Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM in Support re 124 MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories 1 and 7 and Various Document Requests filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. (Hosteny, Joseph) SEALED DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN CLERK'S OFFICE ON 3/16/10. (KT)
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The
Doc. 126 Att. 4
EXHIBIT 5
Dockets.Justia.com
GASS WEBER MULLINS LLC
309
TEL
N
WATER ST
414 2233300
MilWAUKEE WI 53;102 FAX 414 224 6116
www.gasswebermullins.com
Via Email and US Mail
KRISTAl S. STIPPICH DIRECT DIAL: 414224-3446
Sti Oolch@qasswebermuilins.com
July 6,2009
Christopher
Jennifer
W. Madel
Robbins
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle A venue
M.
Minneapolis
MN 55402-2015
LeMond Cycling, Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corporation Case No. 08-cv-101O (RHK/JSM)
RE:
Dear Counsel:
write to recap our Meet and Confer of July 2,2009 on Trek's Second Set of Requests for Discovery to LeMond Cycling, Inc. and Greg LeMond. Written
I
With respect to Trek's Requests for Admission Nos. 1-9, Interrogatory No. 10, and Document Request No. 27, you are not willing to provide any more detailed information. With respect to authentication, it is your position that there are numerous documents and
Trek should delineate those it intends to use at trial and what they purport to be.
With respect to Trek's contention Interrogatory No. 11, you indicated that you would not be revising your answer as this was not an appropriate case for a contention
interrogatory.
With respect to Trek's Interrogatory No. 14, asking for specific information regarding negative comments and emails sent to the LeMond Fitness website in 2004, you repeated your refusal to provide an answer to this interrogatory on the basis that LeMond Fitness is not your client, is not a party to this suit and is not relevant to this lawsuit. We explained that Greg LeMond was receiving comments to the LeMond Fitness website, that LeMond Fitness was ruled relevant by Judge Mayeron and LeMond Fitness documents have been produced by you in response to prior discovery requests according to her rulings. You indicated that you would provide a revised answer to Interrogatory No. 14 within a week.
Christopher W. Madel
Jennifer
M. Robbins
July 6,2009
Page 2
With respect to Document Request No. 28, requesting production of "all documents
concerning, reflecting, commenting upon, summarizing, constituting, or relating to any responses or reactions to Greg LeMond's comments about any individual athlete and the topic of doping or performance enhancing drugs, including without limitation all emails to any person or website identified in response to Trek's Interrogatory No.8 to LeMond Cycling, Inc." you indicated that you produced all such non-privileged documents that you
or your clients had in their custody and control.
With respect to Document Request No. 31, you indicated that you would attempt to ascertain the date of the tape recording between Sidney Bluming, Greg LeMond and Betsy Andreu that you have withheld on the basis of work product privilege (LCI PRIV 202-203), including by requesting the information from Mr. Bluming. You also indicated you will provide us with verification that all tapes whether pre or post lawsuit (including post Trek's April 8, 2008 counterclaim) have been produced and/or identified to us. Please provide this
information within
a
week.
With respect to Document Request No. 33, when we asked you to clarify your
response and specifically to indicate whether you are refusing to produce documents from computer files designated "lemond fitness," warren Gibson," and "Warrant PTI" on the basis of your objection that they are irrelevant, you represented that you searched all files
on LeMond's computers, including those designated "lemond fitness," "warren Gibson," and "Warren PTI," and have produced all documents from the computer files, including these designated files, relating to any claim or defense in this lawsuit.
Sincerely,
~şidL
KSS:js
Enclosures
cc:
Ralph A. Weber (via email) Christopher Dombrowicki (via email) Erik Salveson (via email)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?