Stevens et al v. First State Bank and Trust

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 21 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Thomas Jefferson Stevens, II, Plaintiff Kathryn Anne Stevens, Plaintiff Martha Anne Stevens: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for summary j udgment with respect to Count I of their complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 21.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the testamentary trust of Decedent, Martha Viar Stevens, set out in the Last Will and Testament of Martha Viar Stevens dated March 29, 2001, shal l be amended in accordance with the amended trust document titled, "Amended Martha Viar Stevens Testamentary Trust" (Doc. No. 29-1), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit I. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/2/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I)(JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION THOMAS JEFFERSON STEVENS, II, et al. Plaintiffs, v. FIRST STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No.: 1:12-CV-00161-AGF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Count I of their complaint. (Doc. No. 21) Having considered the motion, all relevant facts of record, and Defendants’ lack of opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment with respect to Count I of their complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 21.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the testamentary trust of Decedent, Martha Viar Stevens, set out in the Last Will and Testament of Martha Viar Stevens dated March 29, 2001, shall be amended in accordance with the amended trust document titled, “Amended Martha Viar Stevens Testamentary Trust” (Doc. No. 29-1), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit I. AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of May, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?