Righthaven LLC v. Smith et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against Jane Smith, Subliminalselfhypnosis.com (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-1977002), filed by Righthaven LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/15/2011. Proof of service due by 9/2/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet, # 5 Summons Jane Smith, # 6 Summons Subliminalhypnosis.com) (Mangano, Shawn) (Entered: 05/05/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-0432 Fax: (702) 922-3851 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Case No.: 2:11-cv-00716 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 JANE SMITH, an individual; and SUBLIMINALSELFHYPNOSIS.COM, an entity of unknown origin and nature, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) complains as follows against Jane Smith (“Ms. Smith”), 19 and Subliminalselfhypnosis.com (“Subliminalselfhypnosis”; collectively with Ms. Smith known 20 herein as the “Defendants”) on information and belief, and at all times relevant to this lawsuit, 21 unless otherwise specifically indicated herein to the contrary: 22 23 NATURE OF ACTION 24 1. This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501. 25 26 27 28 1 PARTIES 1 2 3 2. Righthaven is a Nevada limited-liability company with its principal place of business in Nevada. 4 3. Righthaven is in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State. 5 4. Subliminalselfhynosis is an entity of unknown origin and nature. 6 5. Attempts to find evidence of the formal organizational status in the respective 7 Secretary of State offices of Delaware, California, Illinois, Nevada, New York, Texas and 8 Tennessee demonstrate that, at least with respect to these states, Subliminalselfhynosis is not a 9 formally organized business entity. 10 6. Ms. Smith is also known as Jane Maati Smith and Jane Ma’ati Smith. 11 7. Ms. Smith is identified by the current registrar, Name Secure LLC (“Name 12 Secure”), as the registrant of the Internet domain found at <subliminalselfhypnosis.com> (the 13 “Domain”). 14 8. Ms. Smith is identified by Name Secure as the administrative contact of the 15 Domain (the content accessible through the Domain and the Domain itself known herein as the 16 “Website”). 17 9. Subliminalselfhynosis is the self-proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the 18 work(s) displayed on the Website, as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website: 19 “© Copyright 2011 subliminalselfhypnosis.com.” 20 JURISDICTION 21 22 23 24 25 26 10. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this copyright infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). 11. Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in the literary work entitled, “Veteran shares messages of resilience” (the “Work”), attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 12. On or about April 16, 2011, Defendants displayed, and continue to display, an 27 unauthorized reproduction of the Work (the “Infringement”), attached hereto as Exhibit 2, on the 28 Website. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13. The Work has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 14. The Defendants willfully copied, on an unauthorized basis, the Work from a source emanating from Nevada. 15. The Infringement has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 16. The Defendants knew that the Work was originally published in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 9 17. 10 Nevada residents. 11 18. 12 The Defendants knew that the Infringement was and is of specific interest to The Infringement, as publically displayed on the Website, was and is accessible in Nevada. 13 19. The Infringement occurred and continues to occur in Nevada. 14 20. The Defendants’ display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at 15 Nevada residents. 16 VENUE 17 18 21. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate 19 venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to 20 the claim for relief are situated in Nevada. 21 22. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate 22 venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (a), because the Defendants are subject to personal 23 jurisdiction in Nevada. 24 FACTS 25 26 23. 27 102(a)(1). 28 24. The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § Righthaven is the owner of the copyrights in and to the Work. 3 1 25. The Work was originally published on April 16, 2011. 2 26. On or about April 29, 2011, the United States Copyright Office (the “USCO”) 3 received Righthaven’s official submittal for the registration of the Work, including the 4 application, the deposit copy, and the registration fee (the “Complete Application”), Service 5 Request No. 1-602631208, and attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is the official USCO application 6 submittal for the Work depicting the occurrence of the Complete Application. 7 8 9 10 11 12 27. On or about April 16, 2011, Defendants displayed, and continue to display, the Infringement on the Website. 28. The defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display or otherwise exploit the Work. 29. The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display, or otherwise exploit the Work. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF THE WORK 30. Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 29 above. 31. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(1). 32. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative Work based upon the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2). 33. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(3). 34. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(5). 35. The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1). 36. The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2). 4 37. 1 The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized 2 reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 3 17 U.S.C. § 106(3). 38. 4 The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to display, an unauthorized 5 reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 6 17 U.S.C. § 106(5). 7 39. Ms. Smith has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work. 8 40. Subliminalselfhypnosis has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the 41. Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those acts, 9 10 Work. 11 have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount Righthaven 12 cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law. 13 42. Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further 14 infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus 15 entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the 16 Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502. 17 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 18 19 Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven’s claim for relief herein as follows: 20 1. Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the 21 Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, related 22 companies, partners, and all persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from 23 directly or indirectly infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative Work 24 based on the Work, distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering, 25 directing, participating in, or assisting in any such activity; 26 27 2. Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies or electronic copies: 28 5 a. 1 All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants’ 2 use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and 3 documentation relating to the Website; b. 4 All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses 5 (whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the 6 Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants’ use of the Work; and c. 7 8 of the Work; 9 3. All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants’ use Order the surrender to Righthaven of all hardware, software, electronic media and 10 domains, including the Domain used to store, disseminate and display the unauthorized versions 11 of any and all copyrighted Work as provided for under 17 U.S.C. § 505(b) and/or as authorized 12 by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64; 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 4. Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c); 5. Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees incurred by Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505; 6. Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable law; and 7. Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 2 3 4 Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated this 5th day of May, 2011. 5 SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 6 By: /s/ Shawn A. Mangano SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-0432 Fax: (702) 922-3851 7 8 9 10 11 Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?