Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 288

Brief/Memorandum in Support re 287 MOTION to Compel Participation in Pretrial Order filed by Kenneth S. Bell, Bitterroot Public Library, Robert Brophy, Steven Bruner-Murphy, City of Hamilton, Jennifer B. Lint, Ryan Oster, Nansu Roddy, Trista Smith, Steve Snavely, Jerry Steele. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I) (Crowley, William)

Bill Crowley
From:

Melissa Otis

Sent:
To:

Monday, May 21, 2012 8:32 AM
Bill Crowley

Subject:

FW: Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library, et al

From: Michael Spreadbury [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 11:42 AM
To: Melissa Otis; Bill Crowley; Tasha Jones; Thomas Leonard
Subject: RE: Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library, et al
Dear Melissa,

I have communicated with Sharon Holombeck as assistant to Bill Crowley. I have no idea who you are, and dont really
care to communicate with you.

Mr. Crowley gave me conflicting statement that he wanted to meet in the Boone offices, then said he was out of the
office thursday and friday. We were ordered to meet by US Magistrate Lynch last week, which I tried to coordinateon
several occasions.

I am assuming one of the regognized attorneys: Crowley, Prinzing-Jones, or Leonard can and will meet with me early
next week preferably Monday outside Boone offices.

I'm sorryI did not read you entire email, I have no idea why you are working on this case, or contacting me.
Thank you,
Michael Spreadbury

To: [e-mail]

CC: [e-mail]: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]

Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:35 -0600

Subject: Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library, et al - SENT ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM L. CROWLEY
Dear Mr. Spreadbury:

Your email on Friday, May 11, 2012, reads, "Please expect a draft of a pretrial document by
the end of the day. I will see a representative of your firm Monday." In response, I sent you an
email which reads, "What time will you be in our office so that we can schedule accordingly."
As you know, my paralegal, Shannon, is out of the office until Monday. Late this morning, I
became aware that you have been sending emails to Shannon, alone, despite knowing that she is out
of the office. We sent you a proposed pretrial order on May 7, 2012, asking you to provide your
contentions and your discovery, exhibit and witness lists. We offered to provide you with blank
discovery, exhibit and witness lists to assist you. We also asked you to provide alternatives,
modifications and additions to the nature of the action, the agreed facts and the trial length. We told
you that if you don't agree with something in the proposed nature of the action or agreed facts, it
would be removed. We told you that you draft your own contentions. On May 8, 2012, we provided

EXHIBIT H

EXHIBIT H