Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America
Filing
1972
Almer v. Peanut Corporation of America
Doc. 1972 Att. 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
_ In re: Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation This Document Relates to: Eugene Clasby MDL No. 05-1708 (DWF/AJB) PLACEHOLDER FOR DEFENDANTS' EXHIBITS 1 THROUGH 22 TO
DEFENDANTS' CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff(s) Case Number: 05-2596
v. Guidant Corporation, et al. Defendant(s)
This document is a place holder for the following item(s) which are filed in conventional or physical form with the Clerk's Office: EXHIBITS 1 THROUGH 22 TO DEFENDANTS' CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served upon you in conventional format. This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): ___ Voluminous Document* (Document number of order granting leave to file conventionally: ___ ) ___ Unable to Scan Documents (e.g., PDF file size of one page larger than 2MB, illegible when scanned) ___ Physical Object (description): ___ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media X Item Under Seal pursuant to a court order* (Document number of protective order: 10 ) ___ Item Under Seal pursuant to the Judicial Conference Privacy Policy (General Order 53)
forms\cmecf\convfilingplchldr.doc Form Updated 07/29/05
2508439v1
Dockets.Justia.com
(Document number of redacted version: ___ )
___ Other (description):
* Filing of these items requires Judicial Approval. E-file this place holder in ECF in place of the documents filed conventionally. File a copy of this Placeholder and a copy of the NEF with the Clerk's Office along with the conventionally filed item(s).
forms\cmecf\convfilingplchldr.doc
Form Updated 07/29/05
2508439v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?