Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al

Filing 114

REPLY to Response to 95 First MOTION to Compel the Production of Documents By Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof ; filed by Defendants David Allen, Democratic Underground, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer Johnson, # 2 Exhibit A to Johnson Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B to Johnson Declaration)(Johnson, Jennifer)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT B 1 2 3 4 5 6 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-0432 Fax: (702) 922-3851 Attorney for Righthaven LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Case No.: 2:10-cv-01356-RLH-RJJ PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 26(A)(1)(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN, an individual, 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company, Counterclaimant, 20 21 22 23 24 v. RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company; and STEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, Counterdefendants. 25 26 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) makes the following sixth 27 supplement to its initial disclosures pursuant to the requirements of Rule 26(a)(1)(A) of the 28 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 1 2 3 4 I. DESCRIPTION BY CATEGORY AND LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS, ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION, AND TANGIBLE THINGS IN RIGHTHAVEN’S POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR CONTROL THAT RIGHTHAVEN MAY USE TO SUPPORT RIGHTHAVEN’S CLAIMS Righthaven supplements its prior initial, either amended or supplemental, disclosures by 5 identifying, as required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following documents that 6 it may use to support the claims and defenses at issue in this action, which are being concurrently 7 produced in PDF format as indicated by the exhibit reference associated with same: 8 1. Original assignment of the literary work that is the subject of the instant suit (the “Work”), pages 2 – 3 (Exhibit 1); 9 10 2. Subsequent assignment of the Work, pages 5 – 6 (Exhibit 2); and 11 3. Case summary from the United States Copyright Office of the copyright registration of the Work (the “Work”), page 8 (Exhibit 3); 12 13 14 15 Righthaven reserves the right to supplement the foregoing disclosures as discovery continues. Dated this 25th day of May, 2011. 16 17 SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 18 By: Shawn A. Mangano SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-04732 Fax: (702) 922-3851 19 20 21 22 Attorney for Righthaven LLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of Righthaven LLC and that on this 25th day of May, 2011, I caused PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 26(A)(1)(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE to be served to be served in PDF format via electronic mail to following persons: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Chad A. Bowers, Esq. bowers@lawyer.com CHAD A. BOWERS LTD. 3202 West Charleston Boulevard Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Laurence F. Pulgram, Esq. lpulgram@fenwick.com Jennifer Johnson, Esq. jjjohnson@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Kurt Opsahl, Esq. kurt@eff.org Corynne McSherry, Esq. ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, California 94110 19 Attorney for Defendant/Counterclaimant 20 21 By: /s/ Steven G. Ganim An Employee of Righthaven LLC 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 527-5900 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?