Righthaven LLC v. Law Med Consulting LLC et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against Law Med Blog, Law Med Consulting LLC, Greg Stocks (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-1977048), filed by Righthaven LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/15/2011. Proof of service due by 9/2/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet, # 6 Summons Law Med Consulting LLC, # 7 Summons Law Med Blog, # 8 Summons Greg Stocks) (Mangano, Shawn) (Entered: 05/05/2011)
1
2
3
4
SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6730
shawn@manganolaw.com
SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: (702) 304-0432
Fax: (702) 922-3851
5
Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company,
Case No.: 2:11-cv-00717
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
FOR JURY TRIAL
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
LAW MED CONSULTING LLC, a Maryland
limited-liability company; LAW MED BLOG,
an entity of unknown origin and nature; and
GREG STOCKS, an individual,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) complains as follows against Law Med Consulting LLC
20
(“Law Med Consulting”), Law Med Blog (“Law Med Blog”) and Greg Stocks (“Mr. Stocks”;
21
collectively with Law Med Consulting and Law Med Blog known herein as the “Defendants”)
22
on information and belief, and at all times relevant to this lawsuit, unless otherwise specifically
23
indicated herein to the contrary:
24
25
NATURE OF ACTION
26
1.
This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501.
27
28
1
PARTIES
1
2
3
2.
Righthaven is a Nevada limited-liability company with its principal place of
business in Nevada.
4
3.
Righthaven is in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State.
5
4.
Law Med Consulting is a forfeited Maryland limited-liability company.
6
5.
Mr. Stocks is identified by Mr. Stocks’ LinkedIn profile, as the owner of Law
7
8
9
10
11
Med Consulting, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
6.
Law Med Consulting is identified by the current registrar, GoDaddy.com
(“GoDaddy”), as the registrant of the Internet domain found at (the
“Domain”).
7.
Law Med Consulting is identified by GoDaddy as an administrative contact and
12
technical contact of the Domain (the content accessible through the Domain and the Domain
13
itself known herein as the “Website”).
14
15
8.
Mr. Stocks is identified by GoDaddy as an administrative contact and technical
contact of the Domain.
16
9.
Law Med Blog is an entity of unknown origin and nature.
17
10.
Attempts to find evidence of the formal organizational status in the respective
18
Secretary of State offices of Delaware, California, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New York, Texas
19
and Tennessee demonstrate that, at least with respect to these states, Law Med Blog is not a
20
formally organized business entity.
21
11.
Law Med Blog is the self-proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the work(s)
22
displayed on the Website, as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website: © 2011
23
Law Med Blog. All Rights Reserved.”
24
JURISDICTION
25
26
27
12.
This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this copyright
infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
28
2
1
13.
Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in the literary work entitled, “Lawyer
2
presses for delay in trial of nurses connected to hepatitis C outbreak” (the “Work”), attached
3
hereto as Exhibit 2.
4
14.
On or about February 25, 2011, the Defendants displayed, and continue to
5
display, an unauthorized reproduction of the Work (the “Infringement”), attached hereto as
6
Exhibit 3, on the Website.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15.
The Work has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las
Vegas Review-Journal.
16.
The Defendants willfully copied, on an unauthorized basis, the Work from a
source emanating from Nevada.
17.
The Infringement has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the
Las Vegas Review-Journal.
18.
The Defendants knew that the Work was originally published in the Las Vegas
Review-Journal.
15
19.
16
Nevada residents.
17
20.
18
The Defendants knew that the Infringement was and is of specific interest to
The Infringement, as publically displayed on the Website, was and is accessible in
Nevada.
19
21.
The Infringement occurred and continues to occur in Nevada.
20
22.
The Defendants’ display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at
21
Nevada residents.
22
VENUE
23
24
23.
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate
25
venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to
26
the claim for relief are situated in Nevada.
27
28
3
1
24.
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate
2
venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (a), because the Defendants are subject to personal
3
jurisdiction in Nevada.
4
FACTS
5
6
25.
The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §
7
102(a)(1).
8
26.
Righthaven is the owner of the copyrights in and to the Work.
9
27.
The Work was originally published on February 23, 2011.
10
28.
On or about April 29, 2011, the United States Copyright Office (the “USCO”)
11
received Righthaven’s official submittal for the registration of the Work, including the
12
application, the deposit copy, and the registration fee (the “Complete Application”), Service
13
Request No. 1-602470098, and attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is the official USCO application
14
submittal for the Work depicting the occurrence of the Complete Application.
15
16
17
18
19
20
29.
On or about February 25, 2011, the Defendants displayed, and continue to
display, the Infringement on the Website.
30.
The defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display or
otherwise exploit the Work.
31.
The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce,
display, or otherwise exploit the Work.
21
CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
32.
Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through
31 above.
33.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17
U.S.C. § 106(1).
34.
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the
Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
4
35.
1
2
17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
36.
3
4
37.
The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive
rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1).
38.
7
8
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17
U.S.C. § 106(5).
5
6
Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to
The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of
Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
39.
9
The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized
10
reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under
11
17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
40.
12
The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to display, an unauthorized
13
reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under
14
17 U.S.C. § 106(5).
41.
Law Med Consulting has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the
17
42.
Law Med Blog has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work.
18
43.
Mr. Stocks has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work.
19
44.
Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those acts,
15
16
Work.
20
have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount Righthaven
21
cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law.
22
45.
Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further
23
infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus
24
entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the
25
Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502.
26
27
28
5
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1
2
Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven’s claim for relief herein as follows:
3
1.
Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the
4
Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, related
5
companies, partners, and all persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from
6
directly or indirectly infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative works
7
based on the Work, distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering,
8
directing, participating in, or assisting in any such activity;
9
10
2.
Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies
or electronic copies:
a.
11
All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants’
12
use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and
13
documentation relating to the Website;
b.
14
All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses
15
(whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the
16
Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants’ use of the Work; and
c.
17
18
of the Work;
19
3.
All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants’ use
Order the surrender to Righthaven of all hardware, software, electronic media and
20
domains, including the Domain used to store, disseminate and display the unauthorized versions
21
of any and all copyrighted works as provided for under 17 U.S.C. § 505(b) and/or as authorized
22
by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64;
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work,
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c);
5.
Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees incurred by
Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
6.
Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable
law; and
6
1
7.
Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
2
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
3
4
5
6
Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
Dated this 5th day of May, 2011.
7
SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.
8
By: /s/ Shawn A. Mangano
SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6730
shawn@manganolaw.com
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: (702) 304-0432
Fax: (702) 922-3851
9
10
11
12
13
Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?