Amos et al v. Hall et al

Filing 280

ORDER Requiring Submission of Revised Proposed Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/19/21. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 4:20-cv-00007-SA-JMV, 4:20-cv-00030-SA-JMV (ncb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
MICHAEL AMOS, et al.
PLAINTIFFS
V.

NO. 4:20-CV-7-SA-JMV

NATHAN BURL CAIN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
Consolidated With
DARRAN LANG, et al.
PLAINTIFFS
V.

NO. 4:20-CV-30-SA-JMV

JEWORSKI MALLET, et al.
DEFENDANTS
PROPOSED CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULING ORDER
I.

INITIAL DISCLOSURE UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)

The parties will exchange initial disclosures regarding class certification issues pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 on or prior to
.
II.

AMENDMENTS TO PLEADINGS AND JOINDER OF PARTIES;
RESPONSES TO PLEADINGS AND PENDING MOTIONS

The deadline to file any motions to amend the pleadings or to join additional parties is
. This date is the deadline for motions to amend the pleadings regardless of
whether the case is in the class certification stage or the merits stage. The same deadline applies
to motions to join parties (except as to those parties, if any, joined as a consequence of the grant,
if any, of class certification).
The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint(s) is
deadline for defendants to respond to Brymon Hamp’s motion for TRO in the Lang case
(4:20cv30 [71]) is
.
III.

. The

CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY AND SCOPE

Discovery prior to class certification must be sufficient to permit the Court to determine
whether the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 are satisfied. Until the issue of

class certification is resolved, counsel must give priority to discovery directed to the class
certification issue.
Discovery on the merits shall occur after the decision on class certification with the
understanding that where a deposition is taken for certification purposes the deponent will also
be permitted to be questioned on the merits. In such instances, discovery on these merits issues
may predate the class certification decision.
Once class certification is decided, the Court will schedule a second case management
conference within 30 days of the issuance of an order ruling on class certification, or as soon as
practical thereafter. At the second conference, the parties will, among other things, propose a
new discovery order, addressing additional merits discovery needed and necessary, related
deadlines, and discuss a schedule for trying the case.
IV.

DISCOVERY PLAN AND DEADLINES

Again, this discovery plan and deadlines relate only to the class certification stage.
Discovery limitations are on a “per side” basis, as there is deemed to be only a single Plaintiffs’
side and a single Defendants’ side in this consolidated action. The parties are ordered to
complete all discovery related to class certification as follows:
1. Due to the nature of this case, discovery procedure will differ from the requirements
of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30 and 33 in the following respects only:
a. The parties agree to the following limitations on Interrogatories, Requests for
Production, Requests for Admission and depositions:
i. The parties may take a reasonable number of mutually agreeable
depositions by a specified date before expiration of the certification
discovery deadline. If the parties are not able to agree on this issue, a
motion must be promptly filed with the court to address any particular
issue. If a deposition is taken for purposes of class certification, the
deposition must be conducted for purposes of merits discovery as well.
No deposition may be conducted in the certification stage for purposes
of merits discovery alone.
ii. 15 non-party depositions—excluding experts and record custodians—
per side;
iii. 30 requests for production per side;
iv. 30 interrogatories per side; and
v. 30 requests for admissions per side.
vi. Plaintiffs and Defendants may also separately depose any experts
designated by other parties to testify as to class certification issues.
2. Expert witnesses for class certification, if any, shall be disclosed, in compliance with
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26, by March 15, 2022, for Plaintiffs’ side, and by
May 20, 2022, for Defendants’ side.
3. Discovery must be completed by July 1, 2022.
2

4. Daubert motions challenging the parties’ class certification experts must be filed by
July 22, 2022.
5. Plaintiffs’ side motion for class certification and memorandum shall be filed by
August 26, 2022, and shall not exceed 30 pages; the response by Defendants’ side is
due 14 days thereafter and will not exceed 40 pages; and any reply by Plaintiffs’ side
will be due 7 days after Defendants’ response and will not exceed 10 pages. If a
deposition is scheduled for purposes of the class certification issue, said deposition
must be conducted on all merits issues as well. No deposition may be taken for
purposes of merits discovery alone.
6. Pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the attorney-client
privilege and the work-product protections are not waived by any disclosure
connected with this litigation. Further, the disclosures are not waived in any other
federal or state proceeding.
V.

ESI

The parties CERTIFY that they have discussed, in particular, the proportionality of
discovery, the burden and expense associated with discovery, and the discovery of electronically
stored information (“ESI”). The parties do anticipate a need for an ESI addendum. If the parties
do anticipate the same, they shall submit to the Court a jointly prepared proposed ESI addendum
no later than 10 days after the date of entry of the scheduling order.
VI.

CLASS CERTIFICTION HEARING

The class certification hearing, if any, will be set by separate notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ___________________
_____________________________
United States Magistrate Judge

3