Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 128

Declaration of Joseph N. Hosteny in Support of 126 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Placeholder for Exhibits A, C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, U and V, # 2 Exhibit(s) B, # 3 Exhibit(s) D, # 4 Exhibit(s) N, # 5 Exhibit(s) O, # 6 Exhibit(s) P, # 7 Exhibit(s) Q, # 8 Exhibit(s) R, # 9 Exhibit(s) S, # 10 Exhibit(s) T, # 11 Exhibit(s) W, # 12 Exhibit(s) X)(Hosteny, Joseph) SEALED DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN CLERK'S OFFICE ON 3/17/10. (KT)

Download PDF
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The Doc. 128 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LeMond Cycling, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Trek Bicycle Corporation, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Greg LeMond, Third-Party Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-01010 (RHK/JSM) LR 7.1(c) WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES, TO DEEM FACTS ADMITTED, AND FOR EXPENSES I, Jennifer M. Robbins, certify that Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories, to Deem Facts Admitted, and for Expenses complies with Local Rule 7.1(c). I further certify that, in preparing this document, I used Microsoft ® Office Word Version 2003, and that this word processing program has been applied specifically to include all text, including headings, footnotes, and quotations in the following word count. I further certify that the above-referenced document contains 1,902 words. Dated: July 20, 2009. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By: s/Jennifer M. Robbins Christopher W. Madel (#230297) Denise S. Rahne (#331314) Jennifer M. Robbins (#387745) Katherine K. Bruce (#388887) 80925956.1 Dockets.Justia.com 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2015 (612) 349-8500 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LEMOND CYCLING, INC. AND GREG LEMOND 80925956.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?