Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 294

Brief/Memorandum in Support re 293 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Comply With Court Order filed by Kenneth S. Bell, Bitterroot Public Library, Robert Brophy, Steven Bruner-Murphy, City of Hamilton, Jennifer B. Lint, Ryan Oster, Nansu Roddy, Trista Smith, Steve Snavely, Jerry Steele. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Crowley, William)

Shannon Holdsambeck

From:
Sent:

Michael Spreadbury [[e-mail]]
Friday, May 25, 2012 10:41 AM

To:

Shannon Holdsambeck

Subject:

RE: Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library, et al.

Sharon,

The last email only says that the case will be dismissed. That is when your principals become more professional, and
actually resolvethe case as presented. The paperwork in front of the court has an agreement. Terms of the release are
printed in court documents. This is informal email communications.

We can go to trial ifyour associates cannot either agree to the terms or meet with me in a professinoal matter. That
could not happen for the court ordered pre-trial meeting.

I write in plain english. Lawyers interpret things, lie, and act in ways I dont understand.

Please let me know what your firm would like me to do with the 20-30 photographs of tampered mail with your logo, and
address on them.

Sincerely,
Michael Spreadbury

From: [e-mail]

To: [e-mail]

CC: [e-mail]: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:33:27 -0600

Subject: RE: Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library, et al.
Dear Mr. Spreadbury:

Thank you for your email. We understand your email to mean the case will be dismissed with prejudice and without
condition.

Sincerely,
Shannon E. Holdsambeck

Paralegal
Boone Karlberg P.C.
[phone]

From: Michael Spreadbury rmailto:[e-mail]1
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 10:10 AM
To: Shannon Holdsambeck

Subject: RE: Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library, et al.
The case is going to be dismissed Sharon.

Please remind the three attorneys of the Crime committed by Ken Bell in a civil courtroom November 20, 2009 as an
order of protection "without finding of fact, conclusions of law" imposed that I am asking to have removed.

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT C