Roehm v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated

Filing 20

Attachment 4
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 12 MOTION to Remand filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits to Supplemental Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand# 2 Exhibit A - Selected Pages of Plaintiff's cellular phone records# 3 Exhibit B - Map displaying location of telephone area codes in Michigan# 4 Exhibit C - Declaration of Karl G. Nelson) (McCulloch, Debra)

Download PDF
Roehm v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated Doc. 20 Att. 4 Case 2:07-cv-10168-LPZ-RSW Document 20-5 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT C Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-10168-LPZ-RSW Document 20-5 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION mLIE ANN ROEHM, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2:07-cv-10168 W AL-MART STORES, INC., Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen Defendant. THE LAW FIR OF JOHN F. SCHAEFER JOHN F. SCHAEFER, (P-19948) DYKMA GOSSETT PLLC DEBRA M. MCCULLOCH (P-3 1 995) JOSEPH A. RITOK, JR. (P-25472) Attorneys for Defendants 39577 Woodward Avenue, Suite 300 ANREW RIKI, (P-46L47) Attorneys for Plaintiff 380 North Old Woodward, Suite 320 Birmingham, Michigan 48009 (248) 642-6665 SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. SAM G. MORGAN, (P-36694) KEVIN J. STOOPS, (P-6437L) Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 2000 Town Center, Suite 900 Southfield, Michigan 48075 (248) 355-0300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 (248) 203-0785 GIBSON, DUN & CRUTCHER LLP EUGENE SCALIA KA G. NELSON DAVID J. DEBOLD (P-39278) Of Counsel for Defendant 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 955-9500 DECLARATION OF KARL G. NELSON I, Karl G. Nelson, declare as follows: 1. I am counsel of record in the above-captioned action. 2. I respectfully submit this declaration in support of Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Response to Plaintiff s Motion to Remand. Case 2:07-cv-10168-LPZ-RSW Document 20-5 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 3 3. Attached as Exhibit A to Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand are true and correct copies of selected pages of Plaintiff s cellular phone records, which Plaintiff produced in connection with her response to Defendant's Second Request for Production. 4. Attached as Exhibit B to Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is a true and correct copy of a map of Michigan displaying the geographic location for each telephone area code in Michigan, which Defendant obtained from http://ww.nanpa.com/area code maps/ac map static.htmL. I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 2. '-t--l day of May, 2007. ~.-"'//. '7 './' ~ , 7 / //// ,..:,;:.~ L---/// Karl G. Nelson 10023102SJOOC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?