Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 266

Declaration of Michael Stonebraker in Support of 265 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Thomson Corporation, The, West Publishing Corporation, West Services. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A-1, # 2 Exhibit(s) A-2, # 3 Exhibit(s) A-3, # 4 Exhibit(s) A-4, # 5 Exhibit(s) A-5, # 6 Exhibit(s) A-6, # 7 Exhibit(s) A-7, # 8 Exhibit(s) A-8)(Wagner, Kevin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TIMEBASE PTY LTD., Civil No. 07-1687 (JNE/JJG) Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF MICHAEL STONEBRAKER vs. THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, and WEST SERVICES, INC., Defendants. I, Michael Stonebraker, declare as follows: 1. I have been retained in this matter by defendants The Thomson Corporation, West Publishing Corporation, and West Services, Inc. to provide my opinions and to testify as an expert witness on various topics, including whether claims 24-48 of U.S. Patent No. 7,293,228 are invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Among other things, I was asked to prepare an expert report setting forth my opinion that Claims 24-48 are invalid because they lack a written description of the claimed “graphical representation of a multidimensional space.” 2. Attached as Exhibit A to my declaration is a true and correct copy of the expert report I submitted on this issue dated February 28, 2011 3. The statements and opinions made in my expert report are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, including those relating to scientific issues, which I believe are true and correct to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty. 1 I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed remotely on July 20, 2011 from Portland, Oregon, _________________________________ Michael Stonebraker fb.us.7050439.03 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?