Righthaven LLC v. Computer Services One LLC et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against Computer Services One LLC, Norman Edwards (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-1977098), filed by Righthaven LLC. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/15/2011. Proof of service due by 9/2/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet, # 6 Summons Computer Services One LLC, # 7 Summons Norman Edwards) (Mangano, Shawn) (Entered: 05/05/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-0432 Fax: (702) 922-3851 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Case No.: 2:11-cv-00721 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 COMPUTER SERVICES ONE LLC, a Florida limited-liability company; and NORMAN EDWARDS, an individual, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Righthaven LLC (“Righthaven”) complains as follows against Computer Services One 20 LLC (“Computer Services One”) and Norman Edwards (“Mr. Edwards”; collectively with 21 Computer Services One known herein as the “Defendants”) on information and belief, and at all 22 times relevant to this lawsuit, unless otherwise specifically indicated herein to the contrary: 23 NATURE OF ACTION 24 25 1. This is an action for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501. 26 27 28 1 PARTIES 1 2 3 2. Righthaven is a Nevada limited-liability company with its principal place of business in Nevada. 4 3. Righthaven is in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State. 5 4. Computer Services One is a Florida limited-liability company. 6 5. Mr. Edwards is identified by the Florida Secretary of State business entity 7 8 9 10 11 database, as the Manager/Member of Computer Services One, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 6. Computer Services One is identified by the current registrar, GoDaddy.com (“GoDaddy”), as the registrant of the Internet domain found at <floridasteaks.com> (the “Domain”). 7. Computer Services One is identified by GoDaddy as an administrative contact 12 and technical contact of the Domain (the content accessible through the Domain and the Domain 13 itself known herein as the “Website”). 14 15 16 8. Mr. Edwards is identified by GoDaddy as an administrative contact and technical contact of the Domain. 9. Computer Services One is the self-proclaimed owner of the copyright(s) in the 17 work(s) displayed on the Website, as evidenced by a copyright notice displayed on the Website: 18 “Computer Services One 2010”. 19 JURISDICTION 20 21 22 23 24 25 10. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this copyright infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). 11. Righthaven is the owner of the copyright in the literary work entitled, “Former mayor lends name to new Ron’s Steakhouse” (the “Work”), attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 12. On or about April 13, 2011, the Defendants displayed, and continue to display, an 26 unauthorized reproduction of the Work (the “Infringement”), attached hereto as Exhibit 3, on the 27 Website. 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13. The Work has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 14. The Defendants willfully copied, on an unauthorized basis, the Work from a source emanating from Nevada. 15. The Infringement has depicted and depicts the original source publication as the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 16. The Defendants knew that the Work was originally published in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 9 17. 10 Nevada residents. 11 18. 12 The Defendants knew that the Infringement was and is of specific interest to The Infringement, as publically displayed on the Website, was and is accessible in Nevada. 13 19. The Infringement occurred and continues to occur in Nevada. 14 20. The Defendants’ display of the Infringement was and is purposefully directed at 15 Nevada residents. 16 VENUE 17 18 21. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate 19 venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to 20 the claim for relief are situated in Nevada. 21 22. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is an appropriate 22 venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (a), because the Defendants are subject to personal 23 jurisdiction in Nevada. 24 FACTS 25 26 23. 27 102(a)(1). 28 24. The Work constitutes copyrightable subject matter, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § Righthaven is the owner of the copyrights in and to the Work. 3 1 25. The Work was originally published on April 13, 2011. 2 26. On or about April 29, 2011, the United States Copyright Office (the “USCO”) 3 received Righthaven’s official submittal for the registration of the Work, including the 4 application, the deposit copy, and the registration fee (the “Complete Application”), Service 5 Request No. 1-602470072, and attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is the official USCO application 6 submittal for the Work depicting the occurrence of the Complete Application. 7 8 9 10 11 12 27. On or about April 13, 2011, the Defendants displayed, and continue to display, the Infringement on the Website. 28. The Defendants did not seek permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display or otherwise exploit the Work. 29. The Defendants were not granted permission, in any manner, to reproduce, display, or otherwise exploit the Work. 13 CLAIM FOR RELIEF: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30. Righthaven repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 29 above. 31. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to reproduce the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(1). 32. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(2). 33. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to distribute copies of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(3). 34. Righthaven holds the exclusive right to publicly display the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106(5). 35. The Defendants reproduced the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(1). 36. The Defendants created an unauthorized derivative of the Work in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106(2). 4 37. 1 The Defendants distributed, and continue to distribute, an unauthorized 2 reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 3 17 U.S.C. § 106(3). 38. 4 The Defendants publicly displayed, and continue to display, an unauthorized 5 reproduction of the Work on the Website, in derogation of Righthaven’s exclusive rights under 6 17 U.S.C. § 106(5). 39. Computer Services One has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the 9 40. Mr. Edwards has willfully engaged in the copyright infringement of the Work. 10 41. Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, and the ongoing direct results of those acts, 7 8 Work. 11 have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Righthaven in an amount Righthaven 12 cannot ascertain, leaving Righthaven with no adequate remedy at law. 13 42. Unless the Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further 14 infringement of the Work, Righthaven will be irreparably harmed, and Righthaven is thus 15 entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement by the 16 Defendants of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502. 17 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 18 19 Righthaven requests that this Court grant Righthaven’s claim for relief herein as follows: 20 1. Preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain the Defendants, and the 21 Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, related 22 companies, partners, and all persons acting for, by, with, through, or under the Defendants, from 23 directly or indirectly infringing the Work by reproducing the Work, preparing derivative works 24 based on the Work, distributing the Work to the public, and/or displaying the Work, or ordering, 25 directing, participating in, or assisting in any such activity; 26 27 2. Direct the Defendants to preserve, retain, and deliver to Righthaven in hard copies or electronic copies: 28 5 a. 1 All evidence and documentation relating in any way to the Defendants’ 2 use of the Work, in any form, including, without limitation, all such evidence and 3 documentation relating to the Website; b. 4 All evidence and documentation relating to the names and addresses 5 (whether electronic mail addresses or otherwise) of any person with whom the 6 Defendants have communicated regarding the Defendants’ use of the Work; and c. 7 8 of the Work; 9 3. All financial evidence and documentation relating to the Defendants’ use Order the surrender to Righthaven of all hardware, software, electronic media and 10 domains, including the Domain used to store, disseminate and display the unauthorized versions 11 of any and all copyrighted works as provided for under 17 U.S.C. § 505(b) and/or as authorized 12 by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64; 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 4. Award Righthaven statutory damages for the willful infringement of the Work, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c); 5. Award Righthaven costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees incurred by Righthaven in bringing this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505; 6. Award Righthaven pre- and post-judgment interest in accordance with applicable law; and 7. Grant Righthaven such other relief as this Court deems appropriate. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 2 3 4 Righthaven requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated this 5th day of May, 2011. 5 SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 6 By: /s/ Shawn A. Mangano SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-0432 Fax: (702) 922-3851 7 8 9 10 11 Attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?