Righthaven LLC v. Law Med Consulting LLC et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against Law Med Blog, Law Med Consulting LLC, Greg Stocks (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-1977048), filed by Righthaven LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/15/2011. Proof of service due by 9/2/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet, # 6 Summons Law Med Consulting LLC, # 7 Summons Law Med Blog, # 8 Summons Greg Stocks) (Mangano, Shawn) (Entered: 05/05/2011)

1
2
3
4

SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6730
[e-mail]
SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company,

Case No.: 2:11-cv-00717
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
FOR JURY TRIAL

11
12

Plaintiff,
13

v.
14
15
16

LAW MED CONSULTING LLC, a Maryland
limited-liability company; LAW MED BLOG,
an entity of unknown origin and nature; and
GREG STOCKS, an individual,

17

Defendants.
18
19

Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) complains as follows against Law Med Consulting LLC
20

(“Law Med Consulting”), Law Med Blog (“Law Med Blog”) and Greg Stocks (“Mr. Stocks”;
21

collectively with Law Med Consulting and Law Med Blog known herein as the “Defendants”)
22

on information and belief, and at all times relevant to this lawsuit, unless otherwise specifically
23

indicated herein to the contrary:
24
25

NATURE OF ACTION
26

1.

This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501.

27
28

1

PARTIES

1
2
3

2.

Righthaven is a Nevada limited-liability company with its principal place of

business in Nevada.

4

3.

Righthaven is in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State.

5

4.

Law Med Consulting is a forfeited Maryland limited-liability company.

6

5.

Mr. Stocks is identified by Mr. Stocks’ LinkedIn profile, as the owner of Law

7
8
9
10
11

Med Consulting, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
6.

Law Med Consulting is identified by the current registrar, GoDaddy.com

(“GoDaddy”), as the registrant of the Internet domain found at <lawmedconsultant.com> (the
“Domain”).
7.

Law Med Consulting is identified by GoDaddy as an administrative contact and

12

technical contact of the Domain (the content accessible through the Domain and the Domain

13

itself known herein as the “Website”).

14
15

8.

Mr. Stocks is identified by GoDaddy as an administrative contact and technical

contact of the Domain.

16

9.

Law Med Blog is an entity of unknown origin and nature.

17

10.

Attempts to find evidence of the formal organizational status in the respective

18

Secretary of State offices of Delaware, California, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New York, Texas

19

and Tennessee demonstrate that, at least with respect to these states, Law Med Blog is not a

20

formally organized business entity.

21

11.

Law Med Blog is the self-proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the work(s)

22

displayed on the Website, as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website: © 2011

23

Law Med Blog. All Rights Reserved.”

24

JURISDICTION

25
26
27

12.

This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this copyright

infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).

28

2

1

13.

Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in the literary work entitled, “Lawyer

2

presses for delay in trial of nurses connected to hepatitis C outbreak” (the “Work”), attached

3

hereto as Exhibit 2.

4

14.

On or about February 25, 2011, the Defendants displayed, and continue to

5

display, an unauthorized reproduction of the Work (the “Infringement”), attached hereto as

6

Exhibit 3, on the Website.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15.

The Work has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las

Vegas Review-Journal.
16.

The Defendants willfully copied, on an unauthorized basis, the Work from a

source emanating from Nevada.
17.

The Infringement has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the

Las Vegas Review-Journal.
18.

The Defendants knew that the Work was originally published in the Las Vegas

Review-Journal.

15

19.

16

Nevada residents.

17

20.

18

The Defendants knew that the Infringement was and is of specific interest to

The Infringement, as publically displayed on the Website, was and is accessible in

Nevada.

19

21.

The Infringement occurred and continues to occur in Nevada.

20

22.

The Defendants’ display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at

21

Nevada residents.

22

VENUE

23
24

23.

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate

25

venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to

26

the claim for relief are situated in Nevada.

27
28

3

1

24.

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate

2

venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (a), because the Defendants are subject to personal

3

jurisdiction in Nevada.

4

FACTS

5
6

25.

The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §

7

102(a)(1).

8

26.

Righthaven is the owner of the copyrights in and to the Work.

9

27.

The Work was originally published on February 23, 2011.

10

28.

On or about April 29, 2011, the United States Copyright Office (the “USCO”)

11

received Righthaven’s official submittal for the registration of the Work, including the

12

application, the deposit copy, and the registration fee (the “Complete Application”), Service

13

Request No. 1-602470098, and attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is the official USCO application

14

submittal for the Work depicting the occurrence of the Complete Application.

15
16
17
18
19
20

29.

On or about February 25, 2011, the Defendants displayed, and continue to

display, the Infringement on the Website.
30.

The defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display or

otherwise exploit the Work.
31.

The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce,

display, or otherwise exploit the Work.

21

CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

32.

Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through

31 above.
33.

Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17

U.S.C. § 106(1).
34.

Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the

Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).

4

35.

1
2

17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
36.

3
4

37.

The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive

rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1).
38.

7
8

Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17

U.S.C. § 106(5).

5
6

Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to

The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of

Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2).
39.

9

The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized

10

reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under

11

17 U.S.C. § 106(3).
40.

12

The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to display, an unauthorized

13

reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under

14

17 U.S.C. § 106(5).
41.

Law Med Consulting has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the

17

42.

Law Med Blog has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work.

18

43.

Mr. Stocks has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work.

19

44.

Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those acts,

15
16

Work.

20

have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount Righthaven

21

cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law.

22

45.

Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further

23

infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus

24

entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the

25

Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502.

26
27
28

5

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

1
2

Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven’s claim for relief herein as follows:

3

1.

Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the

4

Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, related

5

companies, partners, and all persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from

6

directly or indirectly infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative works

7

based on the Work, distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering,

8

directing, participating in, or assisting in any such activity;

9
10

2.

Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies

or electronic copies:
a.

11

All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants’

12

use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and

13

documentation relating to the Website;
b.

14

All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses

15

(whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the

16

Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants’ use of the Work; and
c.

17
18

of the Work;

19

3.

All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants’ use

Order the surrender to Righthaven of all hardware, software, electronic media and

20

domains, including the Domain used to store, disseminate and display the unauthorized versions

21

of any and all copyrighted works as provided for under 17 U.S.C. § 505(b) and/or as authorized

22

by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64;

23
24
25
26
27
28

4.

Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work,

pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c);
5.

Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees incurred by

Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
6.

Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable

law; and

6

1

7.

Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate.

2

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

3
4
5
6

Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
Dated this 5th day of May, 2011.

7

SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD.

8

By: /s/ Shawn A. Mangano
SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6730
[e-mail]
9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13

Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

7