Experi-Metal Inc v. Comerica Bank

Filing 41

MOTION to Quash Supboena of Daniel McCarty by Comerica Bank. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A. Declaration of D. McCarty, # 3 Exhibit B. November 16, 2010 letter to R. Tomlinson from L. Kapalla, # 4 Exhibit C. November 17, 2010 subpoena to D. McCarty, # 5 Exhibit D. November 18, 2010 letter from R. Tomlinson enclosing Subpoena to D. McCarty, # 6 Exhibit E. Proposed Order) (Holleman, Todd)

Download PDF
Experi-Metal Inc v. Comerica Bank Doc. 41 Att. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EXPERI-METAL, INC., a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. COMERICA BANK, a foreign banking organization, Defendant. Richard B. Tomlinson (P27604) Daniel R. Boynton (P30359) Joseph W. Thomas (P33226) DRIGGERS, SCHULTZ & HERBST, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 2600 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 550 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 649-6000 rtomlinson@driggersschultz.com EXHIBIT E Case No. 2:09-CV-14890 Hon. Patrick J. Duggan Todd A. Holleman (P57699) Lara Lenzotti Kapalla (P67667) MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK AND STONE, PLC Attorneys for Defendant 150 W. Jefferson, Suite 2500 Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 963-7420 holleman@millercanfield.com kapalla@millercanfield.com ORDER GRANTING DANIEL MCCARTY AND COMERICA BANK'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA OF DANIEL MCCARTY At a session of the Court held on ___________, 2010, in Wayne County, Detroit, Michigan before The Honorable ______________________ This matter having come before the Court on Daniel McCarty and Comerica Bank's Motion to Quash Subpoena of Daniel McCarty, the parties having fully briefed the issue, and the Court being fully advised in the premises; Dockets.Justia.com NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion To Quash Subpoena Of Daniel McCarty is GRANTED, and Mr. Daniel McCarty is relieved of any obligation to appear for deposition or produce documents on November 23, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, other than responding to discovery requests served on or before November 1, 2010 or taking depositions noticed on or before November 1, 2010, the parties are required to observe the November 1, 2010 discovery cutoff in this case. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18,580,077.2\022754-01932 -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?