TimeBase Pty Ltd. v. Thomson Corporation, The et al

Filing 32

RESPONSE re 28 Memorandum, Filed by Defendants In Support of Their Appeal Of And Objections To Orders Denying A Stay Of The '228 Case (07-4551) And Lifting The Stay Of The '592 Case (07-1687), filed by TimeBase Pty Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Rule 7.1 Certificate of Compliance)(Hosteny, Joseph)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TIMEBASE PTY LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) THE THOMSON CORPORATION, ) WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, ) AND WEST SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action Nos. and 07-cv-1687 (JNE/JJG) 07-cv-04551

Honorable Joan N. Ericksen Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham TIMEBASE'S LOCAL RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I, Joseph N. Hosteny, certify that Timebase's Response To Defendants' Memorandum In Support Of Appeal Of And Objections To Orders Denying A Stay Of The `288 Case (No. 07-4551) Ad Lifting The Stay Of The `592 Case (No. 07-1687) complies with the length limitation of Local Rule 7.1(c) and the type-size limitation of Local Rule 7.1(e). I further certify that, in preparation of this memorandum, I used Microsoft Office Word, Version 2003, and that this word processing program has been applied specifically to include all text, including headings, footnotes, and quotations in the following word count. I further certify that the above referenced document contains 3,612 words, excluding caption and signature block. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Joseph N. Hosteny Joseph N. Hosteny Arthur A. Gasey Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Phone: [phone] Michael R. Cunningham Gray, Plant & Mooty 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Phone: [phone]; Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for TimeBase Pty Ltd.