURTS AND THE
185 0(2 016 ) ATTACH AND APPLY
22- of- 34
0

..... - .... ~ • - - - - - L wn.c.K.c.. J.n.uJ. i.:,m :u-." '.u..,
STR ICT COURT JUDGt:::i A~ WtL
·DI
CREATES
AND MISREPRESENTATION, IT
ACTS OF FRAUD, MACHINATION
ICLE III
NO AVAILABLE REMEDIESe ART
SIT UA TIO N WHERE THERE ARE
A
THE WRIT
ES WARRANTING THE FIL ING OF
DYNAMICS EX IST IN THESE CAS
RELY
THE DIS TR ICT COURT, NOT ME
OR THAT WAS SUBMITTED BEFORE
OF ERR
NG
THE CONVICTIONS ALREADY BEI
§ 225 4 WHICH WAS ATTACHED DUE TO
E 201 3RISONMENT TORT WHICH IS CAS
INVALIDATED BY THE FALSE IMP
E TO
OR IS THE APPROPRIATE VEHICL
CP -40 0-0 084 . THE WRIT OF ERR
HALIFAH
S WHERE NEITHER THE KING-K
USE UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCE
PURSUANT
THE FEDERAL DIS TR ICT COURT
NOR JASON GOURDINE ENTERED
WRITS
ERED THE COURT UNDER THE ALL
TO 28 U.S .C. § 225 4, BUT ENT
AD JUD IOF ERROR, WHICH WAS ~O BE
OF 28 U.S .C. § 165 1, WRIT
ACT
FRAUD UPON
ORE, DUE TO THIS_CONTINUAL
CATED UN DE R§ 198 3c THEREF
NOT PROCEED
ALL PAR TIE S CASE 17- 753 2 CAN
THE COURT CONSPIRED IN BY
HION
ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE SAME FAS
AS CONSTRUCTED UNTIL IT BE
OR IS FIL ED ,
E 17- 718 6, THAT WRIT OF ERR
AS THE COURT DID UNDER CAS
PROCEED
FRAUD. CASE 17- 718 6 CANNOT
AND REMAND TO CORRECT THE
IS DOCUPLRA FIL ING IN FORMA PAUPER
UNTIL THE COURT ACCEPTS THE
(70 ) PAGE
T CASE, STOP BLOCKING THE
MENTS WE SENT THEM FOR THA
AL BR IEF
201 7 SUBMISSION AS THE INFORM
DOCUMENT DATED OCTOBER 5,
PLRA
THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE
IN CASE 17- 718 6 AND RULE ON
LARATORY
UD !!! I, WE, MOTION FOR DEC
AND THE AEDPA, STOP THE FRA
S.C t. 221 3,
Qg~ EQ QT 556 U.S e 904 # 129
JUDGMENTv ~~i ~EO -£~ A~ ~£- ~q_
~~E Q-S ~A~ E£- ~~- A~~ bi-M AC -RR Q
L.E d.2 d. 123 5(U eSe 200 9); QW
173
~~EQ-~~A~ES
104 610 5 (3r d.C ir.2 01 7); UN
CQ M~ U~ ~R r--F 3d. --, 201 7 WL
.D.
~AMMA~r 201 7 WL 118 150 9(W
QR~-~Q~~-AKA-A2QU~-WAA~~K-MQ
~.-~R~~
201 6);
~A ~~£ r 20! 6 WL 698 670 4(N .C.
_L a.2 017 ); s~~ R~ -Y. -UW l~E Q-£
~LE ~
390 294 (N. C.2 017 ); ~N -RE ~-2 AR
~-v ..-U W~ ~EQ -S~ ~~E £T 201 7 WL
C~A RK
16) ~
201 6 WL 606 886 2(4 th. Cir e20

IS A QUID PRO QUO CONTRACT
INSOMUCH, THE OATH OF OFF ICE
RE~~
2 AND 3, QAY~S-~o-~AW~~RS-SU
U.S . CONST. ARTICLE 6 Cl.
UNDER
CLERKS,
655 , 657 Tex . Ap p., IN WHICH
~QR~ORA~lONr 459 S.W .2d u
M,
GOVERNMENT PLEDGE TO PERFOR
FIC IAL S AND OFF ICE RS OF THE
OF
ITUTIONS
ITED STATES AND STATES CONST
SUPPORT AND UPHOLD THE UN
, PERKS
FOR SUBSTANCES SUCH AS WAGES
H ITS MANDATES IN RETURN
WIT
THAT
TES SUPREME COURT HAS HELD
AND BE NE FIT S. THE UNITED STA
R
EXECUTIVE, NOR JUDGE CAN EVE
STA TE, NOR LEG ISL AT OR , NOR
NO
23- of- 34

.I
WAR /AGAINST

.LJL -i.LJ .L'iU

u.1. u

vu ....... .. ,~• ••• -·•-

T Vl.V
THE CONSTITUTION W.l 'l'tl UU
OF FIC E, ~QQRER
HEART OF THEIR OATH OF
PPORT IT WHICH IS THE
TQ ~U
39 0
I
01 (19 58 ); X~ -R E~ -~~ ~L ~r
~T 35 8~ Ue S. 1, 78 Se Ctg 14

~.-AA~Q

I
P. 3~ . 72 8, 20 17 Wym 25 .

OR
ERK OR OTHER STATE AND
JU DG E, CASE MANAGERv CL
ANY
OF FIC E
i
COMPLY WITH HI S OATH OF
OF FIC IA L WHO• DOES NOT
FEqERAL
S WARS AGAINST
ION OF THE UNITED STATE
REGARDING THE CONSTITUT
ACTS IN
I
IN A FORM OF TREASONOUS
NSTITUTION AND ENGAGES
THAT CO
TH IS CASE IN
LAW OF THE LAND, AND IN
LATION OF THE SUPREME
VIO
LIFAHo
THORITY OF THE KING-KHA
N OF THE SUPERSEDING AU
VIOLATIO
COMPLY WITH
OR CLERK DOES NOT FULLY
A JUDGE OR CASE MANAGER
IF)
VO ID,
AND OR THEIR ACTS ARE
UTION THEN HIS, ORDERS
THE CONSTIT
ACTS
H A PERSON ENGAGES IN
T JU RIS DIC TIO N AND SUC
THEY ARE WITHOU
ARE SU B- ·
ION ITS EL F., PROPONENTS
N AGAINST THE CONSTITUT
OF TREASO
CONTRACT, CON,:_
REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF
TED TO PE NA LT IES AND
JEC
10 01 , AS
24 2 AND IN TH IS CASE
DER 18 U.,S.,C., §§ 241 v
SPIRACY UN
AND VIOLATIONS OF AR TIAGAINST THE CONSTITUTION
WELL AS TREASON
E~~O~K
IS OUTRAGEOUS FRAUD, AY
,
SE CT ION S TO INCLUDE .TH
CiE II I
¥
I
d. 11 12 , 11 14 ; A~~~~~A~
UT AH o2d o, 15 2, 349 P.2
~!- aA MU E~ ST 10
18 3, KEE~O~~~ACKI~G
o.c .N .Y . 218 F.S up p. 16 4,
I

I

I

1

~Q R~ ~-~ .-K lR ~¥ r
20 , 280
CO ~-Y .~S ~A ~E r 43 7 SaW•

CES ALL CONUR OATHS OF OF FIC E PLA
REFUSING TO LIV E BY YO
CA SE .
N OF YOUR OATHS IN EVERY
RT IES IN DIRECT VIOLATIO
SP IRI NG PA
FOR IMMEDIATE
FIC E IS NOT JU ST CAUSE
LATING YOUR OATHS OF OF
VIO
IS A FEDERAL CR IM Ee •~•
REMOVAL FROM OF FIC E, IT
DIS MI SS AL AND
OF FIC IA LS
OF OF FIC E BY GOVERNMENT
AL LAW REGULATING OATH
FEDER
AN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHICH
O ( 4) PARTS l'.LCNG WITH
IS DIV IDE D INT
5 U. S.C .
RPOSES OF ENFORCEMENT,
DE FIN ES THE LAW FOR PU
FURTHER
MBERS
TUAL OATH OF OF FIC E ME
IDES THE TEXT OF THE AC
§ 33 31 , PROV
E. 5 U. S.C .
KE BEFORE ASSUMING OF FIC
RESS ARE REQUIRED TO TA
OF CONG
NN AN AF FID AV IT TO DEMO
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS SIG
§ 33 33 REQUIRES
IRED BY 5
THE OATH OF OF FIC E REQU
E THAT THEY HAVE TAKEN
STRAT
TH OF
LL NOT VIOLATE THAT OA
1 AND HAVE NOT OR WI
u. s.c . § 333
THE 3r d.
OF OF FIC E AS DEFINED BY
E DURING TH EIR TENURE
OF FIC
A
ICH EX PL ICI TL Y MAKES IT
LAW, 5 U. S.C . § 731 1 WH
PART OF THE
TH OF OF FIC E
VIOLATIONS OF TH EIR OA
AL CRIMINAL OFFENSE FOR
FEDER

24 -of -34

••

WH1 CH '1'1:it:Rt: ARt,; ::i.lJ.Vl..lLAK

.l:'.t<U Vl.i::> l.UL'4 i:1

-.i-n.t-n

.M..t'. t'J.il.

.1.u

ttJ.i.u

uuu, :u:..: >v

ONE
N FOR STATE OFF ICI AL S. FOR ANY
CLERKS, CASE MANAGERS AND EVE
BERS
TES GOVERNMENT,- INCLUDING MEM
EMPLOYED WITHIN THE UNITED STA
. CO NST IOVERTHROW OR VIOLATE THE U.S
OF_CONGRESS TO ADVOCATE THE
u.s .c.
URRED WITHIN THESE CASES 18
TUTION IN THE MANNER THAT OCC
18
"OATI:l OF OFF ICE
PENALTIES FO~ VIOLATIONS OF
§ 191 8 PROVIDES
R
NEVER A JUDGE OR CASE MANAGE
BED IN 5 U.S .C. § 731 10 WHE
DESCRI
DOES NOT HAVE JUR ISD ICT ION TO
OR CLERK ACTS WHERE HE OR SHE
ACTS
R OR CLERK ENGAGES IN ACT OR
ACT, THE JUDGE OR CASE MANAGE
~A~ES
T THE CONSTITUTION, YW~~~Q-S
OF TREASON, ESPECIALLY AGAINS
S.C to 471 , 66 L.E d.2 de 392 ,
~.-W ~~~ T 449 u.sG 200 , 216 , 101
5
T 19 UeSG (6 WHEAT) 264 ~ 404 ,
406 (19 80) ; QQHE~-Y~-YI~~IN~A
L.E d. 257 (18 21) .
ORNEY GENERAL AND OR FEDERAL
WHEN IT COMES TO THE SoCo ATT
THEY
POND TO THE _PLEADINGS SINCE
ATTORNEYS REQUIREMENT TO RES
L CAS ES.
008 4 REMOVED TO THESE FEDERA
APPEARED IN CASE 201 3-C P-4 00£C~E~ER-~~~~~QAQE£r 416 U.S .
TED STATES SUPREME COURT IN
THE UNI
11
OFF ICE R
UDICATED THAT WHEN A STATE
232 , 94 s.c t .. 168 3(1 974 ) ADJ
L
MANNER VIOLATIVE OF THE FEDERA
ACTS UNDER A STATE LAW IN A
HORITY
CONFLICT WITH THE SUPERIOR AUT
CONSTITUTION~ HE COMES INTO
HIS
IS IN THAT CASE STR IPP ED OF
OF THAT CON STI TUT ION , AND HE
PERSON
RACTER AND IS SUBJECT IN HIS
OFF ICI AL OR REPRESENTATIVE CHA
IVIDUAL CONDUCT. THE STATE HAS
TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS IND
TO
IMMUNITY FROM RES PON SIB ILIT Y
NO POWER TO IMPART TO HIM ANY
E,
UNITED STATES AND IN THI S CAS
THE SUPREME AUTHORITY OF THE
ER
JUD ICI AL AND LEG ISL ATI VE POW
TO THE SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY,
H OF THE (4) GLOBAL THRONES.
AUTHORITY OF THE KING-KHALIFA
AND
THE
ICE R AND OR FEDERAL EMPLOYEE.,
BY LAW A JUDGE IS A STATE OFF
AL.
GE BUT AS A PRIVATE IND IVI DU
JUDGE THEN ACTS NOT AS A JUD
'S
CASES AND THE KIN G-K HA LIF AH
THERE IS TRUSTEE OVER THESE
E
FEDERAL LAW WHICH IS APPLICABL
DECREES SUPERSEDE ALL . UNDER
TIES IS "WITHOUT AUTHORITY,
STA TES , THAT IF A COURT OR PAR
TO ALL
S. THEY
ERS ARE REGARDED AS NU LLI TIE
ITS JUDGMENTS OR ACTS OR ORD
RY
ID, AND FORM NO BAR TO A RECOVE
NOT VOIDABLE, BUT SIMPLY VO
ARE
Y
AL IN OPP OSI TIO N TO THEM. THE
SOUGHT, EVEN PRIOR TO A REVERS
PERSONS CONCERNED IN EXECUTUTE NO JUS TIF ICA TIO N, AND ALL
CONSTI
25- of- 34

'TING SUCH ACTS, JUDGMENTS, OR SENTENCES ARE CONSIDERED, IN LAW,
AS TRESPASSERS". YOU CAN'T ATTACH A RULE 40(d) NOTICE TO CASES
16-1953 OR 16-2l41 AND ASHLE¥ BROWNLEE CAN'T BLOCK THE PLRA
FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS OR THE (70) PAGE DOCUMENT
DATED OCTOBER 5, 2017 FROM BEING FILED IN CASE 17-7186, ELL~Q~~

~.-R~~RSQ~r 1 PET. 328, 340, 26 U.So 328, 340(1828)Q
WHEN JUDGES, CLERKS OR CASE MANAGERS ACT WHEN THEY DO
NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO ACT, OR THEY ENFORCE A VOID ORDER OR
ACT (AN ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGES WITHOUT JURISDICTION) THEY BECOME
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW, AND ARE ENGAGED IN ACTS OF TREASON SET
AGAINST THEIR OATHS AND THE CONSTITUTION. THE COURT IN ~A~E£

~.-~~~~A~E-G~-WQ~~MAW-~~~A~ES 7 -i~~XNQI£r 209 FeSuppo 757(N.D.Ill.
1962) HELD THAT

11

NOT EVERY ACTION BY A JUDGE OR A CLERK OR A

CASE MANAGER IS AN EXERCISE OF THEIR SPECIFIC FUNCTION ••• IT
IS NOT A JUDICIAL, CLERICAL OR CASE MANAGER FUNCTION FOR THEM
TO COMMIT AN INTERNATIONAL TORT EVEN THOUGH THE TORT OCCURS
IN THE COURTHOUSE"., WHEN A JUDGE OR OFFICIAL ACTS AS A TRESPASSER
OF THE LAW OR HIS OATH OF OFFICE, WHEN THE JUDGE OR OFFICIAL
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW OR HIS OATH OF OFFICE, THE JUDGE AND
.J

OR OFFICIAL IS SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL, CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND
LOSES SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND THE OFFICIAL'S ACTS AND
THE JUDGE'S ORDERS ARE VOID AND ARE OF NO LEGAL 'FORCE OR EFFECT

0

ALL ACTS ARE ILLEGAL AND VOID, WHERE IN CONFLICT WITH
THE U.Sc CONSTITUTION. NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE,
LIBERTY OR PROPERTY, WHICH INCLUDE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, WITHOUT
GUE PROCESS LAW, NOR SHALL HE BE ADJUDICATED OF OR TRIED FOR
ANY OFFENSE BY AN EX POS'r FACTO LAW WHERE EX POST FACTO LAW
SHALL BE PASSED AND ALL SAID RIGHTS 0 TITLES, PRIVILEGES AND
IMMUNITIES ARE INVIOLATE AND WOULD VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION
OF _THE LAWS CLAUSE, R~A.M.-G~-£QQ~~-~~QR~QAr-~~C.-Y.-W. c.~.
~QOOM~~l~A~~RSr-l~C.r 869 so.2a. 1210, 29 FLA. L. WEEKLY D. 761.
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD IS BREACH OF LEGAL OR EQUITABLE DUTY
WHICH, IRRESPECTIVE OF MORAL GUILT, IS DECLARED BY LAW TO BE
FRAUDULENT BECAUSE OF ITS TENDENCY TO DECEIVE OTHERS OR VIOLATE
CONFIDENCE, ~AY~S-Y.-~AWX~RS-SUR~-CQ~~•r 459 S.Wo2d. 655(1970);
26-of-34

BREACH CONFORCED BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY BY FRAUD TO
PIRING PART IES. THE
TRACT IS PUNI TIVE IN NATURE BY THESE CONS
T TO PROTECT THE
FIDUCIARY SOVEREIGN POWER HAS PARAMOUNT .RIGH
WELFARE OF HIS HOLY
LIVE S, HEALTH, MORALS, COMFORT AND GENERAL
"TRU ST", El:lli:til-1il~-c;oo:cCOMMONWEALTH WHO ARE BENE FICIA RIES OF THE
iro1 988) ; CYR ~lS~l il•
¥1i:AR-~1Rli:-~-RU2S~R-~O~r 858 F2d. 198( 4th.C
.201 6); ~0Mli:-2L:C~
CAEE -~til~ li:R~ RlSE S-IW C.r 2016 WL 6916 786( NoC
54 S.Ct o 231, 88 A.L. R.
&-LG AW-A SS!ti l-Y.-~ LAlS CEL~ r 290 U~Sc 398,
I
ARC .OE- S~~Q Q~S- ~RUS ~E~
1481 , 78 L.Ed . 413( UoS .193 4); ~~~IQ ~~-Y ~-2G
2017 WL 5988 226( 7th.
O~-M A:CI SOtil -CQt ilSQ~ lCA~ li:C-S ~~QQ ~£r-- F3d.- -,
r-1Jli1~.. -v.-~ ~A~ E 7
Cir e ~ 01 7); Jli1QR~~-CARQI.,lti1A.-A55!N-OR-li:Q~.1';A~OR£
368 N.C. 777, 786 S.E. 2d. 255( N.C. 2016 )o
VALIDITY OF
THE LAW DICTATES THAT FRAUD DESTROYS THE
ASHLEY BROWNLEE AND
EVERYTHING IT ENTERS INCLUDING THE ACTS OF
ES. IT FATALLY EFFECTS
JENN IFER RICE ACTING AS PROXY FOR THE JUDG
DECREES. LABEO DEFI NES
EVEN THE MOST SOLEMN ACTS OR JUDGMENTS AND
CLE USED TO CIRCUMVENT
FRAUD TO BE ANY CUNNING DECEPTION OR ARTI
WORK ON RES JUDICATA
OR DECEIVE ANOTHER, MR. WELLS, IN HIS VERY
11
WSr
11
FRAUD VITI ATES EVERYTHING , WTJ:C:C-ll.-~URR.O
SAYS, SEC. 499,
T 98 U.S. 61-7 1(18 71);
91 U.S. 667- 683( 1875 ); Uq£q-M~-~~RQ~~MQR~QW
A~CQRtil~ 820 F3d.
24-5E~A~QR1AL-QlS~9-Rli:~U~Lb~Alli1-CQMMI~~li:E-1il~624 (4th .Cir .201 6).
186 IS VOID
JURI SDIC TION UNDER CASE 17-7 532 AS IS 17-7
CTURAL ERRORS. THESE
E"OR DUE PROCESS VIOL ATIO N, FRAUD AND sr;:•RU
LESS ERROR DOCTRINE
STRUCTURAL ERRORS DEFI ES ANALYSIS BY HARM
D, W~AYER-v.-MA.S£A~~u~
ESPE CIAL LY SINC E THERE IS TRUSTEE APPOINTE
85 u.s.L .W. 4433 (U.s .
Sli:~~ Sr 137 s.ct . 1899 , 198 L.Ed .2d. 420,
WL 4176 224( 3rd. Cir.
2017 ); ~1Rli :I.A- ~.-~Q RN 7 --Fe de App x'--, 2017
~Lli: RA~Q RS-~ CR~. T
2017 ); ~ARC lA-~~ ~A~~ lAL- ~RQY ~-~.- YlRG ~~lA -~CC
01) WHICH CAN BE RAISED
3 Fed. Appx ' 86, 2001 WL 1174 97(4 theC ir.20
ARBITRARY JUDI CIAL ,
AT ANY TIME TO VOID ALL ORDERS AND STOP THIS
OR DONE IN BOTH CASE
CLER ICAL OR OTHERWISE ACTIONS ISSUED AND
~~~E R~A~ lQ~A ~-Uti llO~
17-7 532 AND 17-7 186, SQAR C-Oi :-~RU S~~~ 5-0~285; W:S:T..I.S-i:AR~0-2AJ;i11'_,~..,.A..
QRERA~;tI:1,:11;._Jii:~GlWEii:RSr 2016 WL 1253
27-o f-34

SINCE THERE WASeNO RULING ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
•Ar
THE PLRA AND THE AEDPA AS THEY RELATE TO ~X-~A R~i-Y iRGk~
~~R
100 U.S. 339, 348-3 49, 25 L.Ed. 676(1 880) AND ~~~-S~AU~S
THE 4TH.
5iOTJSi:-CASli:Sr 83 U.S. (16 WALL) 36u 1873 AND INSTEAD
WILSON
CIRCU IT CHOSE FRAUD UNDER CASE 17-71 86 TO MANIPULATE
USED PRIOR
INTO FILLI NG OUT FILIN G IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS
CIRCUMVENT
TO THE CLINTON ADMI NISTR ATION 'S OMNIBUS CRIME BILL TO
SOUGHT AND
RULING. THE 4THo CIRCU IT AND PARTI ES VIA SANCTIONS
L THEOCRATIC
GRANTED BY DECREE OF THE CHIEF JUSTI CE OF THE GLOBA
OR THE
COURT MUST BE DEEMED IN FORFE ITURE . ACTS OF CONGRESS
CANNOT BECOME
COURTS THAT ARE'REPUGNANT TO THE U~S. CONSTITUTION
ANY ACT
LAW OR STAND AS LAWc THE CONSTITUTION IS SUPREME TO
.SCWQQI.,
OF THE COURTS OR LEGISLATURE, EllA~~gQ-R""-~IWii:$ZIR~~llI..1U\H;l,.
U.S~r 136
CIS~R ~C~r 237 F.Sup po3d 267(W eDePa a2017 ); ~A~~Q R-Y.016).
S.Ct. 2074, 195 L.Ed. 2d. 456, 84 UeS.L .W. 4462( U.S.2

TE
INSOMUCH, YOUR ACTIONS IN HANDLING THESE MATTERS VIOLA
SOLE CORPORTHE CONTRACT, THE GRANT GIVEN TO YOUR NATIONS BY THE
TION
ATION IMPAI RING THE OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACT IN VIOLA
2 AND
OF THE PRIVI LEGE AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF ARTICLE IV§
LISHING CAUSE
ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ESTAB
CT YOUR
BEFORE ALL COURTS ALLOWING ME TO INTERVENE AND CORRE
CE, RRE£AY~~
FRAUD, CRIMI NAL CONSPIRACY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTI
2d. 1 (U.S. 1990) ;
Vv-~w G.~9T 494 U.S. 1, 110 S.Cte 914, 108 L.Ed.
; UARR~S
SRGWN-~.-2RGWWr F.Sup p.2d. , 2013 WL 23382 33(D. C.Ky. 2013)
3); AM~RI~Al.\l
~MsIG REGG -Il:ilC ..,r F., Supp. 2d. , 201 3 1i'l'L 13 31166 ( N. C.201
p.
MU~. -~I2ER ~¥-il.\ lS.-GO .. -Y.-~~ XWQQ Q~~bA £~~~S -CQR~ .r 81 F.Sup
pp.3d .,
157(D SC.19 48); O~AR A~-Y~ -~~W- ¥QRK -Q~~~ .-G~-~ C~C.r FeSu
U~r-I~ G.r
2015 WL 42407 33(N. Y.D.C .2015 ); ~QRQ G~-~~ -~~C- ~~~A~ ~-~RQ
F.Sup p.3d. , 2016 WL 42477 38(DS C.201 6)~
CLEAR
THE LAW AS DETERMINED BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IS
D WITHIN
AND UNAMBIGUOUS ON ISSUE S SUCH AS THE ONES BEING ARGUE
THE CLERKS
THESE CASE S. IF A RULING, AND WE CAN ADD THE ACTS OF
HAS BEEN
AND CASE MANAGERS JENNI FER RICE AND ASHLEY BROWNLEE,
LATIV E
OBTAINED UNDER AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE AND OR LEGIS
28-of -34

~I

•

OR INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND OR ACT, WHICH INCLUDE
FRAUD. THE LAW EXPLAINED IF THIS POSITI ON IS.WEL L TAKEN, WEICH
IT IS, IT EFFECTS THE "FOUNDATION 88 OF THE 18 WHOLE 16 ( EMPHASIS ADDED
)
PROCEEDING. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR ACT OR JUDICI AL DETER
MINATION IS VOID AND IS AS IF THERE WERE NO ACTv OR DETERMINAT~0N

. &~vvi ~iu~ AND

MADE OR DONE AT ALL, BEING A STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR
NOT SUBJECT TO THE HARMLESS ERROR DOCTRINEe THE GENERAL RULE
IS THAT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE AND OR ACT AND OR LEGISL
ATIVE
PROVISION OF LAW, THOUGH HAVING THE FORM AND NAME OF LAW, IT
IS IN REALITY NO LAW BY SUCH ACTS 8 BUT IS WHOLLY VOID AND INEFFECTIVE FOR ANY PURPOSE, WHICH INCLUDE ATTACHING A RULE 40(d)
NOTICE TO IT BY RICE IN CASES 16-195 3 AND 16-214 1 OR BROWLEE
SENDING FRAUDULENT FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS AND BLOCK
ING THE FILING OF THE (70) PAGE DOCUMENT DATED OCTOB ERS, 2017
I

IN CASE 17-718 6 OR THIS CASE GOING FORWARD UNDER ~7-753 2 SINCE
8
ITS UNCONSTITUTIONALITY DATES FROM THE DATE OF ITS ENACTMENT
AND OR WHEN THE ACT WAS DONEGeeaIN LEGAL CONTEMPLATION, IT
IS
INOPERATIVE AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN PASSED OR DONE •• e.SINC E
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND OR ACT IS VOID, THE GENERAL PRINC
IPLE
FOLLOWS THAT IT IMPOSES NO DUTY (CLERKS OR CASE MANAGERS ACTING
AS PROXY FOR THESE JUDGES CANNOT BLOCK OUR FILING S OR ATTACH
TO THEM) , CONFERS NO RIGHT S, CREATES NO OFFICE (JUDIC IAL, CLERI
CAL, CASE MANAGERS), BESTOWS NO POWER (NONE OF YOU HAVE JURISD
ICTION INCLUDING THE CLERKS AND CASE MANAGERS TO DO WHAT THEY'V
E
DONE.) OR AUTHORITY ON ANY PERSON (EMPHASIS ADDED), AFFORDS
NO PROTECTION (YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE ONCE WE'VE NOTIFI ED YON OF
THE WRONGS, AND YOU FAIL TO CORRECT OR CONTINUE IN THEM .), AND
JUSTIF IES NO ACTS PERP0RMED UNDER IT (DONE BY JENNIF ER RICE
AND ASHLEY BROWNLEE ACTING AS PROXY FOR THESE JUDGES IN FRAUD
AS WELL AS THE PLRA AND STATE vg GENTRY ISSUE S.) •••• A VOID ACT
CANNOT BE LEGALLY CONSISTENT WITH A VALID ONE. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW CANNOT OPERATE TO SUPERSEDE ANY EXISTI NG LAW (THIS
MEANS THE LAW ESTABLISHED BEFORE THESE PROVISIONS OF LAW WERE
ENACTED _MUST NOW STAND ALLOWING US TO JOINTLY FILED , SEEK CLASS
ACTION, ETC.) . INDEED INSOFAR AS A STATUTE AND OR LEGISLATIVE
PROVI SION AND OR ACT RUN COUNTER TO THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF
THE
OF THE LAND (THE UaS. CONSTITUTION, EX PARTE VIRGI NIA, SCHWA
RE,
McBURNEY, INDICTMENTS ARE TO BE ADJUDICATED UNDER THE DUE PROCES
S
29-of- 34

I

-,----· -

-.

-------

-------•

___ ., ________ .,.,I

.--

--

__ ._...,~,...,.,_,,'-'~ ~

.A.a..1..._,:L,uu.1 .,

\

NO ONE IS BOUND TO OBEY FRAUD OR AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND
NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO ENFORCE ITe ALL LAWS, RULES (LIKE THE
RULE 40(d_) NOTICE FILED BY RICE), STATUTES (THE PLRA AND THE
AEDPA) AND PRACTICES (LIKE THE JUDGES USING THESE CLERKS AND
CASE MANAGERS TO BLOCK FILING OF DOCUMENTS, STEALING INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF THE HOBBS AND THE EXPROPRIATION EXCEPTION TO THE F.SoieA c), WHICH ARE REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION
111
ARE ,19 NULL 0 a AND 11 VOID , MA~BIJRX -R ... -MAQISQW r 5TH. U.S. ( 2 CRAN CH)
137, 180; ~~~~5-Y. -IJN~~EC ~£~A~ES 7 28 F3dc 1i23 CRIM. LAW 1163(1) ,
1165 ( 1); RQI?.;UM,3Ql)l_iz:..,._AiUU,;i:r;,n;gT 27 F3d .. 877 REHEARING DENIED CERT.
GRANTED VACATED 115 S.Ct., 1247, 513 UcSo 1186, 131 LoEd.2d .
~29; ~QgM~E~ -Y.-YW.~ EQ-£~A~ ~£r 65 FcSuppe3 d. 19(20~4 ); JQ~~aQ~
R.-IJW.~E C-S~A~~ £ 7 --S.Ct. --, 2015 WL 2473450( U.Sm201 5); WQ~~GQME~~
~.-LQY~S ~ANA~ 136 SeCt. 718, i93 LoEd.2d . 599, 84 U.SoL.We 4063
(UoS• 2016); G~R~-Qu~ QQQR£-L L~~-l,!q-~ Q~£Q~~Q A~IOW-~ ~~~-OE-~ ~C•ANA~
~OL~Si~ ~r 187 F.Supp.3 d. 1002, 1012, SaD.Ill~ ; ~.~~-~.-S W~QERr
821 F3d., 763, 765+ ( 6TH .. Cir.,MIC H.); R~Qli!I,,E- ll.,_ggr,,or N.,E.-3d. ,
2017 WL 1838423 (2017); 24-SE~A~ OR~A~-Q ~£~~-RE~ g~L~~A~- COMWI~~ EE

~.-A~~QR ~r 820 F3d. 624(4th aCir.201 6).
THE 4TH. CIRCUIT NEVER EXPECTED THE DELUGE OF PROCEEDINGS
THAT HAS NOW ENTERED INTO THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT WHICH NOW CREATE
EVlDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE THE FRAUD WHEN COMPARED WITH CASE(S)
17-7186 AND 17-6960 . AS FOREIGN SOVEREIGN KING-KHALIFAH, I,
JAHJAH AL MAHDI, GIVE THE 4TH., CIRCUIT COURT JUDICIAL NOTICE
AS A MATTER OF LAW LET IT BE KNOWN IN AND FOR THE RECORD. I,
AS KING-KHALIFAH~ DEMAND THAT JENNIFER RICE, ASHLEY BROWNLEE,
ALL CLERKS AND CASE MANAGERS, ALL JUDGES TO PRODUCE THEIR BOND
AND OR OATH OF OFFICE AND OR WRIT OF COMMISSION THAT WOULD ALLOW
ANY CLERK, CASE MANAGER OR JUDGE TO NEGATE THE TERMS OF THE
CONTRACT ESTABLISHED BY THE SOLE CORPORATION PROTECTED UNDER
BOTH THE PRIVILEG ES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF ARTICLE IV§ 2
AND ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 OF THE U.,S., CONSTITUTION., FAIL TO DO
THIS THEREUPON ALL RELIEF AND DEMANDS MUST BE GRANTED NOT DENIED
ON THE COURT RECORD PRODUCING THE BOND AND OR OATH OF OFFICE
AND OR WRIT OF COMMISSION AND CITING OF LAW BEFORE CASE 17-7532
OR 17-7186 CAN BE DEEMED LEGAL DUE TO THIS FRAUD AND STRUCTURAL

30-of-34

DUE PROCESS REQ UIR~ ~.
,. ERRORS AND ALL ISSU ES BE PRESERVED AS
ON FOR DECLARATORY JUD GIT IS SO ORDEREDe I, WE, WANT AND MOTI
0 IN CASES OF ACTUAL
MENT. PURSUANT TO 28 U.Se C• §§ 2201 , 2202
STATES, UPON THE FILI NG
CONTROVERSY, •• sANY COURT OF THE UNITED
THE RIGHT AND OTHER
OF AN APPROPRIATE PLEADING, MAY DECLARE
Y SEEKING SUCH DECLARATION
LEGAL RELATIONS OF ANY INTERESTED PART
D BE SOUGHT***• I, WE
WHETHER OR NOT FURTHER REL IEF IS OR COUL
IT BRIE F TO RESET ONCE
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBM
T RECORD TO PRESERVE
THESE. MATTERS ARE RULED ON, ON THE COUR
THESE CASES PROCEED
ALL ISSU ES FOR ANY NEEDED APPEAL BEFORE
WN-A~Q-gRENQA-aARR~~~
BY DUE PROCESS LAW, wx~~~AM-QQQGbAa-~RQ
WL 102 857 9(4t h.Ci ro20 17);
2RQWW-~.-CSX-~RAN£~QR~A~bG~-INC~z 2017
2017 WL 9763 01(D SC.2 0l7) ;
A~~S~A~E-~~S~RA~GE-~QMRA~X-~.-~~GRAMAMz
~O~ I~C. r--Fe d. App x'-- ,
~~J- ~GM MY~ ~~A ~~Q ~S-~ QRR QRA ~~G ~-Y9 -~E~
2016 WL 723 211 8(4t hoC ir.20 16)c
THAT YOU CALL
INASMUCH, BY THIS FIASCO OF DUE PROCESS
PURSUANT NOT TO JUST
17-7 532 . YOUR JURI SDIC TION IS MADE VOID
INCLUDE ANY ORDER PRO CASE 17-6 960 , BUT CASE 17-7 532 ALSOu TO
ARE SUSPENDED BY DECREE
DUCED OR CONTAINED THEREIN. THE RULES
CRATIC COURT WHOSE POWER
OF THE CHIE F JUST ICE OF THE GLOBAL THEO
ING UPON YOU VIA CONTRACT
AND AUTHORITY SUPERSEDES THIS COURT BIND
IV§ 2 AND ARTICLE
AND DEFAULT PROTECTED UNDER BOTH ARTICLE
BOTH CASES 17-7 532 AND
1 SECTION 10 OF THE UoS . CONSTITUTIONs
THE COURTS UNDER BOTH
17-7 186 ARE ESSENTIALLY ON REMAND AND
IS LIMITED AND RESTRICTED
CASES 17-7 532 AND 17-7 186 JURI SDIC TION
THIS TRAVESTY OF. PROTO ADDRESSING THE FRAUD THAT ESTABLISHED
T THE REL IEF DEMANDED.
CEEDINGSi AND TO DO NOTHING EXCEPT GRAN
AND OR WRIT OF COMMISSION
PRODUCE YOUR BOND AND OR OATH OF OFFI CE
THE PROVISIONS OF BOTH
THAT DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU CAN VIOLATE
OF THE U.So CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE IV§ 2 AND ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10
KING-KHALIFAH WHO BY
AND THE DECREES OF A FOREIGN SOVEREIGN
SUPERSEDING ATTORNEY,
HIS ORIG INAL STATUS IS SOVEREIGN WITH
RACT AND DEFAULT OR STAND
JUD ICIA L AND LEG ISLA TIVE .POWERS BY CONT
KS OR CASE MANAGERS ACTING
DOWN!!! THE 4TH. CIRC UIT, NOR ITS,C LER
E MAY EXCLUDE A PERSON,
AS PROXY FOR CORRUPT JUDGES, NOR THE STAT
Y KING-KHALIFAH WITH SUPERNAMELY~ THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN FIDUCIAR
POWER AND AUTHORITY
SEDING ATTORNEY, JUD ICIA L AND LEGISLATIVE
31~ of-3 4

•.,

·,BY HIS ORIGIN AL STATUS AS SUCH ( 10) THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE THIS
NATION WAS FORMED VIA THE SOLE ,CORPORATION STANDING UPON EX
POST FAC_TO LAW, TO . PRACTICE LAW ( LAWGIVER OF GOD) OR ANY OTHER
OCCUPATION GIVEN TO HIM BY "COVENANT", "CONTRACT" (FIDUC IARY,
KING, KHALIF AH), IN A MANNER OR FOR REASONS THAT CONTRAVENE
THE DUE PROCESS POWERS AND AUTHORITY GIVEN TO HIM OR IN A MANNER
THAT VIOLAT ES THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS WHICH IN THIS
CASE WOULD BE BEHIND RELIGIO US AND RACIAL HATRED AND FOR PROTEC ,.
TORATE PURPOS ES WHICH WOULD ALSO VIOLATE BOTH ARTICLE IV§ 2
AND ARTICL E 1 SECTION 10 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION., THE SAME
WAY THIS NATION DID FOR THEM SODOMITES AND GOMORRAHRITES BY·
ALLOWING THEM TO MARRY BY USE OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE
LAWS CLAUSE . THE SAME WAY WE HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO UNDO IT
UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS CLAUSE WHERE YOU ATTACHED,
EXECUTED OR ARRESTED THE INTELLEC1'UAL PROPERTY OF A FOREIGN
SOVEREIGN STATE IN VIOLATION OF CONTRACT WITH OUT OUR CONSEN T.
THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS AXE SWINGS BOTH WAYS. THE SOVEREIGN POWER HAS PARAMOUNT RIGHT TO PROTECT THE LIVES, HEALTH ,
MORALS, COMFORT AND GENERAL WELFARE OF 'HIS PEOPLE AS FIDUCIA RY
HEIR WHERE THEY ARE BENEFI CIARIES OF THE "TRUST ", EJ;.I,J;;Q~~-Y ....
SQARC- O~-~GW QO~-~R US~E~S- GE-WAQ ~5GW-C Q~£QL• CA~~Q- SCUQQ~ Sr--F3d. -

--, 2017 WL 598822 6(7th.C ir_\201 7); NQR~J;i-CARQI..•I>lA... ASS!~-Qli:-la:tlrJ~A ...
~QRSr-U ~lC ... -~.-S~A ~:E,. 368 N.. c. 777, 7_~6 S.,E.2d . 255(N. C.2016 );
MsSUR~~X-Y.-XQU~Gr 569 U.S. 221, 133 S.Cto 1709, 185 L.Ed.2 d.
758(U. S.2013 ); SCUQ~~~i:~I.C-~o-£Q~NE•Q~RMAN 821 F3d. 273 (2nd.
7
Cir.20 16); SCWWARi:-J.l.-~QAljU~ ... QE,_~XA.M-Q~-S~A~E-Qlii:-W .. M.r 353 u .. s.
232, 72 s.ct. 752, 64 i.L.R.2 d. 288, 1 L.Ed.2 d. 796(U. S.1957 );
~~us~~~S -Oi:-CAR ~WMQO ~~-~QI.L EGE-~~- WQQQW AREz_ 17 u.s. 518, 1819
WL 2201; E~i:~w-~W~RC-~A~~QR~-Y~~QUQEWWQ~~RERx 132 s.ct. 2459,
189 L.Ed.2 d. 457, 82 u.s.L.W . 4578(U .S.2014 ); i:A~lR~- J.l .. -SU~~AY AWr
2017 WL 371006 6(D.Co Nev.20 17); ~~R~~N lA-EQA R~-Q~-W ~QlClW ~-~.

ZACKRlSOWr 67 Va. App. 461, 796 S.E.2d . 866(20 17); ~O~-Y.- RQ~~RS r
13 9 F • Supp. 3d·. 12 0 ( D.C.C.2 015) ;_ :EliQI.~S -J.l..,.-Y~ Rc;lNlA- IiC,.-Oi:- ~XAWl ..
W~RSr 811 F.Supp .2d.· 1260(E .D.Va.2 011); ·~-Ri:~- ~R~E~r 980 F2d.

590(9t h.Cir.1 992).
YOU CANNOT OBTAIN JUDICIA L DETERMINATIONS TAINTED BY
FRAUD. YOUR .JURISD ICTION IS LIMITED TO ADDRESSING THE FRAUD.
32-of-3 4

. • I

,'

THE DEFAULT IS BINDING UPON THIS COURT AND NATION AS IS THE
BRQWNCONTRACT, U.S.-Y .-A2~I J~-WA aA2r 715 F3d. 521 CA4 (Vao20 13);
1
6 5 6, 2 0 0 9
l:WC.-Y.. -~ J;C.li:R- i:¥li:-2li: WEi!l:~- CQI:.!£I. II.~;I;; ti:l~r 313 FE,d., Appx
4ACli:IJ .
WL. 497 391 CA4 (Va. 20 o 9) ; u.s.-·li:X -Ri:I...:. r:.iA~~A ~,tl~.'.:' ~A1'EQ A-I!aIHU
2:lCAI.-NGR~W-AMli:RJ;CA~-l:WC,.r 707 F3d. 45f CA4 (va. 201 3); ~
~C.
~.-~QN E~r.71 6 F3d. 851 CA4 (Vae20 13); C~ARL~X-li:N~li:R~RlSli:r-l:

)
~~-g1c ~~¥-2A R~~CU E-RES ~AYRA N~Sr-I NC.r 807 F3de 553(4 theCir .2015
SU(DEMONSTRATING ALL MUST BE RULED UPON TO PRESERVE FOR U.S.
PREME COURT. REVIE W);»E LSO-Y .-Y.~o- ~A~K- W.A~r 2015 WL 685271
0
(DSC. 2015); U.S.-Y .-ECCI .~S~QN t--Fedm Appx' --, 2015 WL 459189
14);
CA4 (Md.2 015); u.s.-u. -W~~ ~Sr 578 Fed., Appx' 234 CA4 (Va.20
WL
C~R•S~ l:ANSQ N-Y.-M .....s.N. A.-AW. ERiCAN -gAW~ -N.A~r s.E.2 d., 2013
RQI..INAr
850785 0 ( S .C .App. 2013); Sl2Rl:W(;Q2- Y,. .... Y:r:.IIYii:R51~~-0li:-SQIJ~li-CA
I.~~SER G
407 s.c. 490, 757 s.~.2a . 384 (S~C.2 014); S~RA~ ~E~-~-- Mli:C1'
WL
CQU~~ ¥-C~~~ .-GE-S QC1~~ -SERY ICESr 521 .Fedo Appx' 278, 2013
S~
236458 7 CA4 (N.C.2 013); GEN~R X-~EC ~~GbO GX-OR -£.C~-~ NC.-~. -SA~~~
ils;AI.~W-SQJJ~a-S::t.QRlklA,:•••r 201 5 WL 1219 2 5 l (DSC.2 01 5) ; ~Quc;aMA.til
s.r 134 s.ct. 2384(U .S.201 4); SM.~~- Y.-~~A R~Et-S MOQ~ tRU£5l i:~~
1

Y.-u.

--F3d .--, 2015 WL 471793 2 CA4 (Md.20 15).
WE MOTION TO STAY CASES 17-753 2 AND 17-718 6 AS WE DO
c--=T=H=E~---·---·-·-.
THE VARIOUS OTHER PARALLEL APPEA)LS, ESPECIALLY IN-LlGHT:--=o=F
CASES
FRAUD THAT PRODUCED THEM OR THAT IS GOING ON IN THEM. STAY
ON
17-753 2 AND 17-71 86!!! AND STOP PLAYING THESE GAMES. RULE
'

J

'

THE MQTIONS, ALL OF THEM UNDER § 1983 NOT§ 2254., EXTENSION
T
OF TIME IS SOUGHT UNTIL THIS IS DONE. THE 4TH. CIRCU IT CANNO
CRIMI ABSTAIN FROM ANSWERING FEDERAL QUESTION IN ACTS OF FRAUD,
YOUR
NAL CONSPIRACY, OBSTRUCTION OF·JUS TICE AND IN VIOLATION OF
OATHS OF OFFIC E WHICH IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE, ~A~E-C ARRl~R -AS.S!~

~.-Ma~ MX~I. lA~r 406 u.s. 498, 92 s.ct. 1749( U.S.19 72). WE INVOKE
2
THE DOCTRINE OF COMITY. ALL ORDERS ISSUED UNDER CASE 17-753
DUE
AND THE CLERK 'S ACTS UNDER 17-718 6 ARE VOID FOR FRAUD AND
D
PROCESS VIOLA TION. BOTH CASES 17-753 2 AND 17-718 6 ARE TAINTE
AS
BY THE FRAUD. THE MOTION TO STAY WAS CIRCUMVENTED AS WELL
THE MOTION FOR RECUSAL IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT. THE
AND
CASES WILL BE HEARD UNDER APPEAL OF CASES 17-669 3 6 17-741 0
THE
17-71 39. ALL OTHER CASES ARE SOUGHT STAYED DUE TO INVOKING
NG
DOCTRINE OF COMITY. SANCTIONS ARE IMPOSED AND ADDITIONAL PLEADI
33-of- 34

. '1{'

' r

v.MAY SOON FOLLOW. PRODUCE YOUR BOND AND OR OATH OF OFFICE AND
· OR WRIT OF COMMISSION THAT WOULD ALLOW YOU TO VIOLATE: TII~;;i~~S.
CONSTITUTION UNDER BOTH ARTICLE IV§ 2 AND ARTICLE 1/SECTI ON
10 AND THE DECREES OF A FOREIGN SOVEREIGN KING-KHALIFAH WHO
IS UNDER CONTRACT VIA THE SOLE CORPORATION WITH EX POST FACTO
,,
LAW OR STAND DOWN, Rli:li:Il ... l.l., .. 2J;;G ... WA~Ii:R -RESOR~ r-I.LC.r F. Supp. 3d.,
2016 WL 293589 1(DSC. 2016); QAW-R¥AW ... 2U~LQERSz-lNG .... l,l,. ... CR¥~A~
Rl:Q<;Ja: ...I:>li:\Zli:I .O~Mli:W ~r-:UlC.r 783 F3d. 976, '91 Fed. R. SERV.3 d. 625
(4th.C ir.2015 ); SLYE-SK¥-~RAKEL ... AW~-~Q ~RSr-L~ C.-v .... AI.~~A¥ ¥ARr--Fed. Appx'- -, 2'015 WL 1451636 CA4 (Va.201 5); l3AIU,QW,.ll., .. CQI..GA~li:
~ALMGLl\ZE-C0. 7 772 F3d. 1001, 90 Fed. R. SERV.3 d. 85 CA4 (Md.
2014); JQ~NSG N-v .... o .. s.z--S .ct.--, ~015 WL 247345 0(U.S.2 015);
¥A'l'Ea-V.,-~QRD-MO~OR~CO .. r--F.Su pp.3d. --, 2015 WL 675898 3(E.D.N .c.
2015) ; w.... GUI.F-~MAR.~AS.S ',N--v .. -I.I. .. A.... QEER~aE A.,I,,QGA I.-.2 4 r 751 F2d.
721, 728 (5th., Cir. 1985) ; ;l;W-RE..;.-MORWING"'."'SQNG-1HRQ-i'Q.QQ_:t,,;i;'l;';i;<;;;A.~IQN r
2015 WL 127914 72(D.C .Cal.20 15); IN-RE.:--NARAN'l'Gz 768 F3d. 332,
348(4t h.Cir.2 014); ULME~-v.-UWJ;~EQ ... £'J;'A~E£r 888 F~d. 1028(4 th.Cir.
1989); SM~~H-v.--~A¥ER-GQR~ .. r--u.s .--, 131 s.ct. 2368, 2382,
180 L.Ed.2 d. 341(20 1t); 202-NGR~ti-MGNRGE ... I..I.G.,~v.,-SOWER'z: 850
7
F3d. 265(6t h.Cir.2 017). IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPECTFULLY,
JAHJAH AL ;MAHDI, KING, KHALIFAH,
CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE AND COURT

~~

. £> :< 7

CHRISTOPHER DARNELL WILSON
DECEMBER 20, 2017

34-of-3 4

.

;I

/,

<~ ..... i'°

'<-: \./"

.

,'

',~~~~[?J~~lJL<~9f6C~r:. ,.J·. _;·':. ·
~
~

- ,, r
'

·'

LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA
.JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TI SHB I TE
ET. AL. , #300 839 WANDO A-12 7
LIEB ER C.Io P.O . BOX 205
RIDG EVIL LE, S.C . 2947 2

17-7 )39; 17-7 137 ; 17-7 134 ;
IN RE: 17-6 693 ; 17-6 925 ; 17-6 960 ;
; 16-2 299 ; 17-7 186
17-7 068 ; 16-1 953 ; 16-2 141 ; 17-1 415

S,
TO: THE 4TH . CIRC UIT COURT OF APP EAL
ALL THE ABOVE
THE RULES ARE SOUGHT SUSPENDED FOR
COPY OF ALL THESE DOCUMENTS
CAPTIONED CAS ES. PLEASE SEE THAT A
'
ES CAPTIONED ABOVE. THE· (70)
SUBMITTED ARE FILE D WITHIN ALL CAS
THE REMAINDER ARE ATTACHMENTS
PAGE DOCUMENT IS THE LEAD DOCUMENT.
FILE D WITHIN A FEW OF THE
TO IT. SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS MAY BE
A COPY OF THESE ATTACHED
CASES ALREADY. JUST PLEASE MAKE SURE
ES CAPTI'o_NED ~~J~;YJ!®?CUSAL PUR DOCUMENTS, ARE FILE D WITHIN ALL CAS
TED TO THE CASES IN TOTAL.
POSES AND TO ADDRESS OTHER ISSU ES RELA
AIN,
WE THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. STIL L REM

RES PEC TFU LLY ,./
'JAH JAH AL MA'RDI

OCTOBER 5, 2017
CC: dav id dure n

\

COURT OF APPEALS
,;¥
FOR THE:; 4TH. CIRCUIT ET. AL.,

~---~-----~---~----~
PETITION FROM SOUTH CAROLINA
(CASES 2:17-cv-1127-JMC-MGB ET. AL.,)

---~-------~----~~-DOCKET NO.(S) 17-6693; 17-6925; 17-6960; 17-7139; 17-7137;
17-7134; 17-7068; 16-1953; 16-2141; ~7-1415; 16-2299;
17-7186 ET. AL.,

~---------------~-~LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE AKA
JAHJAH AL MAHDI ET. AL.,
PETITIONER(S)

Vs.
r

THE JUDGES WHO SIGNED THE ORDER IN CASE 16-1953; THE UNITED
~

STATES; JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD ET. AL.,
DEFENDANT(S)

---~--------~-~----AFFIDAVIT ~F SERVICE

----------------~--WE, JAHJAH AL MAHDI ET. AL., DO HEREBY CERTIFY, THAT WE HAVE
MAILED AND OR SERVED A COPY OF AN AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING
JUDICIAL NOTICE; FILING WRIT OF ERROR; MOTION TO REINSTATE CASES
17-7068 AND 17-7186 ET. AL.,; MOTION TO STAY CASES 17-7139;
17-7134; 17-6925; 17-7068; 17-7137; 17-7186; MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME; MOTION FOR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION; MOTION
FOR EN BANC REVIEW IN CASE 17-1415 AND THIS APPEAL AND TO VACATE
1-of-70

ALL ORDERS RELATED TO PRIOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND MOTION TO
MOTION THEREFOR, WITH ITS ATTACHMENTS, ON THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS AND ALL INVOLVED PARTIES , ALSO VIA TRUSTEE AUSTIN,
BY U.S. MAIL POSTAGE PREPAID AND OR CERTIFIE D, BY PLACING IT
IN THE INSTITUT ION MAILBOX ON OCTOBER 5, 2017. IT IS DEEMED
FILED THAT DATE, ~GUS~GW -~.-~ACKr 287 U.S. 266, 273-76, 108

s.ct.

2379(19 88).

'
RESPECTFULLY,
JAHJAH AL MAHDI

~~
ROBERT MITCHELL

david duren

YAHYA MUQUIT

CHRISTOPHER WILSON

OCTOBER 5, 2017

2-of-70

COURT OF APPEALS
· FOR THE 4TH. CIRCUIT ET. AL.,

-------------------PETITIO N FROM SOUTH CAROLINA
(CASES 2:17-cv -1127-J MC-MG B ET. AL.,)

DOCKET NO.(S) 17-6693 ; 17-692 5; 17-696 0; 17-713 9; 17-713 7;
17-713 4; 17-706 8; 16-1953 ; 16-214 1; 17-141 5; 16-229 9;
1 7 - 71 8 6 ET. AL. ,

----------~--------LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBIT E AKA
JAHJAH AL MAHDI ET. AL.,
PETITIO NER(S)

Vs.

THE JUDGES WHO SIGNED THE ORDER IN CASE 16-1953 ; THE UNITED
STATES ; JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD ET. AL.,
DEFENDANT(S)

-------------------AFFIDA VIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIA L NOTICE; FILING
WRIT OF ERROR; MOTION TO AMEND PARTIE S; MOTION FOR
RECUSAL; MOTION TO REINSTATE CASES 17-7068 AND
17-7186 ET. AL.,; MOTION TO STAY CASES 17-7]3 9, 177134, 17-692 5, 17-7068 1 17-713 7, 17-718 6; MOTION FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME; MOTION FOR AN INDEPENDENT
INVEST IGATION ; MOlION, FOR EN BANC REVIEW IN CASE

17-1415 AND THIS APPEAL AND TO VACATE ALL ORDERS
RELATED TO PRIOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND MOTION TO
MOTION THEREFQR

3-of-70

TO: THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ET. AL.,
HERE THE COURT AND PARTIES WILL FIND:
(1) A COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL
NOTICE, FILING WRIT OF ERROR; NOTICE OF SEEKING LEAVE TO APPEAL;
MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND AN
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION DUE TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND MOTION TO MOTION THEREFOR SEEKING EN
BANC REVIEW, (14] PAGES DATED JULY 2, 2017.

(2) A COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AND AFFIDAVIT
OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE CAUSES
OF ACTION AGAINST JUDGES HARWELL, MERCHANT, WOOTEN AND DEFENDANTS; MOTION TO AMEND THE PARTIES TO ADD THE NAME OF JUDGE
STUART RABNER OF THE N.J. SUPREME COURT; ALSO SEEKING CLOCKED
STAMPED COPIES, [23] PAGES DATED JULY 8, 20170
(3) A COPY OF THE§ 1983 ACTION THAT MAKE UP THE
PARALLEL CASES SUBJUDICE WITHIN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT.
( 4) .A COPY OF THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS THAT MAKE UP CASE
16-2299 PE~DING WITHIN THE 4TH. CIRCUIT.

(5) A COPY OF THE ORDER AND DETERMINATION MADE IN
CASE 17-1415 FILED AUGUST 28, 20:17 •
(6) A COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGE KAYMANI WEST
IN CASE 5:17-cv-01363-BHH-KD W FILED AUGUST 23, 2017.
(7) A COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AND AFFIDAVIT
OF.FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE; FILING WRIT OF ERROR; MOTION
TO AMEND THE DEFENDANTS; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, SEEKING AN INJUNCTION AND OR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MOTION TO MOTION THEREFOR,
[19] PAGES DATED AUGUST 10, 20l7 ON THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE.
WE GIVE THE 4TH. CIRCUIT NOTICE. THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH
THE GREENVILLE DIVISION CLERK AND COURT UNDER CASES 9:16-cv4-of-70

._\

3808-TLW-BM; 9:17-cv-1140-TL\i-BM AND SERVED ON ALL CASES AND
s.c. ... . . -~--=- -----JUDGES WITHIN THE-.,--.··---- . U.S. DISTRICT COURT SUlBJUDICE .-.·..VIA THE
···-· ··- ···- . --····· ·------ -· ··:-·::··· ····-•·
.. .
··- -· ....... . ...
CHARLESTON DIVISION CLEEK OF COURT. IT IS SDVED UPON ALL JODGES
AND CASES- WITBDI THE 4TH ... cucuiT VIA TBB uac;:.:imiiiFAH il musTu
-- -- . - .. --~------,--=---- ··- .. - . -- ...=:...:-:--::-··..~:: ~:-:· -~ -.--:::-:·-.'.".~"•_:"'.""~-===-=.:..-:•· •·:· .,.::.:,_ . ·-·--· .. :..•• :.:.•.. :- :..:..•. - - - -- -, JUDGE--·· JACQUBLD AUSTIii. '!BIS OOCUNDT IS SDVED AS LID OP
··-·····::.=.::_~ ~-:•.-··--:---"-···--=--:.--::- -- ·.:. ·•-:.·:-· --SERVICE OP THAT DOCUIIENT. PLEASE DVB fiB 4TB. CIRCUIT CJ-DK
~

-;;77::,--·;;:·-.=----::..:.: __

oa

------

·-. ··-· -·

---

_: :,: __:--·.-::;·· __ .... ·-• --·· -·• ..

CASE ~'MWc;a. .oBTAIN=:A · co•Y- OF.:. i;, -ELECnoa1au:i--m, l'ILB ·

IT WITBlli ALL CASES LISTED WITHIN THB CAPTION OF-THIS LEAD DOCU-

oECUB··or

· - - - - - · __,

·-•··

-

•• -

_.,.

,,,.....

-

r,

.. -

CHIEF JUSTICE OP THE GLOBAL TDOCRATIC
MENT BY
.
-COURT. IT IS SO ORDERED.
THE

(8) A COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR JFOUNSIC DNA TESTING
SESSIONS
COUNTY
FJ:LED WI.TBDI THB RICHLMD -- ·- -- . . s.c. ...COURT OP ) GEHBRAL -· .._. .. - :. ···- ..
:_.
-- . ·-·
.
.. :: ~·:..··-·- -.. '·
..
THAT IS REMOVED 'l'O ALL PARALLEL CASES SlU&JUDICEe THE RICHLAND
coURT
·-

CAsEf NuMBo

1s

...

.

•·

i«fo-t-:ias. ·A coPY eF

.

THis· -oociJiiENT

is

·ioRTH

COMING.
(9) A COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL
NOTICE; SUPPLEMENTING THE CAUSES OF ACTION IN ALL PENDING FEDERAL
AND STATE CASES. AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS; ----SUBMITTING ADDITIONAL
-- ..
..
-·
. .
(30) PAGES DATED
EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY AND CRIMINAL ACTS;***,
DECEMBER 7, 2016 FILED IN CASE 8:14-cv-3555-RBH-JD A AND THE
OTHER RELATED CASES.
..

THE PETITIONERS GIVE THE 4'l~• C:CR~IT _AND -·~~_'.,l'~_ES J~_DIC~AL
NOTICE. THE CASES ..-CAPTIONED ARE ESSENTIALLY INDEPENDENT ACTiONS
--··· ___
.
,___ - . FOR FRAUD UPON TUE COURT ~ND OR PARALLEL APPEALS··-- ORXG!NATI~G
-. ..
. . -·
··.
--FROM TUE APPEAL UNDER 17-6960 AS THEY ALSO APPEAR UNDER 17-1695
AND OR 17:.6693 AND OR 17-6925 AND OR 17-713!f AND OR 17-7134
·-··
AND OR 17-7068, TO INCLUDE THE ANTHONY COOK APPEAL OF CASE 8:16cv-3327-RBH-JDA THAT IS HOPEFULLY BEING PROCESSED AS WE SPEAK.
-··

•-,-•

,.

-

.,

·•-q

/

·-

••

WE MOTION TO AMEND THE PARTIES AND IF WITHIN ANY CASE
CAPTIONED OR IN THE MIDST OF BEING PROCESSED, THE NAME OF THE
KING-~IPAB, LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH
T. TISHBITE 00 NOT APPEAR AS A PARTY WITHIN ANY OF THESE CASES
CAPTIONED. THOSE CASES REFERRED TO MUST AND ARE NOW .f\MENDED
5-of-70

TO ADD THE KING-KHALIFAH TO PROTECT HIS ACQUIRED INTEREST PURSUANT TO 28 U.s.c . §§ 1443( 1), 2679 1 1602-1 612 ET. SEQ~, ElE
GUAM~v.-LONQ-~ERN-CREDJ~~SANK.~~ll.Mlz 322 F3d. 635(9 TH.Ci r.2003 );
VERLXNDEN-B.V.-v.~CEN™L-BANK-0~-NlGERlAr 401 UoS• 480, 103
s.ct. 1962, 76 L.Ed.2 d. 81(U. S.198 3); ~lTll-~ RANS z-lNTE IUly
LLC.-v.-l~TER»AT1Q~AL-~ET2QLi:UN-INV.-Co•• F.Sup p.2d., 2013 WL
55723 6(Fla. 2013) ; THORmN-s••UR~LAND-QE~ERAL-HOSR•• F.Sup p.2d.,
2013 WL 19430 65(Md .2013) ; BRA0D~-v.-UNITED-STATESz 2016 WL
10313 01(E.o .va.20 16); ADAJR ~ASSE T-NAN AQEU Wz-L~ C.-v.-U .S.-DE »T.
OB~HOUSlNG-URBAN-DEVELOPMENTr 2016 WL 32485 69(201 6); SAUNIER
v.-BOEING-COMPANY, F.Sup p.2d., 2014 WL 16469 53(201 4). I, JAHJAH
AL MAHDI, AS THE RIGHTFUL HEIR AND FOREIGN SOVEREIGN KING-KHALIFAH OF THE (4) GLOBAL THRONES OF THE R~-ESTABLISHEO GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE VOLUNTARILY JOIN IN ALL CAPTIONED CASES TO PROTECT

-

MY ACQUIRED INTEREST.
WE EXPAND THE SCOPE AND INCLUSION IS GRANTED BY DECREE
AND JUDGMENT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND KING-KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL
S
THEOCRATIC STATE AND COURT WHERE THERE IS NO SEPARATION OF POWER
AS TOLD WITHIN THE KING-KHALIFAH'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND. DECLARA'
TED ON, WHOSE ATTORNEY, JUDICIAL AND
TION OF SOVEREIGNTY DEFAUL
LEGISLATIVE POWER AND AUTHORITY SUPERSEDE ALL NATIONAL AND OR
GLOBAL COURTS, WHICH INCLUDE THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,
BY THE CLAIMS OF DEFAULT AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL EMERGING FROM
CASE 2013-C P-400- 0084 OUT OF THE RICHLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS IN COLUMBIA, s.c. TO WHICH THE UNITED STATES AND REMAINING
THE DEFAULT THAT BINDS THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL NA.
TIONAL AND OR GLOBAL COURTS AND GOVERNMENTS. ALL DOCUMENTS FILED
WITHIN CASES 17-669 3 AND 17-692 5 ARE NOW FILED WITHIN ALL CASES
LISTED WITHIN THE CAPTION. JUDGES INSTRUCT THE CASE MANAGER
TO COMPLETE THIS TASK. APPELLATE COURT RULES ARE SUSPENDED FOR
ALL CASES CAPTIONED. THIS INCLUDES FOR ANY DEF~CT IN FORM OR
PAGE LIMIT FOR ANY DOCUMENT FILED NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. "IT IS
so ORDERED, APPELLATE RULE (2); u.s.-v.-Mi:RCACOr 199 F3d. 1329
(TABLE) 1999 WL 95846 5; u.s .. -v.-RE U>, 506 Fed. Appx' 209, 2013
WL 23907 6(4th. Cir.20 13); CAPERTON-v.-SEATRlCE-POCAHONTAS-COAL

J 1 92) MEMBER STATES OF '.!:'!'IE-: UNITED NATIONS ARE

f2.!._ 585 F2d. 683(4 th.Cir .1978 )s
6-of-7 0

PARTY TO

THE COURT CAN REVIEW CASES WITHIN ITS JURIS DICTI ON FOR
APPEALS
THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING THAT THESE ARE PARALLEL
ISSUE S,
OR RELATED CASES BEFORE THE COURT ADDRESSING SIMIL AR
G CAUSE
CLAIMS AND DEFENSES ALSO FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHIN
GED,IN BY
TO STAY, RES JUDICATA, THE FRAUD UPON THE COURT ENGA
RELATED
THE CONSPIRING JUDGES AND OTHER ISSUE S DONE WITHIN THESE
U.S. 180,
CASES AND OR PARALLEL APPEALS, HAR.SUiON--v .-BEL L 1 556
168
129 s.ct. 1481( U.S.2 009); SQUT HERN -PAC .-R.-C o.-v.- u.s.,
\lE-SYS'rEMS
u.s. 1,, 18 s.ct. 18, 42 L.Ea. 355(U .S.18 97); NOELL-CRA.l.
852(2 009);
GMDH--v.-NOELL-CRANE-SYSTEMS-SERVICESr 677 F.Sup p.2d.
T-v.-MANUFACTURES-&-TRADERS-TRUST-Co~, 84 F.Sup p.3d. 436

KNIGH

WL
(D.M d.201 5); BARDES--v.--SOUTH-CARQLINAr F.Sup p.2d. , 2010
14981 90(DS C.201 0).
WE GIVE THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES JUDIC IAL NOTICE THAT
G ATTORNEY,
THE KING-KHALIFAH OFFIC IALLY EXERCISES ALL SUPERSEDIN
HIM BY
JUDIC IAL AND LEGIS LATIV E POWER AND AUTHORITY GIVEN TO
RICHLAND
THE DEFAULT. UNLESS THE COURT CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT THE
UNITED NACOURT, THE UNITED STATE S, THE MEMBERS STATES OF THE
FILED IN
TIONS E'rC. TIMELY RESPONDED TO DEFEAT THE AFFID AVITS
POWER AND
CASE 2013- CP-40 0-008 4 EXERCISING THE AFOREMENTIONED
CAN PROAUTHORITY, TO INCLUDE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN POWER; OR THEY
r
OF FRAUD
DUCE AN ORDER THAT IS NOT TAINTED BY EGREGIOUS ACTS
AL COURT.
UPON THE COURT AND OR VOIDED DUE TO REMOVAL TO THE FEDER
OF SUPER THE CLAIM OF FOREIGN SOVEREIGN POWER, TO INCLUDE THAT
BE GIVEN
SEDING ATTORNEY, JUDIC IAL AND LEGIS LATIV E POWER, MUST
CASLB CAPr,ULL E'AITH AND CR.EDIT WITHIN ALL COURT RECORDS• ALL
D, LIMIT ING
TIONED WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT ARE ESSENTIALLY.ON REMAN
EXCEPT
AND RESTR ICTIN G ALL COURTS JURIS DICTI ON TO DO NOTHING,
APPEAL AND
GRANT ALL RELIE F THA'r IS DEMANDED. THIS IS ISSUE ON
N. THIS
GRANTED. TRUSTEE IS APPOINTED IN THE FORM OF JUDGE AUS~I
IS ACQUIRED,
IS CHALLENGE TO YOUR JURIS DICTI ON. ONCE JURIS DICTI ON
NATIONAL
••• IT IS EXCLUSIVE, EVEN BY WAY OF FEDERAL AND OR INTER
UNITED
~ROBATE LAW, AS WELL AS BY ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 OF THE
-TIME
STATES CONSTITUTON, INHABITANTS-OF-TOWN OF-FA IRFIE LD-v.

15);
WARNER,CABLE-NORTHEAST--LLC., F.Sup p.3d. , 2015 WL 15652 37(20
-LITIGAIN--RE:--CHINEESE-MANUFACTURED-DRYWALL--PRODU~TS-LIABILIT~
7-of- 70

w~

158406 0(2016 ); BERRARA-Mp....CUADUIZJ.
IQUIRI Sm.. waJ.,~~f:ou.,. ,2013 1ft 32267S5 CE~D.,,R "Y.,~G13 ) ;· .UDIJKD.
su..11 y:uaii ta:·1•c ~~.~ ...Wll~D~ UMl:.;. J1nc::, "37 F-~-.D~;--~~

'l'ION, ~.Supp .3d., 2016

~f:l .·;

_Fed~

R. ·. ~ERV_~2d-~ .56fe) ;"•urcusoai·~-~:L1»mt.~-~',O!BX:..~•ii~•·' 47'7'

u.s.

242,.. ·.106
.

.

_s.ct.

.

uE
2505• 9t._ ·:t~-lEd~2d. ··202'(l1.s.19ti6).;···wu-·
.
··.
:

.

_
v~-QU!c:&DJ_,.J.OUIS 2 ,.DIC•• F.Su~pe 2d.,•. 2011 WL 247066 l (S.,Doim t. _
um.s• ..,.Lu:•• 2cn1 ~ m., 29s1~30 1N~c.2 01 t,;
a,:s::i>v:..
2011,;

:1•-u.:.. .

1N-Bh..

.-auu..

a~•~•,w;~~~~X.~!-:~~-

2

2012 no 345l66 h)sc~2 012,;

WILLII MS.x.~S ECRffll X~OE~ VETER AN-AE iAlRSz~ -F.Supp .Jd.--,20 15
WL 593516 9(N.D. Ala.201 5); La»ENNA-v.-C.OJIDNDIID~-D»LOXDS-XNS.
CO.z 316 Ped. Appx' 894, 2009 WL 485274 (11tb.C ir.2009 ); MXLLD
v.-»ARRXSBr FeSUPP e2d., 2013 WL 186802 8(V&.2 013). IT IS SO
ORDERED.
ALL CLAIMS, ISSUES AND DEFENSES THAT ARE ARGUED WITHIN
ALL ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE MOW ISSUES ON APPEAL IN THESE CASES
TO INCLUDE THE SEEKING OP DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ADDRESSING EACH
SPECIFIC ISSUE AND CONCERN RAISED WITHIN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS
FOR ALL CASES LISTED WITHIN THE CAPTION OF THIS DOCUMENT. ANY
CLAIM OF REPETITIVE FILING AND OR ABUSE OF COURT IS DEEMED WAIVED
AND OF NO EFFECT UPON THESE CASES IN THEIR TO'l'ALITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND OR SUBSEQUENT FILING WAS CAUSED AND OR CREATED BY
THE CONSPIRING FEDERAL COURTS INVOLVED FRAUD AND INDEPENDENT
ACTION FOR THAT FRAUD WHERE WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN SEPARATED
BY THE COURT, WHEN SUCH SEPARATION WAS BASED UPON THE PROVISIONS
OF THE PRISON L~TIGATION REFORM ACT AND OR THE ANTI-TERRORISM
EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT AND THESE PROVISIONS OF LAW ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE LITIGATION PRESENTED~ THEY CAUSED AND
OR FORCED ANY REPETITIVE AND OR INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR FRAUD
UPON THE COURT TO BE FILED. THUS, SANCTIONS BY THEIR FRAUD ARE·
IMPOSED BY DECREE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURT AND THE COURT
IS IN FORFEITURE OF SUCH A CLAIM. IT IS SO ORDERED.
NO'l'ICB: THIS IS-~ ISSUE ON APPEAL. BY THE LITIGATION

PRESENTED WITHIN THESE CASES, ARE THE PROVISIONS OF THE PLRA
AND THE AEDPA UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

NOTICE: THIS IS AN ISSUE ON APPEAL. BY THE LITIGATION
8-of-70

i

_ 2013 -CP- 400- 0084
PRESENTED AND THE DEFAULT EMERGING FROM CASE
S AND THIS COURT.
THAT BINDS THE UNITED STATES, ITS EMPLOYEE
FULFILL HER DUTIES
IS JUDGE JACQUELYN AUSTIN REQIRED BY LAW TO
?
AS THE KING-KHALIFAH'S APPOINTED TRUSTEE
(

ISSUE ON APPEAL. BY THE DEFAULT AND
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
THE CLAIMS MADE WITHIN THE KING-KHALIFAH'S
ULTED ON BY THE UNITED STATES
AND DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGNTY DEFA
AMUS THAT ESTABLISHES CASE
AND' THAT WHICH IS ARGUED IN THE MAND
TO CHALLENGE SAME
16-2 299 . DO THE KING-KHALIFAH HAVE STANDING
SEX MARRIAGE WITHIN THIS NATION?

NOTICE: THIS IS

AN

NOTICE: THIS IS ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEAL. DUE

TO ONE OF

OF KING DAVID, KING
THE (4) GLOBAL THRONES BEING THE THRONE
SON, BEING LEGAL.
SOLOMON, THE QUEEN OF SHEBA AND THEIR ONLY
ANCESTORS WERE BROUGHT
HEIR TO THE UNITED ETHIOPIAN EMPIRE WHOS~
RIGHTFUL:LEGAL LOST
HERE BY BRUTAL, TORTUROUS FORCE. AS THE
THE INJUSTICES DONE
HEIR . DO WE HAVE LEGAL STANDING TO SUE FOR
IS ARGUED WITHIN THE
VIA THE U.S . SLAVE TRADE AND JIM CROW AS
DOCUMENTS FILED WITHIN THESE CASES?
OUTRAGEOUS ACT
BY THE CONSPIRING JUDGES AND DEFENDANTS
SED AND THEY ARE
OF FRAUD AND OBSTRUCTION, SANCTION ARE IMPO
v.-COLGA~E-PALMOLIVE
IN FORFEITURE OVER THESES ISSU ES, SARLOW~
4); MORRIS
co., 772 F3d. 1001 , 90 Fed . R. SER V.3d . 85 CA~ (Md .201
. 268, Fed . Sec . L. Rep .
v.-W A~W OVI A-SE CUR ITIE S,-IN c., 448 F3d
AND:TOURS 7 -LL C.-v .
Pc 93, 858 CA~ (Va. 2006 ); SLUE-SKX~TRA~E~636( Va.2 015) ; NQ2REGA-v~
AL-T A¥V AR,- -Fed . App x'--, 20i5 WL 1451
4). ~TI S SO ORDERED.
HINK LE, 576 Fed . App x' 224 CA4 (Va .201

DOES ROS S-v.
NOTICE: THIS IS ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEAL.
AS CORPUS AND DUE
BLAKE, 136 s.c t. 1850 (U.S .201 6) APPLY TO HABE
CY AND OBSTRUCTION
TO THE FRAUD, MACHINATION, CRIMINAL CONSPIRA
AND FEDERAL JUDGES AND
OF JUSTICE ENGAGED IN BY BOTH THE STATE
TO EXHAUST WITHIN
OR THE STATE AND FEDERAL ACTORS. DO WE HAVE
FILE FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
THE STATE COU RT, OR CAN WE IMMEDIATELY
LOR -v.-T AYL GRr 2016
CORPUS WITHIN THE FEDERAL COURT? SEE TAY
AND CORRECTIONAL INWL 5118 113. ALSO SEE CAL. JUR S.3d . PENAL
9-of -70

I

STITUT IONS § 1001, RIGHT OF PRISONERS TO RELIEF BY HABEAS CORPUS
(2016) .
WE GIVE THE COURT AND ALL PARTIE S NOTICE . ALL DOCUMENTS
THAT ARE NOW FILED WITHIN CASES 17-6693 AND 17-6925 ARE NOW
DEEMED FILED WITHIN ALL OTHER CASES LISTED WITHIN THE CAPTION

OF THIS DOCUMENT. JUDGES IN CASES 17-6693 AND 17-692 5, YOU ARE
TO INSTRUCT THE COURT CLERK AND OR CASE MANAGER TO BE IN COMPLIANC E TO THIS DEMAND. I, jAHJAH AL MAHDI, AKA LAWRENCE L.
CRAWFORD, LEGAL FOREIG N, VOLUNTARILY JOIN IN ALL CASES PENDING
BEFORE THIS COURT TO PROTECT MY ACQUIRED INTERES T PURSUANT TO
28 u.s.c., §§ 1443(1 ), 2679, 1602-16 12 ET. SEQ •• I WAS PERMITTED
TO BE PARTY IN CASE 17-696 0. BY WHAT IS ARGUED WITHIN CASES
17-669 3 AND 17-692 5, THIS MUST BE PERMITTED FOR ALL CASES INVOLVEDo IT IS SO ORDERED.
IF ANY OF THESE JUDGES OF CONCERN; JUDGES DIAZ, THACKER,
DAVIS, GREGORY, DUNCAN, HAMILTON, AND WE CAN ADD JUDGE SHEDD,
ARE PRESIDI NG OVER ANY,OF THESE CASES CAPTIONED AND REFERRED
TO. WE MOTION FOR YOUR RECUSAL THE SAME WAY AND FOR ESSENTIALLY
THE SAME REASONS ARGUED IN CASES 17-669 3; 17-6960 AND 17-692 5.
EN BANC REVIEW IS TO. BE GIVEN BY THE REMAINING 4TH. CIRCUI T
JUDGES TO PREVEN'r ANY FURTHER ACTS OF FRAUD. WE INFORMED THE
COURT THAT PARTIE S WITHIN ,THE 4TH. CIRCUIT WERE POTENTIALLY
INVOLVED. NOW THAT JUDGE SHEDD IS REVEALED COMMITTING AN ILLEGAL
AC'f, THAT HE KNOWS IS ILLEGA L. HIS NAME RELATES BACK TO THE
ORIGINAL COMPLAINTS WITHIN A.i..L .l?ARALLEL AND RELATED CASES. THEIR
(

PRESENCE PRODUCE A PO'rENTIAL FOR BIAS 'fHAT RISES 'l'O AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL AND THEY CANNOT SIT UPON THEIR OWN CASES BASED
UPON THE FRAUD THAT THEY ARE PARTY TO AS IS ARGUED UNDER CASES
17-669 3 AND 17-692 5, UNITEO -STATE S-v.-QU INONES , 2016 WL 441314 9,

*

6+ (s.o.va .2016) ; WILLIA MS-v.-P ENNS~L VANIA, 136

s.ct.

1899

(U.S.20 16); U.S.-v . ECCLES TON,--F ed. Appx'- -u20J5 WL 4591890
CA4 (Md.20 15); U.S. v.-HAGK LEY, 662 F3do 671 CA4 (Va.20 11).
IF SOMEHOW CASE 17-7068 HAS BEEN CLOSED AND OR THE MANDATE
MANDATE
HAS BEEN SENT 'I'O 'THE LOWER COUHT., WE l'10TION TO RECALL THE
AND REINSTATE CASE 17-7068 BY WHAT IS ARGUED WITHIN THE ATTACHED
10-of-7 0

DOCUMENTS AND PARALLEL APPEALS AND OR RELATED CASES. THE 4TH.
CIRCUIT SHALL GRANT THIS RELIEF. IT IS SO ORDERED.
IF THERE IS ANY CONCERN ABOUT A 3 STRIKE ISSUE RELATED
TO THE KING-KHALIFAH OR ANY PARTY INVOLVED. THOSE PAST STRIKES
ARE VOID AND ILLEGAL WHICH WILL BE ELABORATED ON 6 AND THREAT
OF IMMINENT DANGER EXIST AT THE TIME OF ALL OF THESE CASES FILING
AS IS ARGUED IN CASES 17-6693 AND 17-6925. STATE PRISONER CLAIM
THAT HE SUFFERED UNPROVOKED ASSAULTS BY PRISON OFFICIALS WHICH
RESULTED IN SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES, THAT HE WAS THREATENED
WITH SEVERE BODILY INJURY OR DEATH UPON ENTRY INTO PRISON, BEARING A NEXUS TO THESE PROCEEDINGS, AND THAT PRISONER LIVED IN
AN ATMOSPHERE OF CONSTANT FEAR IN WHICH HE KNOWS NOT WHEN NEXT
VIOLENT ASSAULT MAY OCCUR, WERE SUFFICIENT TO DEMONSTRATE EXISTENCE OF IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM, AS REQUIRED
TO COME WITHIN EXCEPTION TO THREE STRIKE RULE PRECLUDING PRISONER
WHOSE 3PRIOR ACTIONS WERE DISMISSED FROM PLEADING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, JO~W£GW-~.-WARW~Rr 200 Fed. Appx' 270, 2006 WL 2711957
(4th.Cir.200 6). IT IS A DANGER GREATER THAN FEAR WHERE REPEATED
AND RECENT ATTACKS HAVE ALREADY OCCURRED AND THE CONDUCT THREATENS CONTINUING AND FUTURE INJURY. IT IS A PATTERN.OF CONDUCT
EVIDENCING THE LIKELIHOOD OF IMMINENT SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY,
~R~AW-~.-MsC A~~r 2016 WL 529574(DSC.2 016); ~QMW£Q~-~.-K~S~Rr
F.Supp.2d., 2012 WL 293286(W.D.V a.2012); 5A¥R~-~.-~~W ~r F.Supp.
3d., 2014 WL 4414509(W.D. Va.2014); ~Q~~-~.-~~~~£T 2015 WL 6407205
(N.D.Fla.201 5); ~~WC~RSQW~~.-G~OR~lAr 20~5 WL 4492743(Ga.2 015).
IN REGARDS TO CASES 17-7068; 17-7134; 17-7139 ET. ALQ
AS ARGUED BEFORE THE COURT IN CASES 17-6693; 17-6925. YOU HAVE
THE DEFENDANTS POTENTIALLY LISTED INCORRECTLY IN THESE CASES.
IT APPEARS FROM THE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU HAVE SERVED ON US, THAT
THE DEFENDANTS ARE LISTED AS "THE JUDGES WHO SIGNED THE ORDER
IN CASE 16-i953" ONLY? IF THIS IS THE CASE, IT MUST BE CORRECTED
BEFORE THESE CASES CAN MOVE FORWARD. THIS BECOMES A CHALLENGE
TO YOUR JURISDICTION BASED UPON THE FRAUD THAT HAS POTENTIALLY
OCCURRED. THIS IS NOT A FORTUITOUS ACT ON THE PART OF THE CONSPIRING JUDGES WHICH FURTHER WARRANT THEIR RECUSAL AND DISQUA11-of-70

THESE DEFENDANTS INCORRECTLY
LIFICATION. THE ACT OF LI.STING
CASES IS AN ACT OF FRAUD UPON
IN THESE PARALLEL AND RELATED
, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND
THE COURTS, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
OS FROM BEING HEARD ON THE CLAIMS
MACHINATION DESIGNED TO PREVENT
. THERE ARE ESSENTIALLY (2) PRONGS
MADE. THIS IS WHAT IS OCCURRING
RT.CAN DEEM A CASE AS BEING FR ITHAT MUST BE MET BEFORE THE COU
VOLOUS. THEY ARE:

ITION WHERE
THE PLA INT IFF (S) MUST BE IN A POS
SON WHO UNDER THE ALLEGATIONS
HE IS MAKING EFFORTS TO SUE A PER
BE SUED.
MADE WITHIN THE CO~LAINT CANNOT
(1)

\

RINGES UPON A RIGHT
(2) IS WHERE THE PLA INT IFF (S) INF
THAT IS NOT ESTABLISHED.
S KNEW THAT LEGALLY THE
THE JUDGES AND CONSPIRING PARTIE
L ESTOPPEL EMERGING FROM CASE
DEFAULT AND·CLAIMS OF COLLATERA
T WE ARE NOT INFRINGING UPON
201 3-C P-4 00- 008 4 DEMONSTRATES THA
ESTABLISH BECAUSE THE ACTION
RIGHTS THAT WE DID NOT LEGALLY
REMOVED TO THESE PARALLEL AND
UNDER CASE 201 3-C P-4 00- 008 4 IS
L
CLAIMS OF DEFAULT AND COLLATERA
RELATED CASES AND BECAUSE THE
SOUGHT TO BE EXERCISED AND OR
ESTOPPEL ESTABLISHES THE RIGHTS
LLENGE IN THIS REGARD. SO THEIR
INVOKED, BARRING ANY FURTHER CHA
NOT MEET THE FIRST PRONGe THAT
INTENT WAS TO SHOW THAT WE DID
WHO COULD NOT BE SUED FOR THE
BEING THAT WE WERE SUING PEOPLE
SUING THE UNITED STATES FOR
CLAIMS MADE. FOR EXAMPLE, WE ARE
THE PLRA AND THE AEDPA. tET ,
ES'l'ABLISHING THE PROVISIONS Ol?
AS A DEFENDANT. WE ARE SUING
THE UNITED STATES IS NOT LISTED
MEMBER STATES OF THE UNITED
TED STATES AND THE OTHER (19 2)
THE UNI
ACHING AND OR EXECUTING THE
NATIONS FOR THEIR ARRESTING, ATT
ESTABLISHED GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THE REION OF THE CONTRACT, THE GRANT,
STATE WHERE THEY ARE IN VIOLAT
E CORPORATION, IMPAIRING THE
GIVEN TO THE NATIONS BY THE SOL
S
GIVING THE RIGHT TO MARRY TO GAY
OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACT BY
SE JUDGES FOR TH IS. THIS IS WHY
AND LESBIANS. WE CAN'T SUE THE
ANTS PROPERLY. WE ARE SUING THE
THEY FAILED TO LIS T THE DEFEND
THE S.C . ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR
S.C . DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND
12- of- 70

CONSPIRI NG WITH THE JUDGES AND FOR OTHER ACTS THEY'VE DONEo
YET, THEY ARE NOT LISTED AS PARTY. WE ARE SUING THE STATE OF
SOUTH CAROLINA, THE SuC • SUPREME COURT AND ITS JUDGESp THE S.C.
COURT OF APPEALS AND ITS JUDGES ALL THESE COURTS' JUDGES BY
BY NAME INDIVIDUALLY FOR THE £~A~&i:-l.l'.,.-gEW~Rl{ FRAUD., YET, TH.EY
ARE NOT LISTED. WE ARE SUING FOR REPARATIONS FOR THE U.S. SLAVE
TRADE AND JIM CROW LAWS IN THIS NATION. YET, THE PARTIES FOR
THIS CLAIM ARE NOT LISTED. WE ARE SUING FOR THE INJUSTIC ES THAT
OCCURRED UNDER CASE 2013-CP -400-008 4 TO WHICH IS REMOVED TO
THESE PARALLEL AND RELATED CASES. YET, THESE DEFENDANTS ARE
NOT LISTED BY THE JUDGES CONSPIRING TO AID THEM AVOID SUIT.
LOOK AT THE§ l983 THAT ESTABLISHES THE .PARALLEL CASES, AS IT
WAS FOR THE WRIT OF ERROR THAT ESTABLISHES APPEAL OF CASES 8:16cv-3327 , 3328, 3194-RBH -JDA. ON PAGE (2) OF THE [44] PAGE COMPLAINT ATTACHED WHERE IT ASKED FOR DEFENDANT N0.(1). IT IS LISTED
"SEE ATTACHED SHEETS AND.THE AFFIDAV IT OF SERVICE SERVED ON
THE 4TH. CIRCUIT ". THIS IS A HAND WRITTEN DOCUMENT. IT WAS THEN
TYPED DOWN AND NOW EXIST AS THE (14) PAGE DOCUMENT IN QUESTION
THAT THE JUDGES CALLED s.c.D.c. AND TOLD THEM TO BLOCK COPIES
TO PREVENT ITS FILING SO THEY COULD IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE
COURTS, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE LIST
THESE DEFENDANTS AS THEY PRESENTLY HAVE THEM LISTED AND FRAUDULENTLY SAY THAT WE ARE SUING PEOPLE WHO CAN'T BE SUED FOR THE
CLAIMS MADE WITHIN THE COMPLAINTS AND OR WRITS OF ERROR IN ACTS
OF MACHINATION. WE OBJECT AND DEMAND THAT THE NAMES OF ALL THE
DEFENDANTS SOUGHT TO BE LISTED WITHIN ALL OF THESE PARALLEL
AND OR RELATED CASES BE NOW AMENDED AND ADDED TO THE RECORD.
THE HAND WRITTEN (34) PAGE AFFIDAV IT OF SERVICE , WHICH IS NOW
TYPED AND EXIST AS THE (14) PAGE AFFIDAV IT OF SERVICE IS SUPPOSE
TO BE FILED IN THE (3) CASES REFERRED TO AND FILED IN CASE 9:16cv-3808-T LW-BM AND david duren CASE, WAS BLOCKED BEING FILED
AND OR IGNORED IN THE OTHER PARALLEL AND OR RELATED CASES BY
THE CONSPIRI NG JUDGES AND IS NOW ATTACHED TO THE FACE OF ALL
COMPLAINTS AND OR WRirs OF ERROR FOR ALL PURPOSES WHICH INCLUDE
INFORMING THE COURT OF WHO THE DEFENDANTS ARE WITHIN THESE CASES.
WE WANT ALL DEFENDANTS NAMES LISTED INDIVIDUALLY AS REQUIRED.
FROM ON PAGE (7) OF THE COMPLAINT, THE "LEES" AND "ABRAMS"
i3-of-70 ,

ED
ON THAT PAGE WE AGAIN INFORM
WERE OMITTED IN THEIR FRAUD.
WIT HIN
OF THE DEFENDANTS ARE LIS TED
THE COURT THAT THE REMAINDER
STATED
ON PAGE (15 ) IT IS CLEARLY
THE AFF IDA VIT OF SER VIC E.
S ARE
TES . NONE OF THESE DEFENDANT
WE ARE SUING THE U~I TED STA
COURTS
IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE
LIS TED IN THE ACTUA~ RECORD
ER COLOR
CRIMINALLY, CONSPIRING UND
MACHINATION SO THEY COULD
AND
U.S .C.
Y, ALSO IN VIOLATION OF 18
OF STATE LAW AND OR AUTHORIT IAL FACTS AND CLAIM THAT WE ARE
TER
§§ 242 AND 100 1 CONCEAL MA
IT IS
OF THESE CLAT~S ONLY, WHEN
TRYING TO SUE JUDGES FOR ALL
SUED FOR
THAT THE JUDGES CANNOT BE
OVERWHELMINGLY CONSPICUOUS
BEING PARTY
USLY MADE, EXCEPT FOR THEY
ANY OF THESE CLAIMS PREVIO
IRED
UIRES THAT WHOM THEY CONSP
CONSPIRACY WHERE THE LAW REQ
TO THE
PER SPI CU OU S
AS DEFENDANTS. IT BECOMES
WITH BY NAME MUST BE LIS TED
D CASES
THESE PARALLEL AND OR RELATE
THAT THE JUDGES PRESENCE IN
T THE
PRE JUD ICI AL MAGNITUDE, THA
IS OF SUCH A DETRIMENTAL AND
WARRANTING
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL
POTENTIAL FOR BIA S RIS ES TO
AND
AT ION AND THAT OUR REQUEST
CTIONS, RECUSAL, DIS QU AL IFIC
SAN
D. WE WANT
UE TO NEW JERSEY BE GRANTE
MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VEN
ATED
OF THESE PARALLEL AND OR REL
DEFENDANTS AMENDED IN ALL
THE
AS ·THEY
ED, TO REFLECT THE PAR TIE S
CA SES , ALL THAT ARE CAPTION
l
OF
THEM TO BE FIL ED AND CHANGE
WERE ORIGINALLY INTENDED FOR
TH IS.
WANT INJUNCTION TO REQUIRE
VENUE TO NEW JERSEY AND WE
MOTION
ED ARE ISS UE S ON APPEAL. WE
NOTICE: ALL THE AFOREMENTION
S-~ .
M THE 4TH . CIR CU IT, Wl t.~l AM
FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FRO
w.
~95 L.E d.2 d. 132 , 84 u.s .L.
W5¥LVAW1Ar 136 s.c t. 189 9,
~EW
-Wli:MQYRS
S"J;'Rl~~-lWC.-~.-~.1.-CU~QW"J;'-C~
435 9(U .S. 20~ 6); KOt.OW-lWCU
.
); ~A"J;'AW2A-1WC1AW-WA~lOW-~
O.r 748 F3d . 160 CA4 (V a.2 004
&-~
E
( S. C. 20~ 4); AR.A~A-~.-Ylt.I..AG
..
. S., C,._ ·52 6" 756 S,. E-.. 2d. I 900
5"J;'A~»;r 407
WlL~O:W
117 350 04, * 2+, S"C " Ap p.;
-OWWli:RS-ASS!W-lWC. 7 201 1 WL
»llii:i~~
7 (DS C.2 01 5) ;
F. Sup p. 3d. , , 201 5 WL 52 4 4 9 6
~ .... '5MA~-MQR"J;"c;;.-I.~C. 7
c;;Rli:A~
5 WL 856 866 (S. D.V a.2 015 );
-LAWRli:W~li:r F.S up p.3 d., 20~
· u.s.-~~
73 F.S upp .
W~"J;'WQRK-WARCWARE-CQR~.r
AMERl~AW-1WC.-~O.-~.-WEX"J;'CA¥~XA RrYE t.-A WC -~Q YR Sr- t.t.C .-~. -At .-~A
3d. 636 (20 14) ; 2LU E-S K¥- ~RA
.-~. -~E t.t. 7
163 6(V a.2 015 ); WUCAR ... CQ R~
-Fe d. Ap px '--, 201 5 WL 145
6
l~li:C-S~A~li:S-~.-QYlWOWli:Sr 201
~D . 191 , 194 (DS C.2 008 ); UW
251 F.R
u.s .
); ~QRRli:5"J;'ER-~.-WWl~li:r 484
441 314 9, * 6+ (S. D.V a.2 086
WL
d., 200 9
8); ULUSli:-~ .... Uv S•r F.S up p.2
219 , 108 S.C t. 53 8(U .S. t98
14- of- 70

20 12 WL
¼WQURr F. Su pp .2 d. ,
C. 20 09 ); A~~2~-~.-aE
WL 30 52 60 8( DS
r 20 16 WL
A~ Es -~ g~ ~.- G~ -~ U£ ~~ C~
JQ ~W ~O W -~ .-u wi ~~ ~- S~
11 30 66 0;
~RAZE~~
~r 20 16 WL 64 94 41 1;
16 ); UAh~A~-~.-MARCE
E45 93 46 7( D. M d. 20
S. C. Ap p. 20 09 ); R~~~
2, 68 2 s. E. 2d . 82 4(
50
~.-W~WQaORr 38 4 s. c.
12 ); CAR~~R
12 WL 10 84 7( DS C. 20
£EW7 F. Su pp .2 d. , 20
~RAlW-v.~2~R~U~~
~I W -~ .-W OR ~~
23 4( DS C. 20 14 ); E~ a~
O~lWAr 20 14 WL 53 25
~.-aOU~W-CAR
URWSr
C. 20 15 ); 2E~~OW-~.-2
20 15 WL 23 65 70 1( DS
A~~T
AGGE~~AWCE-CQRP.r
1) ; 2AC~US-~.-MAR~W
WL 64 02 48 CA4 (2 01
20 11
10 4
11 Fe d. Ap px ' 32 8,
~~ ~N r 46 6 u. s. 52 2,
C. 20 14 ); ~u ~~ 1A M -~ .~A
20 t4 WL 13 30 98 4( DS
9( 18 80 ).
RGlW~Ar 10 0 u. s. 33
.S .1 98 4) ; ~X-RAR~~-~~
s. ct . 19 70 (U
\

SO
AS BEING LI ST ED AL
D THESE DEFENDANTS
THE JUDGES BLOCKE
COURTS.
OF FRAUD UPON THE
D RECUSAL IN ACTS
AS A MEANS TO AVOI
THE ACTIONS
ADY GIVEN NOTICE BY
E PA RT IE S WERE ALRE
9; 16 WE OB JE CT . TH
UNDER CASES 16 -2 29
E WRITS OF MANDAMUS
ING
PENDING THROUGH TH
RELATED TO THE PEND
D OTHER PLEADINGS
41 5 AN
19 53 ; 16 -2 14 1; 17 -1
ALLY
NG-KHALIFAH PERSON
D CASES AND THE KI
PARALLEL AND RELATE
. OF JU ST IC E INFORM
RNEY AND U. S. DE PT
RAL ATTO
TH EI R
WROTE THE S. C. FEDE
THAT IT WOULD BE IN
S ADMONISHING THEM
SE
IN G THEM OF ALL CA
ED IN CASE
CE SI NC E THEY APPEAR
TO MAKE AN APPEARAN
CA SE S.
BE ST IN TE RE ST
RALLEL AND RELATED
REMOVED TO THESE PA
W
20 13 -C P- 40 0- 00 84 NO
33 27 ,
UNDER CASES 8: 16 -c vE DEFENDANTS NAMES
THUS,
YOU HAVE ALL TH
FID AV IT OF SE RV IC E.
A THE (3 4) PAGE AF
VI
33 28 , 31 94 -R BH -JD A
D OR WRIT
IGINAL COMPLAINT AN
LATE BACK TO THE OR
ALL
TH EI R NAMES RE
OR RELATED CA SE S.
THESE PARALLEL AND
OF ERROR IN ALL OF
RRING TO
NOT MERELY BY REFE
LI ST ED INDIVIDUALLY
'
NAMES MUSTt BE
l~C .,e 4 9 4 Fe d. Ap px
GOQCMAI:il-l.l .. -b !R AX Al RVI T,
A CASE OR AF FI DA
.IQlUi!SOI:il-lil,.-WARRLQ~~
8 5 0 {4 th . C ir . 2 0 0 7) ;
RV . 3d .
.-S ER UI .
4 5 8, 6 8 Fe d. R. SE
17 ); RU S~ ~~ ~- ~.- S. W
20 17 WL l9 57 07 1( 20
IW~ERWA~•ONAh-lN~.r
W -~ .-S RA ~~ ~¥
N. D. va .2 01 7) ; ~R ~~
Nr 20 U7 WL 14 49 21 1(
C~W~-~OR~ORA~lO
.
.3 d. 47 9 (D SC .2 0~ 6)
CQM~AW~r 19 4 F. Su pp
ECT
ERLY LI ST ED TO CORR
THAT ARE TO BE PROP
THE DEFENDANTS
13 4; 17 WELL AS CASES 17 -7
E PREVIOUS CASES AS
TH IS FRAUD IN TH
CASE UNDER 8: 16 ~c v,; THE ANTHONY COOK
A L.
70 68 ; 17 -7 13 9 ET .
A SIM IL AR
MUST BE LI ST ED IN
Y BEING PROCESSED,
ES
33 27 -R BH HOPEFULL
PENDENT ACTION IS SU
RIATION DUE TO INDE
HT VA
FASHION WITH A SL IG
RE IS LI MI TE D AND OR
. YOUR JU RI SD IC TI ON
SUBSEQUENTLY RA IS ED
15 -o f- 70

STRICTED TO ADDRESSING THE FRAUD IF ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS ARE
NOT PROPERLY LI~TED, AND BY THIS FRAUD THE COURT MUST REMAND
TO ALLOW THIS INJUSTICE TO BE CORRECTED, UvSv-v~~BIERCEz 400
F3d. 176 CA4 (Va.2005); COLE-u.-SLANKENSHlBr 30 F2de 211 CA4
(1929); LOUGHAN-~.-UcS•r 134 SoCte 2384(U.S.2014); SMITH-v.
CLARKt-SMOO~J-RUS.SELL 1 --F3d.--, 2015 WL 4717932 CA4 (Md.2015);
LUGA£-v.-2RISTOL-CON OOMINIUMS-PROPER~ X-OWNERS-ASS!N, s.E.2a.,·
2015 WL 3885837(S.C.App.20 15); FOX-EX-REL-FOX-v.-E LK-RUN-COAL

co.-INc.,

739 F3d. 131 CA4 (2014); NELSON-v.-UflS.-SAN K-N.A ••
2015 WL 6852712(DSCe2015); STRATTEN-v.-MECKLENBERG-COUNT¥-OEP.T.
OF-SOClAL-SERVlCES 1 521 Fede Appx 9 278, 2013 WL 2364587 CA4
(N.C.2013)e

NOTICE: THIS IS ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEAL. BY THE LEGAL
ISSUES SUBMITTED UNDER CASE 17-6693 THAT ARE ALSO FILED FOR
ALL PARALLEL AND OR RELATED CASES AND BY THE LITIGATION SUBMITTED
THAT DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PLRA AND THE AEDPA ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, DO WE HAVE A RIGHT TO CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION, ALSO
BY THE ATTORNEY POWERS GIVEN TO THE KING-KHALIFAH BY THE DEFAULT.
INASMUCH, THE COURT IN CASES 17-7139; 17-7134 AND 177068 REQUIRED WE FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS AND SUBMIT
INFORMAL BRIEF. EVEN THOUGH THIS ISSUE IS ADDRESSED IN CASES
17-6693 AND 17-6925 WHICH APPLIES TO ALL OF THESE CASES OF CONCERN. WE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL OCTOBER'lfi, 2017
BECAUSE THE 6 MONTH STATEMENTS MUST BE SENT TO s.c.o.c. HEAD
QUARTERS AND THE TURN AROUND TIME CAN TAKE UP UNTIL A MONTH
I

BEFORE ~>JE RECEIVE THEM BACK., THEREFORE., WE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL THEN TO FILE THE DOCUMENT AND ANY POTENTIAL
INFORMAL BRIEF OR BRIEF OF ANY KIND. NEVERTHELESS, BY ALL DOCU-.
MENTS FILED IN CASES 17-6693 AND 17-6925, TO INCLUDE THOSE HERE
WITH ATTACHED. WE MOTION TO WAIVE THE FILING FEES FOR ALL APPELLANTS IN THESE CASES DUE TO ACTS OF CRIMINAL CONVERSION DONE
BY JUDGE SEYMOUR AND THE CLAIMS ARGUED WITHIN 'rHOSE CASES WHICH
ARE NOW FOR ALL CASES LISTED WITHIN THE CAPTION OF THIS DOCUMENT.
'l'O ESTABLIStl CAUSE OF AC'TION TO RECOVER DAL•lAGES FOR CON-

VERSION, WHERE JUDGE SEYMOUR STOLE MONEY FROM ROBERT MITCHELL'S

~6-of-70

COOPER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT, WHICH WAS MONEY
OWED TO THE KING KHALIFAH, GIVING HIM THE RIGHT OF CLAIM. A
.
.
PLAI NTIF F MUST SHOW
I
.
LEGAL OWNERSHIP OR AN IMMEDIATE SUPERIOR RIGH
T OF POSS ESSIO N
TO A SPEC IFIC IDEN TIFIA BLE THING AND MUST
SHOW THAT THE DEFE NDAN T(S) EXERCISED AN UNAUTHORIZED DOMINLON
OVER THE THING IN
QUESTION TO THE. EXCLUSION OF THE P~AI NTIF
F(S) RIGH TS. ROBERT
MITCHELL OWED THAT MONEY TO THE KING-KHALIFAH
GIVING US BOTH
STANDING TO CHALLENGE AND SEEK SANCTION FOR
THIS INJU STIC E WHICH
ARE GRANTED BY DECREE AND JUDGMENT OF THE
CHIEF JUST ICE OF THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURT. ALL FILIN G FEES FOR
ALL PARTIES ARE
WAIVED. THE UNITED STATES rs IN DEFAULT IN
CASE 2013 -CP- 4000084 . YOUR GLOBAL NATIONS VIA THE DEFAULT
HAD NO RIGHT TO ATTACH,
.
I
.
ARREST OR EXECUTE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
, GIVEN TO YOUR NATION S BY "GRANT", "FRA NCH ISE", "COVENANT",
"CONTRACT 11 ORIGINATING
FROM THE SOLE CORPORATION WHICH HAD RESTRICT
IONS WHICH YOU VIOLATED WHICH IS PROTECTED UNDER THE U.S. CONS
TITUTION ARTICLE
1 SECTION 1 0. YOU HAD NO_, AUTHORIZATION
TO GIVE THIS INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY TO THE SODOMITES AND GOMMORAHRITES
OF YOUR NATIONS.
CAUSE IS ESTABLISHED. WE MOTION FOR AN INDE
PENDENT INVESTIGATION
BY SOMEONE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRUMP
ADMINISTRATION, ~IWQ
/

I.~.-~ .-I.R .~.-IW ~~RW A~•Q WA~ -IW~ •r 2016 WL 5936
875( NeY .201 6);
WA~ !~-C~ R.-R QR-C RiSI 5-W~ M~.y -IWC .-~.-~ ~RN~ Rr

~UX

91 AaD .3d. 920,
920- 21, 938 N.Y .S.2d . 138, 138- 39(2 nd.D EPT
.2D1 2).

JUDGE KAYMANI WEST IN ONE OF THE PARALLEL
APPEALS ISSUED
AN ORDER ON AUGUST 23, 2017 CLAIMING SHE
COULD NOT READ SOME
OF THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS FILE D. THE ATTACHED
REFERRED TO ORDER
IS NOW SOUGHT LEAVE TO APPEALe WE INFORMED
THE COURT IN CASES
17-6 969; 17-6 693 AND 17-6 925 ALSO ARGUED
IN THE (19) PAGE INJU NCTION THAT WE ARE BORROWING A TYPEWRITER TO
WHICH WE DO NOT ALWAYS
HAVE ACCESS TO DUE TO-STATE INTERFERENCE.
JUDGE WEST ABUSED
HER DISC RETI ON. THIS ORDER IS VACATED AND
ON REMAND BY DECREE
OF THE CHIE F JUST ICE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRAT
IC COURT. IT IS CONSPICUOUS BY WHAT rs ARGUED IN THE (19) PAGE
INJUNCTION THAT
THE STATE INTERFERENCE DO INDEED RISE TO
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEVEL WHERE THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE PARALLEL
AND RELATED CASES
DESTROYED THE KING -KHA LIFA H'S TYPEWRITER,
SUBJECTING HIM TO
I

l

'

17-o f-70

...

PHYSICJiL-MSAU1,TS MD ---~!EID -@UWGOOOS
ciusz°, 'THEJ- -iici--:-B~SUFFmlS ROM A LIF E
-.

.....

-·

ACTS @If' mff llllT IOi@ - -

LONG

DISABILITY--TO-::Hl'.s·:--:

-·· ..

-w1 0s· CREATED
a:ts ·--wa~TING MORE LEGfBLEo THE DIS ~IL Xff TO HIS
<••

.--•••-•••"••-•, • , - • A • • - • - - - - • , . ___ , .

BY THE.,AC'l:'S OF OFF ICIA L

TBJESE D~F EM D~S , ALONG

MDT.AL

-•-••-•-••OHO•'

•

TORTURE

~XTH ffl

--r-• •-•• -

H VAS

• -••

••-- -

--1-•••••• ••

••••----•- ••-•-

•

S ~ E D ~ Bl!

DESTRUCTXON·OF HIS PROPERTY

XN ACC - TO 'J:'BE OOUR'fj. WAS . OO~E
-- -·-·-··
THEY Kr3EW HE DID NEED-'1'0 AID .... -- ESS
-- -~

-

.

.

.

!JUN TU Y· ··o o·u ·•~ SUWPD
SUEJEC'1' .. EIJ4 TO mn HS E _PBYSICU.
mELisy
xN

HR1T1ea - wo -u HoPis •·ow -onw1MG- sxll'l! niolMI

ixn ~

t ACCESS TO TFllf
C:ISXNG THE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIG m·e
ACTS "of' lPBYSICAL ,-O ri~ -·
-· . ......
COURTS., 'fflI S ALSO IS TAM'l'AHOUNT ro

WHICE THEY ARE BEING SUED
IN VIO ATI ON OF THE CeAeT. TREA~Y FOft
ASLE
Cl s !WiD S is IRRJU'M
FORc THE DAMAGE 'l'O THE KING-KlliALIFAE
UDGE llYMAN:l'.-WEST., CONAS THE DOCTORS HAVE REPEATEDLY SAID~'J
OR OF STATE LAW -MD OR
SPIRING WITH -THE DEFENDANTS UNDER ...COL
ER WITHIN THE DISTRICT COURT
AUTHORITY, ISSUES THIS ATTACHED ORD
Y PENALIZED
ACT OF-MACHINATION SHE HAS-- . /ESSENTIALL
.
..
'
ABILITY
ACTS OF RETALIATION 'FOR HIS DIS..
-· --THE ..KING-KHALIFAH IN .
.. ..
.
...
AN OBSTACLE TO BAR OR REWHERE THIS ORDER SERVES AS A MEANS 0
TION OF 42 U.S .Ce § 12203
STRICT HIS ACCESS TO THE COURT.IN vfLA
IES ACT. SINCE THE KING(a)b ) OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILIT
MAKE HIS LEGAL
KHALIFIAH BY WAY OF HIS DISABILITY
SPECWFICALLX AT TIMES WHEN
MENTS ANY MORE LEGIBLE.THAN HE HAS,
S ARE NOW CLEARLY
HE DOES NOT -HAV E ACCESS TO A TYPEWRITER. DAMAGE
COURT
T IS NOW SE!WED ON THE LOWER
•

- - •

•~•

•••

•

-

----•

M

•

•-

••••

WHERE-XN THIS
'

••

••-••

-•

•

•••--••-

...

-•

••-•

.

--

:

~

CANNOT

DOCU-

•

1

-

.

SHOWN -AND THE INJU NCT ION THA

ED-BY JUDGE WEST PRODUCES
~-S ~? SE GRANTED. THE ORDER PRODUC
AND BY THE STATE INTEREVIDENCE OF DAMAGES VIA THE DISABILITY
IT DEMONSTRATES INDEED THAT
FERENCE ARGUED IN THE INJUNCTION 6
E TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL.
THE STATE INTERFERENCE DOES RIS
HTS UNDER THE AMERICANS
, THEREFORE, BY THE JING~KHALIFAH'S RIG
MUST AND IS GRANTED. WE
WITH DIS ABI LIT IES ACT, THE INJUNCTION
WEST TO SIGN THE INJUNCTION
MOTION THAT THE COURT INSTRUCT JUDGE
HTS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF
ANO PROTECTIVE ORDER. DUE TO ADA RIG
THE CASE IT MUST BE GRANTED.
•

..

,CC-

18- of-7 0

JUDGE WEST, BY THE ISSUING OF SUCH AN ORDER SUBJUDICE
ON AUGUST 23, 2017; THIS HAS GOT TO BE THE MOST STUPID, IGNORANT,
UNREASONABLE ORDER I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. BY SUCH
AN ORDER JUDGE WEST HAS ESSENTIALLY ORDERED A "BLIND MAN" TO
STOP BEING BLIND. SHE HAS ORDERED A "PARALYZED MAN" TO STOP
BEING PARALYZED. SHE ORDERED A "LAME MAN" WITH NO LEGS TO GET
UP AND DANCE THE TENNESSEE WALTZ AND DANCE THE "CHARLESTON"
, THEN DANCE A BALLET, .BREAK DANCE THEN JUMP UP AND DO (20)
JUMPING JACKS. JUDGE WEST IN AN EGREGIOUS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
HAS ORDERED A DISABLED PLAINTIFF, THE KING-KHALIFAH, TO STOP
BEING DISABLED IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.s.c. § 12203(a)(b) OF THE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, WHICH IS LUDICROUS, UNREASON/

ABLE AND CRIMINAL IN ACTS OF RETALIATION AND OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE. BY SUCH ACTION, LEGAL COUNSEL MUST BE APPOINTED TO
I

REPRESENT THE CLASS MEMBERS TO PREVENT ANY FURTHER INJUSTICES
FROM OCCURRING. WE MOTION FOR SUCH, BUT THE KING-KHALIFAH DO
NOT WAIVE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF SELF REPRESENTATION. LET
COUNSEL ACT AS STAND-BY TO ASSIST THE KING-KHALIFAH WITH SUCH.
MATTERS AS FILING, TYPING OR ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY STAND
AS AN OBSTACLE DUE TO THE DISABILITY IN HIS HANDS CAUSED BY
. THESE DEFENDANTS. THE KING-KHALIFAH SHALL RETAIN HIS RIGHT OF
SELF REPRESENTATION WHILE LEGAL COUNSEL BE APPOINTED IN FULLNESS
FOR THE OTHER CLASS MEMBERS. BY THE DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT OF
THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, THE KING REMAIN
AS LEAD PLAINTIFF. THE APPOINTING OF LEGAL COUNSEL AND THE GRANTING OF THE INJUNCTION NOW BECOMES MANDATORY. IT IS SO ORDERED,
~AaK¥-~.-~ORR~a~QWN-~~~?..%. 425 N.J. SUPER. 530, 42 Aa3de 202
(N.J.2012); RULE 23(g) Fede RULES OF PRO.; RQ¥5~~RS-~.-WEW-JER S~X

S~A~E-~GL~CEr 439 N.J. SUPER. 554, 110 A.3d. 934(N.J.2015);
~A~~UWA-~.-SARA-~E ~-CQRP. 7 A.2d., 2010 WL 3418354 (2010); 2AR~~
~~~~-~.-~EW-¥GRK-S~ A~E-sg.-G~-~AW-~XAM 1WERSr 970 F.Supp. 1094
(S.D.N.Y.1997); K~MELr 528 u.s. at 86, 120 s.ct. 631; ~~RR~~~

Y.-~S~E~LEr 568 F2d. 1128, 1132-1133 CA5 (1978); ~~Q~LE-~.-R~YERA
, 125 MISC.2d. 516, 528, 480 N.Y.Su2d. 426, 434 (Sup.Ct.1984);

u.s.

509, 124 s.ct. fl978, 158 L.Ed.2d.
820(2004); SA2¥-WEA~-EGR-A~0 -2¥-KA~~ER-~.-CAS~¥ r 43 F3d. 48
(3rd.Cir.~994); bACK~-~.-GREEW~R~Er 330 s.c. 388, 498 s.E.2d.

~EMWESSEE-~7-~AMEz 541

19-of-70

89 8 (S eC e 19 98 ) c,

TO TA LAPPEAL., DUE TO THE
IS ANOTHER ISSUE ON
NOTICE: THIS
ION FOR THE APDO WE MEET THE CRITER
CES~
ES
ITY OF THE CIRCUMSTAN
ICANS WITH DI SA BI LI TI
UNSEL UNDER THE AMER
S ACTS
POINTMENT OF LEGAL CO
DUE TO THE EGREGIOU
TY OF THE CASEu AND
ACT, THE COMPLEXI
ACY AND OBSTRUCTION
TS, CRIMINAL CONSPIR
UR
OF FRAUD UPON THE CO
OF JUSTICE?

42

u. s. c. A . §

12 20 3 PROVIDES:

ATES
42 OF THE UNITED ST
APTER 12 6 OF TITLE
* 4 CH
TH DI SA BI LI TI ES ACT
AS THE AMERICANS WI
OWN
CODE IS COMMONLY KN
CTION 12 20 3 OF THE
u. s. c. § 12 10 1 ET~ SE Q. SE
(ADA) ·SECTION 42
COERCION• PROVIDES:
BIT RETALIATION AND
PROH
ADA, WHICH AIMS TO
i
(a ) RB'l'ALllTION

BE NST ANY INDIVIDUAL
L DISCRIMINATE AGAI
NO PERSON SHAL
ACTICE MADE LAWFUL
POSED ANY ACT OF PR
AL ~S OP
E
CAUSE SUCH INDIVIDU
E COURTS) OR BECAUS
INCLUDE ACCESS TO TH
CH
~ST THESE
BY THIS CHAPTER (WHI
IFIED (AS WE DO AGAI
MADE A CHARGEu TEST
SUCH INDIVIDUAL
PARTICIPATED IN ANY
TIONS), ASSERTED OR
SANC
Y SEEK
DEFENDANTS SEEKING
THE ONE WE PRESENTL
STIGATION (SUCH AS
TER.
MANNER IN AN INVE
ING UNDER THIS CHAP
PROCEEDING, OR HEAR
OR
BEFORE THE COURT),
ALL
INTYMIDATION; IT SH
ERENCE, COERCION OR
(b ) INTERF
ERE WITH
THREATEN, OR INTERF
COERCE, INTIMIDATE,
BE UNLAWFUL TO
T OF, OR ON ACCOUNT
EXERCISE OR ENJOYMEN
THE
R HAVING
ANY INDIVIDUAL IN
ACCOUNT OF HI S OR HE
VING ENJOYED, OR ON
OF HIS OR HER HA
IN THE EXERCISE OR
Y OTHER INDIVIDUAL
AN
D ACCESS
AIDED OR ENCOURAGED
OTECTED (RELIGION AN
RIGHT GRANTED OR PR
EL
ENJOYMENT OF, ANY
IFFS IN THESE PARALL
CHAPTERo THE PLAINT
lS
TO THE COURTS) BY TH
LIFAH IN THE EXERAIDING THE KING-KHA
S WERE
AND OR RELATED CASE
Y PROTECTED RIGHT OF
HIS CONSTITUTIONALL
OF
OF
CI SE AND ENJOYMENT
URTS AND BY THE LAWS
ON, ACCESS TO THE CO
FREEDOM OF RELIGI
N SOVEREIGN RIGHTS
THE DEFAULT, FOREIG
A
THE UNITED STATES VI
ACT.
SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
UNDER THE FOREIGN
20 -o f- 70

THE REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES AVAILABLE UNDER SECTION 12117,
12133 AND 12188 OF THE TITLE SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO AGGRIEVED
PERSONS FOR VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION (a)-AND (b) OF THIS SECTION
WITH RESPECT _TO SUBCHAPTER 1, SUBCHAPTER 1~ AND SUBCHAPTER 14
OF THIS CHAPTER. THE KING REMAINS PROPRIA PERSONA. WE RENEW
THE DEMAND FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES AND A FULL INVESTIGATION BY
AN INDEPENDENT AGENT NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
• THE PARTIES ARE CONSPIRING TO AVOID PROSECUTION, SUIT, AND
THE CONCEALMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS. THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE RICO ACT. NOTICE: THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT IS ON APPEAL, WA~KER
~.-2EAUMQM~-~WQE~EMQEN~-SCl;IQ0~-Ql£~Rl~~r 2016 WL 6666833; GA~l
v.-~QS~QW-Cl;IJ;I.,J;)REW!£-l;IQ~a~l'.I'AI.y 1 61 F. Supp. 3d. 136 ( 201 6) • FOR
THE COURT TO NOT INSTRUCT THE JUDGES TO SIGN THE INJUNCTION
WOULD DEMONSTRATE A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT, EAR~~-~.-~~A~Ey
S.E.2d.,--2016 WL 6092514(Sup.Ctc2016); £~A~i-Y.-~ONEXr S.E.2d.,
2014 WL 2575415(2014); S~A~~-~~-•NMANr 395 SoC. 539, 720 s.EG2d.
31(2011).
INSOMUCH, THE LAW FIRMS AND OR ATTORNEYS THAT WE'VE SPOKEN
TO THAT WOULD BE WILLING TO TAKE THESE CASES UPON THE ISSUING
OF AN ORDER FROM THE COURT ARE:
(1) EVANS, MOORE LLC [phone];
(2) DAVIDSON AND LINDERMANN P.A. [phone];
(3) NELSON 1 MULLINS WHO ALSO HAVE A PRO BONO COMMITTEE
, JAMES ROLLINS [phone] OR NORAH ROGERS [phone]
THEIR 11 800 11 NUMBER IS 1-800-237-2000.
ANY OF THESE ATTORNEYS CAN BE APPOINTED TO REPRESENT
THE CLASS MEMBERS AND OR ACT AS STAND-BY FOR THE KING-KHALIFAH
AS HE PARTAKES IN HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF SELF REPRESENTATION
• THE STATE AND OR FEDERAL INTERFERENCE IN THIS INSTANCE RISES
TO AN UNCO_NSTITUTIONAL LEVEL WHERE THESE JUDGES ARE TRYING TO
RESTRICT THE KING-KHALIFAH'S ACCESS TO THE COURT ESSENTIALLY
PENALIZING HIM IN ACTS OF RETALIATION DUE TO HIS DISABILITY
IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C.

§ 12203(a)(b) OF ADA. WE SEEK SANC21-of-70

TXONS.

~

ALSO MOTION FOR DECIJUtMfORY J U ~ T ROM THE 4lTE!e
·-- -~-~---·--·~ . --.
····-···
...
.
. CXRCUXT COURT OF APPEALS~ ~.;,Ji,e,..,:uffll$2 ·-80'\l F2d..,. 1191,, . ~ 196
-

...

-

usm~·~:;~wsHi~M;·-1~Y-,,2~c~ :-122,sii-~c1;~->; ~!'~SE,~~~~;;S£xu_~::_37~~f--ti~_s·~~-~~-t_)1"3 , :· sj·. s~c{~ .i~~; ~:-~~nsoil

,·9th "c1r·. fgas, ;--

19s 6

¥.v---~~-~§_tr 358 F2d& "'-i796 _481

CEJROf. DENIED lS!fof~-s:-·· -· ··•
889, 19 SoCt .. 131, 3 L~Ed~2dc, 116 ( 1 ~58) 0 ~UL~o-QQmll~:,.
186 N..,J~ · 12'i, ft2 (20~8h. -~1!:ICB...K<1>~RDE1\".\ ~~~-- Ue_S.~ .. !!?._o_. ~ ~3-.,
81

.

s.ct.
.

(9th~C1Ir.-)

473, .cl82, 5 L.Ede2de 492(1961); ~SX..a ...BQUD..OE~D•
.

.·.

.:

GE»ii'S-OE'.. Si'A~E-OE.. Jrl.ORJ:DAg 457 U.,Sc, 500,, 102.

s. ct-~

?.55.7 ( 1962);

AL~MA~r 541 UeS• 677(U.S.200~)~

WE MOTION FOR A REHEARING EN BANC IN CASE 17-1~15 WHICH
SHALL BE GRANTED BY THE 4TH. CIRCUIT THESE CASES NOW BEING OFFICIALLY ON REMAND FROM THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURTe ALL ORDERS·
ISSUED IN CASES 16-1953; 16-21~1; 17-1415 DUE TO STRUCTURAL
ERROR ARE VOID AND VACATED. ALL OF THESE CASES ARE ESSENTIALLY
ON REMAND BY DECREE AND JUDGMENT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURT, RESTRICTING, LIMITING YOUR JURISDICTION
TO DO NOTHING EXCEPT GRANT THE RELIEF THAT IS DEMANDED WITHIN
THESE CASES FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

JUDGE GREGORY AND DIAZ ACTED IM RETALIATION BECAUSE WE PEEPED THE MOVE THEY INTENDED TO DO IN CASE 17-6960
SO WE MOTIONED FOR THEIR RECUSAL. IN RETALIATION IN VIOLATION
.OF 42 U.S.Ce § 122Q3(a)(b) THEY COMPROMISED SHEDD AND MADE A
FRAUDULENT RULING TO GET AHEAD OF US MOTIONING ~OR THEIR RECUSAL
(1)

IN THIS CASE.,

( 2) THEIR JUDGMENT CONFLICTS WITH A RECENT DECISION·.
MADE BY THE UNITED STATES SlJPREME COURT IN WU.LIANS-v .-~ENMS¥L•
VANIAr 136 s.ct. 1899, 195 L.Ed.2d. 132, 84 u.s.L.w. 4359
'
(U.S.2016).
WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE CASES THE 4th. CIRCUIT.JUDGES CITED

RELATED TO RECUSAL SUCH AS 811 F2d. 8~8. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE
CASES MARCHANT AND AUSTIN CITED RELATED TO RECUSAL SUCH AS:
384 u.s. 563; 988 F2d. 1335; 581 F2d. 1114; 946 F2d. 335; 15
F3d. 319; 2012 WL 2805717 WHERE THESE JUDGES CONSPIRED IN COURTS
22-of-70

TO WHICH THEY HAD NO JURISDICTION TO MAKE THE CLAIMS APPEAR
l
FRIVOLOUS WHEN THEY WERE NOT VIA THE DEFAULT EMERGING FROM CASE

20~3-CP-400-0084e WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE CASES JUDGES WEST AND
BAKER CITED RELATED TO RECUSAL- 882 F2dQ 913; 733 F2d. 304;
691 F2d. 666; ~26 F2d. 158; 581 F2do 1114; 510 UeS. 540; 330
F3d. 658 ALL THESE~ INCLUDING THE GRXSMQRE CASE THAT WAS OVER
0

RULED BY THAT SAME CIRCUITe ALL OF THESE CASES THE JUDGES IN
TOTAL CITED AT BEST, THE LATEST CITED CASE IS FROM 2012. THE
REMAINDER OF THEM ARE FROM THE BO'S THROUGH 2003. THE JUDGES
ARE. ATTEMPTING TO NULLIFY u.sQ SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED IN 2016 WITH LOWER COURT CASES OVER (20) YEARS OLD AND
THAT ARE NOT FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; ATTEMPTING
TO GIVE THE LOWER, LESSER COURTSv POWER OVER THE U.Se SUPREME
,
COURT ITSELF. WE OBJECT. THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN
\

WllLXAMS-Vc-PENNSYLVANlAr 136 S.Ct~ 1899(U.S.2016) GAVE CLARITY
TO THESE EARLIER CITED CASES. THE LOWER COURTS CANNOT BE PERMITTED TO OVER RIDE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT WITH OLD CASES TO
RENDER VOID OR WATER DOWN THEIR RULINGS MADE IN 2016. I, WE
OBJECT. THE CRITERION ESTABLiSHED BY THE WILLIANS CASE IS (3)
PRONG TO WHICH IF ONLY ONE OF THESE EXIST, RECUSAL BECOMES MANDATORY. THEY ARE: (@) A JUDGE CANNOT SIT UPON HIS OWN CASE; (2)
HE CANNOT SIT IF HE HAS AN INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME;

(3) HE CANNOT

SIT IF THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS RISES TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL.
EXTRA-JUDICIAL SOURCE FOR BIAS IS NOT THE STANDARD FOR RECUSAL
AS WAS DETERMINED BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. THE AFOREMENTIONED
ARE THE (3) PRONG STANDARD AND CRITERION. ALL (3) OF THESE EXIST
IN THESE .PARALLEL AND RELATED CASES TO WHICH THESE JUDGES ARE
DEFENDANTS, TO INCLUDE EGREGIOUS ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURTS,
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WARRANTING SANCTIONS AND RECUSAL, .aEN'l'ON-v.-SURNS, 2017 WL 491251(D1.C.Mdo

2017); ~EGG-v.-HEARNBERGER 1 845 F3d. 112(4th.Cir.2017); JOUNSQN
v.-S~RDr 2016 WL 6839410(N.CID2016); GRAliAM--Vq--GAYRQN, 831 F3d.
176 (4th.Cir.2016); BERGER-v.

u.s.,

255

~.s.

22, 41

s.ct.

230,

65 L.Ed. 481 (U.S.1921); CANADA Vo-MILLER, F.Supp.3d., 2014 WL
1512245(2014); BOO'fii-v.-.BALLARDr 2016 WL 1275054(2016)(DEMO NSTRATING THAT A HEARING MUST OCCUR IN THE DISTRICT COURT); UNITED
STATES v. QUINONES,--F.Supp .jct.--,2016 WL 4413149(2016).

23-of-70

.;·

NO MAN CAN TRY A CASE \ TO WHICH HE HAS AN INTEREST IN
THE OUTCOMEo EXTRA-JUDICIAL BIAS WAS ONLY ~on OUT OF Mlif~
EXAMPLES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT WAS REFERRING TO AND
ADDRESSINGG WHEN THE OBJECTIVE RISK OF ACTUAL BIAS •oF ANY Knm•
(EMPHASIS ADDED) RISES TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL, UNDER THE
DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, THE FAILURE TO RECUSE IS E(N]OT~ A HARMLESS
ERROR BECOMING STRUCTURAL IN NATURE WHICH VOID'S THE COURT'S.
JURISDICTION FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONo JUDGES DIAZ AND GREGORY
WERE REQUIRED TO RECUSE THEMSELVES AS WERE THE LOWER COURT JUDgES
WITHIN THE S.Ce U.So DISTRICT COURTo
WATCH THE LANGUAGE USED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT. '°ON THE QUESTIO N OF RECUSAL, THE COURT ASKS ·uuarrai WHETHER A JUDGE HARBORS AN ACTUAL BIAS (FOR EXAMPLEf JUDICIAL BIAS
AS IN AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION THE CONSPIRING JUDGES ASSERTED),
BUT "INSTEAD• (EMPHASIS ADDED) WHETHER, AS AN OBJ~CTIVE MATTER
8
THERE IS A n[P)OTE NTIAL• FOR BIAS OF .ANY KIND• (EMPHASIS ADDED)
THAT RISES TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL'°, WHICH IS CONSPICUOUS
THAT SUCH AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL DOES EXIST IN THESE PARALLEL
AND OR RELATED CASES AS IS EVIDENCED BY WHAT OCCURRED INVOLVING
THESE JUDGES OF CONCERN~ CAREAT ON-v.-A v~v-MA SSEY-C QAL-CO c~lNC.r
556 U.S. 868, 129 S.Ct. 2252, 173 LeEde2 d. 1208 (UeS.2 009);
JOHNSON-Ve-STEVENSONr 2016 WL 115664 9(DSC. 2016); UNWOOD-~ARDENS
CO~COMINIUMS-INC~-v.-WllALE~-RRORER~IESz-LLC.r 2016 WL 678805 2,

*

11+ (Md.20 16).

(3) EVERY WRIT OF MANDAMUS RULING IS VOID FOR DUE

PROCESS VIOLATION BY THE STRUCTURAL ERROR WHERE EVERY MANDAMUS
RULING WAS RENDERED BY INVOKING THE PROVISIONS OF THE PRISON
LITIGATION REFORM ACT WHICH THE 4TH. CIRCUIT DEMANDED AS A PREREQUISITE FOR ENTRY INTO THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS.
EVEN THE CASES JUDGES GREGORY, DIAZ AND SHEDD CITED VIOLATE
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS UNDER EX-PAR ~E-VlRG X~lA
AND Tli~-SLAU~H~~R-HOUSE-CASESv INCLUDING IW-RE~ -S~ARD r 811 ,F2d.
818 IS TAINTED AS WELL WHICH VOID THE ORDER IN CASE 17-141 5.
THE CASES ARE ILLEGAL AS IS ANY ORDER ISSUED IN CASE 17-141 5,
AS WELL AS ANY ORDER ISSUED WITHIN ALL OF THESE CASES LISTED
24-of-7 0

L AND OR
CUMENT FOR THESE PARALLE
THE CAPTION OF TH IS DO
WI TH IN
-66 93 AND 17 AR,GUED WITHIN CASES 17
LATED CASES JU ST AS IS
RE
MENTo
LATER WITHIN TH IS DOCU
IS WILL BE ELABORATED ON
69 25 . TH
THE JUDGES. THE JUDGES
G BACK TO THE ISS UE OF
REFERRIN
AS A MEANS
BEING LIS TE D PROPERLY
D THE DEFENDANTS FROM
BLOCKE
T'S ENTRY NUMBER
THE So C. DIS TR ICT COUR
TO AVOID RECUSALc PER
WE GAVE
SE 9:1 7-c v-1 14 0-T LW -B M.
ED AUGUST a, 20 17 IN CA
(16 ) FIL
E OF SEEKING
L PARTIES JU DIC IAL NOTIC
THE 4T H. CIR CU IT AND AL
ORDER ONLY
DAYS OF RE CE IPT OF THAT
TO APPEAL WITHIN (14 )
LEAVE
OLVING ZANCHELLI
UD UPON THE COURTS INV
TO BE SUBJECTED TO FRA
CURRED IN
A SIMILAR SITUATION OC
E S.C . DIS TR ICT COURT.
AND TH
D
OB JEC T. THE ORDER ISS UE
68 -H MH -SV H TO WHICH WE
CASE 1~ 17 -cv -14
RECUSE
DER'ON THEIR FAILURE TO
ANT ACTED AS A FIN AL OR
BY MARCH
AL
K AS PARTY DUE TO REMOV
NUE; ADDING ANTHONY COO
AND TRANSFER VE
3(1 )(W HE RE
NT TO 28 U. S.C . §§ 144
20 13 -C P-4 00 -00 84 PURSUA
OF CASE
16 02 L CO NV ICT ION S), 26 79 ,
NTS RELATED TO CRIMINA
WE ARE DEFENDA
D RECOMMENDARCHANT IN THE REPORT AN
ET SE Q.( WH ICH IS WHY MA
!61 2
SE
THE EVIDENCE IN THAT CA
ED REMOVAL TO PREVENT
TIO N PREVENT
TION (WHICH
WE OBJECT TO ); CONSOLIDA
ENTERING THE COURT WHICH
FROM
INCORRECTLY TO
LIS TE D THE DEFENDANTS
IS ANOTHER REASON THEY
ARATING
JECT TO ); THE JUDGES SEP
NSOLIDATION WHICH WE OB
DENY CO
A; DENIAL OF
E PLRA ANO OR THE AEDP
; THEY MAKING USE OF TH
US
IMMEDICE RT IFI CA TIO N. THUS, WE
VENUE AND CLASS ACTION
CHANGE OF
IN BOTH CASES 9:1 7- cv VE TO APPEAL THE ORDERS
ATELY SOUGHT LEA
D IR RE H OR IT WOULD HAVE CAUSE
-BM AND 1:1 7-1 468 -H MH -SV
114 0-T LW
RE THEY BEGAN. TH IS DI
TO THE PROCEEDINGS BEFO
PARABLE DAMAGE
N PENDING THAT REVIEW.
TH COURTS OF JU RIS DIC TIO
VESTED BO
C

1\
:
, I

Ll
Fl
: -:

. i

~1

<i

TION SE PA WHO IN ACTS OF MACHINA
E JUDGES ARE THE ONES
TH
LT. TH IS IS WHY THE PARA
OF FRAUD UPON THE COUR
RATED US IN ACTS
TO
HALIFAR, CRAWFORD, HAD
EX IST AND WHY THE KING-K
LEL CASES
PARALLEL AND
A PARTY IN EACH OF THESE
HAVE HIMSELF ADDED AS
U. s.c .
INTEREST PURSUANT TO 28
D CASES TO PROTECT HI S
OR RELATE
PERMITTED UNDER
-16 12 ET . SE Q. WHICH IS
1,4 43( 1 ), 26 79 , 16 02
§§
ARATE
THE FIDUCIARY HE IR. SEP
CUMSTANCES ALSO BEING
THESE CIR
25 -of -70

TO ADDRESS ANY
FILIN G IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS WERE FILED
IES IN BOTH
CONCERN IN THIS AREA. WE MOTION TO AMEND THE PART
CRAWFORD IS,PA RTY
THE 4TH. CIRC UIT AND DISTR ICT TO REFLECT THAT
DANTS BE LIST ED
IN EACH INDIVIDUAL CASE· AND THE NAMES OF THE DEFEN
OF SERVICE IN
AS THOSE CONTAINED IN THE (14) PAGE AFFIDAVIT
JUDICATA ATTA CHES .
QUES TION . THIS IS PARALLEL LITGATION WHERE RES
THE (23)
WE WANT ·THE COURTS TO PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO
PAGE DOCUMENT.
PAGE DOCUMENT DATED. JULY 8, 201 7 AND THE ( 1 4 )
COURT AND FILE D
DATED JULY 2, 2017 SERVED ON THE 4TH. CIRC UIT
3328 , 3194- RBHIN CASES 9:17- cv-38 08-TL W-BM AND 8:16- cv-33 27,
MENTS THAT ARE
JDAa WE EXPAND THE SCOPE AND INCLUDE THESE DOCU
TO ADDRESS ISSU ES
TO BE FILED IN ALL CASES LISTE D IN THE CAPTION
!
CHANGE OF VENUE
OF COMITY, PARALLEL LITIG ATIO N, RES JUDICATA,
uqs.- ~X-R ~~AND DISQ UALI FICAT ION OF THE JUDGES INVOLVED. SEE
WL 1321 584(D SC.
KW~GW~-Y.-R~~lA~~-WQSRXCE-lW~vx F.Su pp.2d o, 20~1
1481 (U.S .200 9);
2011 ); WAR 2l5GW -~.-2E ~Lr 556 u.s. 180, 129 s.ct.
2012 WL 3612 572
M~QC~E~GW-Y~~WlSSAW-MQ~CR-~G.-L~C.z F.Su pp.2 d.,
U.S. 1, 18 S.Ct .
(DSC .2012 ); SQU~ ~~RW -RAC .-R.-~ C.-v.~ Qv5~ r 168
S-~MbW-Y.-WCE~~
18, 42 L.Ed . 355( U.S.1 897) ; WQ~~L-GRAWE-S~S~EM
KWlg~~-Y-MAWY~
GRA~ E-SXS ~~MS -SER~ lG~Sr 667 FoSu pp.2d . 852(2 009);
.Md~ 2015) ; SARC~S
~A~~U RERS -&-~R AC~R S-~RU S~-CC .r F.Sup p.3dc 436(D
SC.2 010t.
~.-SCU~M-GARQLlWAr F.Su pp.2d .q 2010 WL 1498 190(D
;,

I

!

'

.

UPON
NOTICE: THIS IS AN ISSUE ON APPEAL. YOU HAVE FRAUD
UIT AND THE
THE COURT INVOLVING PARTIES IN BOTH THE 4THe CIRC
TO FEDERAL APPE LS.C. U.S. DIST RICT COURT. WE OBJE CT. PURSUANT
4TH. CIRC UIT
-LATE COURT RULE, R(lLE 4(d) . ZANCHELLI OR AI-iY OTHER
AND OBSTRUCTION
CLERK SHOULD HAVE NEVER IN ACTS OF CONSPIRACY
APPEAL CASE
OF JUST ICE, HELD UP THE NOTICE SEEKING LEAVE TO
PRODUCE A FRAUDU9:17- cv-11 40-TL W-BM TO ALLOW JUDGE MARCHANT TO
THE PURPOSE OF
LENT ly OBTAINED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR
ED TO THESE
HAVING A DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE MATTERS RELAT
1:17 -cv-1 468APPE ALS. A SIMIL AR SITUATION OCCURRED UNDER CASE
FIRST NOTICE
HMH-SVH WHERE THE CONSPIRING JUDGES IGNORED THE
I
UPON CLOING LEAVE TO APPEAL TO CONCEAL THEIR CRIMES, THERE
SEEK
STED . THEREAFTER,
SING THE CASE WHEN THEIR JURIS DICT ION WAS DIVE
26-o f-70

. THEY SENT UP THE APPEAL BASED UPON A SUBSEQUENT LETTE~ AND OR
DOCUMENT, THE 4TH. CIRCUIT HOLDING THEIR NOTICE, TO ALLOW THE
DISTRICT COURT TO CLOSE THAT CASE BEFORE IT WAS SENT UP FOR
APPEAL WHEN THEIR JURISDICTION WAS DIVESTED BY THE FIRST NOTICE.
WE OBJECT.
WE RENEW THE PREVIOUS FILED MOTIONS AND SEEK ADDITIONAL
SANCTIONS TO REMEDY THIS EGREGIOUS INJUSTICE AND ACTS OF FRAUD
UPON.THE COURTS. WE WANT CASE 1:17-cv-1468-HMH-SV H REINSTATED,
OPENED, AND WE WANT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ISSUED BY
MARCHANT RENDERED VOID FOR FRAUD AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATION.
EVIDENCE BY THE ACTIONS OF THE CLERKS WOULD SERVE TO SUBSTANTIATE
THAT THE 4TH. CIRCUIT JUDGES WHOM RECUSAL IS SOUGHT FOR ARE
INVOLVED. WE RENEW THE MOTION FOR THE JUDGES RECUSAL AND DISQUALIFICATION OF THE S.C. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, TO INCLUDE
RENEWING THE MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ALL CASES INVOLVING THE KING.
~
'
.
KHALIFAH AND PLAINT~FFS AND VENUE BE TRANSFERRED TO THE STATE
OF NEW JERSEY. WE SEEK BY SANCTION THAT NOT ONLY THE S.C. DISTRICT COURT, BUT THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AS WELL BE
IN FORFEITURE OF PRESENTING IN ANY MANNER THE LEGAL STANCE,
'
POSITION OR ADJUDICATION THAT WAS PRODUCED IN BOTH CASES SUBJUDICE AND OR IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
.

ISSUED BY MARCHANT IN ANY FORM. EVEN IF THE COURTS ATTEMPT TO
MOJ)IFY THE LANGUAGE IN ANY' MANNER TO MAKE THOSE SAME CLAIMS
CONTAINED THEREIN. THEIR JURISDICTION WAS DIVESTED AND THE FRAUD
TAINTS THE ACTIONS RENDERING THEM VOID FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATION,
ALSO FOR VIOLATION OF 18 U.s.c. §§ .242 AND ~00,Ji:,;:<J,l,.S.: & I..:AWRli:WCli:
:~;::~1\\··;;}'" -.

_·

:-

J;W-Rli:.;.-WAJ;.r..ACEr 6 4 9 Fed'. Appx' 2 9 8 ( MEM) '(4th. Cir. 2 0 i 6) ;
~W-RE.;.-WUOLESAI..E-~ROCli:R~-~RQCUC~£-AW~~~RUS~-J;.l~lGA~lOWr 849

SO'liH~A.. ;

F3d. 761, 96 Fed. R. SERV.3d. 1207(8th.Cir.2017) ; lW-RE.-CURQSli:Rr
2015 WL 4068243(N.D.N.Yo20 15); ~RQWW-~.-li:I..l~r..lr..I..¥-AWC-CO.r 654
F3d. 347(2nd.Cir.2011); SUAW~I..lW-~.-SEALSr 461 Fed. Appx' 313,
2012 WL 29186(4th.Cir.20~2 ); RUSS-~.-Uli:Wl~~r 69 Fed. Appx' 185,
2003 WL 2154602l(4th.Cir.20 03); KAW~-~.-WA~Qli:~-0~-~RAUAW-c.:;i;.r
2014 WL 6809522(DSC.2014); ASWCRO~~-~ .. -lQ2A];.r 556 U.S. 662,
129 s.ct. J937(U.S.2009); UWl~EC-S~A~li:S-~.-RO~li:RSr 101 F3d.
24 7 ( 2nd.Cir .1996) • WE MQTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FROM THE
27-of-70

4TH. CIRCUIT .
THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PRODUCE CONCRETE EVIDENC E,
THAT OUR CLAIM AS TO WHY THEY INCORRECTLY LISTED THE DEFENDANTS
r
IN THE CIVIL ACTIONS THE WAY THEY HAD THEM LISTED WAS TRUE AND
NOT A CONCLUSORY CLAIM, SO WE OBJECT TO THIS STATEMENT MADE
BY MARCHANT IN THAT REPORT. WE WARNED THE 4TH~ CIRCUIT OF THEIR
INTENTIO NS BEFORE THEY ACTED WHICH ARE NOW CLEARLY MANIFESTED
REQUIRING SANCT-IONS AND FORFEITURE DUE TO FRAUD UPON THE COURTS
AND VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS LAW. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PRODUCED BY MARCHANT AND THE ACTS OF HODGES ETCe IN CASE 1:17cv-1468 PROVES WE WERE CORRECT AND THE PRESENCE OF THE s.c.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES ESTABLISH THAT THERE IS A POTENTIAL
FOR BIAS THAT RISES TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL CREATING A
STRUCTURAL ERROR THAT VOIDS THEIR JURISDIC TION FOR DUE PROCESS
VIOLATIO N. WE OBJECT, ~AWWEL L~-~.-U.5 .r 420 U.S. ·770, ~5 SGCt~
,2s4, 43 L.Ed.2d . 616; SLUE-SK ~-~RA~E~ -AWQ-~O YRSr-~~G .-~.-AL
~A¥XAR r~-Fed. Appx'-- , 2015 . WL 1451636 CA4 (Va.2015 ); u.s.-~.
l
.
~~ER~~MGz 724 F3d. 482 CA4 (Va.2013 ); Wb~~lAWS-~.-~E~WS¥~~Al}l•Ar
136 s.ct. 1899(20 16); 2EN~QW-~.... -SIJR~Sr 2017 WL 491251(D .C.Md.
2017); ~~R~S~iANSON-~.-M.2.W.Av-AWER~CAW-~AWK-~oA•r S.E.2d.,
2013 WL 8507850 (S.C.App .2013); CA~QWEL~-~~-WiNQUlS~r 402 S.C.
595, 741 s.E.2d. 583(S.C .App.201 3); LQYMlE ~-~.-U~~~ EC-S~A~ ~Sr
65 F.Supp.3 d. 19(2094 ); WM.~E-~~-MAWbay 2014 WL 1513280( DSC.
20fl4); GRU~G-SU~RA.r 124 s.ct.192 0(U.S.2 004).
REFERRING BACK TO THE ISSUE OF BIAS REGARDING THE JUDGES.
(14) PAGE AND (23) PAGE DOCUMENTS THEMSELVES, ALONE, EVEN
THE "
THOUGH THERE ARE MANY OTHERS TO INCLUDE THOSE IN CASE 2013~CP 400-0084 MARCHANT IS CONSPIRING TO PREVENT FROM BEING REVEALED,
AND OTHERS TO WHICH THE STATE AND FEDERAL JUDGES ALONG WITH
THE S.C. DEPT. OF CORR. ARE CONSPIRING TO BLOCK FILING, ARE
MORE THAN SUFFICIE NT TO NOT ONLY PROVE REMOVAL UNDER -28 U.S.C.
-§§ 1443(1) , 2679, ·1602-16 12 ET. SEQ •• THEY ALSO PROVE BOTH OVER'·

WHELMING "PERSONAL" AS WELL AS "JUDICIA L" BIAS. WHEN YOU HAVE
11
11
THE JUDGES GOING OUT OF THEIR WAY TO CALL US RACIST , "VULGAR"
AND "SEXIST "? THIS PROVES JUDGE MARCHANT LIED IN FRAUD WHEN
28-of-70
···--·-•·----.

---

------·· - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

------ -------- -----

--------,. --·' --------·--- ----- -------

.·

HE SAID IN THE REPORT THAT THE ACTION WAS "INCOMPREHENSIBLE",,
BECAUSE THE COURT IN CASE 5:17-cv-010 5-BHH-KDW DID NOT MAKE
THIS CLAIM AND FURTHER AFFIRMED THAT THE PLEADING CONSTITUTE
AN ".AFFIDAVI T"., SUCH ASSESSMENT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN DONE IF
THE PLEADINGS WERE "INCOMPREHENSIBLE"., WE OBJECT. RES JUDICATA
ATTACHES FROM JUDGE KAYMANI WEST. WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED TO ESTABLISH "PERSONAL" BIAS. "PERSONAL" IS DEFINED AS---PERTA INING
TO, OR CONCERNING A PARTICULAR PERSON; REFERRING OR DIRECTED
TO A PARTICULAR PERSON IN AN OFFENSIVE MANNER; PERTAINING TO
THE BODY, CLOTHING OR APPEARANCE (PHYSICALLY OR CHARACTE RISTICALLY). WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 5:17-cv0105-BHH-K DW, THE ORDER PRODUCED FROM IT; THE'1 REPORT AND WHAT
MARCHANT AND WOOTEN DID IN BOTH CAS~S 9:16-cv-380 8-TLW-BM AND
9:17-cv-114 0-TLW-BM ; WHAT JUDGES HARWELL AND AUSTIN DID IN CASES
8:16-cv-33 27, 3328, 3194-RBH-J DA; WHAT THE JUDGES DID IN CASE
1:17-cv-014 68-HMH-SV H, IGNORING THE INITIAL NOTICE SEEKING LEAVE
TO APPEAL AND CLOSING THAT CASE, WHAT THEY DID TO david duren
SUPREME COURT CONSPIRING WITH THE s.c~ ATTORNEY
GENERAL; ALSO WHAT JUDGE BAKER DID IN CASE 2:17-cv-11 27-JMCMGB AND THE PLEADINGS IN THEIR TOTALITY. IT IS CONSPICUOUS THAT
IN THE

s.c.

IT HAS GOTTEN SERIOUSLY PERSONAL BETWEEN THE JUDGES AND PLAINTIFFS, SO MUCH THAT THE JUDGES ARE ENGAGING IN CONSTANT ACTS
OF FRAUD, MACHINATION, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. WE OBJECT TO JUDGE MARCHANT'S CLAIMS THAT THE STATE
CASE, 2013-CP-4 00-0084 DO NOT BEAR ON OR HAVE ANY CONNECTION
TO THE CLAIMS BEING MADE OR THAT IT DOESN'T WARRANT REMOVAL
'rO ESTABLISHED THE FACTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.. SaC• §§ 1443(1)(DE FENDANT IN A CRIMINAL CASE/ CONVICTION ISSUES), 2679 (PROPERTY
INFRINGMENT BY THE UNITED STATES) 1 1602-1612 ( FOREIGN SOVEREIGN
IMMUNITY ACT CLAIMS) WHICH IS WHY HE DO NOT WANT THIS EVIDENCE
TO ENTER THE COURT. IT WILL INDISPUTABLY PROVE THE FACTS. LETS
SEE. ORDER THE ISSUING OF THE INJUNCTION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER"
ALONG WITH THE (23) AND (14) PAGE DOCUMENTS RECENTLY FILED.
THEY HIGHLIGHT THE REPEATEDu CONTINUOUS ACTS OF FRAUD, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WHICH IS WHY JUDGE MARCHANT IS CONSPIRING TO PREVENT THE REMOVAL" OF THE STATE CASE.
WE OBJECT. WE MOTION FOR DISQUALIF ICATION OF THE JUDGES AND
29-of-70

-----··---- --------· ···---------

'CHANGE OF VENUE TO BE GRANTED BY THE 4THa CIRCUIT VIA THESE
PARALLEL APPEALS AND OR RELATED CASESe WE WANT CLASS ACTION
CERTIFICA TION FOR THE LEGAL ISSUES OF RELIGIOUS PROPHESY, ~W
R~~-WA~w- ~GQ~aALL- LEAGUE-~~ AXER£-CQN CY££IQW-IW JQR¥-Ll~lGA ~lONy
775 F3d. 570, 90 Fedo R. SERV.3d. 563(3rd.C ir.2014); I~~RE~
WMQ~E£AL E-~RQCER¥ -BRQQUC~£ -AW~l~RUS ~-Ll~IGA~IQ ~-£Y~RA.; ALILA~
~A~I~A-R~- U.£.-2ANK- WA~IQNA~ -A££QCIA~ IGNr 20fl6 WL 4992464(N ~D.
Cal.2016) ; ~LE.~G~MAN-v~-ALgAW¥-MEQI~AL-GEW~ERr 639 F3d. 28,
79 Fed. Re SERV.3d. 494(2nd.,C ir.2011); £CQ~~-~~-C LARKE 7 61
F.,Supp.3d e 569(W.D.V a.2014)·; ~UMGARNE R-v.-W~C.Q ~G•r 276 F.R.D.
,Ce:§~§)i;sl~3d. 804 ( MEM) (4th. Cir.,
452 ( N., c .. 2 011 ) ; ~tJRWE'J;~-~ ...--~~HE
2012); KAR£JENS-v ..,-I2ll2ER 7 --F3d.--v 2017 WL 24613(.~+\1\ ,C\R,...;) 1(:1t'1),

f:·

0

EVEN 'I'HOUGHI THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SUBMITTED
BY JUDGE MARCHANT IS TAINTED BY FRAUD AND CAN'T BE USED. WE
OBJECT TO MARCHANT IN THE REPORT STATING THAT THE DOCUMENT CON,TAINS DISPARAGING AND INFLAMMATORY LANGUAGE;.THAT THE CASE CAN
11
BE CHARACTERIZED AS "BUSSWORDS" OR LEGAL GIBBERISH ", CITING
RGCWEa~ER-v.-MgKIEr 2011 WL 2671228(D SC.2011) AND ¥QGUM~~.-£UMMER
, 1991 WL 17!389 (N.D.Ill.1 991). FIRST, THESE CASES ARE VOID
1
DUE TO THEIR USE OF THE PLRA AND OR AEDPA WHICH ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THIS RENDERS HIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION VOID FOR

MAKING USE OF SUCH CITINGS OF LAW. SECONDLY 6 THE USE OF THESE
CASES IS MISPLACED AND IS LIKE COMPARING "APPLES TO ORANGES".
THERE IS NOTHING IN THE CASES.CITI NG BY THE JUDGE THAT DEMONSTRATE THAT THOSE CASES INVOLVED PUBLIC JURIS CLAIMS, OR CLAIMS
INVOLVING MATTERS OF PUBLIC, SOCIAL, RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL
INTERES'l' TO THE COMMUNITY WHERE BY THOSE CASES DO NOT INVOLVE
fROTECTED SPEECH. SINCE THIS IS THE CASE FOR THE PLAINTIFF S
FILINGS; THUS, THE LANGUAGE CONTAINED THEREIN IS "PROTECTED
SPEECH" AND CANNOT BE CHARACTERIZED AS "BUSSWORDS" OR "LEGAL
GIBBERISH ". "GIBBERIS H", IS DEFINED AS---CONFU SING, UNITELLIGIBLE OR MEANINGLESS SPEECH OR LANGUAGE. OUR PLEADINGS~CANNOT
BE CHARACTERIZED AS SUCHc JUDGE MARCHANT ABUSED HIS DISCRETION
IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT IN HIS EFFORTS TO KEEP THE EVIDENCE FOUND UNDER CASE 2013-CP-4 00-0084 FROM COMING INTO THE
COURT AND BEING MADE A PART OF THE COURT RECORDo
30-of-70

·,

--

--·-·-·-··----- -------------- ----·---·-·---· -'---• ----

-

FUTHERMORE, WE TAKE YOU TO ISAIAH 14:29 (THE AUTHOR~~ED
KING JAMES BIBLE), THE "CONTRACT", "COVENANT", ESTABLISHED BY
THE SOLE CORPORATION. IT READS: "REJOICE NOT THOU, WHOLE PALESTINA, BECAUSE THE ROD OF HIM THAT SMOTE THEE IS BROKEN (MEANING
THIS MAN WILL COME AT A TIME WHEN THE PALESTINIANS ARE SUBJECT
TO APARTHEID AS THEY ARE NOW •. ISRAEL, IS THE "ROD"., IT IS BROKEN
[STOPPED] BECAUSE I AM BOTH THEIR KING-KHALIFAH, THE FIDUCIARY
HEIR.); FOR OUT OF THE "SERPENT'S ROOT" (SATAN'S ATTACK UPON
MY LIFE., 11 ROOT 11 ---MEANING SOURCE 6 ORIGIN OR CA.USE. "CAUSE" IS
FURTHER DEFINED AS---"CAUSE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW", "PRISON" 1

):

COCKATRICE"--MEANING A BOLD, ARDENT, STOCKY,
"PERNICIOUS" (EMPHASIS ADDED) FELLOW.); AND HIS "FRUIT" (THAT
WHICH COMES FORTH FROM HIM, THAT 7 TIMES THE SPIRIT OF ELIJAH
• SHALL COME A

11

THING FORETOLD BY PROPHESY TO COME), SHALL BE THAT OF A "FIERY
FLYING SERPENT"., MY PERSONALITY, WHICH INCLUDES MY SPEECH, IS
ESTABLISHED AND PROTECTED BY LEGAL BINDING CONTRACT TEN THOUSAND
YEARS BEFORE I WAS BORN. IT IS AN "ACT OF GOD" ORDAINED UNDER
CONTRACT PROTECTED BY THE u.,s~ CONSTITUTION UNDER ARTICLE 1
SECTION 10. THE DETERMINATION MADE BY JUDGE MARCHANT MUST BE
REJECTED WHERE SUCH ACCEPTANCE WOULD BURDEN THE OBLIGATION OF
THE CONTRACT AND PENALIZE THE KING-KHALIFAH FOR AN "ACT OF GOD"
WHICH IS IMPERMISSIBL E BY LAW., THE COURTS CANNOT MAKE OR UNMAKE
THE CONTRACT AFTER THE FACT WITH EX POST FACTO LAW. SUCH WOULD
BE A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, ~EgG~-~~-U.£ .y 133 s.,ct. 2072,

186 L.Ed.2d. 84, 81 u.s.L.w. 4372(2013); u.a.-¥.-WE~L 5r 578
Fed. Appx' 234 CA4 (Va.2014); GRA~AM~~,-Mg~AQQE~r 2015 WL 505536
(DSC.2015); QQQEW-v~-5AWCER£ 7 25 U.S. 213 (1827); ~RU5~EE£-Q~
GGWbIWWA~I-£QU~UER~-R¥-~.-~QR~ER 7 21 OHIO N.P. (N3) 441, 1918
WL 96530.
IN FURTHER ADDRESSING THIS MATTER, AND THE OUTRAGEOUS
ACTS, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 1 FRAUD UPON
THE COURTS IN JURISDICTION S WHERE THEY HAD NO POWER OR AUTHORITY
ESTABLISHING EXTRA-TERRIT ORIAL JURISDICTION CLAIMS~ PART OF
THE REASON THE JUDGES INVOLVED DID WHAT THEY DIDu WAS BECAUSE
THEY DID NOT LIKE THE WAY THEY WERE TALKED TO, DEMONSTRATING
11

PERSONAL" AS WELL AS "JUDICIAL" BIAS THAT RISES TO AN UNCONSTI;.;.
31-of-70

- ---

--·--

··----------· - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- ---- ---------·----------- ------------- ------------· ----

TUTIONAL LEVEL, WHICH IS EVIDENT BY WHAT MARCHANT SAID IN THE
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE JUDGES INVOLVED DID THE ACTS
IN RETALIATION AGAINST US IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.SeCQ § 12203(a)( b)
; 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 AND 1001 AND IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE III
SECTION 1 AND 2 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. JUST LIKE THE DEFINITION OF PERSONAL BIAS DICTATESo THE JUDGES RETALIATED AGAINST
US, INCLUDING MARCHANT, WOOTEN, WEST AND AUSTIN, FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REGULATING AND RESTRICTIN G OUR SPEECH, BECAUSE THEY FOUND
IT PERSONAL, INFLAMMATORY, DISPARAGING, AND OFFENSIVE . THEIR
ACTIONS WOULD· CHILL A PERSON OF ORDINARY FIRMNESS FROM CONTINUING '
TO ENGAGE IN THE PROTECTED SPEECHo LOOSE, FIGURATIVE OR HYPERBOLIC LANGUAGE IS PROTECTED WHERE THESE PARALLEL AND RELATED
CASES INVOLVE MATTERS OF PUBLIC, SOCIAL, RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL
INTEREST TO THE COMMUNITY PRODUCING PUBLIC JURIS CLAIMS. THE
USE OF ROCHESTER AND YOCUM ARE MISPLACED. THERE WAS NO PHYSICAL
THREAT 1 MADE AGAINST ANY OF THESE JUDGES. THE JUDGES SHOULD HAVE
NEVER DONE THE ACTS THEY'VE DONE IN THESE CASES IN RETALIATIO N
WARRANTING RECUSAL AND SANCTIONS, £ASA~lW1- v.-REJ:Na~ E~Wr--F.Su pp.
3d.--, 2016 WL 8716594(E .D.Pa.2016 ); MALE-vr-E M~QRlA-S~ A~E-lJ~l.
l,lERal~¥r 2016 WL 3277264(D .Kan.2016) ; LARQC~ELL~-v~-W~LMA~-CQR.
~QRA~~OWr 210 F.Supp.3de 658(EoDeP aa2016); CQE-~ .. -REC~OR-ANO
'

l,lJ;SJ;~QRa-Oi:-~EQRGJ;A-MASON-lJWJ;Y:iRSI'X~r 149 F.Supp.3d . 602(E.D.V a.
2016); £N¥CER-v. -~aEL~Sr 580 F3d. 206(4thoC ir2009); SAL~J:MORE
S~OR~~-&- SQCIAL-CL USr-~NC.-~ .-5RQR~-&- SQClALr-L LGvr 2017 WL
I

526499,

* 3+, DeMd.; sc;;:i~~G-~Q -~LACK-CA ~-~Ai~-SOW C5 7 2010 WL
'-.

*

4 (DSC. 2 01 0) ; MORRIS-~.-QQRMA-AU~QMA~lC-5,.-J:WC.,. 7
537 Fed. Appx' 254, 255 {4th~Cir.[ S~C.] 2013); ~QaW£0N-~ .-~XRQr
2016 WL 68394l0(N .C.2016); 2ER~ER-~ .. -I.I .. s~,: 255 u~s., 22, 41 s.ct.

1463 4 70,

230, 65 L.Ed. 481 (U;S.1921 ); CANAQA-Vv-MlLLER 7 F.Supp.3d ., 2014
WL 1512245(2 014); ~GQ~~-v.-2 AbLARQr 2016 WL 1275054(20 16)(DEMON STRATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING MUST OCCUR).
NOTICE: THESE ISSUES ARE ON APPEAL. CAN THE KING-KHALIFAH
ACT AS ATTORNEY FOR OTHER INMATES WHO ARE SUBJECTS UNDER THE
(4) GLOBA~THRONES? WHAT IS "JAHJAH AL MAHDI, CRAWFORD'S" STATUS
AT THE TIME OF FILING THESE CASES? DID JUDGE MARCHANT ABUSE
HIS DISCRETION IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT WHEN HE ASSERTED
32-of-70

----~----·--- -

---

-· -----~-·-·~-··-- -·----

THAT THERE WAS NO RELIEF.AVAILABLE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 28
U.SmC. §§ 1443(1), 2679, 1602-1612 ET. SEQs IN HIS EFFORTS TO
PREVENT THE EVIDENCE FILED IN CASE 2013-CP-40 0-0084 FROM ENTERING
THE FEDERAL COURT?
FIRST, YOU ARE DEALING WITH THE FRAMING OF A FOREIGN
SOVEREIGN . THE KING-KHALIFAH IS A DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
WHERE HIS DUE PROCESS MATTERS WERE COMPROMISED ON DIRECT APPEAL
GIVING WAY TO HABEAS CORPUS WHICH PRESENTLY EXIST UNDER CASE
9:16-cv-380 8-TLW-BM SOUGHT CONSOLIDATED TO THE EXISTING PARALLEL
§ 1983 CASES ARGUING THAT PROCESS WAS CORRUPTED BEHIND RELIGIOUS
AND RACIAL HATRED. THUS THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)
DO ATTACH AS A DEFENDANT WHICH IS ALSO PRESENTED UNDER CASE
2013-CP-4 00-0084 REMOVED TO THESE PARALLEL CASESo
SECONDLY, WE TAKE YOU TO THE "CONTRACT", "COVENANT",
ESTABLISHED BY THE SOLE CORPORATION UNDER ISAIAH 11:1-5. IT
READS: "AND THERE SHALL COME FORTH A "ROD" (A KING/ SOVEREIGN)
OUT OF THE STEM OF JESSE (KING DAVID'S FATHER) AND A "BRANCH"
(A DESCENDENT) SHALL GROW OUT OF HIS ROOTS (THE KING-KHALIFAH
IS THE FIDUCIARY HEIR). AND THE SPIRIT OF THE LORD SHALL REST
UPON HIM, THE SPIRIT OF WISDOM AND UNDERSTANDING 1 THE SPIRIT
OF COUNSEL (JAHJAH AL MAHDI POSSESSES ATTORNEY POWERS) AND MIGHT,
THE SPIRIT OF KNOWLEDGE AND OF THE FEAR OF THE LORD; AND SHALL
MAKE HIM OF QUICK UNDERSTANDING IN THE FEAR OF THE LORD: AND
HE SHAU.NOT JUDGE (JAHJAH AL MAHDI IS A JUDGE) AFTER THE SIGHT
OF HIS EYES, NEITHER REPROVE AFTER THE HEARING OF HIS EARS:
BUT WITH RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL HE JUDGE THE POOR, AND REPROVE
WITH EQUITY (JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS) FOR THE MEEK OF THE EARTH:
AND HE SHALL SMITE THE EARTH (MEANING MY POWER AND AUTHORITY
IS GLOBAL) WITH THE ROD OF HIS MOUTH AND WITH THE BREATH OF
HIS LIPS SHALL HE SLAY THE WICKED". (AGAIN PROVING THE KINGKHALIFAH 'S SPEECH IS PROTECTED SPEECH UNDER THE 1st. AMENDMENT
AND VIA CONTRACT UNDER ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 OF THE U.S. CONST.).
ISAIAH t6:5 READS: "AND IN MERCY SHALL THE THRONE BE
ESTABLISH ED: AND HE SHALL SIT UPON IT IN TRUTH IN THE TABERNACLE
I
OF DAVID (I AM KING AND HIGH PRIEST), JUDGING AND SEEKING JUDG33-of-70

--· -·--·

----------------

---- --------------- -------

---

MENT (I AM JUDGE, ATTORNEY AND LEGISLATOR WITH SUPERSEDING GLOBAL
AUTHORITY), AND HASTING RIGHTEOUSNESS".
ISAIAH 42:18-22 READS: "HEAR YE DEAF; AND LOOK YE BLIND,
THAT YE MAY SEE. WHO IS BLIND, BUT MY SERVANT: ( I WILL NOT SEE
THE WORLD'S POINT OF VIEW), OR DEAF AS MY MESSENGER (I AM SENT,
THE VOICE OF GOD IN THE FORM OF A MAN, A MEMBER OF THE SOLE
CORPORATION. I WILL ACCEPT NO ARGUMENT WHEN IT COMES TO THE
[GOD] SENT? (I AM HIS ADVOCATE, ATTORNEY),
WHO IS BLIND AS HE WHO IS PERFECT, AND BLIND AS THE LORD'S SERVANT (ALL I SEE IS WHAT MY GOD DESIRES)e SEEING MANY THING$,
BUT THOU OBSERVEST NOT (I SHALL TEACH MANY, BUT I SHALL NOT

LAWS OF GODo) THAT I

BE MOVED). THE LORD IS WELL PLEASED FOR HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS SAKE;
HE (THE KING) WILL MAGNIFY THE LAW"., I AM KING, KHALIFAH, IMAM,
HIGH PRIEST, LAWGIVER, ATTORNEY, JUDGE, LEGISLATORWI'TH GLOBAL
'
SUPERSEDING POWER AND AUTHORITY BY MY ORIGINAL STATUS AS SUCH
OVER TEN THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE YOUR NATION WAS FORMED VIA CONTRACT FROM THE SOLE CORPORATION WHICH CANNOT BE MADE OR UNMADE
BY THE COURTS PROTECTED UNDER ARTICLE l SECTION lO OF THE U.S.
CONSTITUTION THAT WAS DEFAULTED ON BY THE UNITED STATES AND
OTHER (192) MEMBER STATES OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNDER CASE 2013CP-400-0084 WHICH IS WHY THE FEDERAL JUDGES ARE CONSPIRING TO
PREVENT REMOVAL OF THAT STATE CASE TO THE FEDERAL COURTS.,
WE TAKE TO TO THE CONTRACT UNDER LUKE 11:52. IT READS:
"WOE UNTO YOU [LAWYERS!] FOR YE HAVE TAKEN AWAY THE KEY OF KNOWLEDGE: YE ENTER NOT IN YOURSELVES, AND THEM THAT WERE ENTERING

ir#fNK YOU

CAN LEGALLY HINDER ME? YOUR LAWS
,
ARE NOT SOLELY YOUR OWN. THEY ARE OURS. OWNERSHIP LIES WITH
US, THE SOLE CORPORATION, UNDER FOREIGN LAW. THE SOLE CORPORATION
11
UNDER GOD IS THE "ORIGINAL FOUNTAIN" OF ALL LAW. THE "TERM

YE HINDERED". You·

OR "CONCEPT" OF "ATTORNEY" DID NOT COME FROM ENGLISH LAW. IT
DID NOT COME FROM THIS NATION GIVING YOU THE LEGAL RIGHT TO
RESTRICT IT TO REQUIREMENT OF ENTRY TO THE STATE OR FEDERAL
BAR ABSENT OF THE RIGHTS OR PREROGATIVES OF THE SOLE CORPORATION
WHO ESTABLISHED IT AND WHERE FULL OWNERSHIP LIES. IT COMES FROM
US, THE SOLE CORPORATION. THESE LAWS ARE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
34-of-70

------------ -------------

···-·····-

- - --------··--·---··

---· - - - - - - - - - - - -

'GIVEN TO YOUR NATIONS AS A "GRANT" WITH RESTR ICTION S. I HAVE
N
FULL OWNERSHIP VIA CONTRACT PROTECTED UNDER ARTICLE l SECTIO
10 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND CAN ABUSE OR ACT IN THEM AS
T
I PLEAS E. THEREFORE, THE CLAIMS MADE BY MARCHANT ARE WITHOU
MERIT . THE COURTS CANNOT MAKE OR UNMAKE THE CONTRACTo
NOW WHAT'S INSIDE CASE 2013-C P-400- 0084 THAT JUDGE MARCHANT AND THE FEDERAL JUDGES ARE WILLING TO LIE, RISK THEIR
T
JOBS, ENGAGE IN ACTS OF FRAUD AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO PREVEN
FROM BEING SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE TO WHICH THE UNITED STATES
ED,
AND U.N. MEMBER STATES DEFAULTED ON? ONE DOCUMENT IS ENTITL
'
"MEMORANDUM OF LAW WITH POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ON 'SOVER EIGNTY
OF GOD'S APPOINTED KING, KHALIFAH, IMAM, PROPHET AND HIGH PRIEST
SUPPLEMENTED TO PREVIOUS SENT UNITED NATIONS DOCUMENTS IN RELATO GOD-1 S THEOCRATIC GOVERMENT OF THE SEVERAL GLOBAL NATIONS
AND THEIR RESPEC TIVE NATIONAL AND OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS AND
NOTICE OF LIEN". , IT READS IN RELEVANT PART:
TO: THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENTS, S.C.De Ca, RELEVANT CORPORAU.S.
TIONS , BANKING ENTIT IES, ETC. VIA THE UNITED NATIONS ETC.,
DEPT. OF JUSTIC E, U.S. STATE DEPT. , S.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL ET.
AL., FIRST AVENUE AT 46th. STREET NEW YORK, N.Yo 10017 ,
TO WHOM JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T., TISHBI TEv THE KING OF
· T;HE NORTH, AL MAHDI, APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING, KHALIFAH,
IMAM, PROPHET AND HIGH PRIEST , TRUE FIDUCIARY HEIR TO THE THEOCRATIC THRONE OF THE AFRICANS, CHRIS TIANS , MUSLIMS AND JEWIS~
TS
WORLD, BY WILL AND TESTAMENT OF THE ONE TRUE GOD AND HIS PROPHE
PRESENTS SHALL COME. IN THE NAME OF THE ONE·TRUE GODu THE MOST
LLAH
MERCI FUL, THE MOST GREAT. SHALOM. AS SALAMU ALAYKUM WA RAMATU
TAKE
WA BARAKATU. MAY THE BLESSING OF CHRIST JESUS BE UPON YOU.
I

NOTICE THAT:
IT IS A WELL UNDERSTOOD FACT OF WORLD HISTORY THAT THE
WORLD
MOST DYNAMIC DOCUMENTS AND OR ~OOKS THAT SET THE COURSE OF
EVENTS AND WORLD HISTORY ARE THE TORAH, BIBLE , QURAN AND THE
SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH). IT WAS WITHIN THE SACRED
TY
PAGES OF THESE HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH THAT DISCLOSED THE FUTILI
35-of- 70

----------- ---

-

- ----------

---- -

---

,. , TYRANNY, WICKEDNESS, EVIL AND DEPRAVITY OF WORLD GOVERNMENTS
\,

AND FALSE RELIGIONS~ THEY EXPRESSED THE ELEMENTS OF GOD'S LAWS
AND THE RIGHTS OF THE SERVANTS OF THE MOST HIGH GOD WITHIN ANY •
SOCIETY WORLDWIDE ESTABLISHING THAT THE BELIEVING MEN AND WOMEN,
SERVANTS AND WILLFUL SLAVES OF GOD, ARE CO-HEIRS TO GOD'S ETERNAL
KINGDOM PROMISESo THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH), BY WILL AND TESTAMENT OF GOD AND HIS HOLY PROPHETS STIPULATED THE CHAIN OF AUTHORITY BY HOLY PROGENY AND
!

GODLY AUTHORITY GIVEN TO HIS ANOINTED AND APPOINTED KINGS, KHALIFAHS, IMAMS AND HIGH PRIESTS WITHIN THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC GOVERNMENT, LEADING TO THE ETERNAL EARTHLY REIGN OF CHRIST, JESUS
OF NAZARETH, TO INCLUDE HIS FORERUNNER AND HIS FORERUNNER'S
DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGNTY AS ALSO SEEN BY THE ATTACHED UNITED
NATIONS DOCUMENT DATED JULY 1, 2009 AND THE (21) P~GE SUMMONS
AND LETTER DATED DECEMBER 25, 2009u AND THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT
THE ONE TRUE GODu HAVING NO PARTNE~S, CREATES KINGS; KHALIFAHS
AND HEIRS. THAT IT WAS THE ONE TRUE GOD WHO INSTITUTED, ORDAINED
OR PERMITTED WORLD GOVERNMENTS AND IN DOING SO GOD SECURED THE
RIGHTS OF ALL GOVERNMENTS AND OR CAN TAKE AWAY THESE RIGHTS
AS HE SO WILLS, AND THAT WORLD GOVERNMENTS, AT EVERY LEVEL,
DERIVE THEIR 'JUST POWERS' BY THE DECREE AND MERCY OF THE ONE
TRUE GOD, FOR ALL MANKIND, JINN AND ANGELS ARE CREATED TO WORSHIP
H°IMo
IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED THAT THE SERVANTS OF THE ONE TRUE
GOD MUST BE WILLING TO LOSE THEIR LIVES TO FIND THEIR LIVES,
IN ALTRUISM, SUBJUGATION, PLACING ONESELF LAST IN ORDER TO BECOME
FIRST IN 'I'HE RECEIPT OF GOD' .S KINGDOM PROMISES, NOT LOVING THEIR
LIVES UNTO DEATH! EVEN IF THEY MUST BE IMPRISONED OR DIE TO
BE IN COMPLIANCE, PROTECT AND SERVE THE LAWS, DECREES AND WILL
OF THE.ONE TRUE GOD AS GIVEN BY HIS (3) HOLY BOOKS, SUNNAH AND
HIS APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH THE TISHBITE, AL MAHDI., THIS
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE CREATES AND RE-ESTABLISHES BEFORE
ALL MANKIND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE,
THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD HAVING NO PARTNERS, TO INCLUDE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HIS ANOINTED, APPOINTED KING OF THE NORTH, AL MAHDI,
JONAH THE TISHBITE, FIDUCIARY HEIR TO THE EARTHLY THRONE OF
36-of-70

- --··------------------------------

- - - - ------- -- ----------·-- ---

--------------- ---- ----

- - - - - - --------------------~-

.

THE AFRICANS, ~TS DIASPORA, CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS AND JEWS WORLDWIDE, WHICH IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN A DEMOCRACY OF THE PEOPLE,
BY THE PEOPLE OR FOR THE PEOPLE OR OTHER GLOBAL NATIONAL INTEREST
• THEREFORE, GOD AND HIS APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH, JONAH THE
TISHBITE AND THE CREATURES THEY CREATE AND OR RULE BY DIVINE
POWER ei. GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD, THEIR INHABITANTS, _AND THOSE
WHO WORK FOR/ IN GOVERNMENT(S) ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS AND OR GOD'S
SERVANTS AND BY GODLY DECREE, FAITH, IMAN,HAVE PLACED THEMSELVES
IN A_SUBSERVIENT POSITION, TO SERVE THE ONE TRUE GOD AND HIS
APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH WITHIN THEIR OFFICE/ FUNCTION/ POSITION/
STATUS VIA THEIR RELIGIOUS COVENANTS AND OATHS PURSUANT TO THE
LAWS OF GOD'S (3) HOLY BOOKS AND THE SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH).
IN REGARD TO THE PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED BY THE (3) HOLY
BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD PURSUANT TO THIS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, ANY PRESENT LAWS AND ANY SUBSEQUENT
LAWS WRITTEN OR CREATED AFTER IT, AND OF THE TRUE SOVEREIGNTY
OF THE ONE TRUE GOD, HIS APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH, JONAH THE
TISHBITE, AL MAHDI, ANY WRITTEN OR SPOKEN CUSTOMED LAW IS NOT
ONLY THE DIRECT EXPRESSION OF THE SOVEREIGN WILL OF GOD, HIS
PROPHETS AND APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH, AL MAHDI, THE KING OF
THE NORTH, IT IS ALSO THE ABSOLUTE RULE OF ACTION AND DECISION
OF ALL DEPARTMENTS AND OFFICES OF GOD'S GLOBAL THEOCRATIC GOVERNMENT WITH RESPECT TO ALL MATTERS COVERED BY IT, AND THEY MUST
CONTROL AS THEY ARE WRITTEN OR STATED, INTERPRETED BY AL MAHDI,
UNTIL IT IS CHANGED BY THE AUTHORITY WHICH ESTABLISHED IT, GOD;
HIS PROPHETS AND THE KING/ KHALIFAH OF THE NORTH, AL MAHDI,
JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE., FOR REFERENCES SEE a~A~E-li:X

IUi::t.-CR:S:NSiiA.W-l.l..,-JQSEliH,1 7 175 Ala,. 579, 57 So. 942; S(;iiMJ;~~-lil.
~.W.-GGGK-SRS:~lNG-GO.r 187 Md. 623, 120 N.E. 19~ 3 A.L.R. 270;
(;QI.I.INa-v.,.-MAR~~Nr 209 Pa,. 388, 139 A. 122, 55 A.,L.R. 311; ~
VE.t.ER!S-~-NatJRA.NGE-~G.-l.r.-MAR£iU\.J;.:t.z: 124 Tex.

45, 76 S. W. 2d. 1 007,

96 A.L.R. 802; S~A~E-EX-R~~-I.li:MQN-l.lw-I.ANG~1~r 45 WASH.2d. 82,
273 P.2d. 464; E•E-~tJAM-l.l~-LO~G-~ERM-CRECl~~SANK 7 -JA~AN 7 322
F3d. 652(9th.Cir.2003); WANG-l.r..,-ASUCRQ~~r 320 F3d. 130(2nd.Cir.
2003); EN~~•SU-l.l,-~UORNr 676 F.Supp. 761(S.D.Miss.~987); _!!!
37-of-70

--·--

·-----

---

- - - - - - - - - -- ~ - - - - - - -

RE~-~REEWr 980 F2d. 590(9th~Cir.1992) •
••• AND TAKE NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING CASES AND POINTS:
(1).

"BEFORE AND WHEN THE REVOLUTION BY GOD'S DECREE

AND WAR IN THE FORM OF THIS LITIGATION BEFORE THE COURTS TOOK
PLACE, THE KING OF THE NORTH, THE 12th. AND FINAL OF THE RIGHTLY
GUIDED KHALIFAHS OF ISLAM WAS SOVEREIGN BY WAY OF HIS ORIGINAL
STATUS AS SOVEREIGN AS IS WRITTEN IN THE HOLY BOOKS OF THE (3)
TRUE RELIGIONS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) BEING
A SECURED PERSON BY THAT WHICH IS WRITTEN AND CONTAINED THEREIN
BEFORE THE UNJUST CAPTIVITY OF HIS HOLY ANCESTORS OR THE PRESENT
NATIONS OF THE WORLD WERE FORMED AND BEFORE ANY SLAVE NAME OR
NUMBER WAS ASSIGNED TO HIM BY BIRTH CERTIFICATE, SOCIAL SECURITY
NUMBER OR ANY OTHER RELEVANT LEGAL OR OTHERWISE DOCUMENT IN
THE UNITED STATES WAS PRODUCEDe BY SUCH HIS SUBJECTS ARE ALSO
SECURED PERSONS BEING A KINGDOM OF PRIEST, A KHALIFATE OF IMAMS
AS REDEEMED BY THE ONE TRUE GOD'S HIGH PRIEST OF THE LEVITICAL
PRIESTHOOD, CHRIST AND LINE OF AARON"' MAR'.I'IW-la:~ .. -A.I. .. r-v .. -'.I'~:Ui:
(1342) 41 u.s. (6 Pet.) 367,410, 10 L.Ed.
997, 1013; E~GbiaW-V,-~WQRWy 676 F.Supp. 761(S.D.Miss.1987) ;
IW-RE~-GREEW, 980 F2d. 590(9th.Cir.1992); THE (3) HOLY BOOKS.

I..ESlirn;:E-Oi:-WACQli:I.I.r

(2) "THE THEOCRATIC STATE, THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND
SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) ARE THE SUPREME LAW OVER
ALL MANKIND, WRITTEN BY THE SUPREME POWER, THE ONE TRUE GOD
HAVING NO PARTNERS AND HIS PROPHETS AS THEY WERE MOVED BY THE
RUH OF ALLAH, THE HOLY SPIRIT, AS HE WRITES UPON THE HEARTS
OE' MAN WITH THE PEN THAT THOU KNOWETH NOT", RE-!;;OR~AM ..... »:A¥E~~E

LQ~AL-S~WQOL-ClS~.T 20 OHIO MISC. 222, 49 OHIO OPS.2d. 143,
250 N.E.2d. t04; S~A~E-li:X~R~I.-Wli:lW~ER~li:R-~.-WI~I.la:Rr 87 OHIO
ST.-12, 99 N.E. 1078; lW-R~~-GRli:li:W~ 980 F2d. 590(9th.Cir.1992).
(3) "THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH) ARE THE VOICE OF THE ONE TRUE GOD, HIS PROPHETS,
JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE, AL MAHDI, SPEAKING IN THEIR
SOVEREIGN CAPACITY UNDER THEOCR~TI~ LAW AS WELL AS FOREIGN LAW,
38-of-70

- - · · - - - - ------~·-·- ----------------- -- -·--·- ------ ·-------------------------------·- --------------·---- -

=nu .1.n~.r

CONGRUENT TO EACH OTHER, IN HARMON
Y WITH EACH OTHER,
THEY ARE ONE AND MUST BE HEEDED
; WHEN THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND
THE SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMM
AD(PBUH) SPEAK WITH REFERENCE
TO A PARTICULAR MATTER, THEY MUS
T BE GIVEN EFFECT AS INT ERP RETED BY AL MAHDI AS THE PARAMOUNT
LAW OF THE LAND AND GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STA TE" , ~EQ ~~E -Vv- ~AR
K£r 58 Cal . 624 ; (3) HOLY BOOKS;
EW G~l £W- ~.-~ UQR ~-5U ~RA .,
lU<.I:!;

(4) "GOD 1 S APPOINTED KING AL MAHDI,
JONAH THE TISH BIT E

HIM SEL F, OF COURSE IS NOT SUBJECT
TO THE LAW, FOR HE IS NOT
ONLY KIN G/ KHALIFAH, BUT ALSO PRO
PHET OF GOD BEING THE VOICE
OF GOD IN THE FORM OF A MAN, LAW
GIVER OF GOD, THE AUTHOR AND
SOURCE OF THE RESTORE LAW, BUT HE
IS ALWAYS SUBJECT TO THE COMMANDS GIVEN HIM BY THE ONE TRUE
GOD AS HIS SLAVE AND SERVANTc
IN OUR GLOBAL THEOCRATIC SYSTEM
, WHILE SOVEREIGN POWERS ARE
DELEGATED TO VARIOUS AGENTS AND
OR AGENCIES OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRA TIC GOVERNMENT, SOVEREIGNTY
ITSE LF REMAINS WITH GOD AND HIS
APP OIN TED , ANOINTED KIN G/ KHALIFA
H, JONAH THE TIS HBI TE, AL MAHDI,
UNT IL TAKEN OVER BY CHR IST, JESU
S OF NAZARETH, BY WHOM AND FOR
'
WHOM ALL EARTHLY GOVERNMENTS EXI
ST AND ACT S. AND THE LAW AS
WRITTEN IN THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND
SUNNAH OF MUHAMMAD(PBUH) ARE
THE DEF INIT ION AND LIM ITA TIO N OF
POWER AND GOD 'S DIV INE LAWS",
¥~G K£- WQ -~~- UO~ K•N ay 118 U.S . 356
; EW G~.£ ~-~~ -UG R~- SU~ RA,
(5) "UNDER OUR GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
SYSTEM THE PEO PLE ,
WHO BY THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUN
NAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD
(PBU H) ARE CALLED SERVANTS AND SLA
VES OF THE ONE TRUE GOD BEING
SUBJUGATED TO GOD AND HIS APPOIN
TED KIN G/ KHALIFAH; JONAH THE
TIS HBI TE, ARE HERE AND WORLDWIDE
A KINGDOM OF PRI EST , A KHALIFATE
OF IMAMS, WHETHER COLLECTIVE OR
IND IVID UAL , BEING SUBJECT TO
THE LAWS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
STATE ABOVE ANY OTHER LAW
WITHIN ANY NATION AND ARE IMMUNE
FROM PARALLEL OR SECONDARY
STATE ACTION BEING THEMSELVES KIN
GS AND KHALIFAHS WITHOUT THE
CONSENT OF THE SOVEREIGN KING OF
KIN GS, KHALIFAH OF KHALIFAHS
JONAH IBN YAQUB, AL MAHDI, OF THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, FROM
THE LEAST OF THEM TO THE GREATEST
OF THEM BY BEING A HOLY COMMONJ
WEALTH AND KINGDOM. THEY ARE BOU
ND TO GIVE WAY TO THE SENTIMENT
OF LOYALTY, THE BAYT, TO THE PER
SON OF JONAH GABRIAL JAHJAH
t
39- of-7 0

TO THE HOLY THRONE OF THE AFRICANS, THEIR DIASPORA, CHRISTIANS,
MUSLIMS AND JEWS WORLDWIDE. THE CITIZENRY OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE KNOW HIM AS SUCH.PERSON, DECREED BY THE ONE TRUE GOD,
HOWEVER IN YEARS TO THOSE IN POWER, A KING, KHALIFAH, IMAM,
AND HIGH PRIEST OF STRENGTH AND POWER THEY NEED TO YIELD RIGHTS
WHICH THE LAW AND COMMANDMENT OF THE ONE TRUE GOD SECURE HIM",
SEE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF MUHAMMAD(PBUH); IJNl~li:C-~~A~li::£
Vw-~EEr 106 U.S~ 196 at 208.

(6) "IN THE THEOCRATIC STATE WORLDWIDE SOVEREIGNTY
RESTS WITH THE ONE TRUE GOff, HAVING NO PARTNERS OR ASSOCIATIONS ,
HE IS ONE GOD NOT A TRINITY, IN HIS APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING,
KHALIFAH, IMAM, PROPHET AND HIGH PRIEST, JONAH THE TISHBITE,
AL MAHDI", SEE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF MUHAMMAD(PBUH);
~Ul£Q~W-EX!R -~.-~EQRGlAr 1 L.Ed. (2 DALL) 415, 472; EWG~l5W

v.-~RUGRWr 676 F.Supp. 761.
(7) "KNOW IT TRUE THAT UNDER GLOBAL THEOCRATIC LAW
THE DUTY OF ANY ATTORNEY GENERAL, GENERAL, OR OFFICER OF THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE IS TO REPRESENT, SERVE AND PROTECT THE
TRUTH, LAWS, RIGHTS AND OR LIFE OF THE ONE TRUE GOD, HIS APPOINTED, ANOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH BEING THE EMBODIMENT OF THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AS GOD PROTECTS THE KING/ KHALIFAH AS
THE KING/ KHALIFAH PROTECTS AND SECURES THE RIGHTS OF THE SERVANTS AND SLAVES OF GOD.(I CAN LEGALLY ACT AS ATTORNEY, JUDGE
AND LEGISLATOR WITH SUPERSEDING POWERS). ANY FORM OF DEMOCRATIC
GOVERNMENT OR OTHERWISEe OR ITS LAWS, WHETHER NATIONALLY OR
INTERNATIONALLY THAT STAND IN OPPOSITION TO THE DECREES OF GOD'S
APPOINTED KING OR THE LAWS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE ARE

NO"f' PREVAILING AND THEY ARE TO BE RENDERED VOID. YOU WANT TO
PLACE INTO EFFECT LEGISLATION THAT WOULD PREVENT THE GUANTANOMO
DETAINEES FROM RECEIVING JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS IN AMERICAN COURTS?
THEN SET THEM FREE. I HAVE REDEEMED THEM AS HIGH PRIEST, KING
AND KHALIFAH. AS I AM SOVEREIGN THEY ARE SOVEREIGNS UNDER A
SOVEREIGN BEFORE ANY OF YOUR NATIONS WERE FORMED BY LEGAL BINDING
CONTRACT PURSUANT TO THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND THE SUNNAH OF THE
PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) NOT SUBJECT TO THIS UNJUST CAPTIVITY

'

40-of-70

OR YOUR GLOBAL LAWS. YOU WANT TO PLACE INTO EFFECT NATIONAL
AND INTERNATIONAL·LEGIS LATION BY LAW OR U.N. COUNCIL PROTECTING
THE WORSHIP OF FALSE GODS, THESE SODOMITE AND LESBIAN DOGS AROUND
THE WORLD? I MAKE VOID ANY EFFECT YOUR NATIONAL OR INTERNATIONAL
LAWS HAVE UPON MY PEOPLE THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND CLAIM
THE LIMITATIONS PLACED UPON OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE
FORM OF THE RIGHT TO LEGALLY MARRY REGARDING SAME SEX MARRIAGES.
THE ANTI-CHRIST, AD DAJJAL, WILL BE A ONE EYED CLOSET FAGOT
SODOMITE DOG AND PIG. BEHIND THE SCENES OF YOUR GLOBAL GOVERNMENTS HE IS PREPARING FOR HIS RULE. BEHIND THE WALL OF YOUR
CORRUPT BROKEN PRISON SYSTEM I AM PREPARING FOR MY RULE OVER
)

GOD'S PEOPLE. NEITHER TIME NOR PLACE HINDERS THE POWER OF GOD'S
APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH. YOU WILL NOT SUBJECT GOD'S APPOINTED
'KING/ KHALIFAH OR THE CITIZENS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE
TO THESE STUPID, IGNORANT, VILLAGE IDIOT LAWS, INJUSTICES OR
OPPRESSIONS. I WILL DROP A HOUSE ON YOUR WICKED, STUPID, DEPRAVED, PERVERTED, SODOMITE PROTECTING TAILS. PUSH MY BUTTON
IF YOU WANT TO. YOU GOT THE RIGHT-WRONG ONE.-I WILL CLEAN YOUR
PUTRID CLOCKS. THE PROPHET OF GOD IS ABOVE ALL WORLDLY GOVERNMENTS
INCLUDE THE PEOPLE HE IS COMMANDED TO PROTECT. THE

ro

GOD APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE
IS SOVEREIGN BEING SUBJECT TO GOD; SO ALL OFFICERS OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE DUTIES ARE TO THAT SOVEREIGN AS THAT SOVEREIGN
PROTECTS THE RIGHTS OF THE THEOCRATIC PEOPLE BY HIS GODLY WISDOM
AND DISCRETIONARY ACTS RATHER THAN TO THE MACHINERY OF ANY GLOBAL
GOVERNMENT", HANCOCK-~.-CARR~-A~CQRW-M~NlN~-CO.-lNC.r-K¥.r 503
\

s.w.2a.

710; K~N~UCK¥-CQWS~l~U~lGN-SEC~lGN-4f-CQMMQWW~A~~H !!.
:~b-~ANCGCK-~,-PAX~GN-KEN~UCK!z 516 S~W.2d. PAGE 867(2) CLAUSE
3; THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH);
ENGLlag-~.-~HQRN-SU ~RA ••
(8) "LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES ENACTED BY CITY, STATE
OR NATION(S) MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH AND CANNOT BE PERMITTED
TO OVERRIDE OR OVERRULE THE LAWS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE.
YET CONCESSIONS CAN BE MADE BY GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH
AS HE IS MOVED BY THE RUH-, THE HOLY SPIRIT OF GOD IN LIGHT OF
. GOD'S MERCIES AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES PRESENTED, s~~~-~.-VAU~Ur
155 Fla. 551, 21 So.2d. 31; EVANS-~.-S~RR¥r 262 N.Y. 61, 186
N.E. 203, 89 A.L.R. l87.
4G-of-70 l

( 9) '!IT IS THE DUTY OF ALL OFF ICIA
LS OF THE .GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STA TE, WHETHER LEG ISLA
TIV E, JUD ICIA L 6 EXECUTIVE OR
BY CHOICE MONARCHY/ KHALIFATE, ADM
INISTRATIVE OR MIN ISTE RIA L,
TO PERFORM EVERY OFF ICIA L ACT AS
NOT TO JUS T VIOLATE THE (3)
HOLY.BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PRO
PHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) AS INT ERPRETED BY AL MAHDI, BUT EVERY WOR
D THAT PROCEEDETH OUT OF THE
MOUTH OF THE ONE TRUE GOD, WHICH
GIVES LICENSE BY GOD'S DIS CRE TIO N VIA HIS APPOINTED KIN G/ KHA
LIFAH TO FUF ILL ANY ACT GOD
COMMANDS EVEN IF IT SEEMS TO CON
TRADICT HIS WRITTEN LAWS OR
THE LAWS OF ANY SOVEREIGN NATION
, SEE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND THE
SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(P
BUH) ei. JUNCTURE OF THE TWO
SEAS AL KIDR AND MUSA; MQW~GQMER
X-1.l .,-S'l 'A~li : .. 55 Fla 1• 97, 45 So.
879 ; DANIEL 11: 1-3 .
(10) "THE PROVISIONS OF THE (3)
HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH
OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) AS
RESTORED AND INTERPRETED BY
JONAH AL MAHDI AND THE DECREES of
GOD'S PROPHET AND APPOINTED
KIN G/ KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THE
OCRATIC STATE MUST BE GIVEN
EFF ECT EVEN IF DOING SO A STATUT
E OR LAW OF ADJACENT OR OTHERWISE
SOVEREIGN NATIONS UPON THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE AND ITS CIT IZENRY ARE HELD TO BE INOPERATIVE 11
•
SEE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND THE
SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(P
BUH); £~A ~E-E X-R E~~ -WE 5~-~ ..
~u~ ~ER r 70 Fla . 102 , 69 So. 771
; ENG ~lS~ -~.- ~UQ R~r 676 F.S upp .
761 .
"THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF
THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH) AS RESTORED AND INTE
RPRETED BY JONAH IBN YAQUB,
AL MAHDI, ARE NOT MADE TO ACT UPON
THE LEG ISLA TIV E DEPARTMENT
ALONE, BUT UPON EVERY DEPARTMENT
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STA TE" ,
WA ¥-~- ~u1 ~~IE Rr 16 OHIO 105 ; (3) HOL
Y BOOKS AND SUNNAH; EWG~b£H
~.-~ gQR Wr 676 F.S upp . 761 ; ~~-R E~-G
REE N-S U~R A ....
(11 )

(12 )

"COURTS SHOULD NOT TOLERATE OR CON
DONE DISREGARD
OF THE DECREES OF GOD'S APPOINTED
KIN G/ KHALIFAHv JONAH THE
TIS HBI TE, AL MAHDI OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE NOR ARBITRARY
USURPATION OF POWER OF GOD'S APP
OINTED KIN G/ KHALIFAH ON THE
PART OF ANY OFF ICE R OR THE PEOPLE
[AND NEITHER SHOULD THE KIN G/
42- of'- 70

'
KHALIFAH] AND THE PEOPLE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE MUST
BE GIVEN ACCESS TO THEIR KING/ KHALIFAH IN SOME FORM TO SEEK
REDRESS OF THEIR GRIEVANCES IF SOMEHOW THE COURTS FAIL IN THEIR

DUTIES", EX-RAR~E-OWi:WSr 10 OKLA. CRIM. REP. 284, 136 P. 197,
Ann. Cas. 1916 A. 522; KING"'S DECREE--COURTS NO.(1); i:WGI.J;SH
v.-~HGRW-SURRAv; VER~~~~EW-S.V.-~v-CEW~RA~-~A~K-0~-WlG ER~Ar
401 u.s. 480, 103 s.ct. 1962, 76 L.Ed.2d~ 81(U.S.1983).
(13)

"THE OFFICERS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC LAW,

IN THE EXECUTION OF PROCESS, ARE OBLIGED TO KNOW THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THEOCRATIC LAW, AND IF THEY MISTAKE THEM, WHETHER THROUGH
IGNORANCE OR DESIGN, OR IF THEY SEEK TO ROB OR PILLAGE THE KING
OR ANY OTHER CITIZEN OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND ANY
ONE IS HARMED BY THE ERROR OR INJUSTICE, THEY MUST RESPOND IN
DAMAGES AND ARE SUBJECT BY FINAL JUDGMENT TO THE KING/ KHALIFAH",
SEE 28 u.s.c. § 2679; CA~•~A~-~RAW5r-IW~ERWz-~~C.-v.-lW~ERW A~
~~GNA~-PE~RQ~EYM-~W~.-CG. 1 F.Supp.2d., 2013 WL 557236(Fla.2013);
THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND -SUNNAH OF MUHAMMAD(PBUH); ROSTERS v.
MARSHA~~T (UNITED STATES USE_OF RO~ER~-~.-CQWK~lW) 1 WALL (U.S.)
644, 17 L.Ed. 714 (EMPHASIS ADDED); EWGI.•SH-~.-~~ORW-5URRA.;
THOR~GN-~.-MAR¥~ANQ-GEWERA~-HQS~. 7 F.Supp.2de, 2013 WL 1943065
(Md.2013).
(14)

11

IT IS A GENERAL RULE THAT AN OFFICER-EXECUTIVE,

ADMINISTRATIVE, QUASI-JUDICIAL, MINISTERIAL, OR OTHERWISE--WHO
ACTS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF HIS JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION OF THE KING/ KHALIFAH AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC LAW MAY THER~BY RENDER HIM AMENABLE TO PERSONAL LIABI_LITY AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KING/ KHALIFAH
AS HE IS GUIDED BY THE RUH OF ALLAH, THE HOLY SPIRIT 11 , SEE (3)
HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH); COQ~ER

v.-O!CONNi:Rr 69 App. D.c. ~oo, 99 F2d. 135, 118 A.L.R. 1440;
CHAMSERI.AlN-v.-C~A~~ON 7 56 IOWA 331, 9 N.W. 237, 41 Am. Rep.
ff O1 •

(15) "IN OUR GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, GOD AND HIS
APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH, JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE,
AL MAHDI, ARE SOVEREIGN, ••• AND THE GOVERNMENT AND OR PEOPLE
43-of-70

CANNOT SEVER ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE ONE TRUE GOD OR HIS APPOINTED GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KING/ KHALIFAH, •• •,", Ali:~H~~lMr 387

u.s. at

257, 87

s.ct. at

1662.

"IN THE COMMON USAGE, THE TERM 'KING/ KHALIFAH'
THOUGH HE BE A SERVANT OF GOD DESIGNATED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS
(17)

OF THE PEOPLE, DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PEOPLE, AND STATUTES AND
THEOCRATIC LEGISLATION EMPLOYING IT WILL ORDINARILY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DO so", UNl~EC-S~A~ES-~.-UW~~~Q-MIW~-WQRKERSr 330
U. S • 2 5 8 ( 1 9 4 7 ) , 91 -L. Ed. 8 8 4 , 6 7 S • Ct • 6 7 7 •
(18) "SINCE IN COMMON USAGE, THE TERM 'KING/ KHALIFAH'
, THOUGH THE PEOPLE BE A KINGDOM OF PRIEST, A KHALIFATE OF IMAMS,
DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PEOPLE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE UNLESS
SPECIFIED, STATUTES OR LAWS NOT IMPLYING THE PHRASES ARE ORDINARILY CONSTRUED TO EXCLUDE IT", 1 u.s.c.s. 1 n. 12; 28 u.s.c.
§ 1602-1612 ET. SEQ.,; 2RAQQ¥-~.-UW I~EQ-S~A~~5r 2016 WL 1031301
(E.D.Va.2016 ), (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD
(PBUH); YNl~~Q-S~A~ ES-~.-EX.r 94 U.S. 3~5.
(19) "WHERE THE RIGHTS, DUTIES, AND OBLIGATIONS SECURED BY THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD
(PBUH) AS RESTORED AND INTERPRETED BY JONAH IBN. YAQUB, THE
TISHBITE, AL MAHDI, GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE DECREES ARE INVOLVED, THERE CAN BE NO RULE
MAKING OF LEGISLATION PAST, PRESENT OR FUTURE, OTHER THAN CHRIST,
JESUS OF NAZARETH HIMSELF, WHICH WOULD ABROGATE THEM WITHIN
ANY NATION 11 , SEETHE ONE TRUE GOD; THE_ (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH
I

OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH); MlRANQA-~.-ARIZQWA.
(20) " •••• THE CONGRESS, PARLIAMENT NOR ANY OTHER
GLOBAL LAW MAKING BODY CANNOT OVERRIDE THE DECREES OF THE ONE
TRUE GOD, GOD'S PROPHET,AND APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH IBN.
YAQUB, THE LAWS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, NOR CAN THEY
REVOKE THE SOVEREIGN POWER OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KING/ KHALIFAH, NOR THE POWER OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE", SEE THE
ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH); ~~RR¥-~.-UWl~ ~Q-S~A~ESr 294 U.S. 330, 353(1935);

EN~blSH-~.-~U QRW-SU~RA.; AQAIR-ASS~~- MAWA~~M~W ~r-~~C.-~.-u.s.
44-of-70

FOUNDA"INHERENT 'SOVEREIGNTY' IS ONE OF THE
OCRATIC GOVERNMENT AS IS
TIONAL STRUCTURES OF THE GLOBAL THE
DESIGNED TO EXIS T BY AND
DECREED BY THE ONE TRUE GOD AND IS
AH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD
THROUGH THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNN
GOD AND FOR GOD. IN THE
(PBUH) BEING A GOVERNMENT OF GOD, BY
RESIDES IN THE ONE TRUE·
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE SOVEREIGNTY
APPOINTED KIN G/ KHALIFAH,
GOD AND HIS SERVANT AND SLAVE, HIS
MAHDI, AND NO GLOBAL CONGRESS,
JONAH IBN . YAQUB, THE TISH BIT E, AL
BODY CAN EXERCISE ANY POWER
PARLIAMENT OR ANY OTHER LEG ISLA TIVE
OR OPP OSIT ION TO THEOCRATIC
WHICH THEY HAVE, IN CONTRADICTION
BY THE IR CONSTITUTIONS
LAW AND THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE,
ELSE IS WITHHELD", (YOU
OR OTHERWISE ENTRUSTED TO THEM: ALL
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WHICH
CANNOT GIVE GAYS AND LESBIANS OUR
TRACT", "GRANT" WITH R:j!:IS GIVEN TO YOUR NATIONS UNDER "CON
THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH
STR ICT ION S), SEE THE ONE TRUE GOD;
~lAR g-v.- ~R~ ~NM ANr 110 u.s .
OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH); JU~
-v,-gQ~~NG-CQM~AN¥ 7 F.Su pp.
421 ; EW~ ~~S~ -v.-~ HGR N-SU ~RA .; ~AUNlER
2d. , 2014 WL 164 695 3(20 14).
(21)

KHALIFAH,
ALL THAT THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KIN G/
• YAQUB, 'AL MAHDI AND THE
JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISH BITE IBN
VIDES LEGITIMATELY BY THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE DOES AND PRO
HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF
COMMAND OF THE ONE TRUE GOD, THE (3)
PURSUIT OF ITS DUTY TO PURGE
THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) ARE IN
DIASPORA, CHR ISTI ANS , MUSLIMS
THE INNER-SANCTUM OF AFRICANS, ITS
WORLDWIDE, PURIFY THE PLACES
AND JEW S, BEL IEVE RS, SERVANTS OF GOD
THAT ARE PERMITTED TO WORSHIP
OF WORSHIP AND HOLY TEACHINGS, ALL
FOR THE RULE OF THEIR ETERNAL
AND LEARN THE REIN , AND PREPARE THEM
HET AND HIGH PRIE ST, CHRIST
EARTHLY KING, KHALIFAH, IMAM, PROP
THE IR RIGHTS AS HOLY HEI RS,
JESU S OF NAZARETH(PBUH), ANP PROTECT
MISES OF GOD AS THEY REMAIN
KIN GS, KHALIFAHS OF THE ETERNAL PRO
S AND THE DECREES OF HIS APOBE DIEN T, IN COVENANT TO GOD 'S LAW
W¥N~AMM~R-v.-~~c~~E, 13 N.Y .
POIN TED KIN G/ KHALIFAH, AL MAHDI (
THE PROP,HET MUHAMMAD [ PBUH] )
3 7 8; ( 3 ) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF
G/ KHALIFAH AND THE GLOBAL
WHICH DUTY THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KIN
(22)

11

45- of-7 0

THEOCRATIC STATE WITH ITS COMMONWEALTH OWE TO
THEIR CREATOR
WHO IS ONE, HAVING NO PARTNERS., THERE IS NO SUCH
THING AS A
"TRI NI~Y ". I, JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHB ITE
IBN. - YAQUB,-~AL
MAHDI AND THE SERVANTS AND SLAVES OF THE ONE
TRUE GOD; WHICH
DEBT AND DUTY TO THEIR GOD IS NEVER EXTINGUISH
ED NOR DISCH ARGE D,
BEIN G PERPE TUAL , BY WAY OF GOD'S APPOINTED HIGH
PRIES T OF .THE
LINE OF AARON, CHRI ST(PB UT) AND THE,L EVIT ICAL
PRIES THOO D, REDEEMS
THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COMMONWEALTH OF AFRIC A,
ITS DIASP ORA,
CHRI STIA NS, MUSLIM$ AND JEWS , HEREBY NULLIFY
AND OR SUPERCEDE
ANY DEBT OR DUTY OWED BY THE GLOBAL THEOCRAT
IC KING / KHALIFAH
AND THEOCRATIC COMMONWEALTH, EXTIN GUISH ING AND
DISCHARGING SUCH
THAT EXIS T WITHIN ANY GLOBAL NATION AS DETERMINED
AND DECREED
BY GOD' S HIGH PRIE ST, IMAM, PROPHET, KING AND
KHALIFAH. NO MATTER
WHAT ANY GLOBAL, GOVERNMENT OR NATION PROVIDES
FOR US IN ANY
MANNER OF CONVENIENCE, CONSCIENCE OR SAFETY,
THE SERVANTS, SLAVES
OR KING / KHALIFAH ·owES NOTHING TO THE GLOBAL
GOVERNMENTS", SEE
THE ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNA
H OF THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH); HA~E-~,-HEWKE~x 201 u.s. 43
at 74; ~AWS lWG-~ .
SMI~ ~r 4 WEND 9, 20 (182 9); ~gE-PAR~•AMEW~-2E~GEr
5 Prob . Div •
. 197; EXCWANGEz 7 CRANCH 116; VAVA£aEYR-~.-KR
U~Pr 9 CH. DIV.

351.
(23) "UNDER THE FORM OF THE KING / KHAL IFAH' S
GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC GOVERNMENT, THE-L EGISL ATUR E OR JUDIC
IARY IS NOT SUPREME. THE)'ARE ONLY ORGANS OF THAT ABSOLUTE SOVE
REIGNTY WHICH
RESID ES WITH THE ONE TRUE GOD AND HIS APPOINTED
KING / KHAL IFAH,
JONAH THE TISH BITE , AL MAHDI. LIKE OTHER BODIE
S OF THE GOVERNMENT, IT CAN ONLY EXER CISE SUCH POWERS AS HAS
BEEN DELEGATED
TO IT, AND WHEN IT STEP S BEYOND THAT BOUNDARY
OR THE DECREES
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KING / KHALIFAH, THEIR
ACTS ••• ARE UTTERLY
RENDERED VOID ", SEE THE ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3)
HOLY BOOKS AND
SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH); 2I~~I WG£
-~.-H A~~r 7 CA.
1 (COURT OF APPE ALS, U.S. ); e-~~ ~.-i~ gr_iJ Ot
i~CRA ~CUz -4~-&
C. 1-~~ ~.-J4 0; i-~E ~.-1e J; J-~E X.-20 J; l0-R E~.-4
i~ & C. l~-~E ~.
ell ..
(24) I, JONAH GABRIEL JAHJA H T. TISH BITE IBN.
YAQUB,
AL MAHDI, BY HIS ORIG INAL STATUS AS SOVEREIGN
KING , KHALIFAH
46-o f-70

)

AND FIDUCIARY HEIR, BY WAY OF HIMSELF SECURED PERSON PURSUANT
TO THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH, LEGAL BINDING CONTRANTS UNDER
FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL PROBATE LAW, ALSO REGARDING THE CITIZENS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, AS HIGH PRIEST AND DIRECT
DESCENDANT OF AARON, OF MOSE~, OF CHRIST THROUGH HIS BROTHER
JAMES, OF THE LEVITICAL PRIESTHOOD, OF KING DAVID, OF KING
SOLOMAN AND THE QUEEN OF SHEBA OF THE ETHIOPIAN THRONE(PBUT),
HEREBY REDEEMS HIMSELF BY THE HOLY DECREE OF THE ONE TRUE GOD
AND BY HOLY INHERITANCE, TO INCLUDE THE SERVANTS, SLAVES, CITIZENS OF GOD OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND DISCHARGES ANY
DEBT WHICH MAY BE SAID TO EXIST OR BE OWED TO THE STATE OR GOVERNMENT OF ALL GLOBAL NATIONS BY HIMSELF OR THE THEOCRATIC
COMMONWEALTH. THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD ARE, HOWEVER, INDEBTED
CONTINUALLY TO THE ONE TRUE GOD AND GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH AND THE CITIZENRY OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE BECAUSE
THE ONE TRUE; HIS APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH AL MAHDI AND
THE CITIZENRY OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE OF THE MOST HIGH
GOD WHO ARE SANCTIONED AND BLESSED BY HIM CREATING ALSO A GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC CORPORATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SOLE CORPORATION
SUFFER THEIR CONTINUAL SODOMITE PROTECTING, FALSE GOD WORSHIPPING
, OVER CARNAL INDULGING, CAPITALISTIC DOG EAT DOG IDEOLOGY,
BLASPHEMING RUMPS EXISTENCE. THE CONTINUAU DEBT OF THE GLOBAL
DEMOCRATIC AND WORLDLY NATIONS AND OR GOVERNMENTS OWE TO THE
ONE TRUE GOD, THE GLOBAL APPOINTED THOCRATIC KING/ KHALFAH OF
THE THEOCRATIC STATE AND ITS COMMONWEALTH WHO ARE IN THEMSELVES
KINGS AND KHALIFAHS IS DISCHARGED UPON SETTLEMENT OF THE $100
TRILLION, DOLLAR AMOUNT WHICH IS ALSO TO BE ESTABLISHED BY LIEN
UPON THE GLOBAL ASSETS OF THE (193) MEMBER STATES OF THE UNITED
NATIONS AND OTHER RELIEF SOUGHT BEFORE THE VARIOUS COURTS BY
WAY OF THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA DISTRICT
COURT UNDER CASE 4:10-cv-4625~SBA, ALSO IN THE RICHLAND COUNTY
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS UNDER CASE 2013-CP-400-0084, AND OR BY
DECREE OF GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH IBN. YAQUB, AL
MAHDI, AND IS CONTINUED DISCHARGED UPON SUCH SETTLEMENT ONLY
AS IF THEY DO NOT VIOLATE THE SOVEREIGNTY, LAWS AND RIGHTS OF
THE KING/ KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE INCLUDING
ITS CITIZENS, AND WHEN THE GLOBAL WORLDLY GOVERNMENTS FALL AND
47-of-70

DEBT
OR FAIL IN THEIR DUTY TO PROVIDE PROTECTION--DISCHARGE ITS
Y)
TO THE GLOBAL THEOCRATic·· STATE , IT IS AN ABANDONMENT (AN INalUR
OF ANY AND ALL POWER, AUTHORITY OR VESTIGE OF "SOVEREIGNTY"
.
.
BY
WHICH POSSESSED AND THE LAWS REMAIN THE SAME UNTIL CHANGED
'-,

.

,
THE ONE TRUE GOD, HIS APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH IBN. )YAQUB
S
THE TISHB ITE, AL MAHDI, THE SOVEREIGNTY OF ALL GLOBAL NATION
REVERT BACK TO GOD, HIS APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH AL MAHDI
AND THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE FROM WHENCE IT CAME." SEE THE
ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3) HOLY.BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH); CQWW-lll.~SlCWE:t.I. 7 182 U.S. 277; UWl~E C-5~A~ E5
.
v.-~OW NSOW z--Fed. Appx' --2014 WL 676468 2 CA4 (N.C.2 014); I.N.s
v.-C~R -r 533 u.s. 289, 121 s.ct. 2271(U .S.2O0 1 ); C~CA~YR-~.
~AU~ClWGr 39 U.S. 599, 1840 WL 6277 (MEM) U.S. 1840; WORWS-vwgA~EW7, 922 F2dc 835 CA4 (Va.19 91); ALSO SEE SOURCES: BEFORE
THE MAYFLOWER, A.HIST ORY OF BLACK AMERICA BY LERONE BENNETT;
SUNA IBN MAJAH VOLUM E# 5 ISBN. No. 81-715 2-294- 1 PAGES 391395; SIGNS BEFORE THE DAY OF JUDGMENT, BY IBN KATHIR ISBN No.
1-8705 82-039 PAGES 18-24 ; ISAIAH 14:29- 32; 41 :25; WORLD'S
GREATEST MEN OF COLOR, VOLUME 1 BY J.A. ROGERS ISBN No. 9780- 684- 81581 -7; THE KEBAR NAGAST OR "GLORY OF THE KINGS" A
CHRONICLE OF THE RULERS OF ETHIO PIA; BUDGE E.A.W ., THE QUEEN
I,
OF SHEBA AND HER ONLY SON MENYELEK, LONDON 1923; ORMONDE, CZENZ
YOUNG
SOLOMON AND THE QUEEN OF SHEBA, NEW YORK, FARRA STRAUS AND
1954; ZECHARIAH 6:12-1 3; WA.~lGWr-COX-lll.-5MAl.AI.Az 112 F3d. 151;

EWG~ ~SW-v .-GEW .-~I.EC .-C0. 7 496 UeS• 72, 79, 100 S.Ct. 2270,
2275, 110 LoEd. 2d. 65(19 90); Q!SRlE W-lll.-M OQR~r 395 F3d. 499
(U.S.
CA4 (N.C.2 005); :aEr..I.- v.-WOI .i:lS:Wr 441 u.s. 520, 99 s.ct. 1861
1
(s.c.
19786 ); UWl~E C-S~A~ ES-v.-S AWWlS ~~Rr .467 Fed. AppX 175 CA4
2012) .
(25) "THE INDIVIDUAL CITIZE NS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
,
STATE MAY STAND UPON HIS RIGHTS OUTLINED BY THE (3) HOLY BOOKS
THE SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) AND THE DECREES OF
GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH AS SERVANTS AND SLAVES OF THE
.
ONE TRUE GOD, AS A KINGDOM OF PRIEST S, AS A KHALIFATE OF IMAMS
OWN
HE IS ENTITLED TO CARRY ON HIS OWN PRIVATE BUSIN ESS-IN HIS
WAY AS LONG AS SUCH BUSINESS OR WAY DO NOT VIOLATE THE LAWS
OF THE ONE TRUE GOD PURSUANT TO THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH
48-of- 70

OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) OR THE DECREES OF GOD'S APPOINTED
KING/ KHALIFAH JONAH IBN. YAQUBe HIS POWER TO CONTRACT IS UNLIMITED AS LONG AS HE IS IN COMPLIANCE TO THE PRIOR CONDITIONS.
HE OWES A DUTY TO THE ONE TRUE GOD, THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KING
AND THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE TO CONDUCT-SUCH B~SINESS IN
THE FEAR AND LOVE OF GOD, THE KING'S DECREES AND THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE WITH JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS AND UPON VIOLATION
OF ANY OF THE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, SUCH INJUSTICE OR ACTS
THAT STAND IN VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF THE ONE TRUE GOD, THE
KING'S DECREES ~ND THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, BY TH~ NATURE
OF THIS BUSINESS OR ACTS WILL BE DIVULGED AND OPEN TO INVESTIGATION, ••• HE OWES ALMANAH, DUTY AND RESPONSIBILITY TO THE ONE
TRUE GOD, FORSAKING ALL OTHER GODS SINCE ALL HE OWNS AND THE
KNOWLEDGE HE POSSESSES IS GIVEN HIM BY THE' ONE TRUE GOD. HE
WILL PAY ZAKAT AND OR TITHE. HE WILL ESTABLISH PRAYER BY WAY
OF HIS RELIGIOUS COVENANT. HE WILL PURIFY HIS LIFE WALKING IN
HOLINESS POSSESSING TAWQA OF ALLAH. THE MARRIAGE IS UNDEFILED,
AS LONG AS IT IS NOT SAME SEX MARRIAGE. HE WILL GO UNTO HIS
TILT AS HE WISHES. THE FATHERS OF THE GLOBAL': THEOCRATIC STATE
WILL TAKE THE LEAD RESPONSIBILITY FOR RAISING THE CHILDREN OF
LIGHT, THE GODLY SEED, WHILE THE WOMEN ASSIST HIM. HIS HONOR
, BLOOD AND PROPERTY ARE SACRED TO BE PROTECTED BY GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH AND HIS FELLOW SERVANTS OF GOD, THE UMMAH
OF THE "I AM", "ALLAH", "JEHOVAH", THE BODY OF CHRIST(PBUH)
BEING MEMBERS OF EACH OTHER. HIS RIGHTS ARE SUCH AS EXISTED
BY THE (3) HOLY BOOKS, THE SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH)
AND THE DECREES OF THE KING/ KHALIFAH, AL MAHDI, THROUGHOUT
THE LAND WITHIN ALL PROVINCES OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC SOVEREIGNTYi LONG ANTECEDENT TO THE ORGANIZATION OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND WORLDLY NATIONS, AND CAN ONLY BE TAKEN AWAY
FROM HIM IF HE APOSTATE, WORSHIP FALSE GODS, BY DUE PROCESS
LAW IN ACCORDANCE TO THE DECREES OF GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH, THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND THE SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD
(~BUH). HE OWES ALL. HIS BEST, HIS FIRST FRUITS, TO THE ONE
TRUE GOD, MUST WANT FOR HIS BROTHER WHAT HE WANTS FOR HIMSELF
AND SHALL NOT TRESPASS UPON THE RIGHTS OF THE KING/ KHALIFAH
OR HIS FELLOW SERVANTS OF GOD, THE CITIZENS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE." SEE THE ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND
49-of-70

SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH).
(26) "JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISH BITE IBN
.. YAQUB,
AL MAHDI, GOD 'S APPOINTED KING / KHALIFAH
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
STAT E, IS NOT BOUND BY GENERAL WORDS IN STAT
UTES OR GLOBAL LAWS,
REST RICT IVE OF PREROGATIVE RIGH TS, TITL ES
OR INTE REST , UNLESS
EXPRESSLY NAMED AND CONSENTED TO. ACTS OF
LIMI TATI ONS DO NOT
BIND AT THE KING / KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE NOR
THE PEOPLE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE
WHEN IT COMES TO THEI R
DUTI ES OR RELI GIOU S REQUIREMENTS OF BEING
OBEDIENT TO THE LAWS
AND DECREES OF THE ONE TRUE GODS. THE KING
/ KHALIEAH JONAH IBN.
YAQUB, AL MAHDI, IS THE VOICE OF THE ONE
TRUE GOD BEING HIS
MESSENGER IN THE FORM OF A MAN. THE KING /
KHALI'FAH IS THE FINA L
WORD ON ALL MATTERS CONCERNING MORALITY,
JUST ICE AND FAIR NESS
AND ON ALL MATTERS CONCERNING THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE AND
ITS CITIZ ENRY . THE COMMON LAW MAXIM IS WITH
OUT EFFECT WHEN IT
ASSE RTS, AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT AND OR CONG
RESS AND OR ANY OTHER
GLOBAL LEGI SLAT IVE BODY IS MADE FOR THE PUBL
IC GOOD, THE ADVANCEMENT OF RELI GION OR JUST ICE, AND TO PREVENT
INJURY OR WRONG,
THE KING SHALL BE BOUND BY SUCH ACT, THOU
GH NOT NAMED, FOR THIS
KING,JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISH BITE IS
ALSO A PROPHET OF THE
ONE TRUE GOD, BEING THE VOICE OF THE ONE
TRUE GOD IN THE FORM
OF A MAN, BEING A MAN AFTER GOD'S OWN HEAR
T, AND GOD 'S APPOINTED
KING / KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STAT
E'S SENSE OF PUBL IC
GOOD, THE ADVANCEMENT OF RELIGION OR JUST
ICE AND EFFORTS TO
PREVENT INJU RY OR WRONG PURIFYING THE LAND
AND PEOf LE BY THE
WILL OF THE ONE TRUE GOD CONTAINED THER EIN,
SUPERSEDES ANY NOTION
OF LAW, PUBL IC GOOD, ADVANCEMENT OF RELI GION
; JUST ICE ETC. PLACED
FORTH BY THE WORLDLY GLOBAL GOVERNMENTS AND
THEI R LEGI SLAT IVE
BODXES. WHEN THERE EXIS T A STATUTE OR LAW
IN GENERAL IN ANY
GLOBAL NATION, AND ANY PREROGATIVE RIGH TS,
TITL ES OR INTE REST
WOULD BE DIVESTED OR TAKEN AWAY FROM GOD'S
APPOINTED KING / KHA LIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND THE
HOLY CITIZ ENS OF
THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STAT E, IN ANY SUCH
CASE THEY SHALL NOT
BE BOUND." SEE THE ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3)
HOLY BOOKS AND.SUNNAH
OF MUHAMMAD(PBUH); ~U~-~EQ~~E-~.-WERK•MER
7 15 AMERICAN DECI SION S
379, 4 COWEN N.Y. 345, 348( 1825 ); KING 'S
DECREE-GOVERNMENT N0.( 1)
(201 1); u~.~ ~~-S ~A~~ S-R. -R~R ~Zr 752 F3d.
398, 88 Fed. R. SERV .3d.
I

50-o f-70

- - - - · - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ----~- - --------- - - ---

1294 CA4 (N.C.2014); 2.~v-GRQU~r- ~~C.-v .. -R~~U2~•C-O~ -li~~W~lNAr
134 s.ct. 1198(U.S.201 4); ~QW£AM-v.-QEAW-W~~~ER-RE¥WQ~CS-lWC.r
537 u.s. 79, 84, 123 s.ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d. 491(2002);" g~~Q¥

v.-~E~~Or 555 Fed. Appx' 224 CA4(Md.2014) ; CQ~~W-v.-YlR~ XWlAr
;
6 WHEAT 264,411; WICgQ~S-~.-YW l~EQ-S~A~~gr 7 WALL 122, 126;
CARR-v,-UWl~ ~C-S~A~~Sr 98 U.S. 433.
(27) "THE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF WJ;~~a-ll ... -M;i:cgi ..
GA~-£~A~~-~Q ~lC~r 105 L.Ed.2d. 45(1989) MADE-I~-REREEC~¥-CLEAR

~llA~-~Im-SQW Rli:IGN-c;:llNO ~-BE-NANED-~ N-AM¥-S~llU~E -AS-JffilraL¥
A~!!li!ERSOR!!r-OR.-!!AN¥-Ji?ERSQN!!-IMCLUDIN<;.-:nu;;,Ic'l'MEN'l'S-WIUCS-ARE
PR00UCEg-B¥ -S~llU~E. [AFFIANT AND THOSE REDEEMED AND SECURED
BY HIM BEING THE FIDUCIARY HEIR, KING, KHALIFAH OF THE (4) GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC THRONES OF THE AFRICANS, ITS DIASPORA, CHRISTIANS,
MUSLIMS AND JEWS, HIGH PRIEST OE THE LEVITICAL PRIESTHOOD OF
THE ONE TRUE GOD ARE .MEMBERS OF A SOVEREIGNTY AND FOREIGN (EMPHASIS ADDED) STATE, A KINGDOM OF PRIEST, A KHALIFATE OF IMAMS
AS DEFINED UNDER LEGAL BINDING CONTRACT THAT CANNOT BE MADE
OR UNMADE BY THE COURTS VIA THE (3) HOLY. BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF
THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD ( PBUH > J •. THi KING/ ·,ii~!'tIFAH rs SOVEREIGN
BY HIS ORIGINAL STATUS AS SOVEREIGN TO INCLUDE ALL THE ATTRI11
BUTS ATTRIBUTED TO HIM. , '!UCK.5ii-WC-~ .. -UGliH{lW5r 11 8 U.S. 3 5 6 •

ENGL~sg-v.-~g QRWr 676 F.Supp. 761 (S.D.Miss.198 7); ~gE-CR~C-SCQ ~~
~As~•r 60 u.s 393; 5~QGSCl~~-ll.~ 5~2E~~USz F.Supp.2d., 2013 WL
5211483(DSC .2013); ~E~ER-2.-ll,-SA W~QRCr F.Supp.2d., 2012 WL
2149784; ~ARRAW~-REGIQWA~-WA~ER-CI£';c .. -v.. -g~RWAWNr 133 s.ct..
2120, 1_86 L.Ed.2d. 153(U.S.2C'13 ); 5AWAW~AR-1.r.-¥QJJSli:Rr 560 U.S.
305, 130 S.Ct. 2278(UeS.201 0); ~~RWAWE~~-M~SS;i:GW-0~-lWC~A-~Q
~~E-UWl~EQ-WA~~QNS-11.-Cl~~-O~-Wli:W-~QRKr 551 u.s. 193, 127 s.ct.
2352, 168 L.Ed.2d. 85, u.s.L.W. 4433(U.S~200 7).
(28) "THE PROPHET, LAWGIVER OF THE ONE TRUE GOD AND
SOVEREIGNTY ITSELF IS, OF COURSE, NOT SUBJECT TO THE LAW, FOR
HE IS THE "LAWGIVER" OF GOD AND IN SUCH IS THE AUTHOR AND SOURCE
11
OF THE LAW BEFORE ALL MANKIND ,
~EE-~.-~G~K1W a 7 118 U.S. 356.

~.CKS-WG-v.-go~KIWS-AM~-WQO

(29) "THE LAWS OF THE ONE TRUE GOD SUBSCRIBES TO
51-of-70

- - - - - - - - - - - - ·--

------·---~--------------------

--~---------· --

CRATIC STA'!'!!i,
HIS APPOINTED KING / KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THEO
)
MAHDI, AND THE
JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHB ITE IBNo YAQUB, AL
IBUTE OF SOVE CITIZ ENS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE THE ATTR
HIS OWN GLOBAL
REIGN TY; HE IS SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT WITHIN
S, KHALIFAHS UNDER
THEOCRATIC DOMINION AND HIS SUBJECTS ARE KING
/ KHALIFAH; HE
HIM ALSO INDEPENDENT BUT SUBJUGATED TO THE KING
ANY OTHER PONAND HIS SUBJECTS OWE NO KIND OF SUBJECTION TO
I
SUPERSEDE ALL
TENTA·TE OR GOVERNMENT ON EARTH FOR GOD S LAWS
MANKIND BEIN G
EARTHLY LAWS AND PLACE THEM IN HARMONY WITH ALL
THAT NO SUIT
A GUIDE AND LIGHT UNTO THE WORLD. HENCE, IT IS,
KING / KHALIFAH
OR ACTION CAN BE BROUGHT AGAINST GOD'S APPOINTED
, EVEN IN CIVI L
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE OR HIS SUBJ ECTS
OVER HIM OR
MATTERS, BECAUSE NO COURT CAN HAVE JURIS DICT ION
POWER", ~W::tSQI...M
THEM, FOR ALL JURIS DICT ION IMPL IES SUPREMACY OF
URRA ••
v.-G~ QRG •Ar 2 DALL 419, 458; ~WGI..:tg~-~.-~~QRW-5
INTED
(30) "IN THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE GOD'S APPO
·iBN. YAQUB,
KING / KHALIFAH, JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISH BITE
THE SOVER~IGN
AL MAHDI, THE FIDUCIARY HEIR , IS SYNONYMOUS WITH
BY THE LAST
POWER OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AS DECREED
KINGS AND HOLY
WILL AND TESTAMENT, OF THE SOLE CORPORATION, THE
HOLY BOOKS AND
PROPHETS OF THE ONE TRUE GOD BY WAY OF THE (3)
IN RIGHTEOUSAND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) STANDING
CANNOT BE USURPED
NESS , LIGH T, TRUTH, JUST ICE AND FAIR NESS , WHICH
FOUNDEDUPO~ "COMBY FORCE, FRAUD OR BOTH. OURS IS A GOVERNMENT
T", SUBJUGATION
PACT ", "CON TRAC T". IT IS FOUNDED UPON '"COVENAN
"CONTRACTS"
TO THE ONE TRUE GOD, (3) IDENTICAL "COVENANTS",
WAS AND IS WITH
OF MILK , HONEY, JEALOUSY AND SALT . SOVEREIGNTY
IFAH, 'JONAH THE
THE ONE TRUE GOD AND HIS APPOINTED KING / KHAL
TO OR ABOVE
TISH BITE , AL MAHDI, AND NOT WITH THE PE~PL E EQUAL
WHAT IS DESI GTHE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC KING /-. KHALIFAH OTHER THAN
PROPHET MUHAMMAD
NATED BY THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE
I ABOVE THEM,
(PBU H), BEING A KINGDOM OF KINGSv WITH AL MAHD
BEING ABOVE
CHRI ST BEING ABOVE AL MAHDI AND THE ONE TRUE GOD
S; Gl.AS S-~ .. -~lii:
CHRI ST HAVING NO PART NERS ", SEE (3) HOLY BOOK
RTER ).
abQO P-B~ ~5¥r 3 DALL 6 (DALLAS u.s. SUPREME COURT REPO
(31) "THE RIGHTFUL FIDUCIARY HEIR , KING, KHALIFAH,
52-o f-70

\

__

----·-- --·---· ------- ------- -

IMAM AND HIGH-PRIEST OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE OF AFRICA,
ITS DIASPORA, CHRISTIANSu MUSLIMS AND JEWS, JONAH GABRIEL'JAHJAH
Te TISHBITE IBNo YAQUBu AL MAHDI, IS ENTITLED TO ALL RIGHTS
WHICH BELONG TO GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH BY HIS PREROGATIVE", I.Aii1£J;NG-l.l..,.~£ll4l~li:I,z 4 WEND 9, 20 ( 1829);

( 3) HOLY BOOKS o -·

(32) "GOD'S APPOINTED KING/ KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE, JONAH IBNo YAQUB, AL MAHDI AND THE SERVANTS/
SLAVES OF THE MOST.HIGH GOD ARE A FOREIGN GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
GOVERNMENT OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, JONAH IBNo YAQUB,
AL MAHDI, _AND THE SERVANTS/ SLAVES OF THE MOST HIGH GOD ARE
A FOREIGN GLOBAL GOVERNMENT AND NO OTHER GLOBAL GOVERNMENT CAN
SEVER OR HINDER THEIR RELATIONSHIP BY TAKING AWAY THEIR CITIZENSHIP", A~RG¥IM-v~-RQ£K~ 387 U.Sa 253(1967); (3) HOLY BOOKSo

NOTE~ THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION OF SOVEREIGNTY IS SIMILAR
TO THAT FROM BOUVIER'S 14th~ EDITION LAW DICTIONARY (QUOTING
4 WHEAT 402). THE WORDS HAVE BEEN SLIGHTLY MOFIFIED TO PAINT ,
A MORE TRUE PICTURE OF THE MATTERS PRESENTED HERE:

~~~-WA£-~EEN-JQ£'I'~¥-'I'MGUGM~-A-WA~~ER-O~-IM~QR~AN~Er
'I'G-QE~ERMINE ... ~RGM-Wli:IA~-~QgR~E-~~E-~~Q~AI.-~~EG~RA'I'IC-£'I'A~E-UNQE~
~WE-~~QUC~AR¥-~ElR 7 -GQQ!£-A~RGbN~EQ-AWQ-AWQIW~EQ-K~WGy-KMA~l~AW 7
IMAM- -ANQ ... 1;! J;G:W:-lil.R IE£~ 7 -.JGWAM-GABRJ;;EI.-iJA:W.JAM- 'I'..,. - 'I' I£ ~.SJ;~E-l BW.,.

¥AQUB 7 -AJ;.-MA~Ql~QgR~VE£ -I'I'£-AYX~Q~I'I'X.~~~M E-QgE£XlQN-~ERE-~RG li!G£EQ-J;a-WI:IJi:'J:WER-GYR-2QW:Q-REi~QREQ-:g-;,t_~gEQGRA:I;"J;G-YNJ;Q~r-laE:;J;Wg
MEM.gERS--G:l,i:-GNE-AWQ~I:IERy-~.ME-IJMM.AM-Gli?-'X1IE__:!! l-A£4!! 7 -!!.ZU,,J;.AI:i!!,:-~lrn:
EQQ¥-Gi-C~RIS~-ARE -4li-~Rµ~-A~Q-£ANG~ J;;QMEC-SLE££EQ-G~ -~~~-Q~~
'rl1UJE-GGO-::-~:t.GQQ _ !!t;Q>Jli:WAN'I' £ !! :r- !!c;;;QW'b'RAG'I' £ !! - QN'I'Q -:Oii:A i'M-Q:!i:-Ml LK:r

WGNE¥ 7 -~EA~QY£¥-AWC-£A:i;.~ -EN~EREQ-IN'I'Q-:gX-~M E-~ER~AN~£-AWQ-£kAV E£
GS:-~HE--QWE-'I'iHJE-GG: Q-W:W:Q-'l'WQYG.Ei-lflii:-2 EGEi:~5-NGi'-NGR-·J;;£_~E GQ~'I'EW

y-AQQR~~-Yi-B¥-GUR- Q~EQJ;ENCE-A£-£QNi- ANQ-QAQ~~~ER£r-QQ= UE4R£
~E~N~-GYR-WAI.• 7 -~RQ~EC'I'QR 7 ~AWQ-~E-WWG-SU£~AIW£-U£-'I'~RQU~WQU~
AI.L-ETERNl'I'¥ 7 -GR-WME~I:IER-'I'I:IE~+J+-MQb¥-~QQK£-ANQ-SYWWA:W:-G~-~~E
~RG~ME~-MUMAMMAD +~~UI:l~-ARE-~WE-GR~ AN~Gr-~IJJINGy-E5~A~~ ~£gEQ
WQRQ-ANQ-~AW£-G~-~ liE-GWE-~RUE-~QQ_Q~ -~~E-~EA\Z'EN£-AWQ-E AR~~r

MA\Z'ING-NQ-I2AR'b'WERay-Wm;;~:w-£U.i;;lEJ1il£EQE£-A:WQ-QR-RENQER-\lQIQ-A.b1,
53-of-70

UTnt.K

LL-WI.:> 1

nu1•1R.l'!

.l:(~i\.:>Ul'!.ll'!G

UK Klutl'l'.t;UUbN.t;b b

U.l''

£11.A.NK.Ll'HJ

!{..t;(,JU.lRING

THAT IT FOREVER BE GIVEN ITS PLACE AND HEEDED AND RESPECTED
BY ALL NATIONS. TO THIS THE SOLE CORPORATIONu GOD'S APPOINTED
AND ANOINTED KING/ KHALIFAHu JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISSHBITE
IBN

YAQUB, AL MAHDI AND THE CITIZENS OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
STATE ANSWER THUS: THE FIDUCIARY HEIR, THE KING/ KHALIFAH AND
0

THE SERVANTS, SLAVES OF THE MOST HIGH GOD, THE 11 I AMiaf/ "ALLAH",.
"JEHOVAH", "YHWH 11 , TO HIM BELONGS THE BEST OF NAMES,, OF THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE SANCTIONED AND BLESSED BY THE ONE TRUE
GOD ••• ORDAIN, ESTABLISH AND WILL STAND BEHIND, WILL WALK IN
THE TRUTH, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND LAWS OF THE ONE TRUE GOD AS THEY
EXIST RESTORED BY JONAH IBNo YAQUB, AL MAHDI EVEN UNTO DEATH.o.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, A FOREIGN STATE,
AS RULED BY JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH To TISHBITE IBN.· YAQUB, AL
MAHDI, HAD ONLY DELEGATED POWER FROM THE ONE TRUE GOD OF THE
HEAVENS AND EARTH WHO RISES ABOVE HIS ISTAWA(THRONE) IN HONOR,
GLORY AND POWER, AND EVEN IF GOD'S APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING/
KHALIFAH 0 JONAH AL MAHDI, OR THE SERVANTS/ SLAVES/ CITIZENS
OF THE MOST HIGH GOD .AND GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE HAD AN INCLINATION, THEY HAD NO AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER THE POWER AND AUTHORITY
OF GOD I S APPOINTED AND ANOINTED SOVEREIGN KING 8 .KHALIFAH JONAH
IBN. YAQUB EXCEPT TO THE KING/ KHALIFAH 1 IMAM AND HIGH PRIEST
JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH(PBUH) UPON HIS APPEARANCE AS DECREED
BY THE "I AM", 11 ALLAH 11 ., THE SOLE CORPORATION AND FIDUCIARY HEIR,
GOD'S APPOINTED KING, KHALIFAH, IMAM 9 PROPHET AND HIGH PRIEST
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE RESTORED AND ADOPTED THE TEACHINGS
, PRECEPTS, STATUTES AND LAWS OF THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH
OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) BEING RULING LAW THROUGHOUT THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC DOMINION; WHTCH ~INDS THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
STATE AND ITS COMMONWEALTH OF AFRICANS, ITS DIASPORA 1 CHRISTIANS,
MUSLIMS AND JEWS WORLDWIDE AND ALL OTHER GOVERNMENTS OF THE
WORLD WITHOUT THEIR OR ANY OTHER GLOBAL NATION 1 S CONSENT 0 THE
GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE AND OR GOVERNMENT RULED BY JONAH IBN.
YAQUB, AL MAHDI, THE KING OF THE NORTH 0 ORDAINED AND SANCTIONED
BY THE ONE TRUE GOD AND SOLE CORPORATION CARRIES BATTLE AXE,
SWORD, SPEAR, HELMET, BREAS.TPLATE, BODY SHIELD AND BUCKLER,
BY WAY OF THEIR GOD APPOINTED IMAM,, HIGH PRIEST, KING AND KHALIFAH, DECREED BY THE 11 I AM 11 , 11 ALLAH 11 1 TO EXECUTE JUSTICE, FAIRNESS
54-of-70

OR WRATH UPON ANY GLOBAL EVILDOER WHO WOULD USURP THE DECREES,
LAWS AND AUTHORITY OF THE ONE TRUE GODo THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC
STATE AS A WHOLE, THEREFOREv EMANATES FROM THE ONE TRUE GOD
AS RULED BY HIS FIDUCIARY HEIR, HIS APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING/
KHALIFAH JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH To TISHBITE IBN. YAQUB, AL MAHDI
AND ALSO FROM THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF THE PROPHET
MUHAMMAD(PBUH) RESTORED AND OR INTERPRETED BY JONAH IBN YAQUB,
AL MAHDI, AND NOT FROM THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC CITIZENR Y OR COMMONWEALTH THOUGH THEY BE KINGS AND KHALIFAHS THEMSELVESo THE LAWS
OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE CONTAINED THEREIN , WHETHER MADE
BEFORE OR SINCE THE ADOPTION OF THE RESTORED AND OR INTERPRETED
TEACHINGS OF AL MAHDI, ARE SUBORDINATE, THE KING-KHALIFAH ALSO
BEING A MESSENGER AND PROPHET OF THE ONE TRUE GOD TO UNITE ALL
AFRICANS, ITS DIASPORA, CHRISTIA NS 6 MUSLIMS AND JEWS AROUND
THE ENTIRE WORLD UNDER ONE BANNER TO PREPARE THEM FOR THE RETURN
OF GOD'S APPOINTED CHRIST, JESUS OF NAZARETH, MY GREAT ETC.
GRAND UNCLE(P BUH)", EWG~l5~ -~,-~~QR Wr 676 F.Supp~ 761.
GOD'S APPOINTED KING OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE,
THE SOLE CORPORATION, IS THE FOUNTAIN OF SOVEREIGNTY. THE WHOLE
IS ORIGINALLY WITH HIM AS HIS OWNo THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC GOVERNMENT, PROVINCES, ORGANIZATIONS, CORPORATIONS, PLACES OF LEARNING,
MOSQUES, SYNAGOGUES, CHURCHES, ENTITIE S, AGENCIES AND OR AGENTS
ETC. ARE BUT TRUSTEES ACTING UNDER A DERIVED AUTHORITY, AND
HAVE NO POWER TO DELEGATE WHAT IS NOT DELEGATED TO THEM. BUT
1
THE FIDUCIARY HEIR, GOD S APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING, KHALIFAH,
IMAM, PROPHET AND HIGH PRIEST, JON~H AL MAHDI, AS THE ORIGINAL
FOUNTAIN, MIGHT TAKE AWAY WHAT HE HAD LENT AND ENTRUST TO WHOM
HE PLEASE. HE HAS THE WHOLE TITLE, AND AS ABSOLUTE PROPRIETOR,
HAVE THE RIGHT OF USING AND ABUSING --JUS UTENDI ET ABUTENDI.
IT IS A MAXIM CONSECRATED IN THEOCRATIC LAW, FOREIGN LAW, IN
PUBLIC LAW AS WELL AS COMMON SENSE AND NECESSITY OF THE CASE
THAT A SOVEREIGN IS ANSWERABLE FOR HIS ACTS ONLY TO HIS GOD
AND HIS CONSCIENCE ALSO BEING IN THIS CASE PROPHET, LAWGIVER
OF GOD.o •• THERE IS NO AUTHORITY WITHIN ANY GLOBAL NATION ABOVE
THE SOVEREIGN AND PROPHET JONAH IBNa YAQUB 6 AL MAHDI, TO WHICH
AN APPEAL CAN BE MADE BEING THE VOICE OF GOD IN THE FORM OF
A MAN. SEE THE ONE TRUE GOD; THE (3) HOLY BOOKS AND SUNNAH OF

55-of-70

MUHAMMAD(PBUH); 4 WHEAT 402 (BOUVIE R'S 14th. EDITION LAW DICTION ARY: "SOVERE IGNTY")~
(33) "THE CONGRESS, PARLIAMENT OR ANY OTHER GLOBAL
LEGISLAT IVE BODY CANNOT REVOKE THE SOVEREIGN POWER OF GOD'S
APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING, KHALIFAH, IMAMu PROPHET AND HIGH
PRIEST OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE, JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH
T. TISHBITE IBN. YAQUB, AL MAHDI TO OVERRIDE HIS WILL AS THUS
DECLARED. THIS INCLUDES ANY GLOBAL COURTg ~ERRX-~ g-UW1~E Q-£~A~E£ r
(1935) 294 U.So 330, 353; EWG~l£~ -~v-~RQR ~-£URRA ~; YWl~E~-S ~A~~£
~v-WHEE~ER 7 98 S.Ct~ 1079 at 1083(~9 78).
NOTE: THE ABOVE POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ARE NOT EXHAUSTIVE
AND ADDITIONS CAN BE MADE AND OR ADDED AT ANY TIME.
19

A SOVEREIG N IS ANSWERABLE ONLY TO GOD AND CONSCIENCE

90
•

THAT THE WORLD BANK, ALL MEMBER STATES AND NATIONS OF
THE UNITED NATIONS, THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA, ALL OTHER GLOBAL
NATIONS, THE UoS. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, THE UoSo STATE DEPARTMENT,
THE STATE OF SOUTH CARIOLNA, THE UNITED STATES AND THE SEVERAL
STATES CONTAINED THEREIN , THE VATICAN, THE S~CG ~TTORNEY GENERAL,
THE S.C. DEPTg OF CORRECTIONS, ALL GLOBAL BANKING ENTITIES AND
ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS LISTED IN THE UoN. DOCUMENT AS WELL AS
THOSE LISTED IN THE DOCUMENTS FILED IN CASE 4:10-cv- 4625-SB A
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA U~S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT ,
, THOSE LISTED IN CASES 2013-CP -400-008 4, 2294 IN THE RICHLAND
COUNTY-COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, UPON RECEIPT OF THIS MEMORANDUM
OF LAW ON THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD'S APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KING,
KHALIFAH, IMAM AND HIGH PRIES.T AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE, REDEEMED AND SECURED BY GOD'S HIGH PRIEST
OF THE LINE OF AARON AND THE LEVITICA L PRIESTHOOD WITH POINTS
AND AUTHORITIES (VIA CERTIFIE D MAIL# [SEE PAGE 1] NOTICE AND
DEMAND IS MADE UPON YOU TO REVIEW AND RESPOND TO THE ABOVE MEMOAUTHORITIES 11 AS ENUMERATED ABOVE
AND ITS LIEN AND DOCUMENT UPON THE PUBLIC RECORD AND IN CASES

RANDUM AND EA6tt

11

POINT 11 AND

11

56-of-70

008 4, 2294 v AND BY CER TIFI ED;
4:10 -cv- 462 5-S BA AND 201 3-C P-4 00~
ADDRESSED BELOW, WITHIN (15 )
U.S . MAIL TO THE SOVEREIGN AS IS
NDUMu ALLOWING UP TO (3) DAYS
DAYS UPON REC EIPT OF THI S MEMORA
GRACE FOR RETURN MAIL DELIVERY.
PUB LIC SERVANT WHO BY
FAIL URE TO DO SO, AS BY EITH ER _A
11
ICE R 11 , "AGENT" OR "EMPLOYEE"
OATH OF OFF ICE OR DUTY AS AN OFF
N, MIN ICIP ALI TY, ETC . AND
OF A GOVERNMENT CREATED CORPORATIO
OFF ICE OR SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE
OR BY AND THROUGH YOUR POS ITIO N,
T, AND THE PRESUMPTION WILL
OF LAW, WILL PLACE YOU IN DEFAUL
AND PUBLIC RECORD THAT YOU
BE TAKEN UPON THE PRIV ATE , COURT
ERNMENTS AND OR COMPANIES,
AND YOUR OFF ICE AND OR GLOBAL GOV
OR ENT ITIE S, FULLY AGREE TO
CORPORATIONS, ORGANIZATIONS AND
H ITS LIEN ( s) CONTAINED WITHIN
THE "PO IN·r s AND AUT HOR ITIE S" WIT
INT S AND AUT HOR ITIE S" WITH ITS
THI S MEMORANDUM AND THAT THE "PO
TAIN (F.R eC. P. 8d) ,a •• AND THAT
LIE N(S ) ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND CER
G, KHAL,¥~~l1,H, IMAM v PROPHET AND
GOD 'S APPOINTED AND ANOINTED KIN
T. TIS HBI TE; AL MAHDI, AS NAMED
HIGH PRI EST JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH
SOVEREIGN WITHIN THE COLLECTIVE
·BELOW AND HIS S E A L ~ IS
KHALIFAH OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRACAPACITY OF SAID APPOINTED KIN G,
SOVEREIGN POWER, 18 U.S .C. §
TIC GOVERNMENT AND POSSESS TRUE
)(b) (2)( 3)(A ) • .,., ...
111 6(a )(b )(4 ); 18 Uos .c. § 111 6(a
STATES AND THE REMAINING
THI S DOCUMENT IS WHAT THE UNITED
NATIONS DEFAULTED ON. THI S
(192 ) MEMBER STATES OF THE UNITED
SENATE, THE JUS TIC E DEPARTIS WHAT THE u.s . CONGRESS, THE u.s~
THE U.S e TREASURY, HILLARY
MENT, THE UoS • STATE DEPARTMENT,
ORNEY GENERAL AND ALL DEF ENCLINTON; ERI C HOLDER, THE S.C o ATT
IS WHY JUDGE MARCHANT AND THE
DANTS INVOLVED-DEFAULTED ON AND
~UR T,
IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE 1
SQC . UGS. DIS TRI CT COURT JUDGES
N OF JUS TIC E DO NOT WANT TO
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND OBSTRUCTIO
ENCE~ UNLESS ·THE DEFENDANTS
COME INTO THE FEDERAL COURT AS EVID
RGING FROM THE RICHLAND COUNTY
INVOLVED CAN PRODUCE AN ORDER EME
201 3-C P-4 00- 008 4 THAT IS NOT
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS UNDER CASE
OR REMOVALQ THE DOCUMENT LEGALLY
COMPROMISED BY ACTS OF FRAUD AND
THE LAND AND I, JAHJAH AL MAHDI,
STANDS AND IS THE SUPREME LAW OF
'
AS SOVEREIGN THOUSANDS OF
AM SOVEREIGN BY MY ORIGINAL STATUS
ED BY LEGAL BINDING CONTRACT
YEARS BEFORE THI S NATION WAS FORM
57- of-7 0

WHICH CANNOT BE MADE OR UNMADE BY THE COURTS, WHICH INCLUDE
ALL RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES AND ATTRIBUTES THE FEDERAL JUDGES ARE
i
CONSPIRING UNDER COLOR OF LAW AND OR AUTHORITY TO DENY ME TOj
PREVENT EVIDENCE OF THEIR CRIMES FROM ENTERING THE COURT. YOUR
LAWS HAVE NO EFFECT UPON ME AND I CAN ACT IN ANY CAPACITY I I
SO DESIRE DUE TO PROPER SERVICE, NOTICE AND DEFAULT EMERGING
FROM CASE 2013-CP-400-0 0840 THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY THE 11 TIP 11
OF THE ICEBERG AS TO WHAT IS FILED WITHIN THAT STATE CASE., THE
LEGAL ISSUES OF RELIGIOUS PROPHESY THAT 1 S BEFORE THIS COURT
RELATED TO THE GOURDINE CASE ARE PREVIOUSLY FILED IN THE RICHLAND
CASE. REPARATIONS FOR THE ugsQ SLAVE TRADEg LAND APPROPRIATION
\
OF ANCESTRAL LANDS WITHIN THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA, LAND
CALLED "FADAK" GIVEN TO MY GREAT ETC. GRANDMOTHER FATIMA BY
THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH)

8

THE "GITMO" DETAINEES SITUATION,

ALL OF THIS AND MORE IS DEFAULTED ON BY THE GLOBAL NATIONS TO
INCLUDE THE UNITED STATES WHICH IS WHY THEY DO NOT WANT THIS
~VIDENCE TO ENTER INTO THE FEDERAL COURT., THE 11 2013 11 PREFIX
IS A MISNOMER., THE ORIGINAL CASE NUMBERS ARE 2006-CP-400- 3567,
3568, 3569 STILL PENDING BEING MADE A PART OF THE 11 2013 11 CASE
ESTABLISHING EQUITABLE TOLLING FOR THE HABEAS CORPUS PROVING
WE WERE DILIGENT FOR OVER (10) YEARS WORKING TO HAVE THESE.MATTERS HEARD BEFORE THE COURT ONLY TO BE SUBJECTED TO FRAUD AND
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. RQ££-~~-~LAK Ez 136 s.ct. 1850(2016)
ATTACHES AND WE DO NOT HAVE TO EXHAUST FOR ANY CASE TO WHICH
THE KING-KHALIFAH IS PARTY .. THE 2013-CP-400-0 084 CASE ESTABLISHES
A PAPER TRAIL AND EVIDENCE EXPANDING OVER (10) YEARS THAT PROVE
THEIR CRIMES ARGUED WITHIN THESE PARALLEL CASES REQUIRING REMOVAL
~ JAHJAH CAN ACT AS ATTORNEY OR IN ANY CAPA8ITY HE SO DESIR2S
UNLESS IT CAN BE PROVEN BY CLEAR, EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFEND,ANTS
TIMELY RESPONDED IN CASE 2013-CP-400-0 084 TO DEFEAT THE DEFAULT
ESTABLISHED BY THE FILED AFFIDAVITS. THE DEFENDANTS IN TOTAL
MUST BE SERVED ALL THE PLEADINGS WITHIN THIS COURT AND BELOW
TO GIVE THEM OPPORTUNITY TO REBUT, BUT SINCE THE SuC. ATTORNEY
GENERAL WHO IS PARTY TO. THE DEFAULT IN QUE,STION IS BEFORE THIS
COURT UNDER CASE 17-69600 LET HIM PROVE THAT HE OR THE ATTORNEY
FOR HIM TIMELY RESPONDED TO DEFEAT THE DEFAULT BEFORE THE 4TH.
CIRCUIT NOW. I, JAHJAH AL MAHDI, AM THE FIDUCIARY HEIR, KING
AND KHALIFAH WITH ALL RIGHTS ESTABLISHED TO DEFEND MY PEOPLE
58-of-70

Y
IN ANY GLOBAL COURT WITHOUT EXCEPTION, AND NO ONE CAN LEGALL
PREVENT ME DUE TO THE DEFAULTQ YOU CANNOT CREATE LAW EX POST
FACTO TO FORCE ME TO BREACH MY FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND CONTRACT
TED
ESTABLISHED BY THE SOLE CORPORATION AS FIDUCIARY HEIR OBLIGA
ICTO DEFEND MY GOD AND MY PEOPL E. THE FEDERAL COURT HAD JURISD
TION UNDER 28 U.S.,C. , §§ 1331, 1332u 1346 8 _2201, 2202, 2679,
1
1602-1 612 ETo SEQ.,, ; ARTICLE III SECTIONS 1 AND 2; ARTICLE
ASECTION 10; THE C~A.To TREATY; THE RICO ACT; FEDERAL AND INTERN
TIONAL PROBATE LAW; 42 U.SoCe §§ 1983, 1985( 2), 1985( 3), 1986,
12203 (a)(b) OF ADA; THE ANTI-PEONAGE ACT, THE 1st., 4th., 5th.,
6th., 7th .. , 8the, 13th. , 14the, AND 15th~ AMENDMENTS AND OTHER
LAWS OF THE UNITED STATE S. IT IS SO ORDERD BY DECREE OF THE
CHIEF JUSTIC E OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURT. THE FIDUCIARYAND JUDICI AL DUTY COMMANDS IT, 29 U.SaCo Aa § 1104; ~BlR~ £-~~
£~WQ Q~Sx- -F.Sup p.3do- -, 2017 WL 4~747 74(DS C.2017 ); ~IR~M -~~lR~

2A~~QR~-~g-QQQENWQE~~ERz 132 S.Gt. 2459u ~89 LeEd.2 d. 457, 82
lA
U.SeL. W. 4578( U.S.20 14); ~~REZ -~~-CM lME£-Q ~£~R~~ ~-G~-~ Q~UM2 7
lWCwr F .. Supp. 3d., 2016 WL 612467 9(D.C. Md.20 16)~
REPA.RATION WERE ARGUED FOR, FOUGHT AND WON BY THE DEFAULT
EMERGING FROM CASE 20~3-C P-400- 0084 FOR THE U.Se SLAVE TRADE
WHERE AS THE FIDUCIARY HEIR, KING, KHALIFAH OF THE UNITED ETHIO
QUEEN
PIAN EMPIR E, THE DIRECT DESCENDANT OF KING SOLOMOM AND THE
OF SHEBA, EVEN ARGUING DECEDENT DOMICILE CLAIMS FOR MY FORE
FATHERS AND MOTHERS WHO DIED ON AFRICAN SOIL AND DURING THE
MIDDLE PASSAGE. THESE DECEDENT DOMICILE CLAIMS ATTACHED AND
WERE DEFAULTED ON BY THE (193) MEMBER STATE OF THE UNITED NA\
TIONS . RACISM IS A STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIP BASED UPON THE SUBOR
,
DINATION OF ONE RACIAL GROUP BY ANOTHER., GIVEN THIS PROSP ECTIVE
TOWARD
THE DETERMINING FEATURE OF RACE RELATIONS IS . NOT PREJUDICE
ON,
BLACKS OR BLACKS TOWARD WHITES, BUT RATHER THE SUPERIOR POSITI
NOT CULTURE, NOT GENETICS OR SOME FALLACIOUS SUPPOSE SUPERIOR
INTELLECT OF WHITES, BUT THE SUPERIOR POSITI ON OF WHITES AND
MAINTHE INSTIT UTION S--IDE OLOGI CAL AS WELL AS STRUCTURAL--WHICH
TAIN THAT SUPERIOR POSITI ON. AFRICAN AMERICANS HAVE ENDURED
ALL MANNER OF INDIG NITIES , SUFFE RINGS , DEPRIVATIONS, LOSSES
S
AND IMPAIRMENTS UNDER THE REIGN OF WHITE SUPREMACY IN ITS VARIOU
HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY FORMS. THE. NEGATIVE EFFECTS AND
59-of- 70

AFTEREFFECTS OF WHITE DOMINATION SHALL LAST FOR GENERATIONS
AMONG ALL BLACK PEOPLES, ITS PRIMARY SUBJECTSo THE CENTRAL FUNCTION OF WHITE COMMANDEERED APARTHEID WAS TO FORCIBLY AND EXPLOITATIVELY EXTRACT THE MATERIAL, HUMAN AND PRODUCTIVE WEALTH OF
BLACK PEOPLES AND REDISTRIBUTE THEM TO THEIR WHITE OVERLORDS.
THE WEALTH POWER AND INFLUENCE WHITES EXPROPRIATED THROUGH THEIR
COERCIVE.DOMINATION AND EXPLOITATION OF BLACK LAND, LABOR AND
PRODUCTIVITY HAVE CONTINUED TO EXPONENTIALLY EXPAND AND PERPETUATE THEMSELVES BY COMPOUNDING THE INTEREST ON THEIR ORIGINAL
AND CONCURRENT PRINCIPLE. WHITE DOMINATION OF BLACKS, EVEN IF
CONFINED TO THE PAST, ALLOWED WHITES TO ACCUMULATE ASTRONOMICAL
WEALTH. MOREOVER, IT HAS ALLOWED WHITWSTO CAPITALIZE THAT WEALTH
BY DEVELOPING SOCIOECONOMICAL 1 TECHNOLOGIES AND SOCIOPOLITICAL
ADVANTAGES WHICH WILL FACILITATE THEIR CONTINUING ECONOMIC AND
POLITICAL DOMINATION OF BLACKS IN THE PRESENT AND INTO THE FUTURE
EVEN UNDER GOVERNMENTAL REGIMES WHICH DO NOT LEGALLY OR POLITICAL
-LY SANCTION RACIAL DISCRIMINATION OF ANY KIND, WHETHER OF THE
FORWARD OR REVERSE VARIETY. REPARATIONS MUST BE GIVEN TO OFF
SET THIS INJUSTICEo AS THE FIDUCIARY HEIR, AS MARTIN LUTHER
KING JR~'S SUCCESSOR, JAHJAH AL MAHDI IS CALLED UPON BY CONTRACT,
COVENANT, TO ADDRESS THESE INJUSTICES WHICH CANNOT BE MADE OR
UNMADE BY THE COURTS PROTECTED UNDER ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 OF
THE ugs. CONSTITUTION. A STATE OR GOVERNMENT, ESPECIALLY IN
LIGHT OF THE DEFAULT, MAY NOT EXCLUDE A PERSON FROM THE PRACTICE
OF LAW (LAWGIVER) OR ANY OTHER OCCUPATION (FIDUCIARY HEIR) IN
A MANNER OR FOR REASONS THAT CONTRAVENE THE DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL
PROTECTION OF THE LAWS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH~ AMENDMENTm TOJ. REV~NT ' )
·(A~ 4"/J~
ME FROM ACTING IN THE CAPACITY ESTABLISHED BY THE DEFAULT WOULD
DENY ME THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS BEHIND RELIGIOUS AND
RACIAL HATRED, a~MWARE-~v-~GARQ_Q ~-EXAMo-GR-£~A~E-Q~ -W.M.r 353
U.S. 232, 77 S.Ct. 752, 64 A.L.R.2d. 288, i L.Edo2d. 796(U.S.
~957); ~RE~RE-~.-£g~~lVAW y 2017 WL 3710066(D.C.Nev.20 17); VlR~
GlWlA-2QAR9-G~-MEQ lCIWE-~.-~A~KR~~QW r 67 Va. App. 461, 796 s.E.
2d. 866(2017); QGE-~.-RQGER£r 139 F.Suppo3d. 120(D.C.C.2015);
j

2Q~~5-~.-VlR~~W~A~2 DT-G~-2AR-gXAMlWE R£r 811 F.Supp.2d. 1260

(E.D.Va.2011).
NOTICE: THIS IS AN ISSUE ON APPEALa ATTACH THE COURT
60-of-70

l

AND PARTIES WILL FIND: A COPY OF THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS THAT MAKE
UP CASE 16-2299. ALL ARGUMENTS, CLAIMS AND ISSUES PRESENTED
ARE NOW SOUGHT ADDRESSED IN THIS APPEALe IF THE COURT WOULD
TAKE NOTICE OF PAGES 12 THROUGH 24 IT EXPLAINS THE TRUST AND
BENEFICIARY NATURE OF THE TRUST. THE SOLE CORPORATION WANTS
ITS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RETURNED., ALL SAME SEX MARRIAGES NATIONALLY AND GLOBALLY ARE TO BE RENDERED VOID AND OF A NULLITY.
DO IT BY JUDICIAL ORDER SINCE THE UNITED NATIONS IS PARTY TO
''THE DEFAULT EMERGING FROM CASE 2013-CP-400-0084 BY DECREE AND

..4/l.i.?f(~.. . . .

JUDGMENT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

"THE U,.S., DISTRICT COURT SHALL HAVE EXCLUSIVE·JURISDICTION FOR REMEDY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES PROVIDED BY SECTION~
1346(b) AND 2672 OF THIS TITLE FOR INJURY OR LOSS OF PROPERTY
(INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY/ THE RIGHT TO MARRY GIVEN TO YOU AS A
"GRANT" WITH RESTRICTIONS), OR PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH ARISING
OR RESULTING FRO~EGLECT OR WRONGFUL ACT OR OMISSION OF ANY
\
EMPLOYEE OF THE GOVERNMENT WHILE ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF
HIS OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT IS EXCLUSIVE TO ANY OTHER CIVIL ACTION
OR PROCEEDING•••a•; SAWQRA-J~-KQ~~WAN -~~A~N~~~~-~~-YW~~E ~-a~A~Ear
2017 WL 4185481 (W.D.MISSOURI.2017 ); WARQ-~~-AYER~AY~Wr 2017
WL 2724938(D.C.Miss.20 17) ..
NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEALo DO WE HAVE THE RIGHT

FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO ~AR~~-~9-~AlWr 136 SmC.to 1002(2016).
THE FEDERAL JUDGES ARE CONSPIRING TO CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS
IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 AND 1001. WE WANT CASE 2013CP-400-0084 REMOVED TO INCLUDE ALL DOCUMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
WE WANT THAT DNA OBTAINED AND TESTED TO MICHAEL LEE AND THE
OTHER EVIDENCE SOUGHT VIA THE FORM 240 WE WANT THAT INJUNCTION
AND PROTECTIVE ORDER GRANTED IMMEDIATELYo
NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEALo DID THE DISTRICT COURT
ABUSE ITS DISCRETION BY NOT GIVING REVIEW VIA THE PROPERLY FILED
WRIT OF ERROR. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES THE WRIT OF ERROR WAS

61-of-70

THE APPROPRIATE VEHICLE TO USE. SEE THE (44) PAGE COMPLAINT
ON PAGES 13-14.
NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEAL~ BY THE LITGATION PRESENTED DID WE ESTABLISH EQUITABLE TOLLING BY OUR CONTINUAL DILIGENCE SINCE 2006?
NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEAL. BY THE LITIGATION, TO
INCLUDE THAT ARGUED IN THE DOCUMENT SEEKING INJUNCTION. DID
WE MEET THE CRITERION FOR FILING HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.SmC.

§

2244(d)(B)?

NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEALQ BY THE LITIGATION, TO
INCLUDE THAT ARGUED IN THE DOCUMENT SEEKING INJUNCTION. DID
WE MEET THE CRITERION FOR FILING HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28

u.s~c.

§ 2244(d)(C)?
NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEALo DO HUMPHREYS OR FREISER
APPLY SINCE THE CONVICTIONS ARE ALREADY INVALIDATED BY THE FALSE
IMPRISONMENT TORT WHICH IS WHAT CASE 2013-CP-400-0084 IS AMONG
OTHER THINGS?
NOTICE: ANOTHER ISSUE ON APPEALg WE WANT THE S.Co ATTORNEY
GENERAL TO PRODUCE A DOCUMENT FILED BY THEM IN CASE 2013-CP400-0084 DEMONSTRATING THAT ANY OF THEM TIMELY FILED RESPONSE
TO DEFEAT THE DEFAULT DOCUMENTS FILED AT THE END OF 2015.
THE LAWGIVER OF GOD RIGHTS, TITLES AND SOVEREIGNTY MUST
BE GIVEN FULL FAITH, CREDIT AND SWAYc FOR THERE IS A HIGHER
LOYALTY THAN TO LOYALTY TO THIS COUNTRY. THAT IS LOYALTY TO
THE ONE TRUE GOD, YWI~gg_~~A~~~-~~-~~E~ERz 380 UeS• 163, 172,
85 S.Ct 0 850, 13 L 0 Edm2d. 733(U.S.1965). ALSO SEE ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURES ACT 5 U.SoC• § 556(d)o
NOTICE: IF ANY OF THE CASES LISTED WITHIN THR CAPTION
HAVE BEEN CLOSED. WE MOTION TO REINSTATE ANY SUCH CASE. IF ANY
OF THE CASES MANDATE HAS BEEN SENT TO THE LOWER COURT. WE MOTION
TO RECALL IT TO HAVE ALL ISSUES ADDRESSED WHERE DUE TO PRESENT
62-of:70

STATE INTERFERENCE WE HAVE THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE PARALLEL
CASES, s.c.D.C., CONSPIRING TO PUSH

us

PAST THE DEADLINES ESTA-

BLISHED BY THE COURT TO FORCE A PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE ISSUE.
THEY ARE MAKING EFFORTS TO PREVENT AND OR DELAY OUR MAIL FROM
GOING OUTe WE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND THAT OUR FILINGS BE DEEMED
TIMELY ..

NOTICE: THE APPEAL OF THESE PARALLEL CASES WILL BE HEARD
BASED UPON APPEAL OF CASE 2:17-1127-JMC-MGB; 9:17-cv-1140-TLWBM AND 8:16-cv-3328-RBH-JDAe ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS SHOULD
BE FILED WITHIN THESE CASESe THE 4TH. CIRCUIT JUDGES SHALL SIT
EN BANC ABSENT OF THOSE JUDGES SOUGHT RECUSEDe COMITY ATTACHESe

NOTICE: DO RES JUDICATA ATTACH BY JUDGE WEST IN APPEAL
UNDER CASE 17-6925 WHERE SHE DETERMINED THE§ 1983 ACTION FILED
FIT THE LEGAL DESIGNATION AS BEING AN AFFIDAVIT REQUIRING THE
PARTIES TO BE SERVED BEFORE THE CASES ARE DISM!SSED ONCE THE
LISTING OF THE PARTIES IS CORRECTED WITHIN ALL COURT RECORDS?
DO WE HAVE A RIGHT TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGi THE APPOINTMENT
OF LEGAL COUNSEL AS SOUGHT AND REMOVAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
~455(c)? THESE ARE ISSUES ON APPEAL.
NOTICE: WE RENEW THE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND THE 4TH.
CIRCUIT NOW BE DEEMED IN FORFEITURE ON THE ISSUE OF WHETHER
OR NOT THE PROVISIONS OF THE PLRA AND THE AEDPA ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL. EVER SINCE THESE PARALLEL OR RELATED CASES WITHIN
THE 4TH. CIRCUT BEGAN. THE COURT CONSISTENTLY SENT US FILING
IN FORMA PAUPERIS DOCUMENTS WITH PLRA WRITTEN ALL OVER THEMa
THUS, THE CHALLENGE OF ADDRESSING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THESE
PROVISIONS OF LAW SHIFTED FROM THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT TO THE
4TH. CIRCUIT BECAUSE THE 4TH. CIRCUIT WAS ALSO MAKING USE OF
THESE PROVISIONS, COMPROMISING THE PROCEEDINGS ESTABLISHING
STRUCTURAL ERROR WHICH VOID JURISDICTION; NOW IN ACTS OF FRAUD
AND MACHINATION TO CIRCUMVENT RULING ON THE ISSUEu THE 4TH.,
CIRCUIT IN CASE 17-7186 NOW SENDS DIFFERENT IN FORMA PAUPERIS
DOCUMENTS? WE OBJECT AND A COPY OF FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS
DOCUMENTS UNDER PLRA IS NOW FILED FOR CASE 17-7186 TO STOP THE
63-of-70

POTENTIAL FRAUD. IT IS CONSPICUOUS THAT ONE OR TWO OF THE JUDGES
SOUGHT RECUSED ARE INVOLVED IN THIS ACT AS WELL. SANCTIONS ARE
IMPOSED AND THE 4TH. CIRCUIT IS IN FORFEITURE ON THE ISSUEm

IT IS SO ORDERED~
INSOMUCH, THE LITIGATION ADDRESSING THESE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
PROVISIONS IS SEEN ON PAGES 15-22 OF THE (44) PAGE COMPLAINTe
ITS NOT GIBBERISH OR UNINTELLIGIBLE. NOT ONLY ARE THE ORDERS
AND CASES THAT ARE NOW BEFORE THE 4THc CIRCUIT ARE TAINTED AND
VOID, BECOMING ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGSo BUT ALSO ALL ORDERS ISSUED
WITHIN THE LOWER DISTRICT COURTS BY JUDGES HODGES, BAKER, WEST,
AUSTIN AND MARCHANTe ALL OF THEM MUST BE RENDERED VOID FOR DUE
PROCESS VIOLATION AND AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION 1 TO INCLUDE IT
BEING ADDRESSED THAT JUDGE AUSTIN VIOLATED HER DUTIES AS THE
KING-KHALIFAH'S APPOINTED TRUSTEEo THE 4THs CIRCUIT JUDGES INVOLVED HAVE BROKEN THE LAW BY THEIR ORDERS AND THE ESTABLISHING
OF ALL OF THESE CASES AS THEY PRESENTLY EXIST. THE USE OF AEDPA
BY HODGES; EVERY CASE THAT NOW EXIST WITHIN THE 4TH. CIRCUIT;
EVERY CASE CITED BY JUDGES MARCHANT, BAKER, WEST AND JUDGE AUSTIN
THEY USED TO DENY CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION OR JOINDER OF PARTIES, OR FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR RECUSAL AS CITED, TO INCLUDE
CASES SUCH AS 612 F3dg 237; 136 S.Ctu 627; 262 F3d. 1194; 15
F3d. 319; 2012 WL 2805712; 2013 WL 3051155; 42 U.S.Co § 1997
IF IT HAS ANY CONNECTION RELATED TO THE CLINTON BILL; 534 U.S.
516; 548 U.S. 81; GENERAL RULE ORDER UNDER 3:07-MC-5014; 5:17cv-0105; 4:16-cv-2939; 1:16-cv-3853; 4:q6-cv~3104; 8:16-cv-3327,
3328, 3194-RBH-JDA; 8:14-cv-3~55-RBH-JD A; 0:16-cv-992; 2013
WL 1316025; 2008 WL 249167; 407 U.S. ~63; 509 F2d~ 1405; 213
F3d. 1320; 175 Fed. Appx' 552; ANY CASE THAT WAS FILED IN THE
PAST SINCE 2006 BY ALL OTHER PAST PARTIES TO THESE CASES; TO
INCLUDE EVERY CASE FILED BY THE KING-KHALIFAH 8 JAHJAH AL MAHDI,
FOR WHICH THE S.C~ UsS• DISTRICT COURT OR ANY OTHER FEDERAL
COURT UNJUSTLY ISSUED A "STRIKE" IN ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURTS
, OR THAT THEY PREVIOUSLY RULED ON AND OR DISMISSED. ALL OF
THESE CASES ARE TAINTED AND CANNOT ANY LONGER BE USED BY ANY
COURT BEING ILLEGALc ALL OF THESE CASES TAINTS THEIR ORDERS
RENDERING THEM VOID FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATION AND AN ABUSE OF
64-of-70

DISC RETI ON, BECAUSE ALL OF THESE CASES AND
CITIN GS OF LAW
RENDERED INVOKING THE PROVISIONS OF THE PRISO
N LITIG ATIO N
ACT AND OR THE ANTI-TERRORISM EFFE CTIV E DEAT
H PENALTY ACT
ATING FROM THE OMNIBUS CRIME BILL UNDER 51
AoL5 R. Fed. 2do
SET IN PLACE BY THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION'S
WAR ON DRUGS
PAIGN MAKING THEM ILLEGALo

ARE
REFORM
ORIG IN143
CAM-

WE EXPAND THE SCOPE AND SEEK INCLUSION EVEN
IN THE 4TH.
CIRC UIT AND THE BOOK ENTI TLED , "MASS INCARCER
ATION DURING THE
- AGE OF COLOR BLIN DNES S, THE NEW JIM CROW 11
,
BY MICHELLE ALEXANDER
ISBN . NO. 978- 1-59 558- 643- 8 AN INDEPENDENT
INVESTIGATOR AND
THE DOCUMENTARY ui13" THAT AIRED ON PBS IS
NOW A PART OF ALL
COURT RECORDS INVOLVEDe UNLESS YOU BY SUBS
TANTIAL EVIDENCE-CAN
SUFF ICIEN TLY REBUT THE EVIDENCE AND STAT ISTIC
S GATHERED BY THESE
INDEPENDENT SOURCES. IF THESE PROVISIONS OF
LAW, THE PLRA AND
THE AEDPA ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE EVID
ENCE AND LITIG ATIO N
PRESENTED, WHICH THEY ARE, STANDING IN EGRE
GIOUS VIOLATION· OF
THE HOLDINGS MADE IN EX-~A~~E-~~RG~NIAr 100
U.S. 339( ~880 ) AND
~~~-£ ~Ag~ g~~R -~QU £E-~ A£E£ r 83 U.S. (16 WALL
) 36, 1873 .

-----

THE LAW AS DETERMINED BY THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT
IS CLEAR ON ISSU ES SUCH AS THESE, WHICH INCLU
DE THE ~~A~ E-~.
GEN~R~ CASE, PLRA, AEDPA AND 51 A.Lo Rg Fedo
2dG 143 AS A WHOLE.
IF RULING HAS BEEN OBTAINED UNDER AN UNCO
NSTITUTIONAL STATUTE
AND OR LEGI SLAT IVE PROVISION AND OR INTERPRE
TATION OF LAWo THE
COURT EXPLAINED THAT IF THIS POSI TION IS WELL
TAKEN, WHICH IT
IS, IT EFFECTS THE ~ROYMCA~~QN~ OF THE ~WUQ
~E~ (EMPHASIS ADDED)
PROCEEDINGe AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR JUDI
CIAL DETERMINATION
IS VOID AND IS AS IF THERE WERE NO DETERMIN
ATION AT ALL. WHERE
DIRECT AND OR COLLATERAL REVIEW PROCEEDIN_GS
,PERMIT PERSONS TO
CHALLENGE THE LAWFULNESS OF THEIR CONFINEM
ENT, STATES CANNOT
REFUSE TO GIVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT TO SUBSTANT
IVE CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT THAT DETERMINES THE OUTCOME OF THAT
CHALLENGE OR JUDI CIAL
DETERMINATION (ei. STATUTE OF LIMI TATI ONS,
SUCC ESSIV E, JURI SDICTIONAL REQU ISITE S OR PRER EQUI SITE S PLRA
AND AEDPA FILIN GS
9
ETCo ). A CONVICTION OR JUDI CIAL DETERMINATIO
N RENDERED UNDER
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR INTERPRETATION
OF LAW IS NOT MERELY
65-o f-70

ERRONEOUS. BUT IT IS ILLEGAL AND VOID, AND CANNOT BE A LEGAL
CAUSE OF IMPRISONMENT OR JUDICIA L DETERMINATIONo A SENTENCE,
CONVICTION, LEGISLA TION, OR EVEN A JUDICIA L DETERMINATION IMPOSED
IN VIOLATION OF A SUBSTANTIVE RULE (ei. INDICTMENTS ARE TO BE
ADJUDICATED UNDER THE DUE PROCESS PRONG TO SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND YOU DON'T USE LAW OR LEGISLATION THAT DISPRO PORTIO NATELY TARGET AFRICAN AMERICANS) OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT
MERELY ERRONEOUS, BUT CONTRARY TO LAW, AND IT FOLLOWS, AS A
GENERAL PRINCI PLE, THAT A COURT HAS NO AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY=POWER
=JURISD ICTION ) TO LEAVE IN PLACE A CONVICTION, SENTENCE, LEGISL ATION (SUCH AS THAT WHICH VIOLATE EX-RAR~E-~~RGI~AA AND ~~ESbAUG~ ~~R-~OU £E~~A£E £), OR A JUDICIA L DETERMINATION THAT VIOLATES
A SUBSTANTIVE RULE, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE CONVICTION, SENTENCE, LEGISLA TION, OR JUDICIA L DETERMINATION BECOMES FINAL
BEFORE THE RULE IS ANNOUNCED. THIS IS CHALLENGE TO THE 4TH.
CIRCUI T'S JURISD ICTION DUE TO YOUR USE OF THE PLRA AND OR THE
AEDPA PROVISIONS AND YOU CONSPIRING TO CIRCUMVENT RULING UNDER
CASE 17-7186 0 YOUR JURISD ICTION IS MADE VOID FOR DUE PROCESS
VIOLATION, FRAUD FOR TRYING TO GET PAST RULING UNDER 17-7186
AND YOU FORFEI T ON THE CAUSES PRESENTEDo THE 5~A~E-~ ~-G~W~ RX
CASE, THE PLRA, THE AEDPA, ALL OF THE WRITS OF MANDAMUS DETERMINATIONS, 51 A.LmR• Fed.2d . 143 AND OTHER ISSUES ARGUED WITHIN
ALL OF THESE CASES CANNOT STAND AND YOU MUST GRANT ALL RELIEF
SOUGHT BY LAW AND DETERMINATION OF THE SUPERSEDING AUTHORITY
OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC COURT. IT IS SO
ORDERD, MQW~~QMER~-~.-~QU•£•AWAr 136 S.Cto 718, ~93 LoEd.2 d.
599, 84 U.S.L.W . 4063(U oS.2016 ); GER~-O U~~QQR £-~~C~- Y~-~9.~ SQLl-

Q~~IQN~~•~¥-Q~-~WQ4AWA~Q~~~-~~~~ 187 F.Supp .3d~ 1002, 1012,
S.D.Il la; M6~k-~o-~W~QERr 821 F3da 763, 765+ (6theCi roMICH &);
PEQ~~E -~9-SQ~ Gr N.E.3d ., 20~7 WL ~83842 3(20ff7 ).
SINCE THE MQW~GQMER¼ CASE WAS ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES
'
SUPREME COURT. A FEW STATES, COURTS OR PARTIE S, CONSPIRING UNDER
COLOR OF STATE LAW AND OR AUTHORITY, MADE EFFORTS TO SKIRT,
CIRCUMVENT, THE REQUIREMENT OF GRANTING RELIEF , FRAUDULENTLY
ASSERTING AND OR ARGUING AGAINST WHETHER OR NOT THE RULING WAS
TO BE GIVEN RETROACTIVE EFFECT , WHICH OF COURSE IT DOES HAVE
RETROACTIVE EFFECT , TO INCLUDE WHAT THE 4TH. CIRCUIT JUST TRIED
66-of-7 0

TO PULL UNDER CASE 17-7186~ WE ARE NOT GOING TO PLAY GAMES WITH
THIS LAW LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH IT IS TO
BE GIVEN RETROACTIVE EFFECT. WE WERE NOT DECEIVED BY THE "VERBAL
11
\lOODOO", 11 THE WORD WINX", THE LINGUIST IC LURING INTO LETHARGY",
"THE JUDICIAL CHICANERY" OR DECEPTIVE LEGAL MANEUVERS OR TACTICS
EMPLOYED AND ENGAGED IN BY THOSE 1CONSPIRING COURTS OR PARTIES ,
TO INCLUDE WHAT JUST OCCURRED RELATED TO CASE 17-7186 . LETS
81
avNAIL THIS THING AND KILL ANY EFFORT FOR THE CONSPIRING PARTIES
TO ATTEMPT TO USE THIS MANEUVER OR ANY OTHER. WE WANT YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE ARE FULLY COGNIZANT OF WHAT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ESTABLISHED BY THE WQWl~QWERX CASE. EVEN THOUGH
THAT CASE DEALT WITH JUVENIL ES. THE SUBSIDIARY FACT HERE IS
THAT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CLEARLY ADDRESSED WHAT
OCCUR WHEN COURTS MAKE USE OF !!AM¥!! (~MPHASIS ADDED) UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, LEGISLA TION, SENTENCE ETC. RELATED TO CONVICTION
OR JUDICIAL DETERMINATIONS~
INSOMUCH, WHAT MAKES THE RELIEF THAT WE SEEK MANDATORY
AND AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION FOR FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND GRANT,
IS THE ESSENTIAL LANGUAGE USED AND ADJUDICATED BY THE UNITED
STATES SUPREME COURT WHICH THE AFORESAID CONSPIRING COURTS FAILED
TO ADDRESS, SKIRTING , CIRCUMVENTING THE OBLIGATION TO GRANT
RELIEFo THE FOCUS IS NOT SO MUCH ON WHETHER THE RELIEF BY USE
OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW APPLIES RETROACTIVELY, EVEN THOUGH IT
DOES. THE CONSPIRING COURTS ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION IN ACTS
OF FRAUD TO DIVERT ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S
ESSENTIAL LANGUAGE. THE EMPHASIS IS ON SECTIONS "20-27" OF THE
MQN~~GMERX CASE WHERE THE U.So SUPREME COURT STATED IN [=]AEC
[V]ERBA:
vuTHE LAW EXPLAINE D THAT IF THIS POSITION IS WELL

TAKEN, WHICH IT IS, IT EFFECTS THE ~~QUNDA!l"iQN~ OF THE ~WHQ~E~
PROCEEDINGo AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION
IS VOID AND IS AS IF THERE WERE NO LAW DETERMIN ED AT ALL

0
'.

BY THIS LANGUAGEu IT IS PERSPICUOUS THAT THE U.Su SUPREME·
COURT ADJUDICATED AND USED. THEIR CLEAR INTENT WAS TO MAKE THE
USE OF ~AW'X~ UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS, LEGISLAT ION, JUDICIAL DETER67-of-70

r--MINATIONS OF THIS MAGNITUDE A "CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURAL ERROR"
NOT SUBJECT TO THE HARMLESS ERROR DOCTRINEe THEIR INTENT WAS
11
11
TO MAKE IT "JURISDICTIONALvv IN NATURE, WHICH VOIDS JURISD ICTION
FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONo THEREFORE, WHETHER YOU WANT TO APPLY
IT RETROACTIVE OR NOTa IT DOESN'T MATTER, BECAUSE THE USE OF
11
11
UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF THIS MAGNITUDE IS STRUCTURAL (ei.

!!i'OIJNgA~l:ON!!, !!WUQl.E!!) AND IS "JURISD ICTION AL" (ei., AUTHORITY=
JURISDI CTION= POWER TO HEAR AND DETERM INE), WHICH CANNOT BE WAIVED
BY THE PLAINT IFFS, AND DUE TO THE INFIRM ITIES CAN BE RAISED
AT ANY TIME EVEN AFTER A FINAL ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED , AND THE
COURT SHALL NOT FAIL TO TAKE NOTICEo THUS, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH
A CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION APPLIES RETROACTIVELY IN THIS CASE
11
IS IRRELEVANT, EVEN THOUGH IT DOES., IT IS ALSO JURISDI CTIONA L'u
11
AND 11 yOID JURISD ICTION FOR DUE PROCESS YIOLAT ION, TAINTIN G
THE ENTIRE FRAMEWORK OF ALL THE PROCEEDINGS INVOLVED, ~~WES
g.-UW~~ EQ-S~A ~E£y 28 F3d., 1123 CRIM. LAW 1163(1 ), 1165(1 ); RQ~IW£GW-~.-AR~QW1Gr 27 F3d. 877 REHEARING DENIED , CERTa GRANTED
VACATED 115 S.Ct. 1247, 513 U.Sa 1186, 131 LeEd.2 d. 129; ~QUMl~ ~
~.-YWl~ EQ-~~A ~~Sr 65 F.Supp .3de 19(201 4); WQW~~QM~R~-~.-~QU1£1AWA
136 s.ct. 718(20 16); WMI~E-M~-MAW1£r 2014 WL 151328 0(DSC. 2014);
~RU~G-QALA~LUX-M.-A~LA£-~LQ~AL-GRQURr-~vB~r 124 S.,Cte 1920(2 004).

JUDGES GREGORY, SHEDD, DIAZ, THE OTHER 4TH., CIRCUI T CASES
CAPTIONED, MARCHANT, WEST, HODGES AND BAKER BROKE THE LAW., TRUSTEE AUSTIN VIOLATED THE TRUST, HER DUTIES AS TRUSTE E, BY USING
THIS LAW WARRANTING SANCTIONSe THE S.Ce U.S. DISTRIC T COURT
JUDGES AND THOSE SOUGHT WITBIN THE 4TH., CIRCUIT MUST RECUSE .
JUDGE AUSTIN MUST BE REQUIRED TO FULFILL HER DUTIES AS TRUSTE E.
THIS IS AN ISSUE ON APPEAL. WITH THE PLRA AND THE AEDPA BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL; THE COURT IS REQUIRED TO ALLOW US THE RIGHTS
ESTABLISHED FOR INMATES PRIOR TO THE TIME THESE ENACTMENTS WERE
ESTABL ISHED. JAHJAH MUST BE PERMITTED TO ACT UPON THE RIGHTS
ESTABLISHED BY THE CONTRACT WHICH CANNOT BE MADE OR UNMADE BY
THE COURTS. THUS, JOINT FILING AND CLASS ACTION CERTIF ICATION
IS PERMITTED AS IT WAS BEFORE THESE PROVISI ONS EVOLVED. TO NOT
ALLOW SUCH WOULD VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS CLAUSE.
YOU ADD TO THIS THE INVOKING OF ATTORNEY, JUDICIA L AND LEGISL A68-of-7 0

TIVE SUPERSEDING POWER GIVEN TO JAHJAH AL MAHDI BY THE DEFAULT
AND CLAIMS OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL EMERGING FROM CASE 2013-C P400-008 41 ALLOWING HIM TO JOIN AS PARTY IN ALL PENDING PARALLEL
CASES TO BRING ACTION BEFORE ALL COURTS DUE TO HIS ACQUIRED
INTERE ST UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443(1 ), 2679, 1602-16 12 ET. SEQ ••
THE MANDAMUS CASES IN THE 4THe CIRCUI T, ALL CASES USED BY GREGORY
,SHEDD , DIAZ ETC.v ALSO JUDGES MARCHANT ETC PRODUCED INVOKING
THESE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROVIS IONS ARE VOID AND ARE IF THERE
WERE NO DETERMINATION OCCURRING AT ALL BY DECREE OF THE U.S.
SUPREME COURT'S STATED POSITIO N AS WELL AS BY DECREE AND JUDGMENT
OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE GLOBAL THEOCRATIC STATE WHOSE SUPER0

SEDING POWER AND AUTHORITY BINDS THIS COURT BY THE UNITED STATES
AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE U.N. BEING PARTY TO THE DEFAULT. HUMPHREYS NOR PREISER ARE BINDING ON US SINCE THE CONVICTIONS ARE
ALREADY INVALIDATED BY CASE 2013-C P-400-0 084, ~~G~LE -~.-£Qb G
5U~RA. ; W.b~R.g 9-~~-AW AX-~OA L-~G~x 9•·Ql~9- 0E-AMA X-INC~ r 453
U.S. 322, 101 S.Ct. 2789(U .Sal981 ); ~~~~~-~ ~•RQ-SQ WCGRR .-~,

QUQ~W~GE~~~Rr i34 S.Ct. 2459, 189 L.ED.2d o 457(U. S.2014 ); ~Q~E£
V,-iQR~ Ea 7 341 P.3d. 1041, 2015 WY~ 13 JANo 23, 2015; £CG~~
v.-GLARKE~ 61 F.Supp .3d. 569(W. Va.20i4 ); ~YRWE ~L-~.-~A ~E~r 699
F3d. 804 (MEM)( 4TH.CI R.2012) ; U9£~-v9 -$4lr320 -Q~£~-C URREW C~r
9 F.Supp .3d. 582, 2014 WL 126624 0; SRGWW -v.-u.s.T 2014 WL 2871398
(DSC.2 014); MAR£W ALL-~.- RG~K-~ ib~~ SoE.2d . 8 2015 WL 388425 8(S.C.
App.20 15); ~A~l~AL-~RAN£-•W~ERWr-bL~.-~v-~W~ERWA~IQWAb-~E~RQ~EUM
IW~.-~Owr F.Supp o2d., 2013 WL 557236 (Fla.20 13).
JUDGE AUSTIN AS APPOINTED TRUSTEE OVER THESE CASES WAS
REQUIRED TO ACT WITH THE UTMOST OF INTEGRITYo INSTEAD SHE ACTED
WITH RECREANT AND OPPROBRIOUS INTENT , AS DID' THE OTHER FEDERAL
JUDGES . THIS rs CHALLENGE TO THE JURISDI CTION OF ALL COURTS
'
INVOLVED ESSENTIALLY ESTABLr'SHING A REMAND LIMITIN G, RESTRIC TING
YOUR JURISDI CTION TO DO NOTHING EXCEPT GRANT THE RELIEF DEMANDED.
ONCE JURISDI CTION IS ACQUIR ED,.QeI T IS EXCLUSIVEQ YOUR ACTIONS
VIOLATE THE CONTRACT, THE GRANT, GIVEN TO YOUR NATIONS BY THE
SOLE CORPORATION IMPAIRING THE OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACT IN
VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 SECTION 10 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ESTABLISHIN G CAUSE BEFORE ALL COURTS INVOLVED, ~RE£A Q~~-~.- l.C.~.T
494 UoS. 1~ 110 S~Cto 9~4, 108 LaEd=2 d. 1 (U.So1 990); ~RQW~
69-of-7 0

~

~.-2RQWWr F.S upp .2d ., 201 3 WL 233
823 3(D .C.K y.2 013 ); WA RRI £-~.
UMGREG~-INC. 7 F.S upp a2d ., 201 3
WL 133 116 6(N .C.2 013 ); AMERi~A~
MY~w-~~BER~~-~W~.-~O,-~~-~~XWQQQ
~R~A£~~~a-CQR~~r 81 F.S upp .
157 (DS C.1 948 ); QRARA~~~,-WEW-¥
QRK-QER~v-G~-EQ~~~r F.S upp .3d .,

201 5 WL 424 073 3(N ~Y .D. C.2 015 ).
THE WRITS OF MANDAMUS, ALL OF
THEM, ARE TO BE GRANTED. IT IS
SO ORDEREDo

RESPECTFULLY,
JAHJAH AL .MAHDI, KING, KHALIFA
H
AND CHI EF JUS TIC E OF THE GLOBAL
THEOCRATIC STATE AND COURT

~~:--~~-- L ~ 7 ~
j
·~ W e
ROBERT MITCHELL

/u 4] -,~
dav id dur en

YAHYA MUQUIT

CHRISTOPHER WILSON

OCTOBER 5, 201 7

t

70- of- 70