Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al
Filing
231
REPLY to Response re 225 MOTION for Reconsideration re 222 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Order,, filed by Weather Underground, Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (Schaefer, Enrico)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC., )
a Michigan Corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
) Case No. 2:09-CV-10756
)
NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS,
) Volume I
INC., a Delaware corporation; )
BASIC FUSION, INC., a Delaware )
corporation; CONNEXUS CORP., a )
Delaware corporation; and
)
FIRSTLOOK, INC., a Delaware
)
corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________)
- CONFIDENTIAL - UNDER SEALVIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DONNIE J. MISINO
Los Angeles, California
Friday, August 20, 2010
Reported by:
Judy Samson
CSR No. 6916
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
30(b)(6) Deposition of Donnie J. Misino
Confidential
1
Q
8/20/2010
13
And, then, the next paragraph says:
2
"The deponent is asked to
3
produce any and all documents that
4
concern or reflect the discovery
5
responses and production in this
6
case, including, but not limited
7
to, the extent of searches
8
performed."
9
So this particular paragraph is asking you
10
to bring documents to the deposition today to the
11
extent they've not already been produced.
Okay.
12
Are you aware of any documents that deal
13
with the issue of what searches were performed in
14
order to comply with the discovery request by
15
Weather Underground?
16
MR. DELGADO:
Just so that the record is
17
clear, part of what I gave you today, Enrico, is
18
our formal response to your request for production
19
and the documents that he brought that would be
20
nonprivileged and responsive to this request.
21
22
MR. SCHAEFER:
Okay.
So let's just go over
that for a second so that the record is clear.
23
So Mr. Delgado just prior to this
24
deposition handed me a -- what appears to be a hard
25
drive and cover letter which contains, I assume, a
Westlaw Deposition Services
800.548.3668 Ext. 1
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
30(b)(6) Deposition of Donnie J. Misino
Confidential
1
2
3
4
5
8/20/2010
14
substantial number of documents -MR. DELGADO:
No.
The -- the letter and
the hard drive are separate and apart.
Underneath the letter, there's a -- you see
the pink paper clip there?
6
MR. SCHAEFER:
7
MR. DELGADO:
Yeah.
There's the formal response
8
to this request for production, and paper-clipped to
9
it are documents.
10
MR. SCHAEFER:
11
MR. DELGADO:
12
13
14
15
16
Okay.
So it's kind of two -- it's
two different sets of things there.
MR. SCHAEFER:
Okay.
There you go.
So let's go ahead and
go off the record.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
Going off the record at
10:12 a.m.
17
(Pause in proceedings from
18
10:12 a.m. to 10:15 a.m.)
19
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
20
21
We're back on the record
at 10:15 a.m.
MR. SCHAEFER:
Okay.
I'm going to hand the
22
court reporter a document that is entitled
23
"Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.'s Objection to
24
Second Amended Notice of Deposition of Defendant,"
25
which I was just handed this morning.
Westlaw Deposition Services
800.548.3668 Ext. 1
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
30(b)(6) Deposition of Donnie J. Misino
Confidential
8/20/2010
130
1
tell you what they were because they were with
2
counsel" or "There were no conversations -- even
3
though we had general conversations with counsel,
4
there were no conversations about protecting NCS and
5
the related entities from potential liability and
6
discovery."
7
A
Right.
There were discussions along the
8
lines of preventing spam and being able to offer
9
that as a general service.
10
Should we choose to?
11
12
13
Other registrars do.
Anything related to trademarks was only
discussed with counsel.
Q
Okay.
Are you aware that Seth Jacoby has
14
put in multiple previous affidavits saying that one
15
of the reasons why NCS can't be guilty of
16
cybersquatting is because they do not proxy their
17
domain names?
18
19
20
MR. DELGADO:
Objection; lacks foundation.
BY MR. SCHAEFER:
Q
Are you aware of Seth Jacoby's prior
21
position that when you proxy a domain name to hide
22
your identity, that it is essentially an indication
23
that you're engaging in bad faith cybersquatting?
24
25
MR. DELGADO:
Object.
I don't --
mischaracterization of the declaration.
Westlaw Deposition Services
800.548.3668 Ext. 1
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
30(b)(6) Deposition of Donnie J. Misino
Confidential
1
THE WITNESS:
2
131
I'm not aware of anything
along those lines.
3
8/20/2010
BY MR. SCHAEFER:
4
Q
Are there other -- any other entities that
5
we've not discussed and have not been disclosed
6
besides DomainNameProxy who are related entities as
7
paragraph 3 definition exists on Exhibit No. 87?
8
9
10
So these would be only related companies
with regard to the registration, use, and
trafficking of NCS domain names.
11
A
There are none that I can think of.
12
Q
What other documents are going to -- are we
13
going to see out there related to DomainNameProxy
14
that have not been produced in this case that you've
15
seen before besides potentially some e-mails?
16
A
The only other thing I might be aware of is
17
if I produced, similar to the other documents
18
produced today, a sort of scoping document or a --
19
an "organization of thoughts prior to development"
20
type document.
21
Q
Now, I haven't had a chance obviously to
22
take a look, but I'm seeing a big hard drive over
23
there.
24
be at least some sort of portfolio information over
25
the last 12 months for NCS domains.
And I believe on that hard drive is going to
Westlaw Deposition Services
800.548.3668 Ext. 1
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
30(b)(6) Deposition of Donnie J. Misino
Confidential
8/20/2010
132
1
A
Correct.
2
Q
And you were involved in actually putting
3
that together; correct?
4
A
Yes.
5
Q
Does that database include all the domain
6
names that are also proxied through
7
DomainNameProxyLLC?
8
A
Yes.
9
Q
And will it show on that database which
10
11
domains are proxied?
A
There are num- -- there are several files,
12
several portfolio snapshots.
13
received from Iron Mountain, one dating about a year
14
ago and another about six months ago, will show the
15
actual registrant information without any proxy
16
services.
17
The two that we
The other more recent reports are from
18
VeriSign, which we downloaded, which are
19
registrar-wide listing of domain names without
20
registrant information, these we retrieved from
21
VeriSign, and they don't -- VeriSign doesn't keep
22
track of registrants.
23
Q
So you haven't produced any information
24
which would tell us as of any date which domain
25
names are proxied, as I understand it?
Westlaw Deposition Services
800.548.3668 Ext. 1
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
30(b)(6) Deposition of Donnie J. Misino
Confidential
1
A
Q
How would we get that information?
3
A
That -- well, I'm sorry.
4
133
I have not.
2
8/20/2010
that.
5
Let me qualify
We did produce our entire database in a --
6
one large backup file.
7
within our production database.
8
9
Q
All that information is
But I mean, can I actually see this domain
was one that was proxied and this domain was not
10
proxied?
11
A
Right.
If you were to access the table
12
containing that information, it is clearly listed,
13
yes.
14
Q
So it's in there?
15
A
It's in the database itself.
The entire
16
backup of the SQL production database is within it,
17
yes.
18
19
20
21
22
Q
Okay.
And will it also tell me what date
it was proxied?
A
I don't recall if that's a column in the
table, though likely it would be.
Q
Okay.
Do you believe it also would tell me
23
whether or not that proxy occurred as a -- as a
24
result of a renewal date?
25
A
It would not show that.
Westlaw Deposition Services
800.548.3668 Ext. 1
f4975271-2f8d-4f3d-9f0d-d4b1564f3e73
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?