Righthaven LLC v. Second Amendment Sisters, Inc. et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against Second Amendment Sisters, Inc., Lee Ann Tarducci, Marinelle Thompson (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-1698590), filed by Righthaven LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 8/15/2010. Proof of service due by 12/3/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(Coons, John)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6656 [e-mail] J. CHARLES COONS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10553 [e-mail] JOSEPH C. CHU, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11082 [e-mail] Righthaven LLC 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company,

Case No.: 2:10-cv-01324 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, v. SECOND AMENDMENT SISTERS, INC., a Virginia corporation; MARINELLE THOMPSON, an individual; and LEE ANN TARDUCCI, an individual, Defendants.

Righthaven LLC ("Righthaven") complains as follows against Second Amendment Sisters, Inc. ("Amendment Sisters"), Marinelle Thompson ("Ms. Thompson") and Lee Ann Tarducci ("Ms. Tarducci"; collectively with Amendment Sisters and Ms. Thompson known herein as the "Defendants"), on information and belief:

NATURE OF ACTION 1. This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501.

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PARTIES 2. Righthaven is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, a Nevada limited-

liability company with its principal place of business in Nevada. 3. Righthaven is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, in good standing

with the Nevada Secretary of State. 4. corporation. 5. Amendment Sisters is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, identified Amendment Sisters is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, a Virginia

by the current registrar, GoDaddy.com, Inc. ("GoDaddy"), as the registrant for the Internet domain found at <2asisters.com> (the "Domain"). 6. Ms. Tarducci is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, identified by

GoDaddy as an administrative and technical contact for the Domain. 7. Amendment Sisters is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, the self-

proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the work(s) posted as part of the content accessible through the Domain (said content accessible through the Domain known herein as the "Website"), as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website: "Copyright © 2010 Second Amendment Sisters, Inc. All Rights Reserved." 8. Ms. Thompson is, and has been at all times relevant to this lawsuit, identified as

the founder of Amendment Sisters, as evidenced by the "Board of Directors" portion of the "About SAS" page of the Website, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

JURISDICTION 9. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this copyright

infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). 10. Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in the literary work entitled: "Slain store

clerk, 77, mourned" (the "Work"), attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 11. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, the Work has depicted and depicts the

original source publication as the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

12.

The Defendants willfully copied, on an unauthorized basis, the Work from a

source emanating from Nevada. 13. On or about May 19, 2010, the Defendants displayed, and continue to display, an

unauthorized reproduction of the Work (the "Infringement"), attached hereto as Exhibit 3, on the Website. 14. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, the Infringement has depicted and depicts the

original source publication as the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 15. The subject matter, at least in part, of the Work and the Infringement, is a clerk

that allegedly shot and killed a thief during the attempted robbery of a store located in Las Vegas, Nevada. 16. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, the Defendants knew that the Work was

originally published in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 17. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, the Defendants knew that the infringement

was and is of specific interest to Nevada residents. 18. The Defendants' display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at

Nevada residents. 19. The Defendants' contacts with Nevada are continuous and systematic because

Amendment Sisters maintains a chapter in Nevada. 20. The Defendants' contacts with Nevada are continuous and systematic because the

Defendants published and publish, on the Website, information of specific interest to Nevada residents about Nevada concealed weapons and firearms law. 21. The Defendants' contacts with Nevada are continuous and systematic because the

Defendants published and publish, on the Website, information of specific interest to Nevada residents including lists of gun ranges in Nevada including, but not limited to contact information for each gun range. 22. The Defendants' contacts with Nevada are continuous and systematic because the

Defendants published and publish, on the Website, information of specific interest to Nevada residents including locations, dates and times of gun shows occurring in Nevada.

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

23.

The Defendants' contacts with Nevada are continuous and systematic because the

Defendants published and publish, on the Website, information of specific interest to Nevada residents including lists of individuals in each county of Nevada that provide concealed weapons instruction.

VENUE 24. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate

venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim for relief are situated in Nevada. 25. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate

venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c), because Amendment Sisters is subject to personal jurisdiction in Nevada. 26. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate

venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a), because the Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in Nevada.

FACTS 27. 102(a)(1). 28. 29. 30. Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in and to the Work. The Work was originally published on May 17, 2010. On July 6, 2010, the United States Copyright Office (the "USCO") granted The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §

Righthaven the registration to the Work, copyright registration number TX0007168815 (the "Registration") and attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is evidence of the Registration in the form of a printout of the official USCO database record depicting the occurrence of the Registration. 31. On or about May 19, 2010, the Defendants displayed, and continue to display, the

Infringement on the Website.

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

32.

The Defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display, or

otherwise exploit the Work. 33. The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce,

display, or otherwise exploit the Work.

CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT 34. 33 above. 35. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17 Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through

U.S.C. § 106(1). 36. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the

Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2). 37. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to

17 U.S.C. § 106(3). 38. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17

U.S.C. § 106(5). 39. The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven's exclusive

rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1). 40. The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of

Righthaven's exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2). 41. The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized

reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven's exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(3). 42. The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to publicly display, an

unauthorized reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven's exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(5). 43. Work. Amendment Sisters has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

44. 45. 46.

Ms. Thompson has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work. Ms. Tarducci has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work. The Defendants' acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those

acts, have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount Righthaven cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law. 47. Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further

infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven's claim for relief herein as follows: 1. Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the

Defendants' officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, related companies, partners, and all persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from directly or indirectly infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative works based on the Work, distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering, directing, participating in, or assisting in any such activity; 2. Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies

or electronic copies: a. All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants'

use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and documentation relating to the Website; b. All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses

(whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants' use of the Work; and c. of the Work; All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants' use

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3.

Direct GoDaddy and any successor domain name registrar for the Domain to lock

the Domain and transfer control of the Domain to Righthaven; 4. Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work,

pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c); 5. Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys' fees incurred by

Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505; 6. law; and 7. Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate. Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38. Dated this fifth day of August, 2010.

RIGHTHAVEN LLC By: /s/ J. Charles Coons STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6656 J. CHARLES COONS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10553 JOSEPH C. CHU, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11082 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Attorneys for Plaintiff

7