Brady et al v. National Football League et al

Filing 105

JUDGMENT (Attachments: # 1 Civil-8th Circuit Pre-Hearing Conference Notice, # 2 Civil Notice - appeal)(kt)

Download PDF
OAO450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Minnesota Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Vincent Jackson, Ben Leber, Logan Mankins, Peyton Manning, Von Miller, Brian Robison, Osi Umenyiora, Mike Vrabel, Carl Eller, Priest Holmes, Obafemi Ayanbadejo, Ryan Collins, and Antawan Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE V. Case Number: 11-cv-639 SRN/JJG National Football League, Arizona Cardinals, Inc., Atlanta Falcons Football Club LLC, Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership, Buffalo Bills, Inc., Panthers Football LLC, Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Cleveland Browns LLC, Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd., Denver Broncos Football Club, Detroit Lions, Inc., Green Bay Packers, Inc., Houston NFL Holdings LP, Indianapolis Colts, Inc., Jacksonville Jaguars Ltd., Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Minnesota Vikings Football Club LLC, New England Patriots, LP, New Orleans Louisiana Saints, LLC, New York Football Giants, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, Inc., Oakland Raiders LP, Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc., Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., San Diego Chargers Football Co., San Francisco Forty Niners Ltd., Football Northwest LLC, Rams Football Co, LLC, Buccaneers Limited Partnership, Tennessee Football, Inc., Washington Football Inc. Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: C:\Documents and Settings\thompson\Local Settings\Temp\notesA88DE7\11-639 Judgment.wpd Form Modified: 09/16/04 1. The Brady Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 2] is GRANTED; 2. The Eller Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 58] is MOOT; and 3. The “lockout” is enjoined. April 26, 2011 RICHARD D. SLETTEN, CLERK Date Thomas S. Schappa (By) C:\Documents and Settings\thompson\Local Settings\Temp\notesA88DE7\11-639 Judgment.wpd Thomas S. Schappa Deputy Clerk Form Modified: 09/16/04

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?