Brady et al v. National Football League et al
Filing
144
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR, CAPTION INCORRECT, WILL RE-FILE. MEMORANDUM in Support re 142 MOTION to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings Leave to Amend and Crossclaim filed by Obafemi Ayanbadejo, Ryan Collins, Carl Eller. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Stuckey, Shawn) Modified on 7/7/2011 (JME).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Carl Eller, Franco Harris, Marcus Allen,
Paul Krause, Lemuel Barney, Joseph
DeLamielleure, Elvin Bethea, Michael
Haynes, Obafemi Ayanbadejo, and Ryan
Collins, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Civil Action No: 11-cv-00639
SRN/JJG
Plaintiffs,
v.
National Football League, Arizona
Cardinals, Inc., Atlanta Falcons Football
Club LLC, Baltimore Ravens Limited
Partnership, Buffalo Bills, Inc., Panthers
Football LLC, Chicago Bears Football
Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.,
Cleveland Browns LLC, Dallas Cowboys
Football Club, Ltd., Denver Broncos
Football Club, Detroit Lions, Inc., Green
Bay Packers, Inc., Houston NFL Holdings
LP, Indianapolis Colts, Inc., Jacksonville
Jaguars Ltd., Kansas City Chiefs Football
Club, Inc., Miami Dolphins, Ltd.,
Minnesota Vikings Football Club LLC,
New England Patriots, LP, New Orleans
Louisiana Saints, LLC, New York Football
Giants, Inc., New York Jets Football Club,
Inc., Oakland Raiders LP, Philadelphia
Eagles Football Club, Inc., Pittsburgh
Steelers Sports, Inc., San Diego Chargers
Football Co., San Francisco Forty Niners
Ltd., Football Northwest LLC, The Rams
Football Co. LLC, Buccaneers Limited
Partnership, Tennessee Football, Inc.,
Washington Football Inc.. and National
Football League Players Association, Tom
Brady, Drew Brees, Vincent Jackson, Ben
Leber, Logan Mankins, Peyton Manning,
Von Miller, Brian Robison, Osi
LOCAL RULE 7.1
CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE REGARDING
THE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT,
CROSSCLAIM AND DISMISS
PLAINTIFF ANTAWAN
WALKER
1
Umenyiora, Mike Vrabel and DeMaurice
Smith.
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------x
I, Shawn D. Stuckey, certify that the Memorandum In Support of Motion for Leave
To File Second Amended Complaint and Crossclaim complies with Local Rule 7.1.
The Memorandum of Law, which was prepared using Microsoft Word 2003, contains
920 words. In arriving at that number, the “Word Count” functionality of Word 2003
was used, and was applied specifically to include all text, including headings,
footnotes, and quotations in the word count. The word count does not include the case
heading or signature block.
Dated: July 4, 2011
Respectfully Submitted,
Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice)
Hilary K. Scherrer (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K Street, NW
Suite 650
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 540-7200
Facsimile: (202) 540-7201
mhausfeld@hausfledllp.com
hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com
s/Shawn D. Stuckey
Mark J. Feinberg (#28654)
Michael E. Jacobs (#0309552)
Shawn D. Stuckey (#0388976)
ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL &
MASON, LLP
500 Washington Avenue, South
Suite 4000
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Telephone: (612) 339-2020
Facsimile: (612) 336-9100
mfeinberg@zelle.com
mjacobs@zelle.com
sstuckey@zelle.com
Michael P. Lehmann (pro hac vice)
Jon T. King (pro hac vice)
Arthur N. Bailey, Jr. (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 633-1908
Facsimile: (415) 358-4980
mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
jking@hausfeldllp.com
abailey@hausfeldllp.com
Daniel S. Mason (pro hac vice)
ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL &
MASON, LLP
44 Montgomery Street
Suite 3400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 633-0700
Facsimile: (415) 693-0770
damson@zelle.com
2
Samuel D. Heins (#43576)
Vince J. Esades (#249361)
HEINS MILLS & OLSON, P.L.C.
310 Clifton Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403
Telephone: (612) 338-4605
Facsimile: (612)338-4692
sheins@heinsmills.com
vesades@heinsmills.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
360188v1
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?