State of Missouri v. Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc.

Filing 13

CONSENT DECREE AND SETTLEMENT Signed on 6/1/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A) (Francis, Alexandra)

APPENDIX A

SCOPE OF WORK FOR
NORTHROP GRUMMAN GUIDANCE AND
ELECTRONICS COMPANY, INC.
AT

THE FORMER LITTON SYSTEMS,
INC. SITE

4811 West Kearney
Springfield, Missouri
October 20, 2009

APPENDIX A

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0

2.0

3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0

7.0

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Site Description ...................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Background ............................................................................................................ 1
DESCRIPTION OF THE REMEDIAL ACTION/PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ........ 3
2.1 Access Restrictions and Institutional Controls ....................................................... 3
2.2 Electrical Resistive Heating / Soil Vapor Extraction ............................................... 3
2.3 Engineered Barriers with Institutional Controls ...................................................... 4
SCOPE OF REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ............................................................. 5
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM ......................................................... 6
SCOPE OF REMEDIAL DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION ...................................... 7
CONTENT OF SUPPORTING PLANS ....................................................................... 11
6.1 Quality Assurance Project Plan ............................................................................ 11
6.2 Health and Safety Plan ........................................................................................ 12
6.3 Field Sampling Plan ............................................................................................. 13
6.4 Construction Quality Assurance Plan ................................................................... 13
Summary of Major Deliverables ............................................................................... 15

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

Regional Map
Site Map Showing Areas of Concern and ERH Pilot Study Area

i

182602108

APPENDIX A

1.0

1.1

INTRODUCTION

Purpose

The purpose of this Scope of Work (SOW) is to set forth requirements for implementation of onsite and if necessary, off-site remedial action of impacted soils associated with the Northrop
Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc. (Northrop Grumman or Settling Defendant),
formerly Litton Systems, Inc., facility located in Springfield, Missouri (Site) and is prepared
pursuant to and is made a part of the Consent Decree and Settlement (Consent Decree)
entered into by the State of Missouri and Settling Defendant.
The selected remedial action as discussed in this SOW is designed to protect human health and
the environment in general accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) of 1980, as amended by the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (“SARA”) of 1986, the National Oil and Hazardous
Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (“NCP”), and State of Missouri regulations.
1.2

Site Description

The Site is located at 4811 West Kearney Street, Springfield, Missouri and is identified on
Figure 1 of this SOW. The Site was a former printed circuit board manufacturing facility, which
ceased operations August 31, 2007. The area of investigation also includes a limited area
within the adjacent Springfield-Branson National Airport (Airport) that formerly was part of the
Settling Defendant’s operations until title was transferred in a land exchange between the
Settling Defendant and the Airport.
1.3

Background

Waste historically generated from Site process operations included chlorinated solvents, acids,
and metals. These wastes may have been discharged to various waste management units
located on the Site and one on the adjacent Airport property (a portion of which was formerly
owned by the Settling Defendant). These waste management units are no longer in operation.
These units include the Former Percolation Terrace, the Former “A” and “B” Lagoon, the Former
“Original” Acid Pits and Former Sludge Pits, the Former “New” Acid Pit, the Former “C” Lagoon,
and the Former Sanitary Lagoon.
Numerous environmental investigations and remedial activities have been performed at the Site
and have been documented in reports submitted to MDNR.
In July 2005, a Phase II Feasibility Study (FS) Report was submitted to MDNR. For treatment of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the FS selected Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) as
the preferred remedial alternative for soil. For metals impacts, earthen covers or paved
engineered barriers and institutional controls were selected as the preferred alternative.
An ERH Pilot Study was proposed to quantify the magnitude of contaminant reduction, establish
full-scale design parameters, and evaluate potential geotechnical impacts to on-site structures.
The ERH Pilot Study was conducted in the latter half of 2005. The goal of the Pilot Study was
to apply electrical power and vapor recovery over a planned period of time to raise subsurface
temperatures to a sufficient level to volatilize, and subsequently recover, VOCs, thereby
Scope of Work
MGD:djr

1

182602108

APPENDIX A

reducing TCE concentrations in soil by 99 percent of the 90 percent Upper Confidence Limit
(UCL). See Figure 2 for the location of the ERH Pilot Study.
Based on the results of the Pilot Study, including analytical results and the site response to
ERH, it was determined that a full-scale application of ERH technology could be implemented to
achieve remedial objectives (i.e., cost-effective reduction of subsurface VOC contamination)
similar to those achieved with the Pilot Study. A report summarizing Pilot Study findings was
submitted to MDNR on March 10, 2006.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

2

182602108

APPENDIX A

2.0

DESCRIPTION OF THE REMEDIAL ACTION / PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

The selected remedial alternative to address VOC impacted soils - Electrical Resistance
Heating (ERH) - was chosen by MDNR after a detailed analysis of alternatives included in the
FS and review of the Pilot Study findings. As discussed in further detail in this SOW, Settling
Defendant’s contractor/consultant shall prepare a Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA)
Work Plan to implement the selected remedial alternative. The RD/RA Work Plan shall include
performance standards and specifications such as cleanup standards, standards of control,
quality criteria, and other substantive requirements, criteria, or limitations including all Applicable
or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) set forth in this SOW.
The RD/RA will address soil at the Site and upon completion of further investigation, the
adjacent Airport property. Areas of Concern (AOCs) to be addressed by this SOW are shown
on Figure 2. Soil contamination poses a potential risk to human health as a result of
exceedances above MDNR’s acceptable risk range for dermal contact with soils, ingestion of
soil, inhalation of dust, and inhalation of contaminants that can volatilize to air. This action
presents the final response action anticipated for soils at the Site and addresses in a practical
manner the principal threats by treating VOC-impacted soils with ERH technology, installation of
an earthen or paved engineered barrier over select areas with metals-impacted soils, and,
where appropriate placing institutional controls on future Site use. The final response action for
the off-site Airport property may be different than the remedies selected for on-site soils and will
be based on results of further investigation.
2.1

Access Restrictions and Institutional Controls

During treatment, the selected remedy will include a security fence to prohibit public access to
the remediation areas. Access to the treatment areas will be limited to Northrop Grumman staff
and its contractors/consultants.
The need for and/or the scope of institutional controls as part of the remedy for VOC impacts in
soil will be evaluated at the completion of the ERH remedial work. Institutional controls may be
necessary in regard to copper impacted soil areas.
2.2

Electrical Resistive Heating / Soil Vapor Extraction

Soil in select AOCs that are impacted with VOCs above the established cleanup objective will
be treated in-situ using ERH in conjunction with Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE). The goal will be to
remediate impacted soils to the MDNR approved cleanup objective of 0.4 mg/Kg (for TCE) in
accordance with MDNR’s approval letter dated February 6, 2006. ERH Technical Specifications
and a Basis of Design for achievement of this goal will be outlined in the RD/RA Work Plan to
be submitted to MDNR for review and approval pursuant to this SOW.
The ERH system will consist of a series of electrodes placed into impacted soils at depths at or
near the soil/bedrock interface. An electrical current will be passed from one electrode to
another and this induced electric potential combined with the soil’s natural resistivity will heat
the soil matrix allowing the VOCs to volatilize and move through the soil matrix. The SVE
system will extract the vapors which will then be treated to meet applicable air emission
requirements.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

3

182602108

APPENDIX A

2.3

Engineered Barriers with Institutional Controls

Soils in select AOCs that are impacted with metals (notably copper) above established
threshold levels will be addressed through earthen covers or paved engineered barriers and,
where appropriate, institutional controls. The earthen covers and paved engineered barriers will
be installed to prevent direct contact with metals contaminants, serve as a barrier to limit
exposure to direct contact, prevent fugitive dust emissions, and reduce infiltration from
precipitation events. During the Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) for Soils, it was determined
that due to the presence and concentrations of copper, that this inorganic element would be the
driver for subsequent risk and remedial action decisions. The TRA established an ecological
threshold level of 4,300 mg/Kg for copper and the CALM guidance provided a 4,700 mg/kg
threshold value for human health. Since the 4,300 mg/Kg threshold level was more conservative
and protective than the human health threshold level of 4,700 mg/Kg, it was determined that this
objective would be protective for both human health and the environment. As such, impacted
soils in excess of the MDNR approved cleanup objective of 4,300 mg/Kg for copper (in the 0-3
foot depth range as agreed to in MDNR’s approval letter dated February 6, 2006) will be subject
to an earthen cover or paved engineered barrier.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

4

182602108

APPENDIX A

3.0

SCOPE OF REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

Any existing or potential threats associated with direct contact with contaminants or contaminant
migration through any media pathway will be effectively remediated. Each component of the RA
program will be performed as described in the RD/RA Work Plan. Due to the variety of types of
work to be performed, the components of this program may be performed by separate remedial
contractors working independently of each other, but under the direction of the Site supervising
contractor.
Settling Defendant will implement the soils RA program in a series of phases that will either run
sequentially or concurrently. Settling Defendant anticipates the focus initially to be on
remediating VOC impacted soils. The former Sanitary Lagoon is listed as the last phase due to
ongoing investigation to determine whether ERH or another alternative remedy is necessary.
Because of the extensive and complex infrastructure required for ERH technology to be used,
the cap installed for the ERH infrastructure can also be used for the paved engineered barrier
for the metals impacts (0-3 foot depth range). Installation of the earthen covers or paved
engineered barriers in AOCs with metals only impacts (0-3 foot depth range) will likely be
accomplished in later phases of the RA program. A detailed discussion of the RA activities is
provided in Section 5.0 of this SOW.
A schedule will be submitted with the RD/RA Work Plan and will serve as a framework for
manpower and budget planning for the remedial program. The schedule will be structured to
allow for timely design, construction, and operation of the remedial components of this program.
The schedule will be updated and/or revised for each phase of work.
The schedule will be an approximation of time required to complete various tasks within
prescribed time periods. Some timing and scheduling requirements are prescribed by the
Consent Decree. Other timing requirements, such as for RA planning and completion
documents, will be developed as part of the RD/RA Work Plan.
Settling Defendant anticipates completing RD/RA activities in the following phases:

PHASE
I-1
I-2
II-1
II-2
III
IV

AOC
Former “New” Acid Pit
Former “Original” Acid/Sludge Pits
Percolation Terrace
Former “A/B Lagoon
Plant Sub-Floor
Former Sanitary Lagoon

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

5

ACTIVITY
VOC Removal/Paved Engineered Barrier
VOC Removal/Earthen Cover
Soil Excavation/Backfill
Soil Consolidation/Earthen Cover
VOC Removal/Paved Engineered Barrier
Pending Remedy Evaluation

182602108

APPENDIX A

4.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

Settling Defendant shall develop and implement an appropriate program for long-term Operation
and Maintenance (O & M) of the Site and for components for the remedial action. The plan will
cover aspects of the remedial action including institutional controls, engineered barriers, and
monitoring.
The draft O & M plan will be revised to incorporate MDNR comments, as appropriate, and
finalized once all remedial actions are completed, and the as-built drawings are available. The
list of general requirements for the Site O & M plan is included below in Section 5.0.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

6

182602108

APPENDIX A

5.0

SCOPE OF REMEDIAL DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION

The RD/RA shall consist of the following tasks:
Task 1: RD/RA Work Plans
Settling Defendant will submit an RD/RA Work Plan for approval by MDNR. This Work Plan will
be based upon a design-build approach and will describe the Settling Defendant’s plan for
implementation of the RD and RA within the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree and
this SOW.
Since RA activities will be completed sequentially or concurrently within the select AOCs, RD
activities will occur at the appropriate time in the RD/RA process. Settling Defendant will
prepare a Basis of Design (BOD) that includes the necessary design elements for each AOC
based on the schedule of activities. A BOD report will be prepared for MDNR’s review and
concurrence prior to RA activities in the select AOC. Each BOD report will be incorporated as
an amendment to the Work Plan (as an appendix).
Settling Defendant shall prepare and submit to MDNR for approval an RD/RA Work Plan that
shall document the overall management strategy for performing the remedial design, including
tasks to be performed for meeting the requirements of this SOW. Settling Defendant and its
Contractor shall describe and document the responsibility and authority of organizations and
personnel involved with the implementation. Settling Defendant/Contractor shall develop an
overall project schedule for implementation of the RD/RA, which identifies timing, and specific
dates for initiation and completion of tasks. The Work Plan and corresponding activity plans will
be submitted to MDNR, as specified in the Consent Decree, for review and approval by MDNR.
The RD/RA Work Plan will contain at the minimum the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Site Description and Background;
Organization of the Design-Build Team;
A description of the design/construction process;
Performance standards;
Basis of Design;
Technical Specifications;
A schedule of completion of the design and construction, including required deliverables;
Project Closeout Requirements;
Health and Safety Plan;
Construction Quality Assurance Project Plan (CQAPP); and
Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan.

Task 2: Remedial Design
Settling Defendant shall prepare construction plans and technical specifications to implement
the RA. Plans and specifications shall be submitted in accordance with Section 7.0 below.
Subject to approval by MDNR, Settling Defendant may submit more than one set of design
submittals reflecting different components of the RA. Plans and specifications shall be
developed in general accordance with U.S. EPA’s Superfund Remedial Design and Remedial
Action Guidance (OSWER Directive No. 9355.0-4A) and shall demonstrate that the RA shall
Scope of Work
MGD:djr

7

182602108

APPENDIX A

meet objectives of the Remedy, the Consent Decree and this SOW, including performance
standards. Settling Defendant shall meet with MDNR to discuss design issues on an “asneeded” basis.
Consistent with a design/build approach, Settling Defendant will prepare the necessary
drawings and specifications for the RA contractor(s) to perform RA construction activities in
accordance with the Consent Decree, this SOW, and the RD/RA Work Plan. RD information to
be addressed includes the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Plans, drawings, and sketches, including design calculations;
Results of treatability studies and additional field sampling, if any;
Design assumptions and parameters, including design restrictions, process performance
criteria, appropriate unit processes for the treatment train, and expected removal or
treatment efficiencies for both the process and waste (concentration and volume);
Proposed cleanup verification methods, including compliance with ARARs;
Outline of required specifications;
Proposed siting/locations of processes/construction activities;
Expected long-term monitoring and operation requirements, if any;
Real estate, easement, and permit requirements; and
Preliminary construction schedule, including contracting strategy.

Settling Defendant/Contractor will submit RD deliverables to MDNR for review.
Task 3: Remedial Action Construction
Settling Defendant shall implement the RA in phases as detailed in the approved RD. The
following activities shall be completed in conducting each phase of the RA.
A.

Preconstruction inspection and meeting:
Settling Defendant shall participate with MDNR in a preconstruction inspection and
meeting to:
a. Review methods for documenting and reporting inspection data;
b. Review methods for distributing and storing documents and reports;
c. Review work area security and safety protocol;
d. Discuss any appropriate modifications of the construction quality assurance plan
to ensure that site-specific considerations are addressed; and
e. Conduct a Site walk-around to verify that the design criteria, plans, and
specifications are understood and to review material and equipment storage
locations.

B.

Pre-final inspection:

Within 30 days after Settling Defendant makes a preliminary determination that construction of a
phase of the RA is complete, Settling Defendant shall notify MDNR for the purposes of
conducting a pre-final inspection. The pre-final inspection shall consist of a walk-through
inspection of the Site with MDNR. The inspection is to determine whether the phase of the
project is complete and consistent with the RD/RA Work Plan. Outstanding construction items
discovered during the inspection shall be identified and noted in the Pre-final Inspection Report.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

8

182602108

APPENDIX A

The Pre-final Inspection Report shall outline the outstanding construction items, actions required
to resolve items, completion date for these items, and a proposed date for final inspection.
C.

Final Inspection:

Within 30 days after completion of work identified in the Pre-final Inspection Report, Settling
Defendant shall notify MDNR for the purposes of conducting a final inspection. The final
inspection shall consist of a walk-through inspection of the Site by MDNR and Settling
Defendant. The Pre-final Inspection Report shall be used as a checklist with the final inspection
focusing on the outstanding construction items identified in the pre-final inspection. The Final
Inspection shall confirm that outstanding items have been resolved.
D.

Reports

Within 30 days of a successful final inspection, Settling Defendant shall submit a Completion
Report for that phase of the RA. In the report, a registered professional engineer and Settling
Defendant’s Project Coordinator shall confirm that the specific phase of the RA has been
completed in full satisfaction of the requirements of the Consent Decree. The written report
shall include as-built drawings signed and stamped by a professional engineer. A Completion
Report will be submitted after the completion of each phase of the RA.
Upon the completion of all of the work set forth in the SOW (as may be amended from time to
time), Settling Defendant shall submit a Final Site Report. In the report, a registered
professional engineer and Settling Defendant’s Project Coordinator shall confirm that the RA
has been completed in full satisfaction of the requirements of the Consent Decree.
The Completion Reports and Final Site Report shall contain the following statement, signed by a
person who supervised or directed the preparation of the Completion Report:
Under penalty of law, I certify that to the best of my knowledge, after appropriate
inquiries of all relevant persons involved in the preparation of the report, the information
submitted is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties
for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations.”
Task 4: Operation and Maintenance
Settling Defendant shall prepare an Operation and Maintenance (O & M) Plan to cover both
implementation and long-term maintenance of the RA. An O & M Plan (or subsequent
revisions) shall be submitted as part of each BOD submission. The O & M Plan shall be
submitted to MDNR prior to the pre-final construction inspection, in accordance with the
approved construction schedule. The O & M Plan shall be composed of the following elements,
as applicable:
1.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

Description of normal operation and maintenance
a.
Description of tasks for operation;
b.
Description of tasks for maintenance;
c.
Description of prescribed treatment or operation conditions; and
d.
Schedule showing frequency of each O & M task.

9

182602108

APPENDIX A

2.

Description of potential operating problems
a.
Description and analysis of potential operation problems;
b.
Sources of information regarding problems; and
c.
Common and/or anticipated remedies.

3.

Description of routine monitoring and laboratory testing
a.
Description of monitoring tasks;
b.
Description of required data collection, laboratory tests and their
interpretation;
c.
Required quality assurance and quality control;
d.
Schedule of monitoring frequency and procedures for a petition to MDNR
to reduce the frequency of or discontinue monitoring; and
e.
Description of verification sampling procedures if cleanup or performance
standards are exceeded in routine monitoring.

4.

Description of alternate O & M
a.
Should systems fail, alternate procedures to prevent release or
threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants
which may endanger public health and the environment or exceed
performance standards; and
b.
Analysis of vulnerability and additional resource requirement should a
failure occur.

5.

Corrective Action
a.
Description of corrective action to be implemented in the event that
cleanup or performance standards are exceeded; and
b.
Schedule for implementing these corrective actions.

6.

Safety plan
a.
Description of precautions, of necessary equipment, etc., for Site and
affected personnel; and
b.
Safety tasks required in event of systems failure.

7.

Description of equipment
a.
Equipment identification;
b.
Installation of monitoring components;
c.
Maintenance of Site equipment; and
d.
Replacement schedule for equipment and installed components.

8.

Records and reporting mechanisms required
a.
Daily operating logs;
b.
Laboratory records;
c.
Records for operating costs;
d.
Mechanism for reporting emergencies;
e.
Personnel and maintenance records; and
f.
Monthly/annual reports to State agencies

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

10

182602108

APPENDIX A

6.0

CONTENT OF SUPPORTING PLANS

Settling Defendant will prepare the following documents to implement the RD/RA: the Quality
Assurance Project Plan, the Field Sampling Plan, the Health and Safety Plan, the Contingency
Plan, and the Construction Quality Assurance Plan. The following sections describe the
required contents of each of these supporting plans.
6.1

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Settling Defendant shall develop a Site-Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP),
covering sample analysis and data handling for samples collected in all phases of future work,
based upon the Consent Decree. The QAPP shall be consistent with the requirements of the
EPA Contract Lab Program (CLP) for laboratories proposed outside the CLP. The QAPP shall
at a minimum include:
Project Management
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Title and Approval Page
Table of Contents
Distribution List
Project / Task Organization
Problem Definition / Background Information
Project / Task Description and Schedule
Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data
Special Training Requirements / Certification
Documentation and Records

Data Generation and Acquisition
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Sampling Process Design
Sampling Methods Requirements
Sample Handling and Custody Requirements
Analytical Methods Requirements
Quality Control Requirements
Instrument / Equipment Testing, Inspection, and Maintenance Requirements
Instrument Calibration and Frequency
Inspection / Acceptance Requirements for Supplies and Consumables
Data Acquisition Requirements (Non-direct Measurements)
Data Management

Assessment and Oversight
•
•

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

Assessment and Response Actions
Reports to Management

11

182602108

APPENDIX A

Data Validation and Usability
•
•
•

Data Review, Validation, and Verification Requirements
Validation and Verification Methods
Usability / Reconciliation with Data Quality Objectives

Settling Defendant shall submit the QAPP to MDNR for review and approval.
6.2

Health and Safety Plan

Settling Defendant shall develop a Health and Safety Plan (HASP) which is designed to protect
on-site personnel and potentially affected individuals from physical, chemical and all other
hazards posed by this RA. The HASP shall develop the performance levels and criteria
necessary to address the following areas:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Local emergency contact names, numbers, and hospital directions;
Objectives and goals of the HASP;
Scope of work;
Background information on the project site;
Safety procedures;
Site plan;
Emergency response;
Contractor emergency action plan;
Government contact names and phone numbers;
Project personnel and relevant information;
Maximum concentrations of contaminants identified on-site;
Potential airborne contaminants;
Detailed list of steps with hazard assessments and precautions;
Waste characteristics.

The HASP shall follow USEPA guidance and OSHA requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910
and 1926.
The HASP will provide a Contingency Plan describing procedures to be used in the
event of an accident or emergency at the Site. The Contingency Plan shall include, at a
minimum, the following:
1.

Name of the person or entity responsible for responding in the event of an
emergency incident.

2.

Plan and date(s) for meeting(s) with the local community, including local, State
and Federal agencies involved in the cleanup, as well as local emergency
squads and hospitals.

3.

First aid medical information.

4.

Air Monitoring Plan (if applicable).

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

12

182602108

APPENDIX A

6.3

Field Sampling Plan

Settling Defendant shall develop a field sampling plan (as described in “Guidance for
Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA,” October 1988).
The Field Sampling Plan supplements the QAPP, and addresses sample collection activities,
and shall contain, at a minimum, the following elements.
Introduction
•
•
•

Objectives of Sampling
Investigation Summary
o Field Sampling Activities
Constituents of Concern

Sampling Methods and Procedures
•
•
•
•

Soil Sampling
Monitoring Well Installation
o Springfield Plateau Aquifer
o Ozark Aquifer
Survey of Monitoring Wells
Groundwater Sampling
o Fluid Level Measurements
o Monitoring Well Purging
o Deep Well Sampling
o Groundwater Sample Collection

Sampling Methodologies and Number of Samples
•

Analytical Parameters

Project Documentation
•
•
•

Field Documentation
Sample Labeling
Sample Custody, Storage, and Shipping

Sampling Equipment Decontamination and Waste Disposal
•
•
•
6.4

Equipment Decontamination
Sampling Equipment Calibration
Disposal of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Construction Quality Assurance Plan

Settling Defendant shall submit a Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQAP) which describes
the Site specific components of the quality assurance program which shall ensure that the
completed project meets or exceeds design criteria, plans, and specifications. The CQAP shall
be submitted in conjunction with the RD/RA Work Plan and modified/amended for each BOD
submitted to MDNR. The CQAP shall contain, at a minimum, the following elements:
Scope of Work
MGD:djr

13

182602108

APPENDIX A

1.

Responsibilities and authorities of organizations and key personnel involved in
the design and construction of the RA;

2.

Qualifications of the Quality Assurance Personnel;

3.

Inspection procedures;

4.

Construction Sampling Requirements; and

5.

Documentation/Reporting requirements.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

14

182602108

APPENDIX A

7.0

SUMMARY OF MAJOR DELIVERABLES

A summary of the project schedule and reporting requirements contained in this SOW is
presented below.
Deliverables

Submission Due Date

1.

RD/RA Work Plan

Sixty (60) days after Notice of Authorization to proceed with RD

2.

Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)

Sixty (60) days after Notice of Authorization to proceed with RD

3.

Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

Sixty (60) days after Notice of Authorization to proceed with RD

4.

Field Sampling Plan (FSP)

Sixty (60) days after Notice of Authorization to proceed with RD

5.

Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQAP)

Sixty (60) days after Notice of Authorization to proceed with RD

6.

Operation and Maintenance Plan (O&M)

Sixty (60) days after Notice of Authorization to proceed with RD

7.

Pre-final Inspection Reports

Thirty (30) days after conducting pre-final inspections

8.

Completion Reports

Sixty (60) days after completion of each RA phase

9.

Quarterly Progress Reports

Ongoing

Final Site Report

TBD

10.

Scope of Work
MGD:djr

15

182602108