Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al
Filing
124
AMENDED DOCUMENT by Lee Enterprises Incorporated. Amendment to 111 Affidavit in Support of Motion,, AMENDED AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY B. SMITH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT LEE ENTERPRISES INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REMAINING COUNTS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K) (Smith, Jeffrey) Modified on 10/21/2011 to create relationship w/ 108 Motion (APP, ).
EXHIBIT B
Fax
lit
,.!
lil
!fl
To: JeftreY B. Snith esq'
Gorllngcst, l*inn, R<wr PllP
til
ill
I
ii
P.O. Bo( 7909
trtlsor.ila, AIT 59607
Fr* (4ft) 523.2595
;ll
Il
Ir1
ill
t,r
ifl
ttl
ltl
ttt
iil
ltl
ill
lil
iit
Frmt: rr{lchaet E, SPrea6urY
Xl
Eox'116
Hamltton, ttT 59840
Phonc: ({06}
Pagstl Wcwcrrand
*l-gn
8pg suppottlng Pagce
Su$cc*Or'scwcrY lnfo,
Oate: August 15,2011
ilI
ili
!ll
ill
urg.ntl I
t1i
I',1
firyly I I
Gonmmtr:
l;t
ForRrvlwlrf
Dorr Joff,
lll
lti
lll
lit
E{tcfoc.d
sr
commdilq
tlht
'rt0lcc
2011 plsding ret\,€d upon 0n ooua
d to lhc BPt Cfrc as tlqucdcd
h yowAugrt
12.
iit
t:l
lii
tta
trl
til
til
ill
l!t
itl
lll
lrl
itt
ili
iil
tll
ltl
rm cnctoOng oofnflttlls, errc5 of Augt d g, AnO rdcle cluc b Jt dgc Lynch Indlcdhg
Iebillty to pui Otent Nste a 'nonconrcfioo' b 6.t ertcb rbo Incldrd.
I
fu Scptsmbor 10, 2000, hvelldrton of oareer job at FEUA
ot pogc I vthhn t atttmFeO b oofffct wlth John Crrmor and Pony Bectuc
includctt
lndloopd qnft6 fqnn. CommsnE rogarding my hoalth lnoludod'
Wilhh commctrts frtund
Both artptcr iclcntificd my n.Blr on thr fionl prgr of tho fuY.llitrq9Plb l{owrpeper,
On.lurp 27,2011it appearC I Sfft the cornmcnb b $o Augu6t 0, m11 artblo.
Thls shouH srtiefy your diowwry ruquoc.
lll
ill
lit
li!
li.
el
Pleaseoont*trne if Ptt
Mbhod Sproadbury
sny guee0ons.
W. p,Iffi
4
.) oF 11
Artr4 onmfr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?