Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al

Filing 225

MOTION for Reconsideration re 222 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Order,, by Weather Underground, Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Schaefer, Enrico)

Download PDF
Motion Hearing - September 15, 2011 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _ _ _ 2 3 4 THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC., a Michigan corporation, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, Case No. 09-10756 vs. NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; BASIC FUSION, INC., a Delaware corporation; CONNEXUS CORP., a Delaware corporation; and FIRSTLOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Hon. Marianne O. Battani Defendants. _______________________________/ MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE MARIANNE O. BATTANI United States District Judge Theodore Levin United States Courthouse 231 West Lafayette Boulevard Detroit, Michigan Thursday, September 15, 2011 APPEARANCES: For the Plaintiff: ANTHONY P. PATTI Hooper Hathaway, P.C. 126 South Main Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (734) 662-4426 C. ENRICO SCHAEFER MARK G. CLARK Traverse Legal, P.L.C. 810 Cottage View Drive, Ste. G20 Traverse City, MI 49684 (231) 932-0411 25 The Weather Underground vs. NCS, Inc., et al. - 09-10756 1 Motion Hearing - September 15, 2011 68 1 names to trademarks in the U.S. PTO database. The 2 alternative system that Mr. Schwerzler put in place compares 3 our domain names to other domain names that happen to exist 4 on the Internet. 5 they may or -- quite honestly, I think he got them because 6 they were highly trafficked but they may or may not be 7 comprised of generic words. 8 delta.com, that's an example that Mr. Schwerzler gave earlier 9 with respect to the first motion. They may or may not be trademark protected, So for example think about Delta could refer to an 10 airline, a faucet, I think there is a dental insurance 11 company, it is a mathematical computation as the difference 12 between two things. 13 word delta in it to the trademark database is a much 14 different exercise than just comparing it to a bunch of other 15 domain names that also have the word delta in it because as 16 it turns out I may be very well within my rights to register 17 a domain name with the word delta in it so long as I'm not 18 infringing on the rights of someone else, and that's a 19 problem with his methodology that again it is not just a 20 function of bias, it is the methodology in what he did that 21 is problematic. 22 is they could have selected somebody else to do all of these 23 things and we wouldn't be here talking about these things, 24 but they didn't. 25 Comparing a domain name that has the And, of course, what they don't talk about THE COURT: Let me say on the expert, I agree, this The Weather Underground vs. NCS, Inc., et al. - 09-10756 Motion Hearing - September 15, 2011 69 1 gentleman is way too far involved in this case -- in this 2 business to be unbiassed which, of course, every expert has a 3 certain bias or he wouldn't be selected as an expert, we all 4 know this, but this person has a bias that is beyond the 5 subject, it is an interest in the outcome of the case, and 6 because he has an interest in the outcome of this case the 7 Court is not going to allow him to testify as an expert. 8 don't know what he's going to say as a fact witness, I'm not 9 barring his testimony as a fact witness, but we'll have to I 10 deal with that at trial, his expert testimony. 11 believe that this other development that he had, that he made 12 this other program, would be an area of expertise because it 13 didn't exist at the time that this went on, so therefore he 14 could not be a fact witness as to the facts in the underlying 15 case. So we will see where we go with it at trial. 16 MR. DELGADO: 17 THE COURT: 18 MR. DELGADO: 19 I would Thank you, Your Honor. Okay. My motion is coming up next. I'm just going to stay up here if you don't mind? 20 THE COURT: 21 MR. DELGADO: Go ahead. I think the last motion that we were 22 talking about today is the Epic Media Group's motion for 23 summary judgment as to all claims. 24 25 Before I get into my three points with respect to that motion let me just give the Court a 30-second reminder The Weather Underground vs. NCS, Inc., et al. - 09-10756

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?