Righthaven LLC v. Smith et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against Jane Smith, Subliminalselfhypnosis.com (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-1977002), filed by Righthaven LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/15/2011. Proof of service due by 9/2/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet, # 5 Summons Jane Smith, # 6 Summons Subliminalhypnosis.com) (Mangano, Shawn) (Entered: 05/05/2011)
1
2
3
4
SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6730
shawn@manganolaw.com
SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: (702) 304-0432
Fax: (702) 922-3851
5
Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company,
Case No.: 2:11-cv-00716
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
FOR JURY TRIAL
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
JANE SMITH, an individual; and
SUBLIMINALSELFHYPNOSIS.COM, an
entity of unknown origin and nature,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) complains as follows against Jane Smith (“Ms. Smith”),
19
and Subliminalselfhypnosis.com (“Subliminalselfhypnosis”; collectively with Ms. Smith known
20
herein as the “Defendants”) on information and belief, and at all times relevant to this lawsuit,
21
unless otherwise specifically indicated herein to the contrary:
22
23
NATURE OF ACTION
24
1.
This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501.
25
26
27
28
1
PARTIES
1
2
3
2.
Righthaven is a Nevada limited-liability company with its principal place of
business in Nevada.
4
3.
Righthaven is in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State.
5
4.
Subliminalselfhynosis is an entity of unknown origin and nature.
6
5.
Attempts to find evidence of the formal organizational status in the respective
7
Secretary of State offices of Delaware, California, Illinois, Nevada, New York, Texas and
8
Tennessee demonstrate that, at least with respect to these states, Subliminalselfhynosis is not a
9
formally organized business entity.
10
6.
Ms. Smith is also known as Jane Maati Smith and Jane Ma’ati Smith.
11
7.
Ms. Smith is identified by the current registrar, Name Secure LLC (“Name
12
Secure”), as the registrant of the Internet domain found at (the
13
“Domain”).
14
8.
Ms. Smith is identified by Name Secure as the administrative contact of the
15
Domain (the content accessible through the Domain and the Domain itself known herein as the
16
“Website”).
17
9.
Subliminalselfhynosis is the self-proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the
18
work(s) displayed on the Website, as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website:
19
“© Copyright 2011 subliminalselfhypnosis.com.”
20
JURISDICTION
21
22
23
24
25
26
10.
This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this copyright
infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
11.
Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in the literary work entitled, “Veteran
shares messages of resilience” (the “Work”), attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
12.
On or about April 16, 2011, Defendants displayed, and continue to display, an
27
unauthorized reproduction of the Work (the “Infringement”), attached hereto as Exhibit 2, on the
28
Website.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
13.
The Work has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las
Vegas Review-Journal.
14.
The Defendants willfully copied, on an unauthorized basis, the Work from a
source emanating from Nevada.
15.
The Infringement has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the
Las Vegas Review-Journal.
16.
The Defendants knew that the Work was originally published in the Las Vegas
Review-Journal.
9
17.
10
Nevada residents.
11
18.
12
The Defendants knew that the Infringement was and is of specific interest to
The Infringement, as publically displayed on the Website, was and is accessible in
Nevada.
13
19.
The Infringement occurred and continues to occur in Nevada.
14
20.
The Defendants’ display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at
15
Nevada residents.
16
VENUE
17
18
21.
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate
19
venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to
20
the claim for relief are situated in Nevada.
21
22.
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate
22
venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (a), because the Defendants are subject to personal
23
jurisdiction in Nevada.
24
FACTS
25
26
23.
27
102(a)(1).
28
24.
The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §
Righthaven is the owner of the copyrights in and to the Work.
3
1
25.
The Work was originally published on April 16, 2011.
2
26.
On or about April 29, 2011, the United States Copyright Office (the “USCO”)
3
received Righthaven’s official submittal for the registration of the Work, including the
4
application, the deposit copy, and the registration fee (the “Complete Application”), Service
5
Request No. 1-602631208, and attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is the official USCO application
6
submittal for the Work depicting the occurrence of the Complete Application.
7
8
9
10
11
12
27.
On or about April 16, 2011, Defendants displayed, and continue to display, the
Infringement on the Website.
28.
The defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display or
otherwise exploit the Work.
29.
The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce,
display, or otherwise exploit the Work.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF THE WORK
30.
Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through
29 above.
31.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17
U.S.C. § 106(1).
32.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative Work based upon the
Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
33.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to
17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
34.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17
U.S.C. § 106(5).
35.
The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive
rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1).
36.
The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of
Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
4
37.
1
The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized
2
reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under
3
17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
38.
4
The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to display, an unauthorized
5
reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under
6
17 U.S.C. § 106(5).
7
39.
Ms. Smith has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work.
8
40.
Subliminalselfhypnosis has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the
41.
Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those acts,
9
10
Work.
11
have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount Righthaven
12
cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law.
13
42.
Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further
14
infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus
15
entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the
16
Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502.
17
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
18
19
Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven’s claim for relief herein as follows:
20
1.
Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the
21
Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, related
22
companies, partners, and all persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from
23
directly or indirectly infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative Work
24
based on the Work, distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering,
25
directing, participating in, or assisting in any such activity;
26
27
2.
Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies
or electronic copies:
28
5
a.
1
All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants’
2
use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and
3
documentation relating to the Website;
b.
4
All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses
5
(whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the
6
Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants’ use of the Work; and
c.
7
8
of the Work;
9
3.
All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants’ use
Order the surrender to Righthaven of all hardware, software, electronic media and
10
domains, including the Domain used to store, disseminate and display the unauthorized versions
11
of any and all copyrighted Work as provided for under 17 U.S.C. § 505(b) and/or as authorized
12
by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64;
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
4.
Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work,
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c);
5.
Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees incurred by
Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
6.
Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable
law; and
7.
Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
1
2
3
4
Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
Dated this 5th day of May, 2011.
5
SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.
6
By: /s/ Shawn A. Mangano
SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6730
shawn@manganolaw.com
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: (702) 304-0432
Fax: (702) 922-3851
7
8
9
10
11
Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?